MUS Outcomes Assessment Workshop University-wide Program-level Writing Assessment at The University of Montana Beverly Ann Chin Chair, Writing Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
When Students Can’t Read…
Advertisements

Strategies to Measure Student Writing Skills in Your Disciplines Joan Hawthorne University of North Dakota.
A Framework for Instruction
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
ACADEMIC DEGREE ASSESSMENT & GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay Arts & Sciences Faculty Meeting March 12,
MUS Outcomes Assessment Workshop University-wide Program-level Writing Assessment at The University of Montana Beverly Ann Chin Chair, Writing Committee.
So, What IS a Standards-based
1 Your Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Associate Professor Sarah Thomason & Karen Brunner, Asst. VP for Institutional Effectiveness & Research August 29,
Writing B. Finco. A little light reading! B. Finco.
What, Why, and How? INTRODUCTION: Behind the Rhetoric.
Goals for this session Participants will know:  Requirements for demonstrating proficiency in the Essential Skill of Writing  Official State Scoring.
Using RUBRICS to Assess Program Learning Outcomes By Dr. Ibrahim Al-Jabri Director, Program Assessment Center April 16, 2007.
Assessment in the Biology Department in AY Caroline Solomon Friday December 5.
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
PSU Anthropology Department Assessment Procedures Dr. Michele Gamburd
Apples to Oranges to Elephants: Comparing the Incomparable.
The Course Ajar: Principles and Practices for Multi-Section Program Design Ed Nagelhout Department of English UNLV Faculty Research Institute ● 5 March.
A Multi-method Approach: Assessment of Basic Communication Cheryl E Drout, Ph.D. SUNY-Fredonia.
On Scoring Guides everything you were afraid to ask PART TWO.
QEP Update CFCC Planning Retreat June 19, QEP Update Mid-Term Report Global Outcomes 1.Measurable improvement of students’ critical thinking skills.
May 18, Two Goals 1. Become knowledgeable about the QEP. 2. Consider your role in making the QEP a success.
Developing an Assessment Plan Owens Community College Assessment Day Workshops November 13-14, 2009 Anne Fulkerson, Ph.D. Institutional Research.
Faculty Senate Writing Skills Committee Scott Lazerus, ChairChristy Jespersen Jessica YoungJoAnn Arai-Brown Nancy GaussAnne Ryter Julie LukengaCourtney.
WRITING ACROSS THE CURRICULUM AND THE ROLE OF THE WRITING CENTER Dani Weber University of Pittsburg at Bradford.
The draft NSW English K-10 syllabus Version 2 February, 2012.
Embedded Assessment M.Ed. In Curriculum & Instruction with a Specialization in Language & Literacy.
Emporia State University Phil Bennett (Some Slides by Dr. Larry Lyman) Teacher Work Sample The Teachers College.
CCSS Implementation July 2010: State Board of Education adopts Common Core State Standards for English and Mathematics : Implementation of.
Helping Your Department Advance and Implement Effective Assessment Plans Presented by: Karen Froslid Jones Director, Institutional Research.
Facilitating Peer Assessment Assessment Workshops in Composition.
Assessing Tomorrow’s Leaders Today in an Integrated Reading and Writing Course NADE 2015 – Greenville, SC Kina Lara and Tina Willhoite San Jacinto College.
PEGGY MAKI, PH.D. EDUCATION CONSULTANT IN ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING PRESENTED AT CCRI SEPTEMBER 21, 2012 Assessment at Three Levels: Institution, Program,
ASSESSMENT SYED A RIZVI INTERIM ASSOCIATE PROVOST FOR INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
Assessing Transfer-Level English Strengthening Student Success Conference, October 3, 2007 Sandra Stefani Comerford, Professor, English Assessment Coordinator.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
The Changing Face of Education: How Common Core Impacts Our Curriculum Beth Smith President, ASCCC Oct. 31, 2013.
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
Inquiry and Investigation. What was the TOPIC? PROBLEM? CIVIC INQUIRY?
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
 Integrate the Bacc Core category learning outcomes into the course.  Clarify for students how they will achieve and demonstrate the learning outcomes.
Developing a Teaching Portfolio for the Job Search Graduate Student Center University of Pennsylvania April 19, 2007 Kathryn K. McMahon Department of Romance.
TAKS Writing Rubric
Writing Assignments that Work Lessons for the New Era of College Readiness Keystone Conference Tripp Presley, Heather Farmer, Mike Moran.
Rethinking English Composition A Redesign Project in Process Anne Homan English Instructor Math, English, and Developmental Studies, Division Chair State.
Welcome Richard Montgomery Parents! Richard Montgomery PTSA Information Session on the MYP.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Selecting Appropriate Assessment Measures for Student Learning Outcomes October 27, 2015 Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment Office of Assessment and.
How Technologically Literate are EMCC Students ?.
Who We Are When Working in Assessment  Carl Brun works with Gen Ed and other programs  Aligning curriculum with standards  Collecting syllabi and posting.
MT ENGAGE Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment April 27, 2015.
W R I T I N G M A T T E R S A workshop of the Hoosier Writing Project a site of the National Writing Project at IUPUI Herb Budden, Co-director.
Using Research on Student Learning as a Framework for Curricular Redesign Joanne Baird Giordano University of Wisconsin Colleges.
Teach. Write. Teach Writing.. THE BASICS The Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) program provides support for faculty university-wide in implementing.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. COMMON.
Mary Ann Roe e-Colorado Portal Coordinator Colorado Department of Labor and Employment Jennifer Jirous Computer Information Systems Faculty Pikes Peak.
Quantitative Literacy Across the Curriculum. Members of the QLAC Committee Beimnet Teclezghi – co-chair Laura Pannaman – co-chair Marilyn Ettinger John.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
Promoting Effective Assessment Practices Through Peer Review Claudia J. Stanny Director, Center for University Teaching, Learning, & Assessment Amy Mitchell-Cook.
Assessment in student life
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Consider Your Audience
AP Language and Composition
How Technologically Literate are EMCC Students?
U n i v e r s i t y o f W a s h i n g t o n
Institutional Learning Outcomes Assessment
LEARNAPALOZZA: SERVICE-LEARNING AT CPCC
SDSU’s Writing Placement Assessment (WPA)
SDSU’s Writing Placement Assessment (WPA)
May May June Boston
Presentation transcript:

