Off-axis Current Drive and Current Profile Control in JT-60U T. Suzuki, S. Ide, T. Fujita, T. Oikawa, M. Ishikawa, G. Matsunaga, M. Takechi, M. Seki, O.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stability, Transport, and Conrol for the discussion Y. Miura IEA/LT Workshop (W59) combined with DOE/JAERI Technical Planning of Tokamak Experiments (FP1-2)
Advertisements

George Sips ITPA, active control, 14 July Real-time Control ( and development of control systems ) at ASDEX Upgrade George Sips Max-Planck-Institut.
ELECTRON CYCLOTRON SYSTEM FOR KSTAR US-Korea Workshop Opportunities for Expanded Fusion Science and Technology Collaborations with the KSTAR Project Presented.
International Spherical Tori Workshop 2009, Madison, WI1 Modelling plasma scenarios for MAST-Upgrade Neutral beam requirements, sensitivity studies and.
Discussion on application of current hole towards reactor T.Ozeki (JAERI) Current hole plasmas were observed in the large tokamaks of JT-60U and JET. This.
1 G.T. Hoang, 20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference Euratom Turbulent Particle Transport in Tore Supra G.T. Hoang, J.F. Artaud, C. Bourdelle, X. Garbet and.
T. Nakano, N. Asakura, H. Takenaga, H. Kubo, Y. Miura, S. Konoshima, K. Masaki, S. Higashijima and the JT-60Team Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute,
R Sartori - page 1 20 th IAEA Conference – Vilamoura Scaling Studies of ELMy H-modes global and pedestal confinement at high triangularity in JET R Sartori.
IAEA - FEC2004 // Vilamoura // // EX/4-5 // A. Staebler – 1 – A. Staebler, A.C.C Sips, M. Brambilla, R. Bilato, R. Dux, O. Gruber, J. Hobirk,
Optimization of a Steady-State Tokamak-Based Power Plant Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA IEA Workshop 59 “Shape and.
Energy loss for grassy ELMs and effects of plasma rotation on the ELM characteristics in JT-60U N. Oyama 1), Y. Sakamoto 1), M. Takechi 1), A. Isayama.
Steady State High  N Discharges and Real-Time Control of Current Profile in JT-60U T. Suzuki 1), A. Isayama 1), Y. Sakamoto 1), S. Ide 1), T. Fujita 1),
D. Borba 1 21 st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu China 21 st October 2006 Excitation of Alfvén eigenmodes with sub-Alfvénic neutral beam ions in.
Y. Sakamoto JAEA Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Technologies with participations from China and Korea February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto.
C Gormezano, S Ide ITPA SSO&EP IEA-LT/ ITPA Collaboration 1 Steady State Operation & Energetic Particles Advanced Scenario need the same development path.
H. Urano, H. Takenaga, T. Fujita, Y. Kamada, K. Kamiya, Y. Koide, N. Oyama, M. Yoshida and the JT-60 Team Japan Atomic Energy Agency JT-60U Tokamak: p.
Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.
TOTAL Simulation of ITER Plasmas Kozo YAMAZAKI Nagoya Univ., Chikusa-ku, Nagoya , Japan 1.
JT-60U Resistive Wall Mode (RWM) Study on JT-60U Go Matsunaga 松永 剛 Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Naka, Japan JSPS-CAS Core University Program 2008 in ASIPP.
Measurement Requirements and Assessment of Measurement Capability David Johnson, Réjean Boivin, Ken Young.
The study of MARFE during long pulse discharges in the HT-7 tokamak W.Gao, X.Gao, M.Asif, Z.W.Wu, B.L.Ling, and J.G.Li Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese.
Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Naka Fusion Institute H モード周辺プラズマの無次元量解析 Japan Atomic Energy Agency 浦野 創 原子力機構 那珂核融合研究所.
NSTX-U NSTX-U PAC-31 Response to Questions – Day 1 Summary of Answers Q: Maximum pulse length at 1MA, 0.75T, 1 st year parameters? –A1: Full 5 seconds.
ITER Standard H-mode, Hybrid and Steady State WDB Submissions R. Budny, C. Kessel PPPL ITPA Modeling Topical Working Group Session on ITER Simulations.
Current Drive for FIRE AT-Mode T.K. Mau University of California, San Diego Workshop on Physics Issues for FIRE May 1-3, 2000 Princeton Plasma Physics.
High  p experiments in JET and access to Type II/grassy ELMs G Saibene and JET TF S1 and TF S2 contributors Special thanks to to Drs Y Kamada and N Oyama.
ARIES-AT Physics Overview presented by S.C. Jardin with input from C. Kessel, T. K. Mau, R. Miller, and the ARIES team US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power.
Global Stability Issues for a Next Step Burning Plasma Experiment UFA Burning Plasma Workshop Austin, Texas December 11, 2000 S. C. Jardin with input from.
2 The Neutral Particle Analyzer (NPA) on NSTX Scans Horizontally Over a Wide Range of Tangency Angles Covers Thermal ( keV) and Energetic Ion.
1 Instabilities in the Long Pulse Discharges on the HT-7 X.Gao and HT-7 Team Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O.Box 1126, Hefei,
ASIPP YOUNIS Jawad, WAN Baonian, LIN Shiyao, SHI Yuejiang, and HT-7 Team HT-7 Study of LHW current drive efficiency and fast electron distribution.
ASIPP Long pulse and high power LHCD plasmas on HT-7 Xu Qiang.
F P Orsitto ENEA Frascati 12th ITPA Princeton march 071 Report on the meeting of ITPA TG Steady-State Operations and ITPA TG Transport proposal Francesco.
FOM - Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Diagnostics and Control for Burning Plasmas Discussion All of you.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 12: Diagnostics / heating.
EFDA EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Task Force S1 J.Ongena 19th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Lyon Towards the realization on JET of an.
ITER STEADY-STATE OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS A.R. Polevoi for ITER IT and HT contributors ITER-SS 1.
Comprehensive ITER Approach to Burn L. P. Ku, S. Jardin, C. Kessel, D. McCune Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory SWIM Project Meeting Oct , 2007.
JT-60U -1- Access to High  p (advanced inductive) and Reversed Shear (steady state) plasmas in JT-60U S. Ide for the JT-60 Team Japan Atomic Energy Agency.
CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority ITB formation and evolution with co- and counter NBI A. R. Field, R. J. Akers,
RFX workshop / /Valentin Igochine Page 1 Control of MHD instabilities. Similarities and differences between tokamak and RFP V. Igochine, T. Bolzonella,
TEC Trilateral Euregio Cluster Institut für PlasmaphysikAssoziation EURATOM-Forschungszentrum Jülich 21st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, October.
HL-2A Heating & Current Driving by LHW and ECW study on HL-2A Bai Xingyu, HL-2A heating team.
Work with TSC Yong Guo. Introduction Non-inductive current for NSTX TSC model for EAST Simulation for EAST experiment Voltage second consumption for different.
Improved performance in long-pulse ELMy H-mode plasmas with internal transport barrier in JT-60U N. Oyama, A. Isayama, T. Suzuki, Y. Koide, H. Takenaga,
1 Feature of Energy Transport in NSTX plasma Siye Ding under instruction of Stanley Kaye 05/04/09.
Association Euratom-Cea ITPA CDBM group meeting, St Petersburg, October CRONOS simulations of ITER AT scenarios F. Imbeaux, J.F. Artaud, V. Basiuk,
Heating and current drive requirements towards Steady State operation in ITER Francesca Poli C. Kessel, P. Bonoli, D. Batchelor, B. Harvey Work supported.
20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, 2004 Naka Fusion Research Establishment, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute Stationary high confinement plasmas.
Advanced Tokamak Modeling for FIRE C. Kessel, PPPL NSO/PAC Meeting, University of Wisconsin, July 10-11, 2001.
ZHENG Guo-yao, FENG Kai-ming, SHENG Guang-zhao 1) Southwestern Institute of Physics, Chengdu Simulation of plasma parameters for HCSB-DEMO by 1.5D plasma.
Active Control of Neoclassical Tearing Modes toward Stationary High-Beta Plasmas in JT-60U A. Isayama 1), N. Oyama 1), H. Urano 1), T. Suzuki 1), M. Takechi.
1) For equivalent ECRH power, off-axis heating results in lower stored energy and lower core temperature 2) Plasma flow is significantly reduced with off-axis.
NSTX Meeting name – abbreviated presentation title, abbreviated author name (??/??/20??) Goals of NSTX Advanced Scenario and Control TSG Study, implement,
1 ASIPP Sawtooth Stabilization by Barely Trapped Energetic Electrons Produced by ECRH Zhou Deng, Wang Shaojie, Zhang Cheng Institute of Plasma Physics,
1 ASTRA simulations of ITER long pulse scenarios V. Leonov ASTRA simulations of ITER long pulse scenarios V. Leonov Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, Russia.
G. Matsunaga 1), M. Okabayashi 2), N. Aiba 1), J. A. Boedo 3), J. R. Ferron 4), J. M. Hanson 5), G. Z. Hao 6), W. W. Heidbrink 7), C. T. Holcomb 8), Y.
HT-7 Proposal of the investigation on the m=1 mode oscillations in LHCD Plasmas on HT-7 Exp2005 ASIPP Youwen Sun, Baonian Wan and the MHD Team Institute.
1 E. Kolemen / IAEA / October 2012 Egemen Kolemen 1, A.S. Welander 2, R.J. La Haye 2, N.W. Eidietis 2, D.A. Humphreys 2, J. Lohr 2, V. Noraky 2, B.G. Penaflor.
Lower Hybrid Wave Coupling and Current Drive Experiments in HT-7 Tokamak Weici Shen Jiafang Shan Handong Xu Min Jiang HT-7 Team Institute of Plasma Physics,
Long Pulse High Performance Plasma Scenario Development for NSTX C. Kessel and S. Kaye - providing TRANSP runs of specific discharges S.
17th ISHW Oct. 12, 2009, Princeton, NJ, USA Effect of Nonaxisymmetric Perturbation on Profile Formation I-08 T. Morisaki, Y. Suzuki, J. Miyazawa, M. Kobayashi,
Decrease of transport coefficients in the plasma core after off-axis ECRH switch-off K.A.Razumova and T-10 team.
1 J. Garcia ITPA-IOS meeting Kyoto October 2011 Association Euratom-CEA Free boundary simulations of the ITER hybrid and steady-state scenarios J.Garcia.
9-12 Sept. 2002E. BARBAT0-ENEA, TTF, Cordoba1 Electron Internal Transport barriers by LHCD and ECRH in FTU-high density plasmas E. Barbato Associazione.
11th IAEA Technical Meeting on H-mode Physics and Transport Barriers" , September, 2007 Tsukuba International Congress Center "EPOCHAL Tsukuba",
Determining confinement and stability of q(0)>1 regimes produced
20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference,
Evolution of Bootstrap-Sustained Discharge in JT-60U
Presentation transcript:

Off-axis Current Drive and Current Profile Control in JT-60U T. Suzuki, S. Ide, T. Fujita, T. Oikawa, M. Ishikawa, G. Matsunaga, M. Takechi, M. Seki, O. Naito, K. Hamamatsu, M. Sueoka, H. Hosoyama, M. Nakazato, and the JT-60 Team Japan Atomic Energy Agency 21th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference (19 Oct. 2006, Chengdu) EX/6-4 (17+3min.) This work was partially supported by Grand-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) No and Grand-in-Aid for Scientific Research No and from MEXT.

Introduction Optimization or control of q/j profile is crucial.  For higher confinement and stability such as in ITER SS & hybrid scenarios  In a self-organized plasma, real-time feedback control is essential.  Minimum but efficient control is preferable. Minimum q (q min ) is one of the key parameters for stability at high  and resulting confinement.  Raising q min can avoid low m/n MHD, such as NTM and sawtooth. For the q min control, off-axis current drive is required.  LHCD & NBCD

Contents Current drivers and MSE diagnostic for current profile measurement Real-time control of q min using off-axis LHCD in high  plasmas Measurement of beam driven current profile by off-axis NBCD Summary

Off-axis NBCD  2MW/2MW for co/ctr  Investigated here Off-axis Current Drivers and high resolution MSE diagnostic in JT-60U LHCD (2GHz, <1.5MW for co)  Continuous control of power and N // possible at every 10ms  Used as current driver for real-time control of q min q(r) measurement using 30ch MSE  dR~ m (a~1m)  at every 10ms for real-time calc.

