Intellectual Property Association March 7th, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Information And Procedures
Advertisements

Anatomy of a Patent Application Presented by: Jeong Oh Director, Office of Technology Transfer & Industrial Development Syracuse University April 30, 2009.
The Patent Bar March 10, 2015 Scott Skiles, JD ‘15
College Credit Now (Dual Enrollment) Information And Procedures * Subject to change based on legislative action.
HIGH SCHOOL /COLLEGE DUAL ENROLLMENT Information And Procedures * Subject to change based on legislative action.
Introduction and Overview.   PowerPoint  Civil Service chapter 10 rules  Planning and evaluation form  Performance notes  Request for review Handouts.
Filing for a United States Patent “Helpful Hints” U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
1 1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association USPTO Updates Including Glossary Pilot Program Chris Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. IP Practice.
VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION AVECO July 14 – 18, 2014 Centralized Certification.
TC1600 Appeals Practice Jean Witz, Appeals Specialist.
The Office of Licensing and Review. Licensing and Review Located within Technology Center The L&R staff consists of: Licensing and Review adminstrative.
July 8, Enhanced Examination Timing Control Robert A. Clarke Deputy Director Office of Patent Legal Administration
Now you’ve got a product… what next? Next steps in IP.
HIGH SCHOOL / COLLEGE DUAL ENROLLMENT Information And Procedures * Subject to change based on legislative action.
Safekeeping of 35 U.S.C. 156 Extensions
Patent Term Adjustment (Bio/Chem. Partnership) Kery Fries, Sr. Legal Advisor Phone: (571)
Patent Quality Assurance Program. 2 Office of Patent Quality Assurance (OPQA) Deputy Commissioner for Patent Operations Office of Patent Quality Assurance.
1 Patent Term Extension under 35 U.S.C. § 156 Mary C. Till Legal Advisor Office of Patent Legal Administration.
July 18, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818/P.L ) Topic: Patent Fees Office of Patent Legal.
November 19, 2008 Student Intellectual Property Law Association SIPLA A student association dedicated to the promotion of intellectual property issues.
December 8, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818)(upon enactment) and 35 U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by.
February 19, Recent Changes and Developments in USPTO Practice Prepared by: Office of Patent Legal Administration (OPLA) Robert J. Spar, DirectorJoni.
Return of Title IV Funds R2T4 NYSFAAA REGION VII PRESENTER DEBRA HANSEN STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY.
OBTAINING YOUR CMP CERTIFICATION CMP Best Practices and Tips.
Improper Authorizations for Payment October 21, 2008.
Ph.D. Programs in Systems Engineering Prepared by Dr. Jerrell Stracener.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND YOUR RIGHTS Helen Johnstone Seminar 12 July 2006 EAST MIDLANDS INTERNATIONAL TRADE ASSOCIATION.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Request for Extension of Protection of International Registration to the United States.
 Many more eligible applications are received than spaces available.  50 spaces are available.  The application period is once a year.
The 4-Year College Plan College Academic Vocabulary.
VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION COMPLIANCE SURVEYS GI Bill ® is a registered trademark of the United States Department.
2011 Industry Sponsored Research Workshop INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Michael Jaremchuk Associate Director CVIP Phone: FAX:
Post-Completion Optional Practical Training International Students & Scholars Office Tess Casler, Director.
HIGH SCHOOL / COLLEGE DUAL ENROLLMENT Information And Procedures * Subject to change based on legislative action.
OPT Workshop RIT International Student Services Spring Semester, 2015.
NCAA Eligibility Basics
Seminar Industrial Property Protection Prague, 4 June 2003 Patent Protection in Europe Heidrun Krestel Liaison Officer Member States Co-operation Programmes.
1 United States Patent and Trademark Office PTA Post Wyeth USPTO OPLA - Kery A. Fries PTA Post Wyeth Wyeth v. Kappos (Fed. Cir. Jan. 7, 2010 )
 Many more eligible applications are received than spaces available.  50 spaces are available.  The application period is once a year.
Department of Engineering Management, Information & Systems Systems Engineering Program Proposed PhD with a Major in Systems Engineering Jerrell Stracener,
FY09 Restriction Petition Update; Comparison of US and National Stage Restriction Practice Julie Burke TC1600 Quality Assurance Specialist
SMALL DECISIONS… …BIG IMPACTS Bobby Lothringer, University Registrar (940)
VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION Compliance Surveys October 6, 2015.
Chris Fildes FILDES & OUTLAND, P.C. IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting AIPLA Annual Meeting, October 20, 2015 USPTO PILOT PROGRAMS 1 © AIPLA 2015.
Prosecution Group Luncheon Patent October PTO News Backlog of applications continues to decrease –623,000 now, decreasing about 5,000/ month –Expected.
Department of Engineering Management, Information & Systems Systems Engineering Program Proposed PhD with a Major in Systems Engineering Jerrell Stracener,
Academic policies and Degree requirements for PhD students.
Ph.D., in Applied Science with Major in Systems Engineering 2001 Vs Prepared by: Gerard Ibarra.
Introduction and Summary of the Developments towards Certification of Patent Information Professionals.
Fresno City College’s RN Program LVN To RN Articulation Stephanie R. Robinson, RN Director of Nursing (559)
Serving the Public. Regulating Professional Engineering. How to become a Professional Engineer in Ontario.
NA, Yanghee International Application Team Korean Intellectual Property Office National Phase of PCT international applications April 26,
Prepared for the KBA Professionalism Committee May 29, 2015 Matthew R. Lyon, Associate Dean for Academic Affairs & Acting Dean April C. Meldrum, Associate.
An introduction to Intellectual property protection TG © Copyright by Stevens Institute of Technology.
Planning for the Patent Bar Exam
Bright Futures Scholarship Program Initial Eligibility
College Academic Vocabulary
The FUNDAMENTALS OF ENGINEERING EXAM for Nuclear Engineers
Alexandria, Virginia July 21, 2014
Child Welfare Certification Process
MOVE ON WHEN READY DUAL ENROLLMENT
Compliance Survey Review
Bright Futures Scholarship Program Initial Eligibility
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
PATENT LAW TREATY Gena Jones Senior Legal Advisor
Master’s theses and graduation
Comparing subject matter eligibility in us and eu
What is it and why should I have it?
The Nuclear Engineering PE Exam and Professional Engineering Licensure
Jonathan D’Silva MMI Intellectual Property 900 State Street, Suite 301
Presentation transcript:

Intellectual Property Association March 7th, 2016

Registration is required to represent patent applicants before the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. Registration is not required for patent litigation, but some firms may prefer you to register. Types of practitioners: ─ Attorneys ─ Agents

Administered by USPTO Office of Enrollment and Discipline (OED): See General Requirements Bulletin at: for full details on the registration process.

Registration requires: ─ U.S. citizen / resident alien status ─ qualifying moral character and fitness ─ scientific and technical training ─ passing the examination itself ─ payment of various fees: Application Fee: $40 Registration Examination Fee: $200 Service Fee: $150 No Annual Registration Fee

Biology Biochemistry Botany Computer Science (accredited) Electronics Technology Food Technology General Chemistry Marine Technology Microbiology Molecular Biology Organic Chemistry Pharmacology Physics Textile Technology Aeronautical Engineering Agricultural Engineering Biomedical Engineering Ceramic Engineering Chemical Engineering Civil Engineering Computer Engineering Electrical Engineering Electrochemical Engineering Engineering Physics General Engineering Geological Engineering Industrial Engineering Mechanical Engineering Metallurgical Engineering Mining Engineering Nuclear Engineering Petroleum Engineering Category A: Bachelor’s Degree in one of the following:

Category B: Bachelor’s Degree in another subject Option semester hours in physics. Option hours in a combination of the following: 8 hours of chemistry or 8 hours of physics, and 24 hours in biology, botany, microbiology, or molecular biology. Option hours in chemistry. Option hours in a combination of the following: 8 hours of chemistry or 8 hours of physics, and 32 hours in chemistry, physics, biology, botany, microbiology, molecular biology, or engineering, or some computer science. ** Must provide transcripts and official descriptions from the catalogs of the year in which you took the course.

Category C: Practical engineering or scientific experience Taken and passed the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam.

100 multiple-choice questions (90 scored): ─ 50 morning session (3 hours) ─ 50 afternoon session (3 hours) Limited “open book” examination: ─ Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP). ─ Provided electronically (as searchable PDF) or hard copy. Administration: ─ computer administration - Prometric. ─ paper administration: July 21 and 22, 2009 in Alexandria, VA. Deadline for application May 15, Must answer 70% of scored questions correctly to pass.

Process: Submit application (available on OED website). Following approval (about one month), schedule test date with Thomson Prometric within 90 days. Test centers: Indy (2), Terre Haute, Carmel, Louisville (2), Lafayette, Evansville, Cincinnati. Receive unofficial test result at end of exam. Official results come later. Pay $100 registration fee. Receive registration certificate automatically.

Types of Questions: ─ Substantive Patent Law ─ USPTO Rules and Procedures

Claim 1 of an application recites “[a]n article comprising: (a) a copper substrate; and (b) a electrically insulating layer on said substrate.” The specification defines the term “copper” as being elemental copper or copper alloys. In accordance with the patent laws, rules and procedures as related in the MPEP, for purposes of searching and examining the claim, the examiner should interpret the term “copper” in the claim as reading on: (A) Elemental copper only, based on the plain meaning of “copper.” (B) Copper alloys only, based on the special definition in the specification. (C) Elemental copper and copper alloys, based on the special definition in the specification. (D) Any material that contains copper, including copper compounds. (E) None of the above.

Claim 1 of an application recites “[a]n article comprising: (a) a copper substrate; and (b) a electrically insulating layer on said substrate.” The specification defines the term “copper” as being elemental copper or copper alloys. In accordance with the patent laws, rules and procedures as related in the MPEP, for purposes of searching and examining the claim, the examiner should interpret the term “copper” in the claim as reading on: (A) Elemental copper only, based on the plain meaning of “copper.” (B) Copper alloys only, based on the special definition in the specification. (C) Elemental copper and copper alloys, based on the special definition in the specification. (D) Any material that contains copper, including copper compounds. (E) None of the above.

In accordance with the patent laws, rules and procedures as related in the MPEP, which of the following is patentable subject matter under 35 USC 101? (A) A novel and unobvious abstract idea. (B) A previously undiscovered law of nature. (C) A billing process containing mathematical algorithms producing a written invoice. (D) A novel and unobvious discovery of a physical phenomenon. (E) All of the above.

In accordance with the patent laws, rules and procedures as related in the MPEP, which of the following is patentable subject matter under 35 USC 101? (A) A novel and unobvious abstract idea. (B) A previously undiscovered law of nature. (C) A billing process containing mathematical algorithms producing a written invoice. (D) A novel and unobvious discovery of a physical phenomenon. (E) All of the above.

In accordance with the patent laws, rules and procedures as related in the MPEP, which of the following fees may not be reduced by 50 percent for “small entities”? (A) The basic filing fee for a design patent application. (B) The fee for a disclaimer. (C) The fee for a petition for an extension of time. (D) The fee for recording a document affecting title. (E) The maintenance fee due at 3 years and six months after grant.

In accordance with the patent laws, rules and procedures as related in the MPEP, which of the following fees may not be reduced by 50 percent for “small entities”? (A) The basic filing fee for a design patent application. (B) The fee for a disclaimer. (C) The fee for a petition for an extension of time. (D) The fee for recording a document affecting title. (E) The maintenance fee due at 3 years and six months after grant.

