CROP*A*Syst A confidential, voluntary risk assessment of field- based management practices.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michael Brewer, Thomas Green, Joy Landis, and Brenna Wanous Michigan State University IPM Program IPM Institute of North America Grower Incentives for.
Advertisements

Nutrient Management: Planning and Trends
What is the Future of Feed Management? Or Life After the “P” Project C. C. Stallings Professor and Extension Dairy Scientist.
Local Food Planning Jackie Forbes, MS Health Planner.
Sustainability in Agriculture Jennifer Elwell Kentucky Corn Growers/Kentucky Small Grain Growers Farm PR Network.
Evaluation of Resources Sustainable Small Acreage Farming & Ranching What are the possibilities?
21 Acres Soil Assessment Team: Martin Herrin, Melody Hearten-Johnson, and Aileen Ponio Water and Sustainability BIS 392.
Performance–based Incentives for Conservation in Agriculture (PICA)
Environmental Impact Assessment: A Land Use Planning Tool Diane Sherman, Ben Purdy, and Sara Felker Department of Resource Development Introduction Environmental.
Alachua County Cooperative Extension Division of Community Support Services.
Business Environmental Risk Management Ray Massey University of Missouri Commercial Ag Program,
Field Assessment for Water Resource Protection Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service.
Findings of MGSP 2008 Survey 2008 MGSP Kickoff 28 October 2008.
Findings of MGSP 2008 Survey Center for Economic Analysis Michigan State University 12 November 2008.
Rick Koelsch University of Nebraska – Lincoln Bob Broz University of Missouri - Columbia.
A gricultural E nvironmental M anagement NYS Soil & Water Conservation Committee Department of Agriculture & Markets A E MA E M.
Swayam Shikshan Prayog Groots International & Huairou Commission
Desired Outcomes / Impacts ActionsKnowledge Occurs when there is a behavior change based upon what participants have learned (medium term): -Adoption of.
New Ag Waiver for the San Diego Region (including Temecula Valley) Water Quality Workshop Rancho California Water District November 6, 2008 Presented by.
Agricultural Best Management Practices For Protecting Water Quality Recommended by Georgia Soil and Water Conservation Commission and approved by the EPD.
Nutrient Management Planning Canada-Manitoba Farm Stewardship Program Steve Sager, P.Ag. Soil Resource Specialist Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada-PFRA.
Land Treatment and the Conservation Planning Process CNMP Core Curriculum Section 3 — Land Treatment Practices.
C&T: State Regulatory Programs & Variations North American Pesticide Applicator Certification and Safety Education Workshop Madison, WI. Gina M. Davis.
Nutrient Management Research Conducted by Market Directions for the Conservation Technology Information Center.
APPLYING CONSERVATION TO THE TEXAS LANDSCAPE Norman Bade, NRCS State Resource Conservationist Conservation Provisions of the 2002 Farm Bill (Farm Security.
2 -1 Lesson 2 Whole Farm Nutrient Planning By Rick Koelsch, University of Nebraska.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
BROUGHT TO YOU BY: BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERS IN ANIMAL AGRICULTURE WELCOME TO MANURE MANAGEMENT JEOPARDY! Section 1 Nutrient Management Building Environmental.
Training Module 7. What You’ll Learn In This Module In what areas may Conservation Districts enter into a contractual agreement with Michigan Department.
Natural Resource Conservation Service Local Work Groups.
Our Mission Helping people help the land. NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service Our Vision Productive Lands ---- Healthy Environment.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan Scott Sturgul Nutrient & Pest Management Program Soil & Water Management Farm & Industry Short Course Feb. 16,
LOWER L’ANGUILLE WATERSHED COST SHARE PATRICIA PERRY ST. FRANCIS COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT.
2014 Private PSEP Evaluation University of Nebraska—Lincoln Extension.
Sediment & Nutrient Management in the L’Anguille River Watershed St. Francis County Cost Share Project Patricia Perry St. Francis County Conservation.
Field Specific Decisions: N vs P CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Desired Outcomes / Impacts ActionsKnowledge Occurs when there is a behavior change based upon what participants have learned (medium term): Development.
Green Jobs and Agriculture Green Today, Jobs Tomorrow Conference May 11, 2009 James Johnson, Director Environmental Stewardship Division Michigan Department.
Lecture 2. Agricultural Pollution Control in the Baltic Sea with Special Emphasis on Manure Management Prepared by Assoc. Prof. Philip Chiverton, SLU and.
Your Name A + G or J Your Company’s Name MN PIE – City Your Legal Signature Today’s date All.
Pesticides: What You Need to Know Some of the rules and how the game is played.
T20-1 Soil Science and Management, 4E Chapter 20 Government Agencies and Programs.
Using Manure as Fertilizer Saves $ On this 120 acre farm with 40 cows the manure is worth $5000 It is fertilizer already on the farm, as is the nitrogen.
1 Evaluating the Impact of Farmstead Assessments: Providing Information, Educating, and Changing Environmental Stewardship Behaviors of Michigan Farmers.
Chapter 9 Section 9.4 – Cloning  Clone  Clone- a member of a group of genetically identical cells 2.
Department of Environmental Science and Technology Nutrient Management Planning Patricia Steinhilber Coordinator, Ag Nutrient Management Program.
Kg P per county (1000) > < 45 Figure 4 Estimated P production from confined livestock. kg N per county (1000) > 908 Figure.
Protecting and saving water. Partnership Overview Who we are Our accomplishments Our challenges Our priorities.
Nutrient Management Summary CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Presented By: Boone County Conservation District.
Michigan’s Safe Food Risk Assessment Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development.
Manure Management and Water Quality By Jeff Lorimor, Iowa State University, Ames 32-1.
Crop*A*Syst Training Allen Krizek Roberta Dow Christina Curell Fred Springborn Josh Appleby Marilyn Thelen.
1 AFO or CAFO: Evaluating environmental issues on your farm Winter Dairy Management 2009 Karl Czymmek PRO-DAIRY Cornell University and Greg Albrecht NYS.
What The Agricultural Industry Is Doing Now A Focus On “Nutrient Service Providers” Douglas Busdeker The Andersons, Inc. & Ohio AgriBusiness Association.
Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program.
Nutrient Management Planning for CAFO & AFO Fundamentals Nutrient Management Training Dec. 16 &17, 2009 Tom Basden WVU Extension Service.
Mary Apostolico Potomac Watershed Manager. Current Authorities for TMDL Process Federal Clean Water Act, § 303(d) - TMDL List & TMDL Development §303(e)
MAEAP History 1998 – Industry vision
Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program
Livestock Yards Management Manure nutrients and pathogens are potential surface and groundwater contaminates. Remove and utilize manure nutrients as a.
Water Use & Irrigation Management
PRT 2008 Lecture 9.
Agricultural Best Management Practices For Protecting Water Quality
Recommendations for further study:
Transporting Hazardous Agricultural Supplies
Manure’s Fertility Value
Agriculture WIP Phase III Development Update
21 Acres Soil Assessment Team: Martin Herrin, Melody Hearten-Johnson, and Aileen Ponio Water and Sustainability BIS 392.
Agriculture media Planning Guide
Presentation transcript:

CROP*A*Syst A confidential, voluntary risk assessment of field- based management practices

Links two environmental programs

Same recommendations MGSP groundwater protection MAEAP environmental assurance Michigan Right to Farm guidelines MSU Extension and NRCS Industry supported practices

Farm*A*Syst vs. Crop*A*Syst Farm Headquarters Field-based activities

Crop*A*Syst Based on… Right to Farm guidelines State and Federal environmental laws Consistency among MAEAP system Applies to all cropping systems Crop specific management practices +

Crop*A*Syst Now available Field crops Corn Soybeans Wheat Sugar beets Vegetables Nursery crops and Christmas trees Tree and Small fruit Greenhouse

Why do a Crop*A*Syst? Your family & neighbor’s health Protect farm value Demonstrate good stewardship Foster positive community and neighbor relationships “Good faith effort” liability protection MGSP cost-share and incentive payment CSP readiness - records

Format Risk questions & answers Answers classified… Low – Medium – High Risks Conformance with RTF guidelines Illegal practices Required level for MAEAP verification

Example risk question How often are fields tested for nutrient levels?

Example answers

Records needed for verification Field names or maps Acres in cropped portions of the fields Up-to-date soil test reports Or, a schedule to bring all test up-to- date.

CROP*A*Syst Contents Nutrient management General mgt practices Nitrogen Phosphorus Manure Bio-solids Soil and water conservation Environmentally sensitive areas

Contents (continued) Pest management General pest mgt practices Pesticide application Water use Crop specific management practices Corn Soybeans and alfalfa Wheat Potato Sugar beet Vegetables Pasture Management Irrigation management Other environmental risks

Cropping System Improvement Action Plan Identified high or medium risk practices Planned lower risk management practices Timelines Immediately Future

Crop*A*Syst risk questions 2-4 hours depending on complexity of farm Implementation schedule Additional time to assemble/review records Any record system okay

Re-certification Credits 4 credits Completed with a trained individual  Groundwater Technician Private or commercial pesticide applicator 12 re-certification credits (private) required in 3 years

Cropping System verification

To get started… Contact your Groundwater Technician Conservation District MSU Extension