Linking TSR to ISOLDE Fredrik Wenander, TSR workshop, CERN, 29-30.10.2012 Outline 1. Machine parameters 2. Operational experience 3. Beam-line layout 4.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Rare RI Ring Facility at RIKEN RI Beam Factory M. Wakasugi, and Rare RI Ring Collaborators RIKEN, Nishina Center, Japan ARIS2014.
Advertisements

RAL 27 April 2006The beta-beam task, EURISOL1 Status of the beta-beam study Mats Lindroos on behalf of the EURISOL beta-beam task.
Operational aspects 2008 run ISCOOL Isolde workshop Nov 2008 Erwin Siesling.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Options for a 50Hz, 10 MW, Short Pulse Spallation Neutron Source G H Rees, ASTeC, CCLRC, RAL, UK.
100 MeV- 1 GeV Proton Synchrotron for Indian Spallation Neutron Source Gurnam Singh Beam Dynamics Section CAT, Indore CAT-KEK-Sokendai School on Spallation.
COULOMB ’05 Experiments with Cooled Beams at COSY A.Lehrach, H.J.Stein, J. Dietrich, H.Stockhorst, R.Maier, D.Prasuhn, V.Kamerdjiev, COSY, Juelich, I.Meshkov,
Proton beams for the East Area The beams and their slow extraction By : Rende Steerenberg PS/OP.
Eric Prebys USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014.
Moriond 2003M. Benedikt, S. Hancock Injection and Accumulation in a High Energy Ion Storage Ring Michael Benedikt, Steven Hancock AB Division, CERN.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
P. Spiller, SIS18upgrade, Peter Spiller GSI, Darmstadt Kick off Meeting - EU Construction DIRAC Phase SIS18 upgrade.
Cooler Injector Synchrotron (CIS) at IUCF V.S. Morozov MEIC Collaboration Meeting March 30-31, 2015.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
F Project X Overview Dave McGinnis October 12, 2007.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
Diagnostics for intense e-cooled ion beams by Vsevolod Kamerdzhiev Forschungszentrum Jülich, IKP, COSY ICFA-HB2004, Bensheim, October 19, 2004.
The REXTRAP Penning Trap Pierre Delahaye, CERN/ISOLDE Friedhelm Ames, Pierre Delahaye, Fredrik Wenander and the REXISOLDE collaboration TAS workshop, LPC.
The status and future prospects Fredrik Wenander, ISOLDE workshop 26/ Outline 1.Motivation and physics reach 2.Machine performance 3.Beam-line layout.
Beam loss and longitudinal emittance growth in SIS M. Kirk I. Hofmann, O. Boine-Frankenheim, P. Spiller, P. Hülsmann, G. Franchetti, H. Damerau, H. Günter.
ICIS2015 in NY Y.HIGURASHI Y. Higurashi (RIKEN Nishina center) 1.Introduction RIKEN RIBF and RIKEN 28GHz SC-ECRIS 2.Emittance measurements 1.4D.
Mats Lindroos Future R&D: beta-beam Mats Lindroos.
EBIS ARR Jim Alessi May 4- 7, 2010 Technical Overview.
Peter Spiller, GSI, ICFA workshop, Optimization of SIS100 Lattice and Dedicated Collimation System P. Spiller, GSI ICFA 2004 Bensheim
A mass-purification method for REX beams
Beam Instrumentation for the HIE-ISOLDE linac Francesca Zocca ISOLDE Workshop and Users Meeting December CERN Instituto de Estructura de la.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS OF NICA ACCELERATOR COMPLEX Tuzikov A., JINR, Dubna, Russia.
PHYSICAL PROJECT OF BOOSTER FOR NICA ACCELERATOR COMPLEX Alexey Tuzikov, Nikolay Agapov, Andrey Butenko, Alexey Eliseev, Viktor Karpinsky, Hamlet Khodzhibagiyan,
FLAIR meeting, GSI March Positron Ring for Antihydrogen Production A.Sidorin for LEPTA collaboration JINR, Dubna.
Report on technical study of Fredrik Wenander, TSR workshop 14/ Outline 1.Beam-line layout 2.Storage time REXTRAP 3.Upgrade of charge.
Design and construction of Nuclotron-based Ion Collider fAcility (NICA) and Mixed Phase Detector (MPD) Design and construction of Nuclotron-based Ion Collider.
Project X RD&D Plan Beam Transfer Line and Recycler Injection David Johnson AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
HIE-ISOLDE diagnostic boxes Esteban D. Cantero CERN BE-BI-PM HIE-ISOLDE meeting for BE/BI 28 March 2014 The research leading to these results has received.
LDRD: Magnetized Source JLEIC Meeting November 20, 2015 Riad Suleiman and Matt Poelker.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Overview of new high level software applications developed for the HIE- ISOLDE superconducting linac D.Lanaia*, M.A. Fraser, D. Voulot *The research project.
1 NICA Project Report of The Group I S.L.Bogomolov, A.V.Butenko, A.V.Efremov, E.D.Donets, I.N.Meshkov, V.A.Mikhailov, A.O.Sidorin, A.V.Smirnov, Round Table.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
September 13, 2007 J. Alessi EBIS Project and EBIS as an ionizer for polarized He-3 ? Jim Alessi Work of E. Beebe, A. Pikin, A. Zelenski, A. Kponou, …
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
Riccardo Raabe (IKS, KU Leuven) for the Collaboration INTC 01/02/2012 INTC-O-014 Storage ring facility at HIE-ISOLDE: Technical Design Report.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
PS-ESS and LEBT State of the art Lorenzo Neri Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Laboratori Nazionali del Sud.
CR: status and activities at BINP I.Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk O.Dolinskyy, GSI,Darmstadt , MAC, GSI, Darmstadt.
Beam Preparation, Task 9 Department of Physics, University of Jyväskylä.
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
LINAC4 ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Workshop, 10/2012 “The Project”
A.Lachaize CNRS/IN2P3 IPN Orsay
HIE-ISOLDE Report Jose Alberto Rodriguez on behalf of Yacine Kadi and the HIE-ISOLDE project team.
Injector Cyclotron for a Medical FFAG
SuperB Injection, RF stations, Vibration and Operations
First results from IS468 and further investigation of in-trap decay of 62Mn First results from 2008 ; Problems and questions ; Further investigations ;
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Status of the beta-beam study
Junji Urakawa (KEK) for ATF International Collaboration
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
ELENA Extra Low ENergy Antiproton Ring
Multi-Turn Extraction for PS2 Preliminary considerations
LEIR Presented by M. CHANEL PSDAYS: EVIAN 2001.
Status of the charge breeder upgrade
LEPTA project Measuring lifetime of positrons
JLEIC 200 GeV ion beam formation options
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
Plans for future electron cooling needs PS BD/AC
Presentation transcript:

Linking TSR to ISOLDE Fredrik Wenander, TSR workshop, CERN, Outline 1. Machine parameters 2. Operational experience 3. Beam-line layout 4. Upgraded charge breeder

Ring beam energy TSR magnetic rigidity range: Tm REX Linac 2<A/q<4.5 1 st motivation for high q Storage energy A/q=2 tested at REX Sept no multi-pactoring + nominal transmission at 2.85 MeV/u - larger energy spread  1% HIE-linac beam quality ? sensitive to RF jitter and beam steering

3 A/q =4.5 W = 9.3 MeV/u βγ = A/q = 2.5 W = 14.5 MeV/u βγ = HIE stage 2a Injection beam energy Stage 2a >14 MeV/u inj. energy Stage 2b ~17 MeV/u inj. energy Stage 1 For small A/q => ring acceleration A/q =4.5 W = 5.5 MeV/u βγ = A/q = 2.5 W = 8.8 MeV/u βγ = HIE stage 1

4 2 nd motivation for high q Beam life times e-cooling time T cool – horizontal cooling time for beam with large diameter 3 rd motivation for high q Light elements easiest to reach low A/q Internal gas target Ion beam size at injection also important

5 Operational experience I * Taken part in beam setup at MPI-K Heidelberg * Differences at MPI-K: a. high beam intensities; loading the ring maximally b. rarely need for pilot beam Injection pulse intensity: at MPI-K 1 euA for ~1 ms (flat top) at REX 0.2 euA for 50 us (moderate gas injection into EBIS) at REX 3.0 euA for 50 us (space charge compensated EBIS) Quartz plates for beam position location during first turn Schottky pickup for circulating beam Residual gas profile monitor for circulating beam