A registered practitioner filed a utility patent application on May 15, 2000 pursuant to 35 USC 111(a) claiming a detergent composition. On May 15, 2002 the Office mailed a non-final Office action setting a 3-month period for reply. A proper reply was mailed on August 15, 2002 by first-class mail with sufficient postage to the USPTO. The reply was received by the USPTO on September 15, On September 30, 2002, the Office mailed a final Office action. On October 15, 2002, the Office received a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) meeting all of the requirements of 37 CFR On October 30, 2002, the USPTO mailed a Notice of Allowance in view of the RCE and amendment. The utility application issued on February 11, Which of the following statements is in accord with the patent laws, rules and procedures as related in the MPEP concerning the amount of additional term applicant X would receive because of Patent Term Adjustment (PTA)? (A) The patentee would earn PTA because the Office failed to mail at least one notification under 35 USC 132 or notice of allowance under 35 USC 151 no later than fourteen months after the date the application was filed under 35 USC 111(a) but would lose some earned PTA because applicant did not file a response to the non-final rejection within three months. (B) The patentee would earn PTA because the Office failed to mail at least one notification under 35 USC 132 or notice of allowance under 35 USC 151 no later than fourteen months after the date the application was filed under 35 USC 111(a) and would not lose any earned PTA because applicant filed a response to the non final rejection within three months. (C) The patentee would not earn any additional time under the provisions of PTA because the application is utility application, not a design application. (D) The patentee would not earn any additional time because the application was filed prior to May 29, 2000 and the filing of the RCE would not make the application eligible for PTA. (E) The patentee would earn PTA because the filing of the RCE on October 15, 2002 makes the application eligible for PTA and the Office did not mail at least one notification under 35 USC or notice of allowance under 35 USC 151 within 14 months of the date the application was filed under 35 USC 111(a).

A registered practitioner filed a utility patent application on May 15, 2000 pursuant to 35 USC 111(a) claiming a detergent composition. On May 15, 2002 the Office mailed a non-final Office action setting a 3-month period for reply. A proper reply was mailed on August 15, 2002 by first-class mail with sufficient postage to the USPTO. The reply was received by the USPTO on September 15, On September 30, 2002, the Office mailed a final Office action. On October 15, 2002, the Office received a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) meeting all of the requirements of 37 CFR On October 30, 2002, the USPTO mailed a Notice of Allowance in view of the RCE and amendment. The utility application issued on February 11, Which of the following statements is in accord with the patent laws, rules and procedures as related in the MPEP concerning the amount of additional term applicant X would receive because of Patent Term Adjustment (PTA)? (A) The patentee would earn PTA because the Office failed to mail at least one notification under 35 USC 132 or notice of allowance under 35 USC 151 no later than fourteen months after the date the application was filed under 35 USC 111(a) but would lose some earned PTA because applicant did not file a response to the non-final rejection within three months. (B) The patentee would earn PTA because the Office failed to mail at least one notification under 35 USC 132 or notice of allowance under 35 USC 151 no later than fourteen months after the date the application was filed under 35 USC 111(a) and would not lose any earned PTA because applicant filed a response to the non final rejection within three months. (C) The patentee would not earn any additional time under the provisions of PTA because the application is utility application, not a design application. (D) The patentee would not earn any additional time because the application was filed prior to May 29, 2000 and the filing of the RCE would not make the application eligible for PTA. (E) The patentee would earn PTA because the filing of the RCE on October 15, 2002 makes the application eligible for PTA and the Office did not mail at least one notification under 35 USC or notice of allowance under 35 USC 151 within 14 months of the date the application was filed under 35 USC 111(a).

