ADJUDICATION AND SCORING. Primarily local competitions with a culminating championship competition Mostly guards from North Texas Series of regional championships.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project-Based vs. Text-Based
Advertisements

Rubric Design Denise White Office of Instruction WVDE.
IB Report Cards are Coming!. Did you know? There are now two kinds of report cards at JL Long, IB and Dallas ISD. An IB Report card will be given to you.
USAJR to FISAC There are only two major differences between USAJR judging and FISAC judging – Music (Presentation) – Frequency of notations (Content)
PE in the MYP.

4/6/2017 Department of Human Resources New Performance Appraisal Forms Tutorial Effective: January 2013.
New York State’s Teacher and Principal Evaluation System VOLUME I: NYSED APPR PLAN SUBMISSION “TIPS”
NCAA Division I Women’s Volleyball Selections, Seeding and Bracketing Sharon K. Cessna Director of Championships December 18, 2003.
Designing Scoring Rubrics. What is a Rubric? Guidelines by which a product is judged Guidelines by which a product is judged Explain the standards for.
Designs to Estimate Impacts of MSP Projects with Confidence. Ellen Bobronnikov March 29, 2010.
Vivian Mun, Ed.D. Accreditation What is a rubric? A rubric is a scoring tool that lists the criteria for a piece of work, or “what counts” (for.
Quick and Easy Ways to Assess while Supporting, Not Interrupting, Your Performance and Rehearsal Agenda.
Designing Rubrics for Writing Assignments A Writing Across the Curriculum & Writing In the Disciplines Workshop Dr. Robert T. Koch Jr. Director, University.
Rubrics YOU can do this!. Rubric Achievement relative to a level of mastery (criteria) is compared  Need to know the criteria ahead of time  Need to.
C O L L E G E S U C C E S S ™ SAT Writing Rubric Prepare. Inspire. Connect.
 1. To Examine/Discuss Key ASSESSMENT PREMISES  2. To Define the term “Rubric/Scoring Rubric”  3. To Review Key Strengths of Scoring Rubrics.  4. To.
 MJ Keyboard I  This introductory course  Study will include: ◦ developing fundamental piano skills and techniques, ◦ learning to read music in order.
Middle Years Programme
Assessment in the Middle Years Programme. How are students assessed? The MYP offers a criterion-related model of assessment. This means that students'
If you build it…... They will come! What is PIP TALKS? University style conference, UIL style Students prepare a “Ted Talk” on any subject of their choosing.
CHAPTER 3 ~~~~~ INFORMAL ASSESSMENT: SELECTING, SCORING, REPORTING.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Effingham County Who is a Gifted Student? A student who demonstrates a high degree of intellectual and/or creative ability, exhibits an exceptionally.
Credit to Thomas R. Guskey. Systemic Change  Change is a highly complex process  Professional development is essential.
Assessment, Evaluation and Reporting for Secondary School Students Bonnie Brough and Jenny Perry Friday, May 19, 2006.
Using Rhetorical Modes to Reinforce Deaf Students’ Writing Skills at Different English Proficiency Levels John Panara NTID English Department.
1ACR: Major Assignments
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
2012 SEASON CFOA Evaluation Program. Evaluation Purpose Uniformed officiating.
Let’s Look at... Assessing Group Performance 1. Performance Groups Material for this section largely adapted from: “Assessing group work” © Copyright.
Score of 0 Essays not written on the essay assignment will receive a score of zero.
5 Chapter Five Employee Testing and Selection.
PED 2140 D February 11 th 2011 Assessment. learning offor as Assessment can be:
Recommendations Recommendation 1: Regrade the ten classifications found to be 20 percent or more below market midpoint to be in alignment with the market.
PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Introduction  Alternative and performance-based assessment  Characteristics of performance-based assessment  Portfolio.
FLOOR EXERCISE Levels 6 – 9 Janet Efland August 2013 WINNIE WITTEN - SCNAWGJ.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
PRESENTED AT: THE ISU SUMMER DIRECTOR WORKSHOPS, JULY 10, 2012 DAVID W. SNYDER MAKING THE GRADE: QUALITY ASSESSMENT FOR INSTRUMENTAL GROUPS.
Session 4 Performance-Based Assessment
Grading Efficiently…How Can Rubrics Help? Presenter: Tine Reimers Director, CETaL
GYMNASTICS Lesson 5– Identification of factors - Impact of factor.
Guidelines For successful Portfolio Implementation by Melissa Wood.
Interactive Lesson Denise M. Ginn Grand Canyon University: TEC-542 February 28, 2015.
IDSF New Judging System Proposal Stuttgart, 23rd August 2009.
How to improve on the. Don’t forget to…  Re-read: make sure you understand the prompt before beginning  Pre-write: jot down ideas (pros/cons, their.
Criterion-Referenced Testing and Curriculum-Based Assessment EDPI 344.
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov February 16, 2011.
LONG RANGE PLAN. SECTION I: STUDENT INFORMATION  Students’ prior achievement levels  Learning styles and needs  Cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds.
Your Logo Rating Program 2015 Classified - Personal Information OCFOA.
Mathematics and Science Partnership APR Updates apr.ed-msp.net.
EPortfolio Guide for Students By Laurie Mockler Pilgrim High School.
New Hanover County Schools Board of Education Presentation November 19, 2013.
Quick Start Expectations 1.Write in your planner and stamp sheet: 1.Homework: Practice 1-6 worksheet 2.Warm-up.
REFLECTION ON TEACHING THROUGH VIDEO ANALYSIS. UNDERGRADUATE ELEMENTARY EDUCATION TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM.
©2013, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter 7 Assessing and Grading the Students.
APPROVED CLINICAL INSTRUCTOR WORKSHOP Evaluation.
Sandringham School Computer Science Faculty Year 7 Virtual Tour – Lesson 6.
The Rocket Science of Score Points Holistic Scoring and the New Jersey HSPA Writing Assessment.
Designing Scoring Rubrics
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov March 23, 2011.
Writing Rubrics Module 5 Activity 4.
Assigning Practice Tests to Your Team
Fletcher’s Meadow Secondary School Assessment and Evaluation May 2017
Differentiated Tiered Grading (DTG)
World War II Blog Assignment
NFHS Music Conference - Chicago
Rubrics for academic assessment
Marching Band Festival Terminology and scoring
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Presentation transcript:

ADJUDICATION AND SCORING

Primarily local competitions with a culminating championship competition Mostly guards from North Texas Series of regional championships throughout the country Culminates in the National Championships in Fort Worth, TX North Texas Colorguard Association (“NTCA”) Marching Auxiliaries (“MA”) GRAPEVINE COMPETES IN TWO CIRCUITS

Judges watch, listen, comment, and score our students’ performances Judges are located in the spectator side of the gym A judge has three primary responsibilities: Rank: determine the order that reflects the comparative quality of performance for each guard (first place to last place) Rate: give each guard a score that accurately assess the quality of performance based on the performance criteria rubric Educate: provide recorded commentary that justifies the ranking and rating, as well as potential avenues for improving future performances WHAT DO JUDGES DO?

NORTH TEXAS COLORGUARD ASSOCIATION

Equipment Flags/Rifles/Sabres 20 points Vocabulary (10 points) Excellence (10 points) Movement Body 20 points Vocabulary (10 points) Excellence (10 points) Design Analysis Composition and Achievement 20 points Composition (10 points) Excellence (10 points) General Effect 2 Judges (scores added together) Show Design and Performance 20 points each (40 points overall) Repertoire (10 points) Performance (10 points) Individual Captions (“Downstairs Judges”) Overall Captions (“Upstairs Judges”) FIVE JUDGES FOR EACH NTCA COMPETITION

The DOWNSTAIRS captions (Equipment and Movement) evaluate the quality of technique, musicality, and excellence of performance. The UPSTAIRS captions (Design Analysis and General Effect) evaluate the effectiveness of the repertoire and effectiveness of performance. WHAT ARE THEY LOOKING FOR?

Performers don’t get “ticked” for mistakes they make. Performers start with a score of “zero” and receive credit for the things they do well. Each caption has a rubric that describes criteria for the very best performance. A guard’s performance is evaluated based upon comparison to the qualities described on the criteria rubric. A score is determined based on the frequency that a guard exhibits those qualities: = Box 1: Never (Weak) = Box 2: Seldom (Fair) = Box 3: Occasionally (Good) = Box 4: Frequently (Excellent) = Box 5: Consistently (Superior) Judges evaluate what is being performed at the same as how it is being performed. ALL ASPECTS OF PERFORMANCE ARE EVALUATED USING A RUBRIC

Much like UIL, NTCA rewards performances with an appropriate divisional rating. Divisional ratings are assigned based on the final score after penalties. These ratings are classified as follows: First four weeks of each season: Division III: “Good” (0-24 points) Division II: “Excellent” (25-54 points) Division I: “Superior” ( points Remainder of the season: Division III: “Good” (0-29 points) Division II: “Excellent” (30-59 points) Division I: “Superior” (6-100 points) NTCA DIVISIONAL RATINGS

MARCHING AUXILIARIES

A panel of MA judges will evaluate the performance based on the following criteria: Appearance: 10 points (costuming, grooming, appropriateness to musical selection) Choreography: 20 points (originality/creativity, variety of movement, musicality, difficulty/demand, equipment) Technique: 20 points (method/completion of movement, articulation/strength of movement, posture/alignment, proper use of equipment/prop) Precision: 20 points (uniformity/timing, form/orientation) Presentation/Staging: 10 points (use of performance area, transition, variety of movement Showmanship: 10 points (emotion, projection style) General Effect: 10 points (program content, emotional response) 3 JUDGES FOR EACH COMPETITION

Much like NTCA, MA rewards performances with an appropriate divisional rating. These ratings are as follows: Division V: below 50 points Division IV: points Division III: points Division II: points Division I: points These ratings are somewhat equivalent to the 5-box system NTCA uses. MA DIVISIONAL RATINGS

At the BEGINNING of the season, we expect all aspects of our performance to be in Box 4 or the top of Box 3 (in the upper 50s to upper 60s). By the end of the season, all aspects of our performance are expected to at least be in the top of Box 4 (80s). Box 5 means that all qualities in the performance criteria reference are shown by all of the performers consistently throughout the performance. That means “ALL OF US, ALL OF THE TIME!” ALL OF US, ALL OF THE TIME!

Judging is subjective There are sub-captions to evaluate within each caption. Sometimes buttons get pushed—positively or negatively. It is possible that judges perceive performances differently. It is also possible that different judges see completely different performances based on location. ANOMALIES OR INCONSISTENCIES IN SCORING

A judge’s first priority is to get the finishing order correct (placements). Judges are not “out to get” our kids or to find flaws in the performance. Many judges are current or former teachers. Judges are generally very nice people. Judges begin every competition hoping to see the very best performances. Judges want to encourage excellence in the performers they evaluate. Judges never want to see performers fail and will help them succeed if they can. A JUDGE’S MINDSET