Permitting Workshop 310 Permit AMFM Conference Fairmont Hot Springs Mar 15,2016 Karl Christians DNRC CDB 444-3022.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lawyer Creek Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project presented by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
Advertisements

Riparian Thinning: Logic Paths for Silvicultural Prescriptions
Idaho Conjunctive Management Rules & Ground Water District Formation
401 Water Quality Certification South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control.
Water Supply Law Use and ownership of water ( Water Law). Riparian Doctrine – land owners have a right to use water adjacent to their land (but they cannot.
Fresh Water Chapter 7 Sections 1-4 SOL 6.7.
Streambed Alteration Agreements. Notification Required F&GC § 1600  Notification is required for any project that will: –substantially divert or obstruct.
PENNSYLVANIA CODE Title 25.Environmental Protection Chapter 102 Erosion and Sediment Control Clean Streams Law-Act 394 of To preserve and improve.
Somerset Flooding Summit The Role of Riparian Owners Graham Clark CLA SW.
Bill Orme, Senior Environmental Scientist, State Water Board Liz Haven, Asst. Deputy Director, Surface Water Regulatory Branch, State Water Board Dyan.
May 2005 Petition for Rulemaking for Regulation of CBM Development Bob Bukantis Water Quality Standards DEQ Planning Division.
Waters of the U.S. The EPA land grab. Background Water has always been regulated, either by states or the federal government. The federal law is the Clean.
Module #3 HISTORY OF THE CONSERVATION MOVEMENT. Conservation District History ► Early 1930s – Depression rocked the country ► Dust Bowl – unparalleled.
Hydroelectric Relicensing in Vermont Brian Fitzgerald Vermont Agency of Natural Resources.
Coastal Zone Management.  Coastal Zone Management Act (1972) –Administered by Coastal Programs Division of NOAA –Covers over 22% of U.S. Land Area –Multi-purpose.
In The Beginning —Public Law 46 was passed by Congress: Established soil and water conservation and wise land use as a national policy Created the.
BACWA Wet Weather Management Workshop Spill Notification Requirements Melissa Thorme Downey Brand LLP Sacramento, CA
Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research Program Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research.
Presentation to the Workshop Climate Change and Great Lakes Water Levels March 30, 2001 Chicago, Illinois Gerald E. Galloway, Jr., P.E., Ph.D. International.
Yellowstone River Compact Commission Technical Committee Discussions Sheridan County Courthouse Sheridan, WY April 24, 2007 Bighorn Reservoir operations.
Wetlands Mitigation Policy Sudbury Wetlands Administration Bylaw April 27, 2015.
ANRC AACD Arkansas Conservation Districts Training Program Power Point 12 Arkansas Natural Resources Commission.
Soil and Water Conservation in Georgia Improving Georgia’s Natural Resources to Help People Help the Land Georgia Association of Georgia Soil and Water.
Acquisition of Flood Control Easements Triangle High-Ground Area City of West Sacramento, Yolo Co. Meeting of the Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
Commercial Webinar Series 1 hour presentation Questions will be answered at the end. For technical questions, call
Conservation Districts in New York Training Module 1.
Introduction to PA Act 167 Stormwater Management Planning Little Juniata River Watershed April 21, 2005.
CONSERVATION MILESTONES A Brief History of SWCDs Angela P. White, Ph.D.
Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal Chapter 105 Dam Safety and Waterway Management February 21, 2007.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Lakes District At Louisiana State University CAP 206 Project US Army Corps of Engineers New Orleans District.
Chumstick Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land development, road construction, and other human activities have affected channel migration and sediment.
Icicle Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land Development has affected stream channel movement, off channel habitat, and LWD recruitment. Barriers to migration.
2010 Florida Building Code: I nterpretation P rocess O verview.
State Waters Determination and Stream Buffers
Annexations as a Means to Preserve Open Space October 29, 2009.
The Clean Water Act © Dr. B. C. Paul (Jan. 2000).
Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.
Regional Water Availability Rulemaking Chip Merriam Water Resources Advisory Commission February 8, 2007 Chip Merriam Water Resources Advisory Commission.
“The minimum flow for a given watercourse shall be the limit at which further withdrawals would be significantly harmful to the water resources or ecology.
Nam Ton Watershed Group 2 SangHuyToe Cost and Benefit analysis of Irrigation and Agriculture Development.
Marin County Watershed Stewardship Program Marin County Department of Public Works.
STRATEGIES FOR FRESHWATER. CONTEXT FOR STRATEGIES.
Bath and North East Somerset – The place to live, work and visit Local Flood Representative Meeting 08 October 2015.
R ESOLUTION P ROCESS. Intro to Resolutions A conservation district supervisor should understand the importance of participating in the state and national.
The Mekong River Commission: Challenges, Mission, and Strategies.
Post-Flood Training - Municipal Officials/Contractors Rick Weidenbach, Executive Director Delaware County Soil & Water Conservation District Scotty Gladstone,
MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION PROGRAMMES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Flow Standard Amendment to New York’s Water Quality Standards Regulations Scott J. Stoner Chief, Standards.
1 Calcasieu River & Pass, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting February 2, 2005 Project Manager Mireya Laigast, Civil Engineer,
The Mekong River Commission: Challenges, Mission, and Strategies.
The Jordan Cove Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline and Terminal.
GBLWMP-SLUP Integration Meeting February 4-5, 2010 Sahtu Land Use Planning Board.
Leading Your District To Be All That It Can Be David Williams, Deputy Director Div. of Soil & Water Conservation 2016 Spring Area Meetings.
permitting.
AGENCY ROLES Level 1B: Advanced Fundamentals July 2016 LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL 1.
Legislative History. First enacted in 1934  Enacted due to concerns over the loss of commercial and sport fisheries from water resource developments.
OPEN SPACE/ CONSERVATION
GOOSE CREEK WATERSHED LEVEL I STUDY SCOPING MEETING
Welcome! Lake County Conservation District
Conservation Districts
Supervisor, RIDEM RIPDES Permitting Program
Legal Responsibilities of a Conservation District
Continuing Authorities Program
Hudson Wetlands Protection Bylaw
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Flood Plain Regulations
Level 1B: Advanced Fundamentals Effective August 2018
Review of planned subdivisions
Presentation transcript:

