Revised Quality Assurance Arrangements for Registered Training Organisations Strengthening our commitment to quality - COAG February 2006 September 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to VET Quality Assurance in the UK Mark Novels 6 th December 2011 Quality Assurance in Technical and Vocational Education and Skills Study.
Advertisements

The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
PQF Induction: Small group delivery or 1-1 session.
IBSA VET Capability Framework
Standards for Training Packages. Outline Outline of the development of the Standards Framework Transition timelines Overview of the Standards Framework.
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
The New Regulatory Policy Landscape Dr Dianne Orr Australian Skills Quality Authority.
Using training packages to meet client needs Facilitator: Gerard Kell.
VET Products for the 21 st Century Luke Behncke Project Manager National Quality Council.
WEA Hunter, VET Essentials and You..  The first workshop of 2011 Four workshops offered across the year all aiming to provide opportunities for tutors.
Delivering Person Centred Outcomes Through on-the-job Learning and Involvement Rosemary Hurtley MSc, Dip COT, FRSA Managing Director 360 Forward The 360.
ASQA The National VET Regulator. Commonwealth Parliament Commonwealth Minister ASQA Standing Committee on Tertiary Education Skills and Employment NSSC.
CEET Conference 2011 Funding VET for Social Inclusion Competitive tendering and contestable funding in VET: approaches to supporting access and equity.
Enhancing Data Quality of Distributive Trade Statistics Workshop for African countries on the Implementation of International Recommendations for Distributive.
A Snapshot of TEQSA Dr Carol Nicoll Chief Commissioner Festival of Learning and Teaching University of Adelaide Tuesday 6 November 2012.
The new VET regulator ASQA Australian Skills Quality Authority.
New Standards for Training Organisations and VET Regulators Stephanie Trestrail Executive Officer TAC.
IS Audit Function Knowledge
Update on the National Tertiary Quality Arena Friday 29 April 2011 Lisa Thompson-Gordon, Principal Consultant QCU.
CEET Conference 2008 Is Quality Assurance Improving? Rob Fearnside, Deputy Director VRQA.
© The Association of Independent Schools of NSW Preparing for the ASQA Audit.
SAFA- IFAC Regional SMP Forum
ASQA The Regulatory Model. The Regulatory Model - Vision Students, employers and governments have full confidence in the quality of vocational education.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Manage an assessment system for training outcomes
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
RTO UPDATE Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA) VET Quality Framework August 2011.
Australia’s Vocational Education & Training (VET) System  Nationally agreed  Strong industry leadership and engagement  Provides skills and knowledge.
1 CHCOHS312A Follow safety procedures for direct care work.
 Supporting excellence in assessment  Encouraging professional development for individuals involved in assessment  Disseminating good practice  Proving.
1 School Inspection Update Key Changes since January 2014 Updates continued 17 June 2014 Name Farzana Aldridge – Strategic Director & Caroline Lansdown.
Presenter-Dr. L.Karthiyayini Moderator- Dr. Abhishek Raut
9-1 Copyright © 2013 McGraw-Hill Education (Australia) Pty Ltd Hill, Hill, Perlitz, Professional Training & Assessment, 1e C HAPTER 9 TAEASS503A Lead assessment.
UNPACKING THE VALIDATION PROCESS
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Verification: Quality Assurance in Assessment Verification is the main quality assurance process associated with assessment systems and practice - whether.
Registrant Engagement Through CPD Aoife Sweeney, Head of Education, CORU - Health and Social Care Professionals Council, Ireland.
Implementation of the Essential Standards The Australian Quality Framework (AQTF) is the national set of standards which assures nationally consistent,
Quality Assurance. Identified Benefits that the Core Skills Programme is expected to Deliver 1.Increased efficiency in the delivery of Core Skills Training.
RPL as a strategic opportunity RTO good practice workshop 04/08 RPL as a strategic opportunity…  Introductions  RPL directions o Where are we now? 
Preparing for Audit. Ambition in Action Audit Workshop for Workforce Development Staff Preparing for Audit.
Introduction to Australian Quality Training Framework (AQTF) Created by VELG June 2010.
January Slide 2 Australian Quality Training Framework (AQTF) The AQTF is the national set of standards which assures nationally consistent,
ASQA The National VET Regulator Mr Jerzy Gill Regional Manager Compliance 25 July 2012.
Unpacking and Implementing Training Packages Linda Hopkins.
Developing a Quality Framework for Community Languages Schools Dr Tim Wyatt Dr Bob Carbines Erebus International Victorian Annual Conference 7 July 2007.
Programme Objectives Analyze the main components of a competency-based qualification system (e.g., Singapore Workforce Skills) Analyze the process and.
VCE VET Scored Assessment For assessors of VCE VET programs VCAA February / March 2008.
Quality Assuring Deliverers of Education and Training for the Nuclear Sector Jo Tipa Operations Director National Skills Academy for Nuclear.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
3-1 Copyright © 2013 McGraw-Hill Education (Australia) Pty Ltd Hill, Hill, Perlitz, Professional Training & Assessment, 1e C HAPTER 3 TAEDES505A Evaluate.
Consistency of Assessment (Validation) Webinar – Part 1 Renae Guthridge WA Training Institute (WATI)
Revised AQTF Standards for Registered Training Organisations Strengthening our commitment to quality - COAG February August 2006.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Assessment Validation. MORE THAN YOU IMAGINE ASQA (Australian Skills Quality Authority) New National Regulator ASQA as of 1 July, 2011.
Learn Local Quality Preaccredited Teachers Community of Practice Moderation Workshop South East Victoria ACFE Region 5 th August 2015.
Key actions:  No national regulator, but AITSL to drive improvement  Provisional and full accreditation  Clear and explicit instructions for providing.
TEQSA The Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
Australian Quality Training Framework (AQTF) What are the changes for existing RTOs? Created by VELG June 2010 Adapted from the VETIG Breakfast 23 June.
Hunter Trainers & Assessors Network (HTAN) Facilitator HTAN Recognition Network – Sue Flindell.
ICAJ/PAB - Improving Compliance with International Standards on Auditing Planning an audit of financial statements 19 July 2014.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
Measures for a national outcomes based audit model Stakeholder consultations.
Raising standards improving lives The revised Learning and Skills Common Inspection Framework: AELP 2011.
Group Training Association of Victoria Members Presentation Prepared and presented by James Nash 25 th February, 2015.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
School – Based Assessment – Framework
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
Consistency of Teacher Judgement
Presentation transcript:

