Texas Transformation Project Sam Houston High Fox Tech High Board Presentation September 20, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
Advertisements

School Improvement Grants Webinar – Tier I and II Schools April 21, 2010.
School Improvement Grants Tier I and Tier II Schools March, 2010.
April 15, Through the SIG program, the United States Education Department (USED) requires state educational agencies (SEAs) to use three tiers to.
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION APRIL 27, 2010 VANDERBILT MARRIOTT NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT APPLICATION ROLLOUT 1.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
FY 2012 SIG 1003G LEAD PARTNER REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL (RFSP) BIDDERS’ CONFERENCE February 7, 2011.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Texas Transformation Project Seminar September 2010.
1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.
LCFF & LCAP PTO Presentation April, 2014 TEAM Charter School.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared.
1 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT COHORT 2 LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION APRIL 5, 2011.
Nebraska Department of Education Focus on Effective Instruction and Student Learning Revised Standards and NeSA Nebraska’s P-16 Effort Federal Agenda Fiscal.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
DRAFT Building Our Future 2017 Fulton County Schools Strategic Plan Name of Meeting Date.
Understanding Stimulus Funding and Leveraging Philanthropy to Support Long-Term Education Goals A Webinar for the Foundation Community February 16, 2010.
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION U.S. Department of Education June 12, 2009.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Subtitle 1003(g) School Improvement Grants April 2, 2012.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Federal Program Monitoring and Support Division Charlotte Hughes, Director Donna Brown, Section Chief.
TEXAS LITERACY INITIATIVE.  San Antonio Independent School District (SAISD) will partner with an approved service provider to deliver literacy readiness.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS (SIG): A New Opportunity for Turning Around Low-Performing High Schools January 29, 2010.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Indistar Summit – Coaching with Indistar February 2012 Presenters: Yvonne Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director, Office of School Improvement Michael Hill.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California P-16 Council Recommendations The State’s Transformational.
FLDOE Title I Update FASFEPA Technical Assistance Forum September 16, 2009.
High School Inc. Academies at Valley High School April 26, 2011 Jane A. Russo, Superintendent Dawn Miller, Assistant Superintendent, Secondary Division.
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction March 17, 2011 Presented by: California Department of Education.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Innovative Support February 17, 2010 Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting.
U.S. Department of Education Reform Agenda Overview April 2010.
Slide 1 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of.
Considerations for Technical Assistance School Improvement Grant 1.
REVIEW PROCESS District Capacity Determination:. Review Team Selection Teams will contain geographically balanced representation. Each review team will.
Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement Office of Program Administration and Accountability April 19, 2011.
Title I 2010 Spring Admin. Meeting Spring Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education April 13-14, 2010 Presented by: Maria E.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
SAISD Focus/Priority Training Samantha Gallegos, Coordinator III
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
District Improvement Plan September 21, 2015.
Choosing a Reform Model District Wide Stakeholder Meeting 1.
High Schools That Work An evidence-based design for improving the nation’s schools and raising student achievement.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Center on School Turnaround at WestEd. 2 3 Race to the Top School Improvement Grants Alignment of Existing Federal Resources ESEA Flexibility Lowest-
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
Filling Your Buckets: Aligning it ALL!
Texas Title 1 Priority Schools Grant
New Prospect Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

Texas Transformation Project Sam Houston High Fox Tech High Board Presentation September 20, 2010

WHAT IS IT? It is a project that is funded by the Texas Title I Priority Schools (TTIPS) Grant to assist the state’s most struggling lowest achieving schools. The commitment on the part of the LEA and campus is the implementation of rapid, dramatic reforms employing one of four school intervention models.

RESTART MODEL Statutory Requirements RESTART MODEL Statutory Requirements The campus must implement the following federal requirements: A. Convert or close and reopen the school under a charter school operator, a charter management organization (CMO), or an education management organization(EMO) that has been selected through a rigorous review process. A (CMO) is a non-profit organization that operates or manages charter schools by centralizing or sharing certain functions and resources among schools. An EMO is a for-profit or non-profit organization that provides “whole-school operation” services to an LEA. B. Enroll, within the grades it serves, any former student who wishes to attend the school.

SCHOOL CLOSURE MODEL Statutory Requirements SCHOOL CLOSURE MODEL Statutory Requirements The campus must implement the following federal requirements: A. Enroll the students who attended that school in other schools in the LEA that are higher achieving within reasonable proximity to the closed school and may include, but are not limited to, charter schools or new schools for which achievement data are not yet available. B. A grant for school closure is a one-year grant without the possibility of continued funding.

