Training for organisations participating in Peer Review of Paediatric Diabetes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Team/Organization Name Background and structure Location Brief system information (type, size) Pilot population.
Advertisements

Quality Accounts: Stakeholder Engagement. Introduction.
South West Specialised Commissioning Group Selena Blake – Senior Commissioning Manager / TYA Programme Manager South West Specialised Commissioning Group.
The Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency Ltd Continuous Improvement in Residential Aged Care.
Peer Review of Cancer MDTs Presentation to Gynae Regional Group, 22nd May 2009.
NMAHP – Readiness for eHealth Heather Strachan NMAHP eHealth Lead eHealth Directorate Scottish Government.
Internal verification and external standards moderation.
Managing the Performance of Homecare Medicines Services Jane Kelly, Procurement Project Pharmacist Mick Butterfield, Specialist Technician: Homecare Medicines.
Directorate of Donor Care UK Transplant NHSBT Strategic Plan and ODTF Recommendations Regional Managers.
The situation The requirements The benefits What’s needed to make it work How to move forward.
Creating Better Health and Care Services An overview of a Better Health and Care Review process.
Clear and Credible Plan Quarter 3 update Liane Langdon Director of Commissioning and Strategic Development Together we’re better.
Area Officer Skills for Care – Surrey
Cancer Summit Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust 12 th February 2015 Ruth Bridgeman - Programme Director, National Peer Review Programme.
Empowering Staff Through Institute Planning (ESTIP) Executive Workshop Institute Name: XXXXXX Presenter: XXXXXX Date: XXXXXX.
Children and Young People Improving Outcomes Guidance  Key aims of guidance and age specific requirements  Designation of Principal Treatment Centres.
Disability and special educational needs: local area responsibilities under the Children and Families Act, 2014 Charlie Henry HMI National lead for disability.
Tipologie di Audit e loro caratteristiche Riunione sottogruppo GCP-GIQAR 21 Marzo 2006 Francesca Bucchi.
A Walk Through the Wiki An introduction to the Commissioning Handbook.
Diabetes Programme Progress Report Dr Charles Gostling, Joint Diabetes Clinical Director October 2013.
Improving the Health and Wellbeing of People with Learning Disabilities: An Evidence-Based Commissioning Guide for Clinical Commissioning Groups Dr Matt.
Welcome ISO9001:2000 Foundation Workshop.
Queensland Public Service Capability and Leadership Framework (CLF) 1.
The Education Adjustment Program Profile – Revised.
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Performance Review and Staff Development (PRSD) The Role of Governors Governor Reviewer Training.
CLINICAL GOVERNANCE and MI Services : An introduction National MI Training Course University of Leicester 5 th July 2007 Mark Cheeseman E ast Anglia MI.
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- July 2008.
Assessment Improvement Maureen McEnaney Safeguarding & Review Manager Every Child Matters.
Health Promoting Health Service: Development day.
National Cancer Peer Review Programme Louise Wilson Quality Manager North Zone.
Module 3. Session DCST Clinical governance
South West Specialised Commissioning Group Selena Blake - Programme Manager Teenage and Young Adults Cancer Services South West Specialised Commissioning.
Assessment for improvement [Name] [Title] [Date / Event] V4.5.
Lyndi Wiltshire DEN steering group May  What we should expect  The changes in the NHS and the impact it will have on the diabetes educational.
NAVCA Quality Award Andrea Allez Performance Improvement Manager Excellent service for local groups.
JOINT STRATEGIC NEEDS ASSESSMENT Rebecca Cohen Policy Specialist, Chief Executive’s.
Diabetes Education Network Scotland Donald Pearson 3 rd June 2009.
NIPEC Organisational Guide to Practice & Quality Improvement Tanya McCance, Director of Nursing Research & Practice Development (UCHT) & Reader (UU) Brendan.
BMH CLINICAL GUIDELINES IN EUROPE. OUTLINE Background to the project Objectives The AGREE Instrument: validation process and results Outcomes.
Appraisal update NHS England (Severn) Maurice Conlon FRCGP National Appraisal Lead 23 April 2013.
Comprehensive Area Assessment and UoR Calderdale partners 18 th May 2009.
Validated Self Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Partnerships Evidencing Implementation: The Quality Principles – Care Inspectorate/The Scottish Government.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement Shirley Jones.
Welcome. Registration complete? CQC Inspection visit Routine Responsive Themed.
Equality Standard Guidance Document Equality Delivery System (EDS2) Helen Rushworth – Director of Human Resources Molly Clark – Company Secretary.
1 What is the Inclusion Development Programme? Online : CD Rom / DVD + supporting booklets 
Peer Reviewer Training for MTC’s Improving health outcomes across England by providing improvement and health expertise.
Peer Reviewer Major Trauma Network Training. Welcome and Introductions.
5-19 Children’s Public Health Service. Who are Provide? We provide a broad range of community services across Essex, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough,
Developing a national governance framework for health promotion in Scottish hospitals Lorna Smith Senior Health Improvement Programme Officer NHS Health.
National Peer Review Programme Specialist Palliative Care Ruth Bridgeman / Julia Hill Programme Director/ Deputy Programme Director.
National Cancer Peer Review Programme Ruth Bridgeman National Programme Director Julia Hill Acting Deputy National Co-ordinator.
Senior Management Briefing. Children’s Division 0-19 Vision and the Children’s Division Business Plan Nicky Adamson-Young – Children’s and Families Divisional.
Appraiser Skills Training Workshop One: Initial Training.
Middle Managers Workshop 2: Measuring Progress. An opportunity for middle managers… Two linked workshops exploring what it means to implement the Act.
Peer Review for Paediatric Diabetes Ruth Bridgeman.
National Cancer Peer Review Programme NUSG Meeting 6 December 2012.
What is revalidation? Every three years, at the point of your renewal of registration, you need to show that, as a professional, you are living by the.
The Quality Surveillance Team / Programme
The British Accreditation Council: ensuring standards
Embedding the golden threads that lead to quality care every time……
Welcome and introductions
Improvements following Inspection-Capacity to Improve
Maternity and Neonatal, Skin, Vision and Hearing Deep Dive Workshop Understanding “what to change” using the NHS Right Care methodology Part of the NEW.
National audit of paediatric IBD service provision
Competency Based Learning and Development
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Neurological Services Deep Dive Workshop Understanding “what to change” using the NHS Right Care methodology Part of the NEW Devon Way.
Quality Surveillance Programme
Presentation transcript:

Training for organisations participating in Peer Review of Paediatric Diabetes

Welcome and introductions

Aims of Today’s Training To promote understanding of the purpose and implementation of Peer Review of Paediatric Diabetes. To enable organisations to be prepared for the forthcoming peer review of Paediatric Diabetes and ensure that all good practice is shared. To enable organisations to cascade details of the review to others.

Learning Outcomes Understand the principles of peer review and your responsibilities in the process Understand your role and the relationship with the Peer Review Coordinating Team Understand what you need to do for self assessment Practice reviewing evidence required for self assessment Be familiar with and recognise the importance of the DQuiNs electronic communications system

Provision of disease specific information from across the country together with information about individual teams, which has been externally validated Provision of benchmark data Provision of a catalyst for change and service improvement Identification and resolution of immediate risks/serious concerns to patients and or staff Engagement of a substantial number of front line clinicians in reviews Benefits of Peer Review - 1

Measures achievement against ‘Best Practice Tariff’ Clinical support for peer review Enables rapid sharing of learning between clinicians, as well as a better understanding of : Commissioning Services for Children and Young People with Diabetes Delivering the Diabetes National Service Framework Provides valid information to support future business cases Benefits of Peer Review - 2

The New Health Environment

Aims of Peer Review

Key Principles of Peer Review

Developing Measures for Paediatric Diabetes - 1

Developing Measures - 2

The Peer Review Programme Peer Review Visits Targeted External Verification of Self Assessments (all topics in the cycle) Internal Validation of Self Assessments 3yr cycle (not being undertaken for paediatric diabetes during this cycle) Annual Self Assessment All teams/services

