Update to the Faculty Senate on the approved (2015) pilot of the IDEA course evaluation instrument 1 April 20, 2016.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

University-Wide Course Evaluation Committee Peter Biehl, Chair, Department of Anthropology Krissy Costanzo, Committee Staff Support; Academic Affairs March.

Advertisements

Using the Seven Principles as a Framework for the Evaluation of Student Ratings and Teaching Karl Wirth and Adrienne Christiansen Serie Center for Scholarship.

Using the IDEA Student Ratings System: An Introduction University of Saint Thomas Fall

Teaching and Learning Center What Do We Offer?? 9/27/2012.

Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System

IN SUPPORT OF STUDENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE COURSE TRANSFORMATION PROGRAM Senate Resolution 1012.

Update from the UNC General Education Council [presented to the UNC Board of Governors’ Educational Planning, Programs, and Policies Committee on February.

New Web-Based Course Evaluation Services Available to Schools and Departments Presentation to Faculty Council November 6, 2009.

What’s it Like to be a Professor? REU July 7, 2009 Michael J. Lewis, Director Department of Computer Science Binghamton University (SUNY)

Program Review and General Education Assessment at the University at Albany: Past, Present and Future Barbara Wilkinson Assistant Director for Assessment.

Coordinator of Assessment Coordinate assessment efforts on campus Maintain the NCCC General Education Assessment Plan Collect assessment results from course.

Promotion and Ten ure October 21, 2014 S. Laurel Weldon Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs (Interim) PURDUE FACULTY.

Monroe Community College 1 Assessment of General Education Social Sciences Knowledge and Skills Area Presenters Frances Dearing, Assessment Coordinator.

Analyzing and Improving College Teaching: Here’s an IDEA Alan C. Lacy, Associate Dean College of Applied Science and Technology Illinois State University.

The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System.

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.

Proposed Revisions to Appendix J Areas of Performance Section IX April 26 and 27, 2007.

Assessing Progress on the Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Quality Enhancement Committee Meeting Department of Academic Effectiveness and Assessment.

School of Medicine –Promotions and Tenure Jane F. Reckelhoff, PhD Chair, SOM Appointments, Promotion and Tenure Committee.

Promotion and Ten ure October 15, 2013 S. Laurel Weldon Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs (Interim) PURDUE FACULTY.

End of Course Evaluation Taimi Olsen, Ph.D., Director, Tennessee Teaching and Learning Center Jennifer Ann Morrow, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Evaluation,

Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System. Learning Objectives for this Session After completing this session you should be able to… 1.Articulate.

Presented by Maria Luz Fernandez, PhD (Diversity Committee Chair) to the University Senate March 2, 2015.

Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.

Gerard L. Hanley, Ph.D. Executive Director, MERLOT Senior Director, California State University Using MERLOT To Support Retention, Tenure, and Promotion.

1 Overview of Issues and Activities of the Planning Committee of Council Presented to University Council October 19, 2006.

Students Course and Teacher Evaluation Please refer to notes at the bottom of this slide.

University Teaching Symposium January 9,  Individual Development and Educational Assessment  Kansas State University  A diagnostic to.

Changes in the Faculty Review Process for United Academics Faculty Presenter: Patricia Linton, College of Arts & Sciences.

Laura Winer Interim Director, Teaching and Learning Services (TLS) MAUT Teaching and Mentoring Workshop for Non-Tenured Academic Staff 25 April 2014.

Teaching Council Recommendations to the Faculty Senate DRAFT 2/9/09 & 3rd DRAFT Feb 13, 2009 for use by the FS Exec Committee, March 4, 2009.

School of Medicine –Promotions and Tenure Jane F. Reckelhoff, PhD Chair, SOM Appointments, Promotion and Tenure Committee.

MACHINE FOR FACILITATION OF EVALUATION OF TEACHING BY STUDENTS.

W W W. C E S. C L E M S O N. E D U / G E / Planning Engineering Education Research Facilitator: Matthew W. Ohland.

Promotion and Ten ure October 2015 Alyssa Panitch Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs PURDUE FACULTY.

Faculty Governance Jane Dillehay Faculty Chair Jan Hafer AAUP Chair 12 August 2011.