Revised Quality Assurance Arrangements for Registered Training Organisations Strengthening our commitment to quality - COAG February 2006 September 2006

Background COAG “Commitment to Quality” Review the AQTF to focus on quality skills outcomes Implement outcomes based auditing Improve national consistency in implementing the new arrangements

Drivers for change Industry and licensing bodies concerned about the quality of skills outcomes from VET AQTF perceived to be too reliant on documentation and processes Diversity of RTO operations not adequately catered for in AQTF Level of national consistency in regulation of RTOs needs to be improved

Timelines for change Review the AQTF Standards for RTOs by October 2006 Determine outcomes measures for RTOs by December 2006 Introduce the revised AQTF standards and outcomes based auditing model from 1 July 2007

Key tasks for implementation Revise AQTF Standards for RTOs Identify and agree qualitative and quantitative measures for a system of outcomes based auditing Revise standards for Registering Bodies to support outcomes based standards and auditing and improved national consistency Develop criteria and system for recognition of quality committed or outstanding RTOs

Features of the new regulatory approach Quality skills outcomes  RTO Standards streamlined to focus on quality skills outcomes  RTOs to focus on evidence of continual improvement of key operations Outcomes based standards  Measures of RTO performance will be identified to determine whether the quality skills outcomes sought by industry, community and government are being achieved  Performance measures will be published to support consumer choice and continuous improvement

Features of the new regulatory approach Reduced regulatory load  Evidence requirements less prescriptive to better accommodate RTO scope and scale  “Administrative” components of former standards separated from RTO operations that are subject to continuous improvement  Level of regulatory activity will be informed by RTO performance measures and risk data  Audits will take more account of RTO outcomes with less emphasis on the detail of RTO processes where these outcomes are satisfactory

Features of the new regulatory approach Consumer protection  Consumer protection elements and RTO obligations for effective operation of a national VET system of current AQTF retained Improved industry engagement  Occupational licensing bodies to be adequately engaged in regulatory processes to build their confidence in VET outcomes National consistency  Standards for Registering Bodies to be revised to facilitate improved national consistency

Revised standards for Registering Bodies To facilitate national consistency in: Industry engagement Risk management Cross jurisdiction protocols Auditor competencies to focus on quality of teaching and assessment systems Review  Audit tools and methods  Sanctions and conditions  National moderation mechanisms

Revised AQTF Standards for RTOs STANDARDS 1.training and assessment to industry standards 2.services to meet needs of each learner and client 3.responsive management systems Essential elements the underpinning systems and expected results RTOs must continually improve during their registration period CONDITIONS OF REGISTRATION compliance requirements not generally subject to continuous improvement obligations necessary for effective operation of the national VET system OUTCOMES MEASURES valid and reliable measures of RTO performance 1 2

The RTO Guide National guide to provide interpretation of the standards for RTOs Assist RTOs to understand the evidence requirements for each Essential element “Common sense” approach to be taken to evidentiary requirements dependent on size and complexity of RTO Continuous improvement activities required across all Essential elements Systems approach to be taken by RTOs Appropriate level of documentation and records to support continuous improvement and provide evidence for audit

Feedback – the new Regulatory Approach High level of support for outcomes focus Audit model requires careful implementation Important focus on employability and skills Timelines are very tight and difficult to meet

Feedback - The Standards, Conditions and RTO Guide High level of support Clear language, easily understood Further development of the guide required to reflect RTOs of varying scales and scope Clarification of legal force of the Conditions of Registration Concerns about level of documentation still required

Outcomes and performance measures National project being undertaken by PhillipsKPA Investigate qualitative and quantitative measures for a system of outcomes based auditing Measures must be: relevant to RTO standards for RTOs including maintaining high standards of teaching, learning and assessment valid and reliable measures of RTO performance stable over time practical to implement Examining availability and relevance of existing data

RTO Excellence Categories - Aspirational Criteria being developed and trialled through a working group of RTOs and quality experts Supports RTOs that wish to develop their systems in accordance with established quality system approaches Optional level of recognition for RTOs to be assessed by contracted agency – not registering body Two validation points  Quality committed and  Outstanding RTOs will need to provide evidence of ongoing compliance with AQTF Standards for RTOs

RTO Excellence Categories - Aspirational Excellence categories consistent with Business Excellence systems internationally RTOs will need to demonstrate high levels of achievement and continuous improvement across 6 categories Learning and assessment People Client satisfaction Working relationships Leadership Management systems

The path to implementation… Data collection and analysis by RTOs Determining the extent and purpose for reporting of the data

The path to implementation………. Resources and support materials for new Quality Framework RTO Guide Auditor Handbook Outcomes measures Guidelines for data collection and reporting Revised registering body standards Excellence Framework RTO Guide for Excellence

The path to implementation Communication and Professional Development Strategy Information sessions Workshops Training program for auditors Media campaign

Contact VETAB for further information; ph: (02)