Session 2 Completing a Self Assessment

Self Assessment – The Process Purpose of self-assessmentThe requirements of self assessment Self-Assessment should address the measures, the 4 key themes and specific clinical issues The key themes form part of the validation of self assessments

MDT– Key Themes

MDT- Evidence Documents Operational Policy Annual Report Work Programme Describing how the team functions and how care is delivered across the patient pathway Outlining policies/processes that govern safe / high quality care Agreement to and demonstration of the clinical guidelines and treatment protocols for the team. Summary assessment of achievements & challenges Demonstration that the team is using available information (including data) to assess its own service MDT Workload & Activity Data (activity by modality, numbers discussed at MDT, MDT attendance) -National Audits -Local Audits -Patient Feedback -Trial Recruitment -Work Programme Update How the team is planning to address weaknesses and further develop its service. Outline of the team’s plans for service improvement & development over the coming year -Audit Programme -Patient feedback -Trial Recruitment -Actions from Previous reviews

Network Group - Evidence Documents Constitution Annual ReportWork Programme The Group’s terms of reference including a description the constitution and how it functions Description of the process explaining how the Network Group links to individual MDTs within Network The current clinical and referral guidelines agreed by the Group The agreed structure and scope of the service delivered across the Network. Summary assessment of achievements & challenges Demonstration that the group is using available information to assess Network services, including a summary of patient feedback and audit data Summary update on implementation of previous year’s work-programme (including progress on implementing actions from previous reviews) Consideration and discussion of performance against clinical indicators How the group is planning to address weaknesses and further develop Network services Outline of the groups plans for Network wide service improvement & development over the coming year Should include addressing actions from previous peer reviews where relevant

Demonstrating Agreement Where agreement to guidelines and policies is required this should be stated clearly on the cover sheet of the relevant evidence document. Evidence Guides will indicate the groups and individuals that need to be documented as agreeing the key evidence documents.

Using Evidence Guides Guidance to help you structure your evidence documents Guidance for complianceAdditional guidance Always refer to the full measure in making assessments against measures

Self-Assessment – Key Tips

Group Work – A Fictional Paediatric Diabetes Team You are the Paediatric Diabetes team and are required to validate another team’s self-assessment. You will need to review the team’s evidence & for some of the measures highlighted in yellow on the spread sheet, identify whether you agree with the self-assessment or not.

Group Work – A Fictional Paediatric Diabetes Team contd. Consider whether you have sufficient information to determine compliance, or would you need to see any supporting documents or ask questions of the team? Measures: D11-2A-107 D11-2A-115 D11-2A-118 D11-2A Minutes

Key Points from Group Work Did you change compliance for any measures? What questions would you like to ask this MDT? Did you consider the “key themes”? What are the key concerns?

Categorising Review Findings

Handbook for the Paediatric Diabetes Peer Review Programme Contains details of the process from start to finish Including: 1.The Peer Review Programme 2.Self Assessment 3.Outcomes of the Peer Review Process 4.Identification of Concerns 5.DQuiNs

Session 3 DQuiNs

Using DQuiNs V4 Available via the web site at: Secure web based database supporting each stage of the cancer peer review process Records assessments, compliance with the measures and reports Provides information for national analysis and reporting

DQuiNs Homepage Navigate to DQuiNs homepage nhs.uk nhs.uk Enter your registration details

DQuiNs Front end website Resources for teams Measures manual Published reports Public information about Paediatric Diabetes Teams. Login access to the database (which won’t be publicly accessible)

Session 4 External Verification

External Verification -The Process All teams that self-assess will be externally verified for this cycle Desk top review of validated assessment undertaken by the Peer Review Coordinating Team Review accuracy of self-assessmentCoordinating Team may request further information Coordinating Team will have access to specialist clinical input and patient/carer input

What Happens Next? 1. Self assessment : November 2012 to February External verification March Brief summary report circulated to MDTs and Networks – April Final report published by May 2013

Resources Available on NCPR Handbook & Briefing Pack for Self Assessment Evidence guides for each topic areaDQuiNs ‘resource’ section Slides and packs from today James Heasman/Jane Marr available for support

Any Questions? Thank you