College of Charleston Presented by the Faculty Compensation Committee to the Faculty Senate April 7, 2015 Faculty Salary Resolution Update.

Matthew L. S. Gboku DDG/Research Coordinator Sierra Leone Agricultural Research Institute Presentation at the SLARI Annual Retreat 26 – 28 October, 2015.

COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FACULTY COMPENSATION COMMITTEE Report to Faculty Senate November 5, 2013.

IDEA Ad Hoc Committee Report Submitted by: Andreas Veh, Diane Erickson, Nelta Edwards, Kerri Morris UAA Faculty Senate, Dec. 7, 2007.

Assessing Progress on the QEP: Status Update Quality Enhancement Committee Meeting Department of Academic Effectiveness and Assessment.

Patty Francis Associate Provost Institutional Assessment & Effectiveness.

Report from the Working Group on NTT Faculty APRIL 17, 2013.

Institutional Planning and Effectiveness Integrated system of review that helps drive the overall mission of the College!!! Office of Institutional Research.

P&T Update: College of Medicine, Carol S. Weisman, PhD Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs Distinguished Professor of Public Health Sciences.

1 Identifying Instruction-Related Research Issues Deborah Lines Andersen School of Information Science and Policy University at Albany June 26, 2004.

1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.

Documenting Your Teaching and Student Evaluations

CURRICULUM-CHANGE APPROVAL PROCESSES

New and Improved Annual Reviews

Unit 3 Introduction to Marketing

Rice Pilot of IDEA evaluation system

Andrew Caudill Western Kentucky University

Motivation to Examine Grading at Rice

Course Evaluation Committee

Summer/Winter Programs

A Report to The Faculty Senate From The Committee on Teaching

Objectives What is the P & T process?

Heather Brod, Executive Director of Faculty Affairs and FAME

Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations

Provost Guidelines for Submission of Tenure on Hire Requests to the University Promotion and Tenure Committee.

Pilot Goals Focus Consistency Response

Departmental Evaluation Criteria

Faculty Senate Mission

Assessment Day Strategy

Promotion Tenure and Reappointment

Accreditation follow-up report

Extension Title Series

Welcome to FSU Janet Kistner VP Faculty Development & Advancement

Fall 2016/Spring 2017 Administrative Review Process Update

Presentation transcript:

Update to the Faculty Senate on the approved (2015) pilot of the IDEA course evaluation instrument 1 April 20, 2016

IDEA Pilot: Fall semester 2016 Committee Arnaud Chevallier Provost’s Office Mike Gustin Committee on Teaching Michele Biavati Committee on Teaching Fred Oswald Dept of Psychology Betsy Barre Center for Teaching Excellence Josh Eyler Center for Teaching Excellence John Cornwell Office of Institutional Effectiveness Diane Butler IT Justin Schilke Registrar

IDEA pilot, more Sampling strategy – all fall courses will have Rice instrument, with a fraction of the courses doing both Rice and IDEA Faculty effort for IDEA – fill out learning objectives form Seek feedback, make recommendation: switch to IDEA, keep Rice instrument or create new instrument

Three primary uses of course evaluation: 1)Assist faculty in improving their teaching; 2)Assist students with relevant information as they select which courses to take; and, 3)Assist decision-makers in the case of salaries, promotion and tenure. The IDEA Committee will seek feedback from stakeholders in such processes. 4

The benefits of IDEA include: 1)Validated with hundreds of thousands of students, thousands of courses, and is currently used at hundreds of universities; 2)Most thorough, especially on questions of teaching and learning that the current Rice instrument does not have; 3)Responses to items on the instrument can help faculty improve teaching behavior. 4)Technology is more facile. 5)May be better fit for NTT evaluation system.

6

7 QUESTIONS CONSIDERED 1.Has the instrument been research validated (i.e., has it been proven, through numerous studies, to measure what it claims to measure)? 2.Is the instrument easy to complete and/or administer? 3.Do the results control for known biases (class size, student interest, discipline)? 4.Do the results provide useful, formative feedback for faculty? 5.What sorts of questions does the form ask (teaching behaviors? progress on learning outcomes? contextual questions?) 6.Can the instrument be customized? 7.Does the instrument require us to give an external company access to Rice data? 8.Is the instrument cost effective?