Comparison of wild type S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus Natalie Williams and Karina Alvarez.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Presenting Graph and Chart. Introducing our presentation I’d like to refer to the first graph If we have a look at this graph If I could direct your attention.

Advertisements

Airport Inn Presentation to the Board Your Name Goes Here.

Phase Difference = Phase Difference = 0.05.

ANOVA WTdZAP1 p < /6189 (31.42%)2264/6189 (36.58%) p < /6189 (24.67%)1445/6189 (23.35%) p < /6189 (13.90%)792/6189 (12.80%) p

Modeling the Gene Expression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Δcin5 Under Cold Shock Conditions Kevin McKay Laura Terada Department of Biology Loyola Marymount.

1 Operational Excellence 1 MeasureLevel 5 Vision Breakfast participation> 58% Lunch participation> 78% Supper program>50%

Determining the Identity and Dynamics of the Gene Regulatory Network Controlling the Response to Cold Shock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae June 24, 2015.

Deletion of ZAP1 as a transcriptional factor has minor effects on S. cerevisiae regulatory network in cold shock KARA DISMUKE AND KRISTEN HORSTMANN MAY.

Workforce Profiling Statistics Gender Split Across College 2007/08 The above chart illustrates a fairly even gender split across the College,

 decimals/cc-7th-fracs-to-decimals/v/converting-fractions-to-decimals-example.

Supplementary Figure S1 Percentage of peaks from Trf1 +/+ p53 -/- -Cre vs Trf1  /  p53 -/- -Cre comparison that are located in non subtelomeric and subtelomeric.

Changes in Gene Regulation in Δ Zap1 Strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae due to Cold Shock Jim McDonald and Paul Magnano.

Economics for your Classroom from Ed Dolan’s Econ Blog US GDP Grows at 3.5 Percent in Q3 for Best Six-Month Run of the Recovery Posted October 30, 2014.

Creating a Gene Regulatory Network Comparing a Wild Type Strain with a Mutant ΔGLN3 Deletion in S. cerevisiae Showed that ΔGLN3 Exhibits No Meaningful.

Figure SOM1. Functional roles of the genes affected in zmet2-m1 mutants. Although the genes localized on the intracellular membranes were slightly over-represented.

Gene Expression and Epigenetic Regulation JESSICA LAINE AND ELIZABETH MARTIN.

Comparison of the wild type of S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus Karina Alvarez and Natalie Williams.

Outline S. cerevisiae, a eukaryote known for cold-shock adaption, used in cold-shock experiments Deletion strand HMO1 and the comparison of microarray.

Yeast Cell-Cycle Regulation Network inference Wang Lin.

Comparison of the wild type of S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus Karina Alvarez and Natalie Williams.

Представление числовой информации и графиков

Supplementary figure 5.

Departments of Biology and Mathematics

Final Presentation [work in progress… work completed for Week 11 Journal Assignment] Kara Dismuke.

Budding yeast has a small genome of approximately 6000 genes.

Molecular Biology of the Cell Vol. 18, 5100–5112, December 2007

Deletion of ZAP1 as a transcriptional factor has minor effects on S

Microarray Outreach GMC Fall 2005

Cold Adaptation in Budding Yeast

Lauren Kelly April 19th, 2017 BIOL398-05

Modeling Nitrogen Metabolism in Yeast

Biomathematical Modeling: The Deletion of HMO1 and its Effect on Cold Shock Reaction in S. cerevisiae Lauren Magee & Lucia Ramirez Department of Mathematics.

ANOVA Within Strain P-values

dCIN5 and Wildtype Transcription Factor Mapping in Cold Shock

IELTS WRITING TASK 1 (Describing a chart).

Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)

KEY CONCEPT Entire genomes are sequenced, studied, and compared.

Within Strain ANOVA for All Strains

Significance Table from Anova Test

Similarity of gene expression level (A) and nucleosome occupancy profile (B) between paralog pairs. Similarity of gene expression level (A) and nucleosome.

Final Presentation [work in progress… work completed for Week 11 Journal Assignment] Kara Dismuke.

Week 11 Assignment Figures

Tai LT, Daran-Lapujade P, Walsh MC, Pronk JT, Daran JM

dCIN5 and Wildtype Transcription Factor Mapping in Cold Shock

Oncogenic ras results in increased cell kill due to defective thermoprotection in lung cancer cells Roger A Vertrees, PhD, Joseph B Zwischenberger, MD,

Comparison of the P-value significance between Wild Type and ΔGLN3

Volume 149, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)

ANOVA Within Strain P-values

Percentages of specific p-value data

Within-strain ANOVA for dCIN5

(Within-Strain ANOVA)

Comparison of the P-value significance between Wild Type and dGLN3

Molecular Biology of the Cell Vol. 18, 5100–5112, December 2007

Practice before a Percentage Change on finding the amount using a

Activity 2: Profiling a Country

KEY CONCEPT Entire genomes are sequenced, studied, and compared.

ANOVA WT STRAIN p < 0.05 number (%) p < 0.01 p < p <

Jeffrey Crosson and William Gendron

Summary of differentially expressed genes.

Percentages of specific p-value data

Correlation between Pten/p53 status and AKT pathway activity in BC and effect on clinical outcome Box plot for p53‐pathway activity in p53 wild‐type and.

Benjamini & Hochberg-corrected p < 0.05 Bonferroni-corrected

Percentages Find 35% of 200 Find 5% of 80 Increase 120 by 15%

SAM transport by Gap4 in S. cerevisiae cells.

KEY CONCEPT Entire genomes are sequenced, studied, and compared.

Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (March 2013)

Loyola Marymount University

The invasive isolate has higher levels of intracellular glutathione following exposure to oxidative stress. The invasive isolate has higher levels of intracellular.

Jeffrey Crosson and William Gendron

Jeffrey Crosson and William Gendron

Presentation transcript:

Comparison of wild type S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus Natalie Williams and Karina Alvarez

Wildtype S. cerevisiae has a higher percentage of signifcance in the NSR1 gene compared to S. paradoxus

STEM results: wild-type S. cerevisiae has 6 profiles that have significant changes in response to cold shock

Profile 45 genes initially increase expression, then decrease in the recovery phase

Profile 22 genes initially decrease in expression, then increase in recovery phase

Profile 9 genes have a significant decrease in expression, then increase in the recovery phase.

Profile 28 genes steadily increase in expression before decreasing sharply in the recovery phase.

Profile 48 genes have a slight increase in expression before decreasing steadily in the recovery phase.

Profile 0 genes generally decrease throughout the cold shock experiment. They exhibit a slight increase in the recovery phase, but expression is generally decreased throughout the entire 120m.