Software and TDAQ Peter Lichard, Vito Palladino NA62 Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 2014 Ferrara.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kondo GNANVO Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne FL.
Advertisements

LAV trigger primitives Francesco Gonnella Photon-Veto Working Group CERN – 09/12/2014.
Data Acquisition System for 2D X-Ray Detector Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility (BSRF) located at Institute of High Energy Physics is the first synchrotron.
CHEP04 - Interlaken - Sep. 27th - Oct. 1st 2004T. M. Steinbeck for the Alice Collaboration1/20 New Experiences with the ALICE High Level Trigger Data Transport.
CHEP04 - Interlaken - Sep. 27th - Oct. 1st 2004T. M. Steinbeck for the Alice Collaboration1/27 A Control Software for the ALICE High Level Trigger Timm.
LKr readout: present and future R. Fantechi 30/8/2012.
Data Acquisition Software for CMS HCAL Testbeams Jeremiah Mans Princeton University CHEP2003 San Diego, CA.
Straw electronics Straw Readout Board (SRB). Full SRB - IO Handling 16 covers – Input 16*2 links 400(320eff) Mbits/s Control – TTC – LEMO – VME Output.
Emulator System for OTMB Firmware Development for Post-LS1 and Beyond Aysen Tatarinov Texas A&M University US CMS Endcap Muon Collaboration Meeting October.
+ discussion in Software WG: Monte Carlo production on the Grid + discussion in TDAQ WG: Dedicated server for online services + experts meeting (Thusday.
R. Fantechi. DAQ tools My feelings Not dealing with readout stuff No TEL62, no CREAMS, etc But the auxiliary software needed to run the experiment After.
Status of NA62 straw electronics and services Peter LICHARD, Johan Morant, Vito PALLADINO.
Plans for the 2015 Run Vito Palladino Straw Working Group 2/2/2015.
DAQ & ECS for TPC commissioning A few statements about what has been done and what is still in front of us F.Carena.
Management of the LHCb DAQ Network Guoming Liu * †, Niko Neufeld * * CERN, Switzerland † University of Ferrara, Italy.
Clara Gaspar, March 2005 LHCb Online & the Conditions DB.
R. Fantechi. TDAQ commissioning Status report on Infrastructure at the experiment PC farm Run control Network …
Features of the new Alibava firmware: 1. Universal for laboratory use (readout of stand-alone detector via USB interface) and for the telescope readout.
Introduction CMS database workshop 23 rd to 25 th of February 2004 Frank Glege.
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
4 th Workshop on ALICE Installation and Commissioning January 16 th & 17 th, CERN Muon Tracking (MUON_TRK, MCH, MTRK) Conclusion of the first ALICE COSMIC.
Status of NA62 straw electronics Webs Covers Services Readout.
LKR Working group Introduction R. Fantechi October 27 th, 2009.
News on GEM Readout with the SRS, DATE & AMORE
Kraków4FutureDaQ Institute of Physics & Nowoczesna Elektronika P.Salabura,A.Misiak,S.Kistryn,R.Tębacz,K.Korcyl & M.Kajetanowicz Discrete event simulations.
Installation status Control Room PC farm room DetectorsEB Infrastructure 918 ECN3.
R. Fantechi. Shutdown work Refurbishment of transceiver power supplies Power supplies dismounted Shipped to Orsay this week Refurbishment work to start.
Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
5 June 2003Alan Norton / Focus / EP Topics1 Other EP Topics Some 2003 Running Experiments - NA48/2 (Flavio Marchetto) - Compass (Benigno Gobbo) - NA60.
FPD STATUS Carlos Avila Uniandes/UTA 1. FPD overview 2. Roman pot and detector status 3. FPD readout integration status 4. Software status 5. Stand-alone.
RunControl status update Nicolas Lurkin School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham NA62 TDAQ Meeting – CERN, 14/10/2015.
TDAQ Experience in the BNL Liquid Argon Calorimeter Test Facility Denis Oliveira Damazio (BNL), George Redlinger (BNL).
Trigger matched firmware Top Level block diagram 4ch 3.2gbps deserializer “Test Assembly 1” Module Latency buffer 1GB DDR2 DRAM a.c.r The GTKRO.