TURNAROUND MODEL Statutory Requirements TURNAROUND MODEL Statutory Requirements The campus must implement the following federal requirements: A. Any of the required and permissible activities under the transformation model; or B. A new school model (e.g., themed, dual language academy).

TRANSFORMATION MODEL* Statutory Requirements TRANSFORMATION MODEL* Statutory Requirements 1.Develop and increase teacher and school leader effectiveness (A) Replace the principal who led the school prior to commencement of the transformation model (B) Use rigorous, transparent, and equitable evaluation systems for teachers and principals that– (1) Take into account data on student growth as a significant factor as well as other factors such as multiple observation-based assessments of performance and ongoing collections of professional practice reflective of student achievement and increased high school graduation rates; and (2) Are designed and developed with teacher and principal involvement;

TRANSFORMATION MODEL* Statutory Requirements (con’t) TRANSFORMATION MODEL* Statutory Requirements (con’t) 1.Develop and increase teacher and school leader effectiveness (C) Identify and reward school leaders, teachers, and other staff who, in implementing this model, have increased students achievement and high school graduation rates and identify and remove those who, after ample opportunities have been provided for them to improve their professional practice, have not done so; (D) Provide staff ongoing, high-quality, job-embedded professional development (e.g. regarding subject-specific pedagogy, instruction that reflects a deeper understanding of the community served by the school, or differentiated instruction) that is aligned with the school’s comprehensive instructional program and designed with school staff to ensure they are equipped to facilitate effective teaching and learning and have the capacity to successfully implement school reform strategies; and

TRANSFORMATION MODEL* Statutory Requirements (con’t) TRANSFORMATION MODEL* Statutory Requirements (con’t) 1.Develop and increase teacher and school leader effectiveness (E) Implement such strategies as financial incentives,, increased opportunities for promotion and career growth, and more flexible work conditions that are designed to recruit, place, and retain staff with the skills necessary to meet the needs of the students in the transformation school. 2. Comprehensive instructional reform strategies (A) Use data to identify and implement an instructional program that is research- based and vertically aligned from one grade to the next as well as aligned with State academic standards; and (B) Promote the continuous use of student data (such as from formative, interim, and summative assessments) to inform and differentiate instruction in order to meet the academic needs of individual students.

TRANSFORMATION MODEL* Statutory Requirements (con’t) TRANSFORMATION MODEL* Statutory Requirements (con’t) 3. Increasing learning time and creating community-oriented schools ( A ) Establish schedules and strategies that provide increased learning time; and (B) Provide ongoing mechanisms for family and community engagement 4. Provide operational flexibility and sustained support (A) Give the school sufficient operational flexibility (such as staffing, calendars/time, and budgeting) to implement fully a comprehensive approach to substantially improve student achievement outcomes and increase high school graduation rates; and (B) Ensure the school receives ongoing, intensive technical assistance and related support from the LEA, the SEA, or a designated external lead partner organization (such as a school turnaround organization or an EMO)

HOW MUCH MONEY? This is a 3 year grant starting with the school year

AWARDS AMOUNTS Fox Tech HS: $4,316,581 Year 1---$1,526, Year 2---$1,527, Year 3---$1,527, Sam Houston HS: $4,662,956 Year 1---$1,623, Year 2---$1,554, Year 3---$1,554, * Please refer to Appendix A for a complete yearly budget breakdown

WHAT IS THE PLAN? Transformation Overviews

Fox Tech HS Transformation Overview Fox Tech HS Transformation Overview ( A) Fox Tech HS started to undergo a transformation over the past 18 months including: ◊ The hiring of a new principal, new curriculum instruction coordinators and new leadership staff ◊ A 50% turnover in teaching staff in and 31% in ◊ A series of public community meetings which have led to the adoption of a plan to become a thematic high school for health and law professions within the next three years (B)With traditionally lower teacher to student ratios, the focus on individual student needs, and a balance of rigorous core academic classes and hands-on opportunities inside and outside the classroom to develop practical, work-based skills, these programs have demonstrated success in attendance rates and academic performance (Kemper & Willner 2008) (C)The five year plan includes the graduation of health and law professions students who are both college and career ready and have earned dual credit hours. Expectations are that each graduate be accepted and enrolled in a university. (D) Within five years, Fox Tech expects to create a reputation of excellence that attracts students and results in steady enrollment increases that will maximize at 400 students in each program.. This will occur in a state of the art facility that will afford students a plethora of hands on experiences, investigations and project- based learning.

