Cancer System Quality Index (CSQI) 2012 Treatment
Cancer System Quality Index 20122
3
4
5
6 Thoracic Cancer Surgery Standards Designated thoracic surgery facilities in Ontario Report date: December, 2011 Data source: Discharge Abstract Database (CIHI) and National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (CIHI) Prepared by: Cancer Care Ontario, Cancer Informatics Notes: 1. Kingston General and Thunder Bay Regional are level 2 designated centres
Cancer System Quality Index 20127
8
9
10 Designated HPB Surgery facilities in Ontario HPB Cancer Surgery Standards Report date: December, 2011 Data source: Discharge Abstract Database (CIHI) and National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (CIHI) Prepared by: Cancer Care Ontario, Cancer Informatics CSQI 2012
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index Cancer patients receiving adjuvant Chemotherapy Breast: N= 3210 | Colon: N= 796 No ED visit Breast: N= 1674 (52%) Colon: N= 421 (53%) Direct admission to hospital Breast: N= 98 (3%) Colon: N= 28 (4%) No admission Breast: N= 938 (65% of ED visits) Colon: N= 238 (69% of ED visits) Admitted Breast: N= 500(35 % of ED visits) Colon: N= 109 (31% of ED visits) Visited ED Breast: N= 1438 (45%) Colon: N=347 (44%) Report date: January 2012 Data source: New Drug Funding Program, Discharge Abstract Database (CIHI), National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (CIHI) Prepared by: Cancer Care Ontario, Cancer Informatics Percentage and number of breast and colon cancer patients receiving NDFP drugs who visit the emergency department or are admitted to hospital any time within 4 weeks of any cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy, Ontario, 2010 Emergency Department Visits after Chemotherapy CSQI 2012
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index Radiation Treatment Utilization Report Date: February, 2012 Data source: Ontario Cancer Registry, Activity Level Reporting Prepared by: Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queens Cancer Research Unit Notes: 1. Rates were estimated using the MCUT Method based on the radiotherapy given between December 1, 2009 and November 30, Shortfalls were calculated as: (rate - benchmark rate) / benchmark rate. 3. Benchmark rate was the rate in the countries without long wait times in 2010 and CSQI 2012 Percentage Shortfall in Radiation Treatment Utilization: Estimated lifetime use of radiation treatment for breast cancer, 2010–2011
28 Radiation Treatment Utilization Report Date: February, 2012 Data source: Ontario Cancer Registry, Activity Level Reporting Prepared by: Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queens Cancer Research Unit Notes: 1. Rates were estimated using the MCUT Method based on the radiotherapy given between December 1, 2009 and November 30, Shortfalls were calculated as: (rate - benchmark rate) / benchmark rate. 3. Benchmark rate was the rate in the countries without long wait times in 2010 and CSQI 2012 Percentage Shortfall in Radiation Treatment Utilization: Estimated lifetime use of radiation treatment for lung cancer, 2010–2011 Cancer System Quality Index 2012
29 Radiation Treatment Utilization Report Date: February, 2012 Data source: Ontario Cancer Registry, Activity Level Reporting Prepared by: Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queens Cancer Research Unit Notes: 1. Rates were estimated using the MCUT Method based on the radiotherapy given between December 1, 2009 and November 30, Shortfalls were calculated as: (rate - benchmark rate) / benchmark rate. 3. Benchmark rate was the rate in the countries without long wait times in 2010 and CSQI 2012 Percentage Shortfall in Radiation Treatment Utilization: Estimated lifetime use of radiation treatment for prostate cancer, 2010–2011
Cancer System Quality Index Radiation Treatment Utilization Report Date: February, 2012 Data source: Ontario Cancer Registry, Activity Level Reporting Prepared by: Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queens Cancer Research Unit Notes: 1. Rates were estimated using the MCUT Method based on the radiotherapy given between December 1, 2009 and November 30, Shortfalls were calculated as: (rate - benchmark rate) / benchmark rate. 3. Benchmark rate was the rate in the countries without long wait times in 2010 and CSQI 2012 Percentage Shortfall in Radiation Treatment Utilization: Estimated lifetime use of radiation treatment for rectal cancer, 2010–2011
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index
Cancer System Quality Index