HEX-Tox paper reading 2015. 4. 14. Tue Hye Young Choi.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in the Environment: What are the Key Research Questions? Alistair BA Boxall, Murray A Rudd, Bryan W Brooks,
Advertisements

Framework for the Ecological Assessment of Impacted Sediments at Mining Sites in Region 7 By Jason Gunter (R7 Life Scientist) and.
Perspectives from EPA’s Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program
Introduction and Project Definition Russell L. Jones January 30, 2006.
Some Results from C5: Modification of the Current Draft Dr. Ted Lazo on behalf of C5.
Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006.
1 The “Straw Man” System for Defining the RfD as a Risk-Specific Dose Making Use of Empirical Distributions Dale Hattis, Meghan Lynch, Sue Greco Clark.
Trichloroethylene (TCE) Toxicity Values Update Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting March 27, 2014 C. Mark Smith Ph.D., M.S. Deputy Director Office.
Regulatory Toxicology James Swenberg, D.V.M., Ph.D.
Risk Assessment.
1 Risk assessment: overview and principles –Risk principles –Steps in risk assessment –Risk calculation –Toxicology.
1 Development & Evaluation of Ecotoxicity Predictive Tools EPA Development Team Regional Stakeholder Meetings January 11-22, 2010.
William H. Farland, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Science Office of Research and Development U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Biomarkers:
It Takes a Village to Raise a Child Roberta L. Grant, Ph.D. Toxicology Section - Chief Engineer’s Office Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
NSF/ANSI STANDARD 61 FRAMEWORK FOR RISK ASSESSMENTS For use by Toxicology Sub-committee only Please do not copy or distribute.
Module 8: Risk Assessment. 2 Module Objectives  Define the purpose of Superfund risk assessment  Define the four components of the human health risk.
Biomonitoring ….a dialogue EnviroCancer Connections-LDL February 14, 2005 Discussion Leader: Suzanne Snedeker - BCERF.
Sources of Uncertainty and Current Practice for Addressing Them: Toxicological Perspective David A. Bussard U.S. Environmental Protection Agency The views.
Key issues in biopesticide regulation Pesticides Safety Directorate 19 June 2007.
Multivariate Data Analysis Chapter 10 - Multidimensional Scaling
Environmental Health XIV. Standards and Monitoring Shu-Chi Chang, Ph.D., P.E., P.A. Assistant Professor 1 and Division Chief 2 1 Department of Environmental.
Copyright 2002 Marc Rigas Issues in Exposure Assessment Marc L. Rigas, Ph.D. National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Michael H. Dong MPH, DrPA, PhD  readings Toxicology and Risk Assessment (3rd of 10 Lectures on Toxicologic Epidemiology)
AIIDA V3.0 (AQUATIC IMPACT INDICATOR DATABASE) PRESENTATION & TRAINING.
14 January ILSI Europe Human Exposure and Internal Dose Assessments of Acrylamide in Food ILSI Europe Acrylamide Task Force Sandra Tuijtelaars ILSI.
NORA Exposure Assessment Methods Team Whitepaper Research Needs and Priorities Beth Donovan Reh National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
Michael H. Dong MPH, DrPA, PhD readings Human Exposure Assessment I (7th of 10 Lectures on Toxicologic Epidemiology)
ILSI Risk Science Institute Acrylamide Toxicity: Research to Address Key Data Gaps Presented by Dr. Stephen S. Olin ILSI Risk Science Institute.
Lynn H. Pottenger, PhD, DABT The Dow Chemical Company
BIOLOGIC MARKERS IN OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE By: Dr Chavoshi.
Food Advisory Committee Meeting December 16 and 17, 2014 Questions to the Committee Suzanne C. Fitzpatrick, PhD, DABT Senior Advisory for Toxicology Center.
Committee on Carcinogenicity (COC) Approach to Risk Assessment of Genotoxic Carcinogens David H. Phillips* COC Chairman Descriptive vs. Quantitative.
Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can be masked by a collage strip of one, two or three images. The photo image area is located 3.19” from left.
Environmental • failure analysis & prevention • health • technology development A leading engineering & scientific consulting firm dedicated to helping.
Charge Question 5-1 Comment Summary for HHCB Peer Review Panel Meeting January 9, 2014.
Translating HPV Information into Plain Language Characterizing Chemicals in Commerce Austin, TX December, 12-14, 2006.
Age-specific Exposure Assessment for Children Johan Bierkens, Christa Cornelis, Mirja Van Holderbeke, Rudi Torfs INTRODUCTION Recognition.
A Novel Bottom Up Approach to Bounding Potential Human Cancer Risks from Endogenous Chemicals Thomas B. Starr, PhD TBS Associates, Raleigh NC SOT RASS.
TCA in groundwater Anne Karvonen Juha Villman Mikko Pohjola.
Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Dekant Department of Toxicology University of Würzburg Germany Risk, Hazard, and Innovation.
Determining Risks to Background Arsenic Using a Margin – of – Exposure Approach Presentation at Society of Risk Analysis, New England Chapter Barbara D.
Chapter 15.3 Risk Assessment 2002 WHO report: “Focusing on risks to health is the key to preventing disease and injury.” risk assessment—process of evaluating.
Air Toxics Risk Assessment: Traditional versus New Approaches Mark Saperstein BP Product Stewardship Group.
UPDATE: Nonclinical Reproductive Toxicity Information in Assessing Human Risk Joseph J. DeGeorge Ph.D. Associate Director for Pharmacology and Toxicology.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
Biologic Monitoring A. H. Mehrparvar, MD Occupational Medicine department Yazd University of Medical Sciences.
NUATRC/TCEQ Air Toxics Workshop October Air Toxics Air Toxics: What We Know, What we Don’t Know, and What We Need to Know Human Health Effects –
1 Air Toxics Exposure: Relevance to Risk Assessment TCEQ/NUATRC Air Toxics Workshop October 17, 2005 Tina Bahadori, D. Sc. Long-Range Research Initiative.
European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation The key principles of pharmacology.
‘DOSE’-‘OUTCOME’ IN GENERAL Relationship between a measured outcome associated with a measured dose –‘outcome’ = level of biological response or prevalence.
Perspective on the current state-of-knowledge of mode of action as it relates to the dose response assessment of cancer and noncancer toxicity Jennifer.
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Assessment Human Health Risk Assessment and Information for SRP July 28, 2009 Reeder.
Volker J. Soballa Evonik Degussa GmbH Essen, Germany
Acute Toxicity Studies Single dose - rat, mouse (5/sex/dose), dog, monkey (1/sex/dose) 14 day observation In-life observations (body wt., food consumption,
Nondefault Uncertainty Factor Values John Lipscomb, Ph.D., DABT, ATS US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development National Center.
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
Manganese Biomonitoring for assessment of Exposure to Airborne Manganese in Foundry Plants Dr. Seyedtaghi Mirmohammadi Assistant Professor. Indoor Air.
Risk Assessment of Exposure to Trihalomethanes: Use of Biomonitoring Equivalents and Biomonitoring Data from NHANES Lesa L. AylwardRichard A. Becker Sean.
CHAPTER 5 Occupational Exposure Limits and Assessment of Workplace Chemical Risks.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 9. Periodic data collection methods.
FIFRA SAP Meeting February 2, 2010
Biologic Monitoring A. H. Mehrparvar, MD
Plymouth Environmental Research Centre
Case Study: Risk – Risk Comparison n-Propyl Bromide vs
이 장 우.
Journal reviews 이승호.
Oliver Kroner, Lynne Haber, Rick Hertzberg TERA
Paul Y Hamey Chemicals Regulation Division
EFSA’s Chemical Hazards Database
VICH GL 54, Studies to evaluate the safety of residues of veterinary drugs in human food: General approach to establish an Acute Reference Dose (ARfD)
Presentation transcript:

hEX-Tox paper reading Tue Hye Young Choi

The Purpose of reading hEX-Tox PR2

Introduction and Background Biomonitoring the measurement of parent chemical or metabolite in a biological sample BE (biomonitoring equivalent) the concentration of a chemical (or metabolite) in a biological medium consistent with defined exposure guidance values hEX-Tox PR3

Key Concepts and Methods Derivation of BE Values hEX-Tox PR4 Prof. Choi, US EPA(1997) SourceTarget organ 체외 ( 환경 ) 체내 ( 세포벽 통과 ) 체내 ( 위 등 ) External dose Internal dose

Key Concepts and Methods Derivation of BE Values ① In case of available Human PK data (pathway 1) hEX-Tox PR5 External dose ex) DEHP in dust (unit : ng/g of dust) Internal dose ex) MEHP in urine (unit : ng/mL of urine) Human PK model Human

Key Concepts and Methods Derivation of BE Values ② In case of available Animal PK data (pathway 2) hEX-Tox PR6 at POD Internal dose Exposure guidance value ⇒ BE Animal PK model Uncertainty Factors Human Animal Point of departure ex) BMDL, LOAEL, NOAEL

Key Concepts and Methods Derivation of BE Values hEX-Tox PR7 BE POD Final BE value

Key Concepts and Methods BE derivation process ① Identification of the Target Organ and any Available Understanding Regarding the Mode of Action for Toxicity. ② Identification of Potential Biomarkers. ③ Identify and Assess Available Pharmacokinetic Data and Models in Humans and the Relevant Animal Species. ④ Calculating BEs for Biomarkers in Urine ⑤ Confidence Rating ⑥ Discussion of Variability and Uncertainty hEX-Tox PR8

Key Concepts and Methods Communication and Interpretation using BE Values hEX-Tox PR9

Case Studies Toluene hEX-Tox PR10 38 ppm BE POD : 135 ㎍ /L in blood BE : 40 ㎍ /L in blood

Case Studies 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid hEX-Tox PR11 Animal POD (NOAEL) : 5 mg/kg/day Human POD : 0.5 mg/kg/day UF : 10 Be adults,POD : 30,000 ㎍ /g of crea. UF : 100 BE : 300 ㎍ /g of crea.

Case Studies Cadmium hEX-Tox PR12 POD : 200 ㎍ /g of renal cortex BE POD : 6.3 ㎍ /g of crea. BE : 2 ㎍ /g of crea. UF

Case Studies Acrylamide hEX-Tox PR13 POD : μmol AA or GA in serum NOEL : 0.2 mg/kg/day POD animal : 0.13 μmol AA or GA in serum BE POD AAVal : 25.3 fmol/mg of globin GAVal : 39.8 fmol/mg of globin BE AAVal : 8 fmol/mg of globin GAVal : 13 fmol/mg of globin

Interpretation of Biomonitoring Data using BE Values hEX-Tox PR14

Interpretation of Biomonitoring Data using BE Values hEX-Tox PR15

Future Challenges As part of the evolution, there is a natural fit for the BEs to be developed along with such exposure guidance values. No existing exposure guidance values, but available toxicity and pharmacokinetic data. set of conservative uncertainty factors to derive a provisional BE POD and BE Lacking in pharmacokinetic data, but existing exposure guidance values. Provide the means to develop a provisional BE. Derivation of a BE involves a careful evaluation of the mode of action and the most relevant internal dose metric and the biomarkers The BE approach helps identify such situations and focus research efforts on issues that will enhance the value of collected biomonitoring data hEX-Tox PR16

Future Challenges As part of the evolution, there is a natural fit for the BEs to be developed along with such exposure guidance values. No existing exposure guidance values, but available toxicity and pharmacokinetic data. set of conservative uncertainty factors to derive a provisional BE POD and BE Lacking in pharmacokinetic data, but existing exposure guidance values. Provide the means to develop a provisional BE. Derivation of a BE involves a careful evaluation of the mode of action and the most relevant internal dose metric and the biomarkers The BE approach helps identify such situations and focus research efforts on issues that will enhance the value of collected biomonitoring data hEX-Tox PR17

Conclusions The BE process seeks to translate those risk assessments so that biomonitoring data can be interpreted in the context of those existing risk assessments. Framework for potentially improving risk assessments by focusing on mode of action and relevant internal dose metrics. framework for identifying the most relevant chemical specific biomarker(s). risk prioritization and calculating about margin of safety. Other approaches : ‘reverse dosimetry’ modeling hEX-Tox PR18

감사합니다 hEX-Tox PR19