Permitting Workshop 310 Permit AMFM Conference Fairmont Hot Springs Mar 15,2016 Karl Christians DNRC CDB

Background of the Natural Streambed and Land Preservation Act “310 permit” Conservation Districts History (1939) History of 310 (1975) Purpose Who Administers the program Who must apply Definition of a project Jurisdiction (covered by Dan) Navigating the Permitting Process Applicability Permitting Process

History of Conservation Districts Conservation Districts.. A little history. Early 1930s, the Dust Bowl.

On May 12, 1934, a major storm hit the plains, later to be described by Hugh Hammond Bennett (A soil conservationist) as a turning point in the battle to get public attention to the erosion problem. Congress unanimously passed Soil Conservation Act of April 27, 1935.

Caught on across the country with district-enabling legislation passed in every state. Montana passed the Montana Conservation District Law (Section , MCA) in Wibaux CD & Sheridan CD were the first CD’s formed in Montana on Jan 15, Today, there are 58 conservation districts in MT. CD’s become reality in Montana

The Key to Success of Conservation Districts: Three-fourths of the continental United States is privately owned, and 59% in Montana. Congress realized that only active, voluntary support from landowners would guarantee the success of conservation work on private land. CD’s operate under the direction of a Board of Supervisors Supervisors are elected yet are not paid. They volunteer countless hours away from their own businesses to share their knowledge, experience, passion and dedication to the protection of the natural resources in their area.

Questions on Conservation Districts in general?