A patent specification discloses a personal computer comprising a microprocessor and a random access memory. There is no disclosure in the specification of the minimum amount of storage for the random access memory. In the disclosed preferred embodiment, the microprocessor has a clock speed of megahertz. Claims 9 and 10, presented below, are original claims in the application. Claim 11, presented below, was added by amendment after an Office action. 9. A personal computer comprising a microprocessor and a random access memory that includes at least 1 gigabyte of storage. 10. The personal computer of Claim 9, wherein the microprocessor has a clock speed of megahertz. 11. The personal computer of Claim 10, wherein the random access memory is greater than ½ gigabyte of storage. Which of the following statements is or are in accord with the patent laws, rules and procedures as related in the MPEP regarding the respective claims under the fourth paragraph of 35 USC 112? (A) Claim 9 is a proper independent claim, and Claims 10 and 11 are proper dependent claims. (B) Claim 9 is a proper independent claim, and Claims 10 and 11 are improper dependent claims. (C) Claim 9 is an improper independent claim, and Claims 10 and 11 are improper dependent claims. (D) Claim 9 is an improper independent claim, and Claims 10 and 11 are proper dependent claims. (E) Claim 9 is a proper independent claim, Claim 10 is a proper dependent claim, and Claim 11 is an improper dependent claim.

A patent specification discloses a personal computer comprising a microprocessor and a random access memory. There is no disclosure in the specification of the minimum amount of storage for the random access memory. In the disclosed preferred embodiment, the microprocessor has a clock speed of megahertz. Claims 9 and 10, presented below, are original claims in the application. Claim 11, presented below, was added by amendment after an Office action. 9. A personal computer comprising a microprocessor and a random access memory that includes at least 1 gigabyte of storage. 10. The personal computer of Claim 9, wherein the microprocessor has a clock speed of megahertz. 11. The personal computer of Claim 10, wherein the random access memory is greater than ½ gigabyte of storage. Which of the following statements is or are in accord with the patent laws, rules and procedures as related in the MPEP regarding the respective claims under the fourth paragraph of 35 USC 112? (A) Claim 9 is a proper independent claim, and Claims 10 and 11 are proper dependent claims. (B) Claim 9 is a proper independent claim, and Claims 10 and 11 are improper dependent claims. (C) Claim 9 is an improper independent claim, and Claims 10 and 11 are improper dependent claims. (D) Claim 9 is an improper independent claim, and Claims 10 and 11 are proper dependent claims. (E) Claim 9 is a proper independent claim, Claim 10 is a proper dependent claim, and Claim 11 is an improper dependent claim.

 Before graduation: ─ Looks good on resume. ─ Must front costs yourself.  After graduation but before starting work: ─ Firms will pay for fees and bar review course. ─ Must also study for state bar exam. ─ Knowledge from law school will help.  After graduation and after starting work: ─ Typically within first two years as an associate. ─ Firms will pay for fees and review course. ─ Preparation more difficult: Time off OR No time off per se but you may receive billable or non-billable hours credit.

B743 Patent Law Course ─ Helpful but not necessary. Patent Bar Review Course ─ Does not teach you patent law. ─ Teaches you what you need to know to pass the exam. ─ One-week courses are very condensed. ─ Study-at-home; need self discipline. Take old exams. ─ Many questions are repeated from past exams.

Live lectures often take place on the coasts. They are given infrequently. Courses that offer both live and at-home options generally include the same written and computerized materials with both. Courses include computerized sample questions and exam simulation software.

Name & WebsiteCostDescription BAR/BRI$1,895 (student rate) Live: Six day-long lectures At-Home: Same lectures on DVD or streaming audio or video Practising Law Institute (PLI)$1,845 (student rate) Live: Five day-long lectures At-Home: Same lectures on DVD, CD-ROM, or audio CD Patent Resources Group (PRG)$2,290 (student rate) Live: Six day-long lectures At-Home: Same lectures on DVD PATBAR.com$995 (student rate) Live: None At-Home: Lectures on DVD or audio CD Jim Longacre $1,349 $1,095 Live: None At-Home: Lectures on video iPod or Audio CD/CD-ROM Patent Education Series (PES)$647Live: None At-Home: No lectures but some materials on CD-ROM and audio CD OmniPrep$395 / $295Live: None At-Home: Materials online

Past exams: Patent Bar Simulator: $4.99/1 exam; $14.99/4 exams; $30/9 exams Pass rates: 27-70%