“Planning for Dry Run: material for discussion” Gianluca Lamanna (CERN) TDAQ meeting
Peter LICHARD CERN (NA62)1 NA62 Straw tracker electronics Study of different readout schemes Readout electronics frontend backend Plans.
October Test Beam DAQ. Framework sketch Only DAQs subprograms works during spills Each subprogram produces an output each spill Each dependant subprogram.
R. Fantechi. Shutdown work Refurbishment of transceiver power supplies Work almost finished in Orsay Small crisis 20 days ago due to late delivery of.
SRB data transmission Vito Palladino CERN 2 June 2014.
LKr readout and trigger R. Fantechi 3/2/2010. The CARE structure.
Management of the LHCb DAQ Network Guoming Liu *†, Niko Neufeld * * CERN, Switzerland † University of Ferrara, Italy.
FW and HW Status TDAQ WG 10/6/2015. Hardware MPOD: ◦ HV was NOT floating   Sensibility of current limit to external devices  Particularly for chamber.
1 Tracker Software Status M. Ellis MICE Collaboration Meeting 27 th June 2005.
NA62: The LKr Electronics Matt Huszagh. Installation & Setup (1/5) Crate Setup 8 vertical columns of 4 crates Almost all installed.
Straw VME Data Monitoring M. Koval Straw WG meeting
The NA62 Spectrometer Acquisition System TWEPP 2015, Lisbon Peter Lichard and Vito Palladino - CERN On Behalf of NA62 Straw Working Group.
Straw readout status Status and plans in Prague compared with situation now Choke and error Conclusions and plans.
S.Anvar, V.Gautard, H.Le Provost, F.Louis, K.Menager, Y.Moudden, B.Vallage, E.Zonca, on behalf of the KM3NeT consortium 1 IRFU/SEDI-CEA Saclay F
Event Management. EMU Graham Heyes April Overview Background Requirements Solution Status.
TELL1 readout in RICH test: status report Gianluca Lamanna on behalf of TDAQ Pisa Group (B.Angelucci, C.Avanzini, G.Collazuol, S.Galeotti, G.L., G.Magazzu’,
The NA62RunControl: Status update Nicolas Lurkin School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham NA62 TDAQ Meeting – CERN, 10/06/2015.
Plans for the 2015 Run Michal Koval, Peter Lichard and Vito Palladino TDAQ Working Group 25/3/2015.
Status of LAV electronics commissioning Mauro Raggi, Francesco Gonnella Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati 1 Mauro Raggi - Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati4.
R. Fantechi 2/09/2014. Milestone table (7/2014) Week 23/6: L0TP/Torino test at least 2 primitive sources, writing to LTU, choke/error test Week.
LAV electronics status report Mauro Raggi and Francesco Gonnella TDAQ meeting NA62 Collboration Meeting 1-5 September 2014 Ferrara.
Sumary of the LKr WG R. Fantechi 31/8/2012. SLM readout restart First goal – Test the same configuration as in 2010 (rack TS) – All old power supplies.
Report from the straw working group H. Danielsson 8/29/13Plenary Liverpool, H. Danielsson.
PC-based L0TP Status Report “on behalf of the Ferrara L0TP Group” Ilaria Neri University of Ferrara and INFN - Italy Ferrara, September 02, 2014.
Straw (T)DAQ Peter Lichard, Vito Palladino NA62 Collaboration Meeting, Sept Ferrara.
Straw Working group Ferrara 4/9/2014. Outline Status and Plans Installation of Chambers 1-3 Chamber 4 Vacuum test SRB Readout, monitoring and software.
DAQ and Trigger for HPS run Sergey Boyarinov JLAB July 11, Requirements and available test results 2. DAQ status 3. Trigger system status and upgrades.
THIS MORNING (Start an) informal discussion to -Clearly identify all open issues, categorize them and build an action plan -Possibly identify (new) contributing.
Straw readout status Run 2016 Cover FW SRB FW.
Gu Minhao, DAQ group Experimental Center of IHEP February 2011
Status of NA62 straw electronics and services
Status of NA62 straw readout
Enrico Gamberini for the GTK WG TDAQ WG Meeting June 01, 2016
Vito Palladino Straw Working Group 23/3/2015
Online Control Program: a summary of recent discussions
Run experience Cover FW SRB FW DAQ and monitoring
Presentation transcript:

