Aviation Products from the Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) Judy E. Ghirardelli National Weather Service Meteorological Development Laboratory Presented.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide 1ECMWF forecast User Meeting -- Reading, June 2006 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
Advertisements

Slide 1ECMWF forecast products users meeting – Reading, June 2005 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting
Gridded MOS – A Prototype System
Accessing and Using GFS LAMP Products National Weather Service Meteorological Development Laboratory Mesoscale Prediction Branch Scott D. Scallion, March.
SIPR Dundee. © Crown copyright Scottish Flood Forecasting Service Pete Buchanan – Met Office Richard Maxey – SEPA SIPR, Dundee, 21 June 2011.
Upcoming Changes in Winter Weather Operations at the Weather Prediction Center (WPC) Great Lakes Operational Meteorological Workshop Dan Petersen, Wallace.
Comparison of Several Methods for Probabilistic Forecasting of Locally-Heavy Rainfall in the 0-3 Hour Timeframe Z. Sokol 1, D. Kitzmiller 2, S. Guan 2.
MDL Accomplishments and Plans: MOS, LAMP, EKDMOS, Storm Surge, AutoNowCaster, VLab NCEP Production Suite Review December 4, 2013.
CCFP COLLABORATIVE CONVECTIVE FORECAST PRODUCT TRAINING SPRING 2005.
MOS Developed by and Run at the NWS Meteorological Development Lab (MDL) Full range of products available at:
Hydrometeorological Prediction Center HPC Medium Range Grid Improvements Mike Schichtel, Chris Bailey, Keith Brill, and David Novak.
Depicting LAMP probabilities and uncertainty in best category forecast New LAMP web page product Judy E. Ghirardelli Scott Scallion National Weather Service.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 Evaluation of WRF Using High-Resolution Soil Initial Conditions from the NASA Land.
Improving Gridded Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) Guidance by Using Emerging Forecast and Observation Systems Judy E. Ghirardelli, Jerome P. Charba,
MOS Performance MOS significantly improves on the skill of model output. National Weather Service verification statistics have shown a narrowing gap between.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
1 Localized Aviation Model Output Statistics Program (LAMP): Improvements to convective forecasts in response to user feedback Judy E. Ghirardelli National.
Aviation Verification and Convection Chris Leonardi WFO RLX August 31, 2005.
Weather Information for the Ballooning Community Jennifer McNatt Lead Forecaster National Weather Service Tampa Bay Office.
Aviation Cloud Forecasts – A True Challenge for Forecasters v       Jeffrey S. Tongue NOAA/National Weather Service - Upton, NY Wheee !
Warm Season Aviation Weather and Resources National Weather Service Chanhassen, MN Center Weather Service Unit Farmington, MN.
Phillip Bothwell Senior Development Meteorologist-Storm Prediction Center 3 rd Annual GOES-R GLM Science Meeting Dec. 1, 2010 Applying the Perfect Prog.
SCAN SCAN System for Convection Analysis and Nowcasting Operational Use Refresher Tom Filiaggi & Lingyan Xin
NOAA FAA-NWS Aviation Weather Weather Policy and Product Transition Panel Friends and Partners in Aviation Weather October 22, 2014.
Future of the NWS What Does It Mean? Where Are We Going? When Are We Going To Get There? How Are We Going To Get There? Aviation Is Foundational.
1 “The dawn came late and breakfast had to wait When the gales of November came slashing When afternoon came it was freezing rain In the face of a hurricane.
CHRIS LEONARDI NWS CHARLESTON WV Improving Information Presentation to Aviation Users April 15, 2010 ER Subregional Aviation Conference.
Enhancing Digital Services Changing Weather – Changing Forecasts Aviation Climate Fire Weather Marine Weather and Sea Ice Public Forecasts and Warnings.
NOAA’s National Weather Service IFP/NDFD Conceptual Overview Michael Tomlinson Office of Climate Water and Weather Services NWS Partners’ Workshop September.
NOAA’s National Weather Service National Digital Forecast Database: Status Update LeRoy Spayd Chief, Meteorological Services Division Unidata Policy Committee.
Utilizing Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) for Improved Forecasting Judy E. Ghirardelli National Weather Service Meteorological Development Laboratory.
June 19, 2007 GRIDDED MOS STARTS WITH POINT (STATION) MOS STARTS WITH POINT (STATION) MOS –Essentially the same MOS that is in text bulletins –Number and.