Sam Houston HS Transformation Overview Sam Houston HS Transformation Overview ( A) Sam Houston HS started to undergo a transformation over the past 18 months including: ◊ The hiring of a new principal, a new academic dean and two new curriculum instruction coordinators in ◊ The decrease in discipline incidents (2759 incidents down to 1252) ◊ The increase in academic performance as measured by the TAKS scores (Math from 43% to 53% and Science 37% to 62%) ◊ The commencement of an extensive school and community needs assessment and dialogues with community stakeholders ◊ The administration by the LEA’s Research and Evaluation Department of a comprehensive community survey through in-person interviews and telephone surveys (English & Spanish) ◊ The opening of the Magnet Program for Manufacturing, Engineering and Technology ◊ The rating of Advanced in technology infrastructure (B)Sam Houston plans to infuse a technology-focused, project based learning program that will change the climate of the campus as well as the academic outcomes and graduation rate. (C)Intensive traditional as well as job embedded professional development will be conducted to ensure sustainability of the curriculum and improve teacher quality. (D)The skills and expertise of the New Technology Network (NTN) will be employed in Spring 2011 to create Sam Houston New Tech High with a new level of technology integration that will transform the campus as NTN has done successfully in campuses across the country

Buy In What was the process for obtaining it and how will we keep it?

STAFFING What does the staffing look like on both of these campuses for this year as well as the next two years?

STUDENT AND PARENT RESPONSIBILITY What is it?

SUSTAINABILITY How do we sustain these programs once the money is gone?

HOW WILL WE ASSESS & MONITOR? The 7 Critical Success Factors

CSFs Improve Academic Performance Improve School Climate Increase Use of Data Driven Instruction Increase Parent Community Involvement Increase Teacher Quality Increase Learning Time Increase Leadership Effectiveness

Critical Success Factor Increase Leadership Effectiveness Milestone On-going Job- Embedded Professional Development Milestone Operational Flexibility Milestone Resource/Data Utilization 12

Improve Academic Performance Data Driven Instruction Curriculum Alignment On-going Monitoring of Instruction

Increase Use of Quality Data to Drive Instruction Data Disaggregation/ Training Data-driven Decisions On-going Communication

Increase Learning Time Flexible Scheduling Instructionally- focused Calendar Staff Collaborative Planning

Increase Parent/ Community Involvement Increased Opportunities for Input Effective Communication Accessible Community Services

Improve School Climate Increased Attendance Decreased Discipline Referrals Increased Involvement in Extra/ Co-Curricular Activities

Increase Teacher Quality Locally Developed Appraisal Instruments On-going Job- Embedded Professional Development Recruitment/Retention Strategies

Performance Goals (APGs) Improvement Activities Found in TTIPS Application Campus Improvement Plans (CIPs) Contains APGs and Improvement Activities 90-day Strategy Arises out of CIPs These are the immediate steps needing to be taken/what has to be done now. Quarterly Implementation Reports (QIRs) Pull from APGs, Activities, 90-day Strategy and CIPs Critical Success Factors (CSFs)

Connections CSFsAPGs Improvement Activities Campus Improvement Plans 90-day Strategy QIRs

WHO ARE THE KEY PLAYERS?

Key Players In The Transformation Key Players In The Transformation LEA District Shepherd Principal Teacher Leaders Professional Service Provider SIRC-TTIPS NCLB-TTIPS

Principal PSP District Shepherd LEA

WHAT IS OUR COMMITMENT?

LEA Commitment for Transformation Expected involvement includes: Creating and clearly communicating a vision for the participating schools and Identifying dedicated personnel whose role is to support the participating schools Supporting the implementation of purposeful instructional arrangements and grant requirements at the designated campus Customizing supplementary support and resources provided to participating campuses

District Commitment (cont.): Making necessary adjustments to budgeting procedures/practices to effectively and efficiently address identified campus needs Providing priority/preferential status in HR practices Expressing/demonstrating explicit board support and active engagement of the superintendent for Transformation

WHAT IS THE DISTRICT SNAPSHOT? SAISD In Focus

Framework Research Basis Foundational Practice Turnaround Practice Targeted Intense Early/Immediate Flexible District Snapshot Overview

It’s time…

to get uncomfortable

to form bold partnerships

“I wish we were bolder for kids.” Joel L Klein, Chancellor New York City Schools

QUESTIONS?