Software and TDAQ Peter Lichard, Vito Palladino NA62 Collaboration Meeting, Sept Ferrara.

Straw DAQ Straw will have 2 operational modes: ◦ Triggerless ◦ Standard L0 matching Triggereless mode: we will record all the data coming from the detector (it might not be suitable for run with full intensity, 148Tb/d of data throughput), and the trigger time stamps, each PC in pc farm will record data coming from 2 SRBs Standard mode: will send data within a tunable time window (from 0ns to 800ns with 25ns step).

Possible Solution for TL Mode Straw 4 Straw 3 Straw 2 Straw 1 SRB8 SRB7 SRB6 SRB5 SRB4 SRB3 SRB2 SRB1 SRB8 SRB7 SRB6 SRB5 SRB4 SRB3 SRB2 SRB1 SRB8 SRB7 SRB6 SRB5 SRB4 SRB3 SRB2 SRB1 SRB8 SRB7 SRB6 SRB5 SRB4 SRB3 SRB2 SRB1 Opt Switch 2x1Gb/s Switch Opt Switch 10(+10)Gb/s PC farm PC 10Gb/s 1Gb/s Merger 10Gb/s

Data Handling (First Step) SRBs are equipped with 2x1Gb/s Ethernet ports each to transmit data, UDP packets are assembled in Event manager (data are read from the DDR3) and then forwarded to the physical link, First (fake) data from SRB have been sent to PC farm (19/08/2014).

Data Handling (First Step) SRBs are equipped with 2x1Gb/s Ethernet ports each to transmit data, UDP packets are assembled in Event manager (data are read from the DDR3) and then forwarded to the physical link, First (fake) data from SRB have been sent to PC farm (19/08/2014).

Data Handling (First Step) SRBs are equipped with 2x1Gb/s Ethernet ports each to transmit data, UDP packets are assembled in Event manager (data are read from the DDR3) and then forwarded to the physical link, First (fake) data from SRB have been sent to PC farm (19/08/2014).

RUN Control RUN control provides the management of the detector, SBC will be the bridge between RUN control commands and hardware (SRB and COVER configuration), The RUN control is not yet implemented: ◦ Riccardo has already prepared an interface for the LKr that can fit our requirements, Next week we plan to install the SBCs (the VME bridge) at least for straws 1, 2, and 3, ◦ At the same time we can install and test the software form the RUN control side

Monitoring VME Monitoring: The SRBs will be able to use the full statistic (in and outside the burst) to generate histograms like the occupancy of each channel (VME online monitoring), These histograms are stored in the VME manager and than forwarded (to PC farm? Dedicated PC?), In case of in-spill monitoring we will send the data in accordance to the general rules of the experiment, PC farm Monitoring: Monitoring from the data stored in PC farm is also foreseen, ◦ Inter-station correlations, ◦ Tracking samples, ◦ …

VME Monitoring (in-SPILL) ~ ~ ~ ~ SOB EOB ~ ~ BURST (SRB signal) Needed to wait “late” data from COVERs (few  s) Monitoring data sent to SBCs SPILL (integration time)

VME Monitoring (off-SPILL) ~ ~ SOG (Start Of Gap) EOB ~ ~ BURST (SRB signal) Tunable integration window (from few  s up to SPS cycle) EOG (End Of Gap) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Gap between SPS cycle and command to perform off-spill operations

Software EOB data Need to add information coming from non-TEL62 based detectors i.e. DCS data for the KTAG, LKr calibration settings, Straw eob data, etc. Basic mechanism discussed, protoype implemented, to be reviewed Based on DIM publishing Add the data to the EOB event of the various detectors Decoding left to detector reconstructions Plan to add derived classes to SpecialTrigger class Riccardo, 02/09/2014 TDAQ meeting

Viewer Example to follow: KTAG on-line monitoring (Technical Run)

Database The final solution of parameters storage is a database, Emanuele Leonardi (Rome) is working on it The WG (me) needs to provide the structure of this DB that will store all the information we need to initialize the detector: ◦ Thresholds ◦ SRB configuration (timing, delays, eth configuration, hsl configuration, PLL, etc.) We can start with a simple TXT (or XML) file

Software Ethernet controller ✓ Thresholds setting and getting ✓ Noise scan ~ (to be tested) SRB firmware upload ✗ COVER firmware upload ✓ (working on the old SRB to be tested on the new one) Run control ✗ (sw from LKr) Monitoring ✗ Concerning the SRBs, anything to add to the list that you think is needed for the Run…

Conclusions and Plans The first (small) step toward SRB integration within the TDAQ system has been done, Software will be completed within next 2/3 weeks (at least the main parts), Run control must be tested text week Monitoring is not in a good shape but we can have something Next steps toward October the 6th: 1. Develop the firmware to send realistic (but still fake) data to PC farm, 2. Installation of the new SBCs is planned for the next week, 3. Next week is foreseen a first implementation of RUN control, 4. Real data in PC farm (~ mid Sept.), ◦ Coarse time ordering (steps of 25ns) not immediately ready, 5. L0 matching will be next step, 6. On line monitoring.

Spares

Data Formats

The coarse time (16-MSB) can 1.64 ms time resolution

Data Throughput (DT) Full luminosity20% FL1% FL Average rate per Straw (kHz) DT per SRB (Gb/s) Data per SRB per Burst (MB) DT per station (Gb/s) Data whole detector (TB/d)~148~30~1.5