Summer WAS*IS 2006 National Weather Service Verification Program Overview Brenton MacAloney II National Weather Service Headquarters Silver Spring, MD.
By John Metz Warning Coordination Meteorologist WFO Corpus Christi.
Overview of the Hydrometeorological Prediction Center Precipitation/Flash Flood Products/Services Michael Eckert
OUTLINE Current state of Ensemble MOS
© Crown copyright Met Office Probabilistic turbulence forecasts from ensemble models and verification Philip Gill and Piers Buchanan NCAR Aviation Turbulence.
1 NWS Forecast Grids Served by an NNEW Web Coverage Service AIXM/WXXM Conference Steve Olson Meteorological Development Laboratory Office of Science and.
MDL Lightning-Based Products Kathryn Hughes NOAA/NWS/OST December 3, 2003
Model Post Processing. Model Output Can Usually Be Improved with Post Processing Can remove systematic bias Can produce probabilistic information from.
NOAA/NWS Digital Services 1 Glenn Austin, Transition Manager AMS Corporate Forum Washington, DC March 9-10, 2006.
HEMS Weather Summit – 21 March The Outlook for National-Scale Ceiling and Visibility Products Paul Herzegh Lead, FAA/AWRP National C&V Team.
Collaborative Convective Forecast Product (CCFP).
Science and Technology Infusion Plan For National Digital Forecast Database Science and Technology Infusion Plan For National Digital Forecast Database.
The Evolution of NWS Aviation Weather Services in Chicago Mike Bardou National Weather Service Chicago.
ATS/ESS 452: Synoptic Meteorology Friday 2/8/2013 Quiz & Assignment 2 Results Finish Thermal Wind MOS decoding (Assignment) New England weather.
NOAA/NWS Digital Services 1 National Weather Service Forecast Evolution and Delivery in a Digital Era Glenn Austin Office of Climate, Water, and Weather.
Digital Aviation Services Paving the way for aviation forecasts of the future Cammye Sims Cammye Sims.
1 Gridded Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) Guidance for Aviation Forecasting Judy E. Ghirardelli and Bob Glahn National Weather Service Meteorological.
Briefing by: Roque Vinicio Céspedes Finally Here! The MOST awaited briefing ever! February 16, 2011.
OPERATIONAL 2-H THUNDERSTORM GUIDANCE FCSTS TO 24 HRS ON 20-KM GRID JESS CHARBA FRED SAMPLATSKY METEOROLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY OST / NWS / NOAA.
The LAMP/HRRR MELD FOR AVIATION FORECASTING Bob Glahn, Judy Ghirardelli, Jung-Sun Im, Adam Schnapp, Gordana Rancic, and Chenjie Huang Meteorological Development.
An Examination Of Interesting Properties Regarding A Physics Ensemble 2012 WRF Users’ Workshop Nick P. Bassill June 28 th, 2012.
NOAA/NWS Digital Services 1 NWS Forecast Evolution and Delivery in a Digital Era Glenn Austin Office of Climate, Water, and Weather Services David Ruth.
Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) Judy E. Ghirardelli National Weather Service Meteorological Development Laboratory February 05, 2009.
Improved Gridded Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) Ceiling and Visibility Guidance using HRRR model output Presenting: Judy E. Ghirardelli/Adam Schnapp.
MDL Requirements for RUA Judy Ghirardelli, David Myrick, and Bruce Veenhuis Contributions from: David Ruth and Matt Peroutka 1.
Meteorological Development Lab (MDL) FY15-16 Overview + Future (Direction and Challenges) Dr. Mike Farrar Director, Meteorological Development Lab (MDL)
1 NWS Digital Services American Meteorological Society Annual Partners Meeting San Diego, CA January 13, 2005 LeRoy Spayd National Weather Service Office.
Translating Advances in Numerical Weather Prediction into Official NWS Forecasts David P. Ruth Meteorological Development Laboratory Symposium on the 50.
Developing GFS-based MOS Thunderstorm Guidance for Alaska Phillip E. Shafer* and Kathryn Gilbert Meteorological Development Laboratory, NWS, NOAA
RUC Convective Probability Forecasts using Ensembles and Hourly Assimilation Steve Weygandt Stan Benjamin Forecast Systems Laboratory NOAA.
11 Short-Range QPF for Flash Flood Prediction and Small Basin Forecasts Prediction Forecasts David Kitzmiller, Yu Zhang, Wanru Wu, Shaorong Wu, Feng Ding.
LAMP improvements for ceiling height and visibility guidance*
Realities (NDFD, NDGD, IFPS)
Model Post Processing.
Naval Research Laboratory
Post Processing.
Model Output Statistics
Presentation transcript:

Aviation Products from the Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) Judy E. Ghirardelli National Weather Service Meteorological Development Laboratory Presented at New England Aviation Workshop Gray, ME May 12, 2009

Outline LAMP Overview Brief LAMP Verification Current Status and Products Example of LAMP Application Future Plans

LAMP Overview

Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) Background LAMP is a system of objective analyses, simple models, regression equations, and related thresholds which together provide guidance for sensible weather forecasts LAMP acts as an update to GFS MOS guidance Guidance is both probabilistic and non-probabilistic LAMP provides guidance for aviation elements LAMP bridges the gap between the observations and the MOS forecast

Theoretical Model Forecast Performance of LAMP, MOS, and Persistence LAMP outperforms persistence for all projections and outperforms MOS in the 1-12 hour projections. The skill level of LAMP forecasts begin to converge to the MOS skill level after the 12 hour projection and become almost indistinguishable by the 20 hour projection. The decreased predictive value of the observations at the later projections causes the LAMP skill level to diminish and converge to the skill level of MOS forecasts.

LAMP Guidance Details LAMP provides station-oriented guidance for: –all LAMP forecast elements –~1600 stations –CONUS, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico LAMP provides grid-oriented guidance for: –Thunderstorms: Probability of thunderstorm occurrence in a 2 hour period in a 20-km grid box Best Category Yes/No of thunderstorm occurrence in a 2 hour period in a 20- km grid box –CONUS only As of November 13, 2008, LAMP is running 24 times a day (every hour) in NWS operations Temperature and dewpoint Wind speed, direction, and gusts Probability of precipitation (on hr) Probability of measurable precipitation (6- and 12-h) Precipitation type Precipitation characteristics Thunderstorms Ceiling height Conditional ceiling height Total sky cover Visibility Conditional visibility Obstruction to vision LAMP guidance is in the range of hours in 1 hour projections

Example of blending Observations and MOS

1-3 hr LAMP Thunderstorm forecast Predictor: 21 UTC lightning strike dataPredictor: 12 UTC MOS Thunderstorm Prob – Valid 22 – 00 UTC 21 UTC LAMP Thunderstorm Probability Valid UTC 21 UTC LAMP Thunderstorm Probability Valid UTC

13-15 hr LAMP Thunderstorm forecast 21 UTC LAMP Thunderstorm Probability – Valid 10 – 12 UTC (next day) 12 UTC MOS Thunderstorm Probability – Valid 10 – 12 UTC (next day)

June 8, UTC GMOS - Valid UTC 18 UTC LAMP - Valid UTC Verifying Lightning Strikes UTC

Brief LAMP Verification

0900 UTC LAMP verified against 0000 UTC GFS MOS 0900 UTC LAMP compared to MOS Categorical Visibility < 3 miles

Current Results LAMP in Stats on Demand:

Current Status and Products

Guidance sent out from NCEP on SBN/NOAAPort and NWS FTP Server –ASCII text bulletin –BUFR data –GRIB2 thunderstorm data Available Products: –Guidance viewable in AWIPS D2D and AvnFPS –Website products: Text bulletins Station plots Meteograms Probability/Threshold images Gridded Thunderstorm images

Overview of Available AWIPS Products Available to NWS forecasters via AWIPS –Guidance is viewed as text or graphically by forecasters –Guidance is input into software for preparing TAFs

Website: LAMP Station Plots Elements Flight Category Click an element name on this slide to see its plot Ceiling Height Total Sky Cover Precipitation Type Obstruction to Vision Visibility Wind Speed Probability of Precipitation Wind Gust Temperature Dewpoint Wind Direction

Website: LAMP Station Meteograms Up to 12 displayable LAMP forecast elements Real-time verification of current and past cycles Verification of completed past cycles including the corresponding GFS MOS forecast Features

