1 Trends in drug development programs in the era of Personalized Medicine Gunnar Saeter, M.D., Ph.D. Head, Institute for Cancer Research Oslo University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Zeroing in on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Integrating Targeted Therapies into Practice.
Advertisements

Clinical Implementation of Genomic Cancer Medicine
Targeted Cancer Therapeutics, LLC Investor Presentation.
Statistical Issues in Incorporating and Testing Biomarkers in Phase III Clinical Trials FDA/Industry Workshop; September 29, 2006 Daniel Sargent, PhD Sumithra.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH Working with FDA: Biological Products and Clinical Development Critical Path.
Drug/Disease Modeling & Simulation in Oncology Mendel Jansen Director Modeling & Simulation Translational Medicine & Clinical Pharmacology, Daiichi Sankyo.
Clinical Perspective. Screening/Prevention Who is at risk for what type Decision to Intervene: Risk Assessment normal Evidence of Disease Disability Death.
Acquired Resistance Patient Forum September 6, 2014 | Boston In ALK, ROS1 & EGFR Lung Cancers Clinical trial design and development of highly targeted.
HIGHLIGHTS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF BREAST CANCER
Re-Examination of the Design of Early Clinical Trials for Molecularly Targeted Drugs Richard Simon, D.Sc. National Cancer Institute linus.nci.nih.gov/brb.
Filling in the holes: Other oncology trial designs Methods in Clinical Cancer Research February 19, 2015.
Discovery of new medicines through new models of collaboration Simon Ward Professor of Medicinal Chemistry & Director of Translational Drug Discovery Group.
CR-1 Concluding Remarks and Risk/Benefit Summary Mace L. Rothenberg, MD Professor of Medicine Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center.
NDA Study MP-US-M01. Division of Oncology Drug Products 2 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1962 Substantial Evidence = Adequate and well-controlled.
First-Line TKI Use in EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC
New Developments in Cancer Treatment Dulcinea Quintana, MD.
The Need for Organ Site Specific Cancer Research John T Isaacs Chemical Therapeutic Program Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins.
Challenges in Incorporating Integral NGS into Early Clinical Trials
Efficacy and Safety of Single Agent Sunitinib in Treating Advanced Hepatocelluar Carcinoma Patients After Sorafenib Failure: A Prospective, Open-Label,
Annual prostate cancer symposium February 23, 2013 The Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 2nd “ Novel Therapeutic Strategies for Prostate Cancer ”
Results of Docetaxel Plus Oxaliplatin (DOCOX) +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric and/or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Results.
Michael Birrer Ian McNeish New Developments in Biology and Targets of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.
Systemic Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Living with a Moving Landscape Neal J. Meropol, MD Fox Chase Cancer Center May 16, 2005.
Metals in Medicine Consortium Sydney Cancer Centre.
Single Patient Use of Investigational Anticancer Agents: An Industry Perspective Gerard T. Kennealey, MD Vice President, Clinical Research, Oncology AstraZeneca.
European Statistical meeting on Oncology Thursday 24 th, June 2010 Introduction - Challenges in development in Oncology H.U. Burger, Hoffmann-La Roche.
Developing medicines for the future and why it is challenging Angela Milne.
Two Year Estimate of Overall Survival in COMBI-v, a Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Combination of Dabrafenib and Trametinib With Vemurafenib.