Real-time control of q min using off-axis LHCD in high  plasmas

In 2006, q min is controlled in real-time using LHCD in high  plasmas In 2004, q profile control at low  demonstrated  Real-time evaluation of q(r) using MSE  Real-time control of CD location through N // In 2006, q min control at high  for better core performance  Control of key parameter at high  : q min  Real-time control of LH power: P LH  I LH  N // is fixed to keep CD location at higher T e region for better CD efficiency.  LH power control: dP LH /dt=-  (q min - q min,ref )   : positive constant  LH power increases when q min < q min,ref.

Real-time q min control demonstrated at  N = , f BS =0.46, f CD =0.87 High-  p ELMy H-mode  I p =0.8MA, B t =2.5T, q 95 =5.8, n e =1.8x10 19 m -3,  p = q min followed the given reference q min,ref.   =2MW/s Without control, q min goes down to  1.7 interlocks by arcing N // =1.7 q min raised q min =1.7

Complex behavior in current profile evolution during q min control in high  LHCD spatially localized at  =  decrease j by reduction of j OH inside  =0.3 Complex interaction between j, p, and T e (or  NC ) at high  during q min control q(r) change through q min control  T e increases  j OH  NC and j BS increase  q min decreases  Control system increases P LH contour plot j increase j LH j BS +j OH q min control

m/n=2/1 NTM in high-  p mode plasma at  N ~1.7,  p =1.5 I p =0.8MA, B t =2.4T, q 95 =5.4  22% decrease in W dia q min rises above 2 overshoot of control during q min control to 1.7  m/n=2/1 NTM disappears  W dia recovers  Central n e, T e, T i increase.  No change in peripheral MHD stabilization and confinement recovery by q min control in high  m/n=2/1 NTM confinement recovery

Measurement of beam driven current profile by off-axis NBCD

Off-axis NBCD investigation for real-time current profile control Off-axis NBCD has been known to drive current, raise central q and decrease V loop in JT-60U.  working as one of standard off-axis current drivers in JT-60U But, off-axis NBCD “profile” has not been fully recognized, yet.  difficult to measure, veiled by large Ohmic current. Important to know its character in order to use for optimization and real-time control of j(r).  NBCD profile measurement exploiting  progress in diagnostics (high resolution MSE, neutron emission profile)  flexible NBI system (perp. NB w/o NBCD)  improvement in analysis technique typical configuration for off-axis NBCD

Spatially localized off-axis NBCD profile is measured using MSE diagnostic. I p =1.2MA, B t =3.8T, q 95 =5.4, fixed n e =3.3x10 19 m -3, ELMy H-mode, No MHD except ELMs Temporal evolution of increment of current  I from reference current profile, measured by MSE  spatially localized NBCD at  = Off-axis beam driven current profile j BD dS agrees with increase in neutron emission S n (r) representing beam population profile.  th-th neutron < 10%, bulk density constant tangential minor radius  min of diag. sight line current increase (reference)

Measured I BD agrees with calc., but CD location in calc. shifts inward than meas. I p =0.8MAI p =1.2MA Measured off-axis NBCD is spatially localized both at I p =0.8&1.2MA.  consistent with neutron emission profile Peak CD location in calc. shifts inward than exp. by d  ~0.2 in Ip=0.8&1.2MA.  But, total NBCD current in exp. agrees with calc. in Ip=0.8&1.2MA. Difference between CD locations in exp. and calc.  further study required 127  32kA 103kA 106  41kA 90kA

Summary Real-time control of q min was demonstrated in high  plasma having  N = , f BS =0.46, f CD =0.87.  q min was evaluated by MSE, and current profile was modified by off- axis LHCD at  =  q min followed the given reference rising in time.  Complex interaction between j, p and T e was observed. NTM (m/n=2/1) was stabilized through q min increase above 2 during q min control, and confinement was recovered.  Development of current profile control system is important for higher confinement and stability in advanced scenarios in ITER. Spatially localized off-axis NBCD is possible.  Measured CD location agrees with neutron emission profile.  Measured total driven current agrees with the ACCOME calc.  CD location in the ACCOME code shifts inward than measurement by d  ~0.2.  Some mechanism is required for the explanation.  further study