Website: LAMP Thunderstorms Probabilities and Best Category (Y/N) All Projections

New website graphics New LAMP probability/threshold graphics available on LAMP website: Goal is to depict the LAMP probabilities and information about the related thresholds so that users can have more information about the probabilities underlying the best category forecasts from LAMP One would have more confidence in a chosen category if the probability exceeded the threshold by a large amount, compared to the probability just barely exceeding the threshold. Graphics for stations:  Line plots show probabilities and thresholds by element  Color coded bar charts indicate the confidence in choosing a category by indicating how close the probability was to the threshold Aviation probabilities and associated thresholds easily viewable for all LAMP stations and cycles

LAMP Categorical Forecast Selection Process Probability (%) Does the probability equal or exceed the threshold? The probability of “few” exceeds the threshold value for “few” – therefore LAMP categorical forecast is “few” Category 1Category 4Category 3Category 2Category 5 Does the probability equal or exceed the threshold?

Depicting Probabilistic Information Purpose: indicate to user the uncertainty associated with the Best Category forecasts given the probabilistic information Threshold = dashed black line Probability < thres = green line Probability ≥ thres = red line San Francisco – very small chance of precip St. Louis – slight chance of precip Chicago – slight chance yes and slight chance no precip St. Cloud – high chance of precip

Red=Yes Probability exceeds threshold by more than 10% Orange=Likely Probability exceeds threshold but NOT by more than 10% Yellow = Chance Probability is less than threshold but within 10% Cyan = No Probability is less than threshold by more than 10% LAMP Probabilities and Thresholds for Flight Categories Uncertainty Plot Tab – looking at vis ≤ 5 miles Note that this shows you one condition (e.g., vis ≤ 5 miles). To determine the most likely condition, you should consider rarer conditions first.

Example of LAMP Application

LAMP/CCFP Hybrid Customers can access LAMP guidance and develop products from it. Example: Customers are retrieving LAMP thunderstorm grids from NDGD and producing a LAMP/CCFP Hybrid thunderstorm product: Background ( : “The Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) stakeholders chartered the Weather Evaluation Team (WET) to evaluate and recommend an 8-24 hour convective forecast product to be used for operational planning. For the 2009 convective season, the WET proposed to evaluate the use of LAMP as a complement to the CCFP for convective forecasting. The LAMP-CCFP Hybrid webpage is the outcome of this proposal and is currently a prototype product.”

Future Plans

Minimize inter-element inconsistencies in anticipation of gridding forecasts Gridded LAMP forecasts of: Temperature and dewpoint Winds Probabilities of Ceiling Height Ceiling Height Probabilities of Visibility Visibility

Future Plans Redevelop LAMP station guidance of ceiling height and opaque sky cover Inter-hour station-based LAMP using SPECI observations Convective cloud tops?

Questions? LAMP Website: – Training Materials: –Powerpoint Presentations, each one should take less than 1 hour to complete – Training on LAMP Background: “An Introduction to The Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP)” by David Rudack. Training on LAMP Products: “Accessing and Using GFS LAMP Products” by Scott Scallion. Contact:

Backup Slides

The probability of vis < 1 mile (solid line) does not exceed the threshold (dashed line). Look to next rarest category. LAMP Probabilities and Thresholds for Flight Categories Threshold Plot Tab Look at rarest of these categories first.

LAMP Probabilities and Thresholds for Flight Categories Threshold Plot Tab Look at next rarest of these categories. The probability of vis < 3 miles (solid line) exceeds the threshold (dashed line) only for the last hour; therefore this condition is indicated for only that hour. Look to next rarest category to determine the conditions for other hours.

LAMP Probabilities and Thresholds for Flight Categories Threshold Plot Tab Look at next rarest of these categories. The probability of vis ≤ 5 miles (solid line) DOES exceed the threshold (dashed line) at times; therefore this condition is indicated for those times. Note that vis ≤ 5 is not chosen for the last hour, because a rarer condition (vis < 3 miles) was already indicated.

LAMP Probabilities and Thresholds for Flight Categories Threshold Plot Tab Show all together. Looking at these categories, look at the rarest first, then the next rarest, etc. The condition indicated is the rarest probability which exceeds its threshold. This is indicated by the red probability line.