MUS Outcomes Assessment Workshop University-wide Program-level Writing Assessment at The University of Montana Beverly Ann Chin Chair, Writing Committee Megan Stark Professor, Writing Committee Kelly Webster Director, Writing Center

General Education Writing Requirements at UM  Freshman Composition Course (WRIT 101)  Approved-Writing Course (usually 200-level)  Upper Division Writing Proficiency Assessment  Writing in the Major Course (usually 400-level)

AIM: to improve the quality of student writing by improving the writing program Grounded in Gen Ed courses: analyzes student writing and course syllabi as primary reflections of our writing program Focused on studying the efficacy of learning outcomes : reflects General Education Approved-Writing Course Learning Outcomes Formative: focuses on studying aspects of the writing program to improve and modify those aspects Contextualized : can be scaled and shaped locally to address questions and issues faculty value University-wide Program-level Writing Assessment Implemented, Fall 2013

Goals of the UPWA to provide useful data about student writing proficiency in the context of a General Education Requirement; to analyze student writing as a reflection of our writing program; to uncover trends in students’ writing strengths and areas for improvement; to improve writing instruction and curriculum across disciplines; to provide professional development opportunities for faculty and staff.

The UPWA Holistic Rubric Grounded in the Approved-Writing Course Learning Outcomes Faculty generated Field tested Widely available and adaptable Discussed, interpreted, and debated each spring

Learning Outcomes for Approved-Writing Courses  Compose written documents that are appropriate for a given audience or purpose  Formulate and express opinions and ideas in writing  Use writing to learn and synthesize new concepts  Revise written work based on constructive feedback  Find, evaluate, and use information effectively  Begin to use discipline-specific writing conventions (largely style conventions like APA or MLA)  Demonstrate appropriate English language usage

Example: Score Point 4 Score 4: Advanced The texts show a strong sense of purpose and audience. Expression of ideas is articulate, developed, and well- organized. These texts demonstrate a clear ability to synthesize concepts. The texts consistently show the writer’s ability to evaluate and use information effectively. Writing style (word choice and sentence fluency) is highly effective for the purpose and audience. The writer is beginning to use discipline-specific writing conventions with general success. While there may be a few errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics, a strong command of English language usage is clearly evident.

UPWA Procedures for Paper Collection Approved-Writing Course faculty identify an assignment in which students are asked to demonstrate the Learning Outcomes. Students remove identifying information from and upload their papers to an online UPWA repository. Students take an online survey.

UPWA Annual Retreat Procedures All faculty, staff, and graduate students TAs are invited to participate. A random sample of papers is identified for scoring. Trained leaders teach participants how to apply accurately and efficiently the UPWA Holistic Rubric. Table leaders facilitate discussion on the rubric and scoring process as participants reach consensus on their scores. Participants complete a survey.

Using UPWA Data The University Writing Committee will: analyze the scoring data for trends in students’ writing strengths and areas for improvement; analyze student survey information; use the Writing Retreat results and feedback to plan a Fall Writing Symposium for faculty; share its findings and monitor/refine the UPWA.

Benefits of the UPWA empowers faculty to shape and engage in assessment that will impact teaching and learning; allows for authentic writing assessment; enacts and promotes shared responsibility for and commitment to writing instruction across disciplines; provides professional development and collaboration opportunities grounded in current research and best practices.

For Further Information UM Writing Committee Website