Adam Heathfield, PhD Senior Director, Worldwide Policy, Pfizer Inc. September 25, 2013 Personalised Medicine – an industry perspective.
The Use of Predictive Biomarkers in Clinical Trial Design Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National Cancer Institute
Using Predictive Classifiers in the Design of Phase III Clinical Trials Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National Cancer Institute.
Final Efficacy Results from OAM4558g, a Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating MetMAb or Placebo in Combination with Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC Spigel DR.
FDA’s Public Workshop: Innovative Systems for Delivery of Drugs and Biologics: Scientific, Clinical, and Regulatory Challenges Paul Goldfarb, MD, FACS.
PHASE II/III BIOMARKER-DRIVEN MASTER PROTOCOL FOR PREVIOUSLY TREATED SQUAMOUS CELL LUNG CANCER. (LUNG-MAP) THIS SLIDE DECK CONTAINS AN OVERVIEW OF THE.
S1400 Revision #3 Training Slides
S1207: Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Use of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy +/- One Year of Everolimus in Patients.
Patients access to investigational drugs Steinar Aamdal Dept. of Clinical Cancer Research Oslo University Hospital.
Agency Review of sNDA SE-006 DOXIL for Ovarian Cancer Division of Oncology Drug Products Office of Drug Evaluation 1 Center for Drug Evaluation.
Frontier Pharma Innovative Licensing Opportunities in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma 2015 Published on : August No. Pages : 115.
Dr Marco Matos Medical Oncologist Gold Coast Cancer Care, Gold Coast University Hospital and, Pacific Private Oncology Group.
Personalized medicine in lung cancer R4 김승민. Personalized Medicine in Lung Cancer patients with specific types and stages of cancer should be treated.
httpwww.youtube.com/watch?v=DhxD6sVQEYc:// The Drug Discovery Process.
Immuno-Oncology Axel Hoos, MD, PhD Senior Vice President, Oncology R&D
Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis Presented By: Michael Difilippantonio, Ph.D. October 1, 2015.
Drug Development at CINJ Evolving challenges. Phase 1 Studies at CINJ Early drug trials– Fits easily in scope for single or limited number of institutions.
Weekly Paclitaxel Combined with Monthly Carboplatin versus Single-Agent Therapy in Patients Age 70 to 89: IFCT-0501 Randomized Phase III Study in Advanced.
Clinical and Research Updates in Gynecologic Oncology
Recent Advances in NSCLC Treatment
Brian Boulmay, MD LSUHSC- New Orleans Section of Hematology & Oncology
The Stages of a Clinical Trial
ANALGESIC, ANESTHETIC, AND ADDICTION CLINICAL TRIAL TRANSLATIONS, INNOVATIONS, OPPORTUNITIES, AND NETWORKS (ACTTION) Public-Private Partnership WITH.
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
Metastatic Head Neck Cancer and Immunotherapy
Seeking Treatments for PSC Out of the Desert and into the Woods
Nivolumab in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R cHL): Clinical Outcomes from Extended Follow-up of a Phase 1 Study.
Rosell R et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 7503.
Christopher S. Lathan, M. D. , M. S. , M. P. H
Abraxane-Pembro nei carcinomi uroteliali avanzati
Clinical Drug Development
Intervista a Lucio Crinò
Finland, a Global Testbed for Personalized Cancer Research?
Figure 2 Multiscale modelling in oncology
Introduction. For Pulmonologists by Pulmonologists: Diagnosis of NSCLC in an Age of Biomarkers.
Reviewer: Dr. Sunil Verma Date posted: December 12th, 2011
Adam Falconi, BSc, Pharm, Gilberto Lopes, MD, MBA, Jayson L
A New Approach to Clinical Trials
Ali Shamseddine,MD,FRCP
Jennifer Gauvin, Group Head and Director
role of comparative oncology in translational research
Presentation transcript:

