Information Governance & Standards Across the World: DoD5015.2, VERS, MoReq Presented by: Mike Alsup, Gimmal June 16, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
International Council on Archives Project Principles and Functional Requirements for Records in Electronic Office Environments Adrian Cunningham National.
Advertisements

International Council on Archives Project Principles and Functional Requirements for Records in Electronic Office Environments Adrian Cunningham National.
1 Auditing in the Public Interest Records Management in the Victorian Public Sector Audit objective Audit had two objectives : The first objective was.
Records Management for UW-Madison Employees – An Introduction UW-Madison Records Management UW-Archives & Records Management 2012 Photo courtesy of University.
© Copyright 2013 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. trans for ma tion : a.
SAP BI ConnectorDuet Enterprise for Microsoft SharePoint and SAP SAP NetWeaver Gateway productivity accelerator for Microsoft Synch enterprise data.
IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist IU Electronic Records Program Website:
ECM RFP 101 Presented by: Carol Mitchell C.M. Mitchell Consulting.
Use of Oregon Statewide Electronic Records Management Systems (ERMS) Price & Services Agreements (PSA) DAS SPO Representative Lena Ferris DAS EISPD Representatives.
…your guide through terrain
Developing a Records & Information Retention & Disposition Program:
Kevin L. Glick Electronic Records Archivist Manuscripts and Archives Yale University ECURE Arizona State University March 2, 2005 Fedora and the Preservation.
Managing Records in SharePoint Step 1: Develop Retention Rules that Work.
Automating the Contract Review, Approval and Record Filing processes at NAIC By: Eric Chamas, NAIC Rick Macartney, Gimmal.
Renaud Comte [MVP]
Author(s): David A. Wallace and Margaret Hedstrom, 2009 License: Unless otherwise noted, this material is made available under the terms of the Creative.
1 From Filing Cabinet to Desktop and Network: Records Management in N.C. State Government Ed Southern Government Records Branch N.C. Office of Archives.
Why Compliance Legal and Regulatory requirements Organizational governance requests Internal and external threats Today’s Challenges Duplicate solutions.
Legal Discovery, e-Discovery and Records Management at National Gypsum ARMA Meeting.
SharePoint's Role in the Future of DMS and ECM for Legal.
Created May 2, Division of Public Health Managing Records What is a Record? What is a Records Retention & Disposition Schedule? Why is this Important?
Caroline J. Walters, MA, MLS University Records Officer.
Welcome to the Exchange 2013 Webcast Archiving, eDiscovery, & Data Loss Prevention.
AIIM Presentation Selecting and Implementing A Records Management System June 5, 2008.
Enterprise Content Management In Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007 Lionel Moyal Intervate Solutions
Developing a Standards-Based Records Management Program
1 EDMS 101 Speaker: Monica Crocker, DHS EDMS Coordinator Overview of current project(s) Objective of this section: This session outlines EDMS fundamentals.
Good Digital Records Don’t Just ‘Happen’ Embedding Digital Recordkeeping as an Organic Component of Business Processes and Systems Adrian Cunningham, National.
Legal aspects of digital archiving. Agenda Objectives of the conference Archiving vs Legal Archiving vs Compliance Legal archiving coverage and principles.
Digital Imagery Good News and Bad News for Public Documents Druscilla R. Simpson N.C. State Archives.
Recordkeeping for Good Governance Toolkit Digital Recordkeeping Guidance Funafuti, Tuvalu – June 2013.
STORAGE MANAGEMENT/ EXECUTIVE: Managing a Compliant Infrastructure Processes and Procedures Mike Casey Principal Analyst Contoural Inc.
Records Management
Information Technology through Innovative Thinking MARBULUTIONZ CONSULTING Using SharePoint 2010 as a record keeping tool Presented by: Marlon Green #marl0ngreen.
Retention & Disposition in the Cloud: Mission Critical and/or Mission Impossible? Patricia C. Franks, PhD, CA, CRM, IGP Archives 2015 August 22, 2015 Tweet.
Ecords Management Records Management Paul Smallcombe Records & Information Compliance Manager.
Records & Information Management (RIM) Risk: Is Your Company Exposed? March 19, 2013.
Empower the User Outlook, Word, PowerPoint, SharePoint, Mobile Apps, etc. Exchange, SharePoint, Lync, AD, File Server, third parties, etc. Exchange/
1.Summary of Needs Analysis 2.Summary of Action Plan 3.Systems Analysis between Microsoft SharePoint® and OpenText Content Server 4.System Recommendation.
An introduction to records management at Clemson University Records Management Office 139 Anderson Hwy, Suite 100 Clemson, S.C
Project MoReq 2 Electronic Document and Records Management in the Public Sector Marko Lukičić BCC Services.
Archival Workshop on Ingest, Identification, and Certification Standards Certification (Best Practices) Checklist Does the archive have a written plan.
Business Productivity Infrastructure Optimization Campaign 1 Agenda: BPIO Partner Sales Readiness Workshop Day 3: Topic: Enterprise Content management.
Microsoft.com/publicsector Records Management Microsoft Records Management for Government Agencies.
Create Content Capture Content Review Content Edit Content Version Content Version Content Translate Content Translate Content Format Content Transform.
Managing the Paper Mountain Kaushika Patel, Rockland BOCES Maureen McCarthy, Lower Hudson Regional Information Center.
A Technical Guide to ERMS Bill Manago, CRM. What You Need to Plan For Implementing an Electronic Records Management System Out of the Box What you should.
Modular Requirements for records systems DLM Forum AGM, Budapest 12 th /13 th May 2011 Jon Garde, Journal IT
RECORDKEEPING METADATA STANDARDS: THE INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT Barbara Reed, Director, Recordkeeping Innovation.
Coding Compliance Components Writing Custom Policies for Auditing, Expiration and More Jason Morrill Program Manager Windows SharePoint Services.
@ulccwww.ulcc.ac.uk IRMS Cymru October 2015 From EDRMS to digital archive: a wish-list for ways to preserve digital records.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. Documents.
Accurate  Consistent  Compliant Contact: i4i the structured content company the structured content company.
University case study Suresh Joshee Product Manager, EDRMS, University of Alberta Mike Priest CTO, Glazr Software.
0 Information Management for Everyone DLM Forum Meeting - Dublin Records Management 2.0 & SharePoint Mike Alsup, Gimmal SVP & Founder June 26, 2013.
Progress Report Jon Garde, José