Comparison of the wild type of S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus Karina Alvarez and Natalie Williams.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Britain Southwick Nicole Anguiano March 29, 2014
Advertisements

ANOVA WTdZAP1 p < /6189 (31.42%)2264/6189 (36.58%) p < /6189 (24.67%)1445/6189 (23.35%) p < /6189 (13.90%)792/6189 (12.80%) p
Modeling the Gene Expression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Δcin5 Under Cold Shock Conditions Kevin McKay Laura Terada Department of Biology Loyola Marymount.
Software Refactoring and Usability Enhancement for GRNmap, a Gene Regulatory Network Modeling Application Mathematical Model Equation 2. Equation 3. Future.
Determining the Identity and Dynamics of the Gene Regulatory Network Controlling the Response to Cold Shock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae June 24, 2015.
Deletion of ZAP1 as a transcriptional factor has minor effects on S. cerevisiae regulatory network in cold shock KARA DISMUKE AND KRISTEN HORSTMANN MAY.
A COMPREHENSIVE GENE REGULATORY NETWORK FOR THE DIAUXIC SHIFT IN SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE GEISTLINGER, L., CSABA, G., DIRMEIER, S., KÜFFNER, R., AND ZIMMER,
GRNmap Testing Analysis Grace Johnson and Natalie Williams June 10, 2015.
GRNmap Testing Grace Johnson and Natalie Williams June 3, 2015.
Open Source Projects for Undergraduate Research Experiences
SURP 2015 Presentation draft 15 minutes. Wt, initial weight 1 run.
Changes in Gene Regulation in Δ Zap1 Strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae due to Cold Shock Jim McDonald and Paul Magnano.
GRNmap and GRNsight June 24, Systems Biology Workflow DNA microarray data: wet lab-generated or published Generate gene regulatory network Modeling.
Data Analysis and GRNmap Testing Grace Johnson and Natalie Williams June 24, 2015.
Creating a Gene Regulatory Network Comparing a Wild Type Strain with a Mutant ΔGLN3 Deletion in S. cerevisiae Showed that ΔGLN3 Exhibits No Meaningful.
Index Slide 2-5: Statistical testing results 6-14: Clustering results 15-17: GRNsight visualization of YEASTRACT results 18-20: GRNmap output visualization.
GRNmap Testing Grace Johnson and Natalie Williams June 17, 2015.
Nonlinear differential equation model for quantification of transcriptional regulation applied to microarray data of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Vu, T. T.,
Comparing the Dynamics of the Cold Shock Gene Regulatory Network in Yeast with a Random Network K. Grace Johnson 1, Natalie E. Williams 2, Kam D. Dahlquist.
Student: Trixie Anne M. Roque, Tessa A. Morris Faculty Mentors: Dr. Kam D. Dahlquist, Dr. Ben G. Fitzpatrick, & Dr. John David N. Dionisio SURP 2015 Final.
Within Strain ANOVA WTdHAP4 p < (38.4%)2387 (38.6%) p < (24.7%)1489 (24.1 %) p < (13.8%)679 (11.0%) p < (7.25%)240.
Individual Gene Analysis, Categorized on Validity of Inputs.
Comparison of the wild type of S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus Karina Alvarez and Natalie Williams.
Outline S. cerevisiae, a eukaryote known for cold-shock adaption, used in cold-shock experiments Deletion strand HMO1 and the comparison of microarray.
Comparison of wild type S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus Natalie Williams and Karina Alvarez.
Systems modeling and statistical analysis allows comparison in the response to cold shock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae between Δhap4-derived and randomly.
Departments of Biology and Mathematics
Student: Trixie Anne M. Roque, Tessa A. Morris
Eddie Azinge, John Lopez, and Corinne Wong
Evaluating Hap4’s Role in the Gene Regulatory Network that Controls the Response to Cold Shock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using GRNmap K. Grace Johnson1,
Final Presentation [work in progress… work completed for Week 11 Journal Assignment] Kara Dismuke.
Evaluating Hap4’s Role in the Gene Regulatory Network that Controls the Response to Cold Shock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using GRNmap K. Grace Johnson1,
Budding yeast has a small genome of approximately 6000 genes.
Molecular Biology of the Cell Vol. 18, 5100–5112, December 2007
Deletion of ZAP1 as a transcriptional factor has minor effects on S
Lauren Kelly April 19th, 2017 BIOL398-05
Modeling Nitrogen Metabolism in Yeast
1 Department of Engineering, 2 Department of Mathematics,
Biomathematical Modeling: The Deletion of HMO1 and its Effect on Cold Shock Reaction in S. cerevisiae Lauren Magee & Lucia Ramirez Department of Mathematics.
ANOVA Within Strain P-values
dCIN5 and Wildtype Transcription Factor Mapping in Cold Shock
Change in Expression after modifying fix_b?
Week 14 Output Figures Kristen Horstmann.
Change in Expression after modifying fix_b?
Change in Expression after modifying fix_b?
Comparison of the P-value significance between Wild Type and ΔGLN3
Loyola Marymount University
Within Strain ANOVA for All Strains
Significance Table from Anova Test
GRNmap Testing and Results
Change in Expression after modifying fix_b?
Final Presentation [work in progress… work completed for Week 11 Journal Assignment] Kara Dismuke.
Week 11 Assignment Figures
dCIN5 and Wildtype Transcription Factor Mapping in Cold Shock
Comparison of the P-value significance between Wild Type and ΔGLN3
Loyola Marymount Unviersity
ANOVA Within Strain P-values
Percentages of specific p-value data
Evaluating Hap4’s Role in the Gene Regulatory Network that Controls the Response to Cold Shock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using GRNmap K. Grace Johnson1,
Within-strain ANOVA for dCIN5
(Within-Strain ANOVA)
Comparison of the P-value significance between Wild Type and dGLN3
Molecular Biology of the Cell Vol. 18, 5100–5112, December 2007
 ANOVA WT STRAIN p < 0.05 number (%) p < 0.01 p < p <
Jeffrey Crosson and William Gendron
There are 16 Different Combinations for the Test Inputs
Percentages of specific p-value data
Benjamini & Hochberg-corrected p < 0.05 Bonferroni-corrected
Jeffrey Crosson and William Gendron
Jeffrey Crosson and William Gendron
Presentation transcript:

Comparison of the wild type of S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus Karina Alvarez and Natalie Williams

The WT of S. cerevisiae shows a higher percentage of significance with all p-values in the NSR1 gene than in S. paradoxus’. S. cerevisiaeS. paradoxus p < %36.55% p < %22.62% p < %11.05% p < % B-H p < %24.25% Bonferroni p < %2.343%

Results of stem show 6 different profiles, signifying that S. par has a collection of genes that reacts to cold shock.

Profile #45 contains genes that are activated during cold shock and then are repressed during the recovery phase. S. paradoxus

Profile #9 shows genes that are generally repressed throughout the cold shock and gradually reach activation later in the recovery phase. S. paradoxus

Profile #22 shows genes that do not have a significant level of expression during cold shock, but in the recovery phase, they are highly activated. S. paradoxus

Profile #28 shows genes that are activated and then reach a level of steady expression close to 0 or no expression. S. paradoxus

Profile #48 shows fewer genes than previous profiles and that those genes are activated before reaching decreased expression levels. S. paradoxus

Profile #2 shows genes that are decreased initially in cold shock and during recovery phase are activated. S. paradoxus

Restrictions/SettingsNodesEdges DNA binding plus expression ONLY DNA binding38*102* DNA binding and expression 20*23* * Amounts before alterations were done to see the visualized GRN in GRNSight The amount of transcription factors responsible for gene regulation decreases with the varying criteria for the test.

Original GRNSight visualization of the GRN resulting from the Only DNA binding evidence

Modified GRN from Only DNA binding evidence with a few strains deleted from the Original visualization. Deleted: -SRB8 -RLM1 -SPT20 -MIG1 -CST6 -MET31 -SPT2 -SNF5 -PIB2 -SNF6 -SNF2 -CBF1 -SSN2 -SKO1 -YAP6

GRN visualized from the DNA binding evidence and expression data.

GRN visualized from the modified DNA binding evidence and expression data. Deleted: -HAP1 -RLM1 -SNF2

Restrictions/SettingsNodesEdges DNA binding plus expression* ONLY DNA binding2958 DNA binding and expression 1721 The altered table that depicts the amount of transcription factors responsible for gene regulation. * A visualization was not able to be produced due to the number of nodes and edges.

Visualization of the GRN when the parameters and production rates were optimized with a fixed b – threshold – value.

Output from Fixed b values

Output from Estimated b values

Visualization of the GRN when the parameters and production rates were optimized with estimated b values.

There was little difference in optimized weight parameters that MATLAB gave when the threshold was fixed vs. when it was estimated.

There was little differences seen among the various production rates that were estimated under the conditions of “b” being a fixed value vs. being estimated.