Demystifying Project Level MIS: Practical Implementation Dr Eric Weiss Experience Sharing Workshop on MIS for IFAD Projects, Bangkok, 9-10 October 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Mateja Bizilj PEMPAL BCOP KEY CONCEPTS AND APPROACHES TO PROGRAMS AND PERFORMANCE Tbilisi, June 28, 2007.
Advertisements

Results Based Monitoring (RBM)
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Ray C. Rist The World Bank Washington, D.C.
Green Recovery And Reconstruction: Training Toolkit For Humanitarian Aid Project Design, Monitoring and Evaluation Session 2: Environmental Monitoring.
Cross-cutting M&E functions in MENARID MENARID Knowledge Exchange workshop 24th to 28th of March, Hammamet, Tunisia 1.
IFAD Reform towards a better development effectiveness How can we all do better? Mohamed Béavogui Director, West and Central Africa January 2009.
M&E Issues: RAFIP and REP Kaushik Barua Accra, 12 Dec
Role of Result-based Monitoring in Result-based Management (RBM) Setting goals and objectives Reporting to Parliament RBM of projects, programs and.
1 Designing a Monitoring and Evaluation System for a Rural Travel and Transport Project Michael Bamberger Gender and Development Group The World Bank RTTP.
IFAD MONITORING AND EVALUATION HOTEL, ACCRA DEC August 7,
At the end of this module, participants should have a better understanding of the following : Elements of Gender Mainstreaming Basics of Gender Analysis.
Monitoring & Evaluation in World Bank Agriculture and Rural Development Operations SASAR Monitoring & Evaluation Workshop New Delhi; June 20, 2006.
Participants should expect to understand: Concept of M&E Importance of gender in M&E Different steps in the M&E process Integrating gender into program/project.
IRRIGATION, RURAL LIVELIHOODS AND AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1 MONITORING AND EVALUATION: GOOD PRACTICES REGIONAL IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP FOR IFAD-
ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.
A Sourcebook for Monitoring and Evaluating Agricultural and Rural Development Measuring Results in less-than-ideal Conditions Global Donor Platform for.
Indicators Dr Murali Krishna Public Health Foundation of India.
Measuring & Assessing Democratic Governance Pro-poor & gender-sensitive indicators Lorraine Corner.
Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.
Managing staff development Chris Schiller Thursday 31 July 2014.
May 8, 2012 MWP-K Learning Event Monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) framework for the Millennium Water Program, Kenya.
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
1. Development Planning and Administration MPA – 403 Lecture 17 FACILITATOR Prof. Dr. Mohammad Majid Mahmood Bagram.
MARKETS II M&E FRAMEWORK AND CHALLENGES Joseph Obado.
Mastewal Yami Post Doctoral Fellow: Social and Institutional Scientist Challenges to Investment in Irrigation in Ethiopia: Lessons.
W HAT IS M&E  Day-to-day follow up of activities during implementation to measure progress and identify deviations  Monitoring is the routine and systematic.
1 Designing Effective Programs: –Introduction to Program Design Steps –Organizational Strategic Planning –Approaches and Models –Evaluation, scheduling,
The Results-Based System Awoke Kassa ENTRO M&E Officer ENTRO M&E Officer SDCO Capacity Building Workshop IV October 2008 Cairo Nile Basin Initiative.
1 Second Regional Workshop on gender and Poverty Reduction Strategies, September 2003, Siem Reap Gender responsive costing and budgeting Nalini Burn.
UK Aid Direct Introduction to Logframes (only required at proposal stage)
Results achieved under IFAD VII and directions for results measurement under IFAD VIII Edward Heinemann Programme Manager, Action Plan Secretariat, Office.
SUMMARY PROJECT OUTLINE (SPROUT) ITC-ILO/ACTRAV Training Course A : Trade Union Training on ILS & the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles &
MAFF Workshop on INTERNATIONAL BEST Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) PRACTICES 24 August 2010.
Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
1 Malawi Public Expenditure Review: Road Sector 21 November 2007.
1 Module 1 Introduction: The Role of Gender in Monitoring and Evaluation.
The WHY and HOW of a Gender Sensitive Approach to Transport Indicators Pretoria, RSA Nite Tanzarn June 12-14, 2006 Makerere University.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
LIFT Village Organization Study: Findings and Implications 24 February 2016.
Session 7: Planning for Evaluation. Session Overview Key definitions:  monitoring  evaluation Process monitoring and process evaluation Outcome monitoring.
Annual Review 2011 Julian Abrams PART 2: PROJECT DELIVERY COSOP IFAD Country Strategic Opportunities Programme.
SUB-MODULE 4. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2)
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Steps in development of action plans ITC-ILO/ACTRAV Course A3 – Trade Union Training on Information Management for Trade Union Organization, Research.
Session 1 S3.1 session day 5 4 training delivered by lead partners Habitat for Humanity, RedR and Shelter Centre on 2 nd to 9 th July 2011 in Thailand.
Session VII: Formulation of Monitoring and Evaluation Plan
Monitoring and Evaluation
Japan-Caribbean Climate Change Partnership
Translating ideas into proposals for action programmes
Module 2 Basic Concepts.
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Background of the Workshop Managing Information for Results
Session 1 – Study Objectives
How can Communities contribute in Project MIS
CIFSRF Phase 2 (Call 5) SIAC/PSC/Team meeting 13 May 2016, Hawassa
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
Policy and Budget Monitoring and Evaluation
Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation System M E S
CATHCA National Conference 2018
Translating ideas into proposals for action programmes
Results Based Management for Monitoring & Evaluation
Translating ideas into proposals for action programmes
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
Translating ideas into proposals for action programmes
Integrating Gender M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Addis Ababa
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
Presentation transcript:

Demystifying Project Level MIS: Practical Implementation Dr Eric Weiss Experience Sharing Workshop on MIS for IFAD Projects, Bangkok, 9-10 October 2006

Presentation Topics MIS and the Projects Project Level Issues that Can Be Addressed by MIS Links Between MIS and M&E Systems –RIMS –Logframes Practical Methodology for Addressing MIS Design Examples

RIMS, M&E, and MIS in Context MIS Management Information System M&E Monitoring & Evaluation RIMS Results & Impact Management System IMPACT Impact Measurement

RIMS, M&E, MIS, and Logframes: Conceptual Framework Problem Impact Indicators - RIMS Level 3 Outputs Output Indicators - RIMS Level 1 - AWP&B Project Goal Impacts Project Objectives Project Interventions Desired Outcomes Problem Causes Outcome Indicators - RIMS Level 2

“Typical” Project RIMS and M&E Data Flows Other Indicators - Outputs/AWP&B - Outcomes - Impacts IFAD Other Donors Government - Local - National RIMS Data - Level 1 (Outputs) - Level 2 (Outcomes) - Level 3 (Impacts) IFAD RIMS/M&E Data are often not used by the Projects themselves Project

Context for MIS Data MIS Data: Any data used to manage and/or improve project results MIS data comes from multiple sources –M&E/RIMS –Expenditures –Budgets/Financial tracking –Manpower allocation reports –Etc

MIS Support to Projects MIS data can be used to answer questions about the project of basic interest to Project Directors and other project level managers –Is the Project meeting its stated objectives? –Can the Project be made more effective? –Is the Project on schedule (outputs/time)? –Is the Project within budget? –Can the Project be made more efficient? –How can the next Project do better?

OutcomesImpactOutputsActivitiesInputs Can the Project be made more effective? Can the Project be made more efficient? Project Efficiency Project Effectiveness Are we doing well? Did we achieve our objectives and make progress towards our goal?

How can the next Project do better? Source: Introduction to CARE USA Impact Guidelines, Jim Rugh 1999

Example Evaluation Data Promoted farming method Percentage of farmers that have adopted method BaselineMTR Use of fertilizer 4050 Rice intensification 2348 IPM 2745 Intercropping 3248 % Increase

Questions Raised by Example Evaluation Data (Farming Methods) Why did use of fertilizer show such a small percentage gain in farmers? –Inadequate extension work? Insufficient interchanges with farmers? Too few field demonstrations? Poor lead farmers? Wrong crop types selected for demonstrations? Wrong fertilizers used for these crops? –External reasons? Bad weather led to marginal yield results ? Cost too high for farmers?

2 nd Example Evaluation Data IGA Training Topic % of male headed households adopting IGA training % of female headed households adopting IGA training BLMTR% ΔBLMTR% Δ Improved Agriculture Animal Husbandry Making Handicrafts Petty Trading

Questions Raised by 2 nd Example Evaluation Data (Farming Methods) Why are there gender differences in adoption rates for different IGAS? –Gender preferences for different IGAS? –Poor training of some gender groups? –Inadequate targeting of women for some IGAS? What should the Project do in response to these results? –Stop training for some IGAs by gender? –Evaluate training and trainers for gender bias? –Better targeting by gender for some IGAs

Example AWP&B Data Output Indicator TargetActual Number of farmers trained 15,00016,700 Km of roads built and/or rehabilitated Number of self help groups (SHG) formed 4542 Ratio: A/T

Questions raised by Example AWP&B Data Why was there such a discrepancy between the Target and Actual Km of roads built/rehabilitated? –Unrealistic target values? Too optimistic? Terrain difficult to work in? Poor logistics? –Inadequate resources for the job? –Untrained construction personnel? –Rainy season prevented work?

Workshop Evaluation Review Exercise: Training Doctors to Do Specific Assessments

Example Evaluation Results 3: Increase in Organizational Capacity

How Can Projects Define, Collect, and Use MIS Data Decide on Management objectives –Achieve/Exceed Project objectives –Stay within schedule and budget –Develop “Lessons learned” for the future Determine relevant information that will allow assessment of management objectives

How Can Projects Define, Collect, and Use MIS Data - 2 Determine information sources for the needed information –Logframe, RIMS Table –AWP&B –Budgets, financial tracking systems –Other Ensure that Project data collection activities for these sources will provide the needed data Use the collected data to assess project results and to guide improvements as appropriate

When Projects are Preparing to Define, Collect, and Use MIS Data? Remember and follow the “KISS” Rule: Keep It Simple, Stupid