1 Trends in drug development programs in the era of Personalized Medicine Gunnar Saeter, M.D., Ph.D. Head, Institute for Cancer Research Oslo University Hospital Institute for Cancer Research

Disclosures Global Director of Scientific Affairs, Merck (MSD) Oncology Institute for Cancer Research

Drugs in clinical development

Institute for Cancer Research Industry Cost of a Successfully Developed New Molecule $137 $319 $445 $802 $1,300 $0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1, Millions of $ Includes cost of 90% failures…

Institute for Cancer Research Historically: Statistical significance but marginal clinical benefit Years of enrollment...

Institute for Cancer Research Main Challenges in Drug Development 1.Insufficient patient benefit 2.Long time line until patient access 3.High failure rate 4.Unsustainable cost Major Opportunities & Changes in the ”Era of Personalized Medicine”

Institute for Cancer Research Main Challenges 1.Insufficient patient benefit 2.High failure rate 3.Long time line 4.Unsustainable cost Responses 1. Targeted attack on tumour driving abnormalities

PI3K Targeted attack on key cell signalling abnormalities in the tumour at hand…. 1. Single drug and combinations EGFR Institute for Cancer Research

PI3K Sosman et al., N Engl J Med 2012; 366: Institute for Cancer Research

Selectively attacking the sustained driving abnormality: The imatinib - KIT example in GIST Survival

Institute for Cancer Research Main Challenges 1.Insufficient patient benefit 2.High failure rate 3.Long time line 4.Unsustainable cost Responses 1. Targeted attack on tumour driving abnormalities 2. Biologically based approach with ↑ efficacy and ↓ toxicity Survival

Institute for Cancer Research Paradigm shift away from general mechanisms of action: Narrow therapeutic window with effects on tumour and normal tissues..

Institute for Cancer Research Main Challenges 1.Insufficient patient benefit 2.High failure rate 3.Long time line 4.Unsustainable cost Responses 1. Targeted attack on tumour driving abnormalities 2. Biologically based approach 3. Novel study designs with need for fewer patients 4.

Institute for Cancer Research From: Phase I Safety No efficacy Phase II Single arm Efficacy Phase III Large random. Benchmark Registration Phase IV Pharmaco-vigilance Cost benefit Optional To: Approval (high failure rate) (Conditional) Approval (Approval re-assessment) (Approval re-assessment) (Conditional) Approval Phase I Safety Efficacy signal Biomarker research Randomized Phase II Low patient number Efficacy verification Biomarker verification Phase III Low patient no. Confirmatory Phase IV Long term safety May be conditional Phase I expansion Dose/schedule refinement Efficacy Biomarker refinement Changes in Study Design & Conduct

Institute for Cancer Research Hamid et al., N Eng J Med 2013 Accelerated FDA approval on expanded Phase I: Pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma Sept Keynote 001 Ph. I study activated Feb. 2011

BATTLE 2: Adaptive randomized design for NSCLC who have failed at least one front-line chemotherapy regimen Primary Endpoint: 8-week Disease Control Continue on study if stable or response.. If progression, subject has option of re- enrolling into BATTLE-2 program * EGFR Mut + EML4-ALK + Excluded Biopsy performed. Biomarker profile obtained Adaptive Randomization (AR) Subject assigned to one of the treatment arms based on K-Ras mutational status Statistical Modeling and Biomarker Selection Refined AR based on CLIA certified markers (n=4-6) STAGE 1 N=200 STAGE 2 N=200 ErlotinibErlotinib + AKTi MEKi + AKTI SORAFENIB ErlotinibErlotinib + AKTi MEKi + AKTI SORAFENIB

Institute for Cancer Research Some other traits in drug development...

PARP mTOR BRAF

Need for combinations: Pharma-Pharma collaboration PI3K Institute for Cancer Research EGFR

Institute for Cancer Research Big Pharma Pharma downscaling discovery and early research Essential need for aquisitions & joint ventures with Biotech Happens later in development path to reduce risk Drug development path more dependent on venture capital Higher dependence on academic input & collaboration

Institute for Cancer Research “Preferred Academic Partners”

Institute for Cancer Research

Main Challenges 1.Insufficient patient benefit 2.High failure rate 3.Long time line 4.Unsustainable cost Responses 1. Targeted attack on tumour driving abnormalities 2. Biologically based approach 3. Novel study designs with fewer patients 4. All of the above

Leonard Saltz, 2015 ASCO ? Courtesy of S. Aamdal