History of the Natural Streambed and Land Preservation Act (310 Program) Implement the Natural Streambed and Land Preservation Act of 1975 Senate HB 310, 1975 Legislature Title 75, Chapter 7, MCA Rules 36, Chapter 2, ARM 310 Committee * Joint Permit (1990’s) (Used by all permitting agencies) * Montana Stream Permitting (Guide for CD supervisors) * Guide to Stream Permitting in Montana (Used by many)

Purpose of the 310 Law * To protect and preserve streams and rivers in their natural or existing state. * Minimize soil erosion and sedimentation. Who Administers the Law? * The Local Conservation District (CD) Board

CD Authority Intent -- policy. (2) It is the policy of the state of Montana that its natural rivers and streams and the lands and property immediately adjacent to them within the state are to be protected and preserved to be available in their natural or existing state and to prohibit unauthorized projects and, in so doing, to keep soil erosion and sedimentation to a minimum, except as may be necessary and appropriate after due consideration of all factors involved… Further, it is the policy of this state to recognize the needs of irrigation and agricultural use of the rivers and streams of the State of Montana and to protect the use of water for any useful or beneficial purpose as guaranteed by the Constitution of the State of Montana.

Definition of “Project”: “Any activity that results in a change in the state of a natural perennial-flowing stream or river, its bed, or its immediate banks.” This can also mean a project can be located on a drainage that is not perennial flowing that in the event of a storm event, could cause sediment or erosion in or on a perennial stream. Jurisdiction will be cover a bit later today.

WHO MUST APPLY? Any private, nongovernmental individual or entity that proposes to work in or near a stream. "Stream" means any natural perennial-flowing stream, or river, its bed, and immediate banks, and its channels and includes the entire stream from its mouth to its source even if portions go dry periodically. The term does not include a stream or river that has been designated by district rule as not having significant aquatic and riparian attributes in need of protection or preservation under , MCA. "Natural perennial-flowing stream" means a stream, which in the absence of diversion, impoundment, appropriation, or extreme drought, flows continuously at all seasons of the year and during dry as well as wet years.

310 Committee: Model Rules Joint Permit (1990’s) (Used by all permitting agencies) Montana Stream Permitting (Guide for CD supervisors) Guide to Stream Permitting in Montana (Used by many)

Number of 310 permits processed in 2013

310 permits processed for… Year Total AG Total Forestry Total Mining Total Other Total All %5%3%56% %7%3%48% %5%3%56% %4%3%44% %6%4%44%1125

Navigating the Permitting Process

“Any activity that results in a change in the state of a natural perennial-flowing stream or river, its bed, or its immediate banks.” Law applies to: Perennial-flowing streams Flows all year May be dry due to extreme drought or use Immediate banks Above high water mark to a point where a project doesn’t physically alter a stream Located on a drainage that is not perennial flowing that in the event of a storm event, could cause sediment or erosion in or on a perennial stream. Definition of a Project:

Example of activities/projects that need a 310? Channel Changes/ Dredging Culverts Bridges Dams, Reservoirs, and Ponds New Diversions Stream Bank Protection Projects Fords Trenching in Pipelines Boat Ramps/Docks Other

PROCESS CD Receives Application Initially Reviews and Accepts or Not Two ways Time Frame Starts When Accepted Notify FWP Has 5 days to say if they want an inspection Though their participation is required, it is advisory only

PROCESS cont’d Supervisors to determine : The purpose of the project If the project is reasonable Law sets forth criteria to determine reasonableness Information gathered on application Sets up Team inspection Team member reports has checklists

FWP Landowner/ applicant CD Rep Team inspection Consists of three parties

Six Criteria Note: Do Not Design The Applicants Project 1. Effects of soil erosion and sedimentation: 2. Risk of flooding or erosion problems upstream or downstream: 3.Effects of stream channel alterations: 4. Effects of stream flow, turbidity, or water quality caused by materials used or by removal of ground cover: 5. Effects on fish and aquatic habitat: 6. Are there reasonable alternatives to reduce disturbance to stream or better accomplish the purpose of the Project?

Within 30 days, team members submit a report in writing to the supervisors Use forms Supervisors decide to approve, modify, or deny team’s recommendations Notify applicant within 60 days of acceptance of application PROCESS cont’d

15-day waiting period after supervisors decision (permit) CD, if all members agree, may waive waiting period A team member may ask for arbitration if the disagree with board’s decision PROCESS cont’d

The Review Process

Questions..?