Examples Measured R=200 counts/s for 2.4E6 particles of 12 C 6+ at 4.2 MeV/u at 5E-11 mbar Reduce rate to 20 counts/s Increase pressure to 5E-10 mbar Residual gas BP: R = counting rate  = detector length / ring circumference  = ionization cross-section v = ion velocity N = number of stored ions 6 Quartz plates: integrated current from REXEBIS at the detection limit alternative plates exist – lifetime? Beam diagnostics improvements Schottky pickup: needs some 100 enA => corresponds to ~1E6 circulating charges at 10 MeV/u suitable for pilot beam, not for low intensity RIB => see ~2E4 circulating particles

7 A. Injection energy /rigidity determination * Ideally know the injection beam energy with some per mille precision * With a separator magnet at the Linac end a precision of ±0.5% is achievable MPI-K solution: ramp ring rigidity slowly over 10 s until Schottky signal appears injection and ring rigidity matching Operational experience II B. Beam scaling Problem:Pilot beam with identical A/q not existing Suggested challenging solution: 1. Inject pilot beam (different A/q) at wrong energy but at correct rigidity 2. Tune injection line and ring parameters 3. Scale HIE-LINAC to radioactive A/q and correct beam energy 4. Change voltage on the electrostatic injection septum and the e-cooler cathode potenti al REX-ISOLDE based on A/q-scaling from pilot beam TSR setup uses fixed rigidity and subsequent energy scaling Example: for 10 MeV/u 76 Zn 20+ use MeV/u at A/q=4

8 0 th order layout – version presented in TSR TDR - outdated height difference between hall floors (now 4.1 m) - used ‘non-standard’ 60° dipole magnets - located far to the right, little space for relocated experimental setup Old layout Work done by D. Voulot BE/OP Present experimental ring side Alternative low  -function side

9 Heidelberg ring configuration Exchange RF and experiment sides Benefits of change 1. Smaller  -function smaller beam size lifetime increase with in-ring target 2. Small dispersion in the RF region beam position independent of beam energy easy to hit the target 3. Advantageous for storage of multiple charges avoid betatron oscillations and beam losses Exchange position RF system Injection septum e-cooler Target station Beam profiler M. Grieser Beam dimensions:

10 Vacuum chamber at the end of the experimental beam line will collide with fast bumper magnet BM41 1. move fast bumper magnet BM41 to the other side of QF42 2.then the opposite fast bumper magnet BM12 has to be moved to the other side of QF12 3.from this position the sextupol has the be removed (12 sextupoles available, only two needed for the slow extraction) 4.the closed orbit pickup also needs to be moved to another position (or suppressed) Consequences 10 Heidelberg ring configuration Exchange RF and experiment sides Benefits of change 1. Smaller  -function smaller beam size lifetime increase with in-ring target 2. Small dispersion in the RF region beam position independent of beam energy easy to hit the target 3. Advantageous for storage of multiple charges avoid betatron oscillations and beam losses Exchange position

11 New layout 2.62 m imaginary magnets Work done by A. Parfenova TE/ABT and D. Voulot BE/OP * Use beam-line element design from HIE-ISOLDE (45° dipoles and QPs) * 1 vertical and 1 horizontal achromat * Start vertical displacement earlier + ring less close to Jura wall - beam line in the air * Beam elements needed Four 45° dipoles One triplet Four doublets One singlet doub sing doub trip vertical achromat horizontal achromat

12 Results: *  -functions excursions limited * Easy matching -> good sign Injection line flexible for other matching conditions. Future: * Fine-adjust matching and determine tuning range of Twiss parameters * Calculate optimal multiturn injection for different beam energies transverse emittances injection septum last SC cavity Matching goal for injection septum:  x =0.8 m,  y =2.2 m,  x =0  y =0, D x =1.8 m, D x’ =0 Matching parameters Work done by A. Parfenova TE/ABT and D. Voulot BE/OP HIE-ISOLDE and TSR injection line

13 New layout 2.62 m Questions marks 1.Beam back to HIE hall ISOLDE or only for use in TSR hall? 2.Space needed for extraction line? 3.Technical feasibility – magnets, support and alignment imaginary magnets doub sing doub trip vertical achromat horizontal achromat CERN users Work done by A. Parfenova TE/ABT and D. Voulot BE/OP preliminary

14 Idea: Beam sharing could be of some interest for: 1.For long measurement times (>10 s) inside the ring 2.For mass-selective acceleration inside the ring (takes several seconds) Have Miniball or similar as parallel user Beam sharing To do:Check if useful Long term perspective - aim for pulsed HIE supplies NB: Accumulation time in REXTRAP (possibly) limited to couple of seconds Possible? + HIE-ISOLDE magnets laminated -> can be switched rapidly (<1 s) - Pulsed magnet PS not foreseen -> switching time several seconds

injection Reaction measurements measurement ≈1-2 s e-cooling ≈0.5 s Based on R. Raabe presentation injection cooling s e-cool stacking (no target inside the ring) measurement, acceleration, mass separation Injection rate Many different ways of operating the machine REXTRAP trapping + cooling CB Repetition rate limitations * T ramp bumper magnets (max 5 Hz) * T e-cool * T breed in EBIS * T exploitation 0.2<T period <??

16 REX repetition rate vs e-cooling rate A T breed < T rep_rate in many cases + ample time to reach high charge states - keep them in 1. REXEBIS or 2. REXTRAP q + dependent Holding time in REXTRAP? 60 Ni + and 87 Rb + kept for >1.5 s Additional losses <20% 3E7 ions/s injected P. Delahaye et al., Nucl Phys A746 (2004) 604 Worries - Short-lived ions - Space-charge effects (  c changes; eff. decrease) - Noble gases and ions with high I.P. such as F, Cl, Br EBIS breeding time

17 NB! High injection efficiency of outmost importance  t=length injector pulse  t  25 turns typically  33  s at 10 MeV/u closed orbit at the septum foil ε  0.8 Ring injection time => Adapt EBIS T extraction to fit beam pulse into transverse acceptance A TSR_geo ~ 100 mm mrad  stack < 1  REX_norm ~ 0.5 mm mrad C TSR = m c = 3E8 m/s => < 36  s If we reach T extraction <30 us => More efficient injection => Smaller initial beam size => Faster cooling M. Grieser

*Measured extraction times for 12 C, 20 Ne, 39 K, 40 Ar, 133 Cs * T ext (10%) contains >95% of the extracted ions in the pulse Measured EBIS extraction time offset 10% T ext (10%) Preliminary TOF after REX mass separator

*Measured extraction times for 12 C, 20 Ne, 39 K, 40 Ar, 133 Cs * T ext (10%) contains >95% of the extracted ions in the pulse offset 10% T ext (10%) Preliminary T ext (A,q,I e ) TOF after REX mass separator Measured EBIS extraction time

C stripper foil (~150 ug/cm 2 ) after Linac + boost charge state in certain cases - reduced ion transmission (only 15-25% in the correct charge state) - fully stripped and few-electron systems cannot be attained Stripper foil after the linac (at 10 MeV/u) G. Schiwietz and P. L. Grande, Nucl. Instrum. Meth B175 (2001) 125 REXEBIS upgrade required to cover all suggested physics cases (as it stands now) IonZqA/qBreeding time (ms) 7 Be F Ni Sn Sn * 182 Pb * 182 Pb EBIS upgrade needed REXEBIS breeding times for a selection of elements of relevance for TSR at ISOLDE experiments 4 th motivation for high q Attainable charge states Some experiments might require: * Fully stripped to Z=60 * Few-electron system, e.g. for Th/U * to be tested

21 Z~60, H-like, bare, 10% of CSD, HzA/q ~ 4.0, 100 Hz I. P. ~ 50 keV Competing RR Gun bias ~ 150 kV Jτ ~ 10 4 C/cm 2 τ =0.2-2 s Jτ ~ 10 2 C/cm 2 τ =10 ms CX P < mbar CW injection ion-e heating Deep radial SC I=2-5 A J=10 4 A/cm 2 Design: Requests: Compression> 3500, Brillouin gun TSR Faster REX HIE-EBIS design considerations Slide from A. Shornikov

Beam parametersHIE-EBISREXEBIS Energy, keV1505 Current, A Magnetic field of the main solenoid, T62 Current density, A/cm Vacuum, mbar<1E-121E-11 Breeder length, m~ 10.8 Collector power, kW2001 Significant scaling! HIE-EBIS design considerations HIE-EBIS workshop 16-17/ * 11 external EBIS/T specialists * CERN expertise Goal: reach pressure < mbar. Cold system Warm system

23 Preliminary design layout Status and schedule  Design and simulations – BNL (complete)  Production – CERN (in preparation)  Test – BNL Test-EBIS (2013) BNL-CERN HEC 2 gun project

24 Conclusions Good news: + TSR and ISOLDE seem compatible + REXEBIS can provide many beams as is To be followed up: - Low intensity beam diagnostics crucial - Holding time / capacity in REXTRAP Integration study started at CERN

25 HIE vs TSR comparison Taken from Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics (2012) usually     