Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Measuring Student Growth and Teacher Effectiveness Using NCEs Pro-Core + On-Track School Reports.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring Growth Using the Normal Curve Equivalent
Advertisements

Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Making Data Work for Kids: EVAAS Teacher Reports October 2012 SAS ® EVAAS ® for K-12.
MAP Information Martha - introduction October 23, 2013.
Standardized Tests What They Measure How They Measure.
Upper Darby School District Growth Data
Student Growth Objectives (SGO)
Evaluating Pretest to Posttest Score Differences in CAP Science and Social Studies Assessments: How Much Growth is Enough? February 2014 Dale Whittington,
Keystones to Opportunity Grant Utilizing the GRADE Data to Drive Instruction.
Post-Test Data Analysis Workshop. Agenda I. Analyze 2014 TerraNova Results II. Comparative Data Analysis: TerraNova & Explore Test Results III. Using.
Copyright 2001 by Allyn and Bacon Standardized Testing Chapter 14.
NECAP Results 2006 Chichester Central School Never Enough Children At Proficient!
Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 7e © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 9 Assessment of Achievement.
JUNE 26, 2012 BOARD MEETING Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
OCTEO INTRODUCTION TO VALUE-ADDED ANALYSIS October 25, 2012.
PVAAS Overview: Evaluating Growth, Projecting Performance PVAAS Statewide Core Team Fall 2008.
TKS Student Test Results Spring & Fall Tests Kentucky Performance Rating for Educational Progress (K-PREP) Administered May 2012 Kentucky test aligned.
Analyzing Institutional Assessment Results Longitudinally (with nonparametric effect sizes) Dr. Bradley Thiessen, Director of Institutional Research Problem:
How Can Teacher Evaluation Be Connected to Student Achievement?
Copyright ©2006. Battelle for Kids. Understanding & Using Value-Added Analysis.
Chapter 3 Understanding Test Scores Robert J. Drummond and Karyn Dayle Jones Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 6 th edition.
Evaluation of Nelson-Denny Reading Test Mini Project I By Becky Brandl.
.  Personal Registration Days  The advantages of testing these high schools off-site were 4 fold:  Convenience for the student  Decreased traffic.
Department of Research and Planning November 14, 2011.
Understanding ITBS Scores A Guide for Parents Created By: Ginger Psalmonds/CST New Prospect Elementary.
Teacher-Student Ratio and Elementary Children’s Academic Achievement Wendy Jowers, Teri Paulk, and Sol Summerlin.
Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. EVAAS Concepts: NCEs and Standard Errors Sandy Horn January 2013 SAS ® EVAAS ® for K-12.
Cognitive Abilities Test McKinney ISD
Gifted Presentation Mike Nicholson, Senior Director of Research and Evaluation.
Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. How Do They Do That? EVAAS and the New Tests October 2013 SAS ® EVAAS ® for K-12.
Assessment Information from multiple sources that describes a student’s level of achievement Used to make educational decisions about students Gives feedback.
SUCCESSFULLY PREPARING ALL STUDENTS FOR THEIR FUTURES SE 256 TH STREET, KENT, WA | SUMMARY i-Ready End of Year Report
Understanding ITBS Scores A Parent Guide. Overview ITBS testing is done in October at BMS. The testing is a “norm-referenced” test that compares a student’s.
Using EVAAS to Improve Student Performance Donna Albaugh Rachel McBroom Heather Stewart Region 4 PD Leads NCDPI.
Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. How Do They Do That? EVAAS and the New Tests October 2013 SAS ® EVAAS ® for K-12.
PVAAS Overview: Evaluating Growth, Projecting Performance PVAAS Statewide Core Team Fall 2008.
2009 Report Card and TVAAS Update Recalibration 2009 October 26, 2009.
1 Getting Up to Speed on Value-Added - An Accountability Perspective Presentation by the Ohio Department of Education.
Standardized Testing. Basic Terminology Evaluation: a judgment Measurement: a number Assessment: procedure to gather information.
SAT-10/ARMT Results (Stanford 10),was administered to Alabama students in Grades 3-8 for the first time in April Norm-referenced scores Enable us.
The Normal Distribution and Norm-Referenced Testing Norm-referenced tests compare students with their age or grade peers. Scores on these tests are compared.
Standardized Testing EDUC 307. Standardized test a test in which all the questions, format, instructions, scoring, and reporting of scores are the same.
PVAAS – The Thanksgiving Edition Did your Thanksgiving Dinner Meet the minimum expectations this year? Whether it met the expectations or not was it better.
Assessment Assessment is the collection, recording and analysis of data about students as they work over a period of time. This should include, teacher,
An introduction to SEN Data analysis The Research and Evaluation Unit.
Best Practices in CMSD SLO Development A professional learning module for SLO developers and reviewers Copyright © 2015 American Institutes for Research.
Copyright © 2014 American Institutes for Research and Cleveland Metropolitan School District. All rights reserved. March 2014 Interpreting Vendor Assessment.
Understanding ERB Scores
1 Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013 Roanoke Virginia Department of Education Division of Teacher Education and Licensure.
Parent’s Guide to Individual Profile Report
Understanding Growth Targets and Target Adjustment Guidance for Student Learning Objectives Cleveland Metropolitan School District Copyright © 2014 American.
Making Data Work for Kids: EVAAS Teacher Reports October 2012 SAS ® EVAAS ® for K-12.
Understanding ITBS Scores A Parent Guide. Overview ITBS testing is given in the Fall of each year to students in grades 1 – 8 enrolled in Crosscreek Charter.
Terra Nova By Tammy Stegman, Robyn Ourada, Sandy Perry, & Kim Cotton.
1 Overview of Teacher Evaluation 60% Multiple Measures of Teacher Performance At least 31 points based on “at least 2” observations At least one observation.
Analysing the Primary RAISE
What is Value Added?.
CHAPTER 3: Practical Measurement Concepts
EVAAS EVALUATION EFFECTIVENESS …AND WHAT DOES IT SAY???
IT’S ALL ABOUT GROWTH!. Hemet Unified School District’s Use of Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
Understanding ITBS Scores
NWEA Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
EVAAS Overview.
CHAPTER 4: Test Scores and What They Mean
Proactive Assessments
CHAPTER 12: Assessing Reading Achievement
Chapters 5 Formal Assessment.
Trinity Catholic School is to teach the Catholic faith
Percentile to Percentages Your goal is to have more gains than losses!
“Reviewing Achievement and Value-Added Data”
Evaluating a Mathematics Intervention
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Measuring Student Growth and Teacher Effectiveness Using NCEs Pro-Core + On-Track School Reports TWM Services © 2014

Normal Curve Equivalent (NCE) Growth Standard Model  Normal Curve Equivalent (NCE) scores are norm- referenced scores ranging from 1 to 99 and have an average score of 50. An NCE of 50 represents the national average score for any given grade level.  Progress/Growth is measured relative to the student NCE progress in a grade/subject on two tests between two points in time.  The Average Progress/Growth Standard is 0.0.

Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. TWM Services © 2014

Normal Curve Equivalents (NCEs) are a way of measuring where a student falls along the normal bell curve. 4

How does Pro-Core Measure Growth?  Pro-Core Form A diagnostic/formative pre-assessments are administered prior to instruction. Student scores are converted to NCEs.  Pro-Core Form B interim/summative post-assessments are administered later to the same students. Those scores are also converted to NCEs.  Student growth is determined by the difference between a student’s NCE position in the distribution in a grade/subject at the beginning of instruction and the student’s NCE position in that distribution at the end of a period of instruction.  The Average Progress/Growth Standard is 0.0, also called the “Expected Student Growth Target.”

NCEs and the Growth Standard Pre-test: NCE 37 Post-test: NCE 37 The student Growth Standard (0.0) is achieved when a student does not lose ground between two points in time, relative to other students who take the same test. This procedure is applied to each student in each teacher’s class in a school. Post-test NCE 37 - Pre-test NCE 37 = 0 = Met Expected Growth Target

NCEs and the Growth Standard Pre-test: NCE 32 Post-test: NCE 37 This student gained ground between two points in time, relative to other students who took the same test. This student has exceeded the growth standard. Post-test NCE 37 - Pre-test NCE 32 = +5 = Above Expected Growth Target

NCEs and the Growth Standard Pre-test: NCE 62 Post-test: NCE 37 This student lost ground between two points in time, relative to other students who took the same test. This student has not exceeded the growth standard. Post-test NCE 37 - Pre-test NCE 62 = -25 = Below Expected Growth Target

How does Pro-Core Measure Teacher Effectiveness?  Students’ NCE Growth Scores in each grade/subject are averaged in each teachers class (and school) at the end of a period of instruction.  The Teacher Effectiveness Rating is determined by the class NCE average.  The expected NCE growth target for students attaining normal growth is 0 NCEs. Therefore, teacher class averages are expected to be 0 (i.e. between ± 1).  Teacher Effectiveness Rating Scale: * 5. Most Effective =>+3 average NCEs * 4. Above Average Effectiveness +2 to +3 average NCEs * 3. Average Effectiveness +1, 0, -1 average NCEs * 2. Approaching Average Effectiveness -2 to -3 average NCEs * 1. Least Effective =<-3 average NCEs

5. Most Effective Rating => +3 CLASS AVERAGE NCEs = +3 68% met the growth target

Normal Curve Equivalent (NCE) averages are a way of measuring where a group of students (school/class) falls along the normal bell curve.

Teacher Effectiveness Class Detail Report

Teacher Effectiveness Class Summary

Using Pro-Core CCSS-based Assessments  Pre-Test (Form A) – September Diagnostic Data on each student and class Individual student/class strengths & weaknesses  Interim/Post -Test (Form A) – January-May “On-Track” Diagnostic Data on each student and class Mid-term or End-of-Course assessment  Short-Cycle Assessments – throughout the year Student/Class Progress reports on each CCS Standard

QUESTIONS? Contact: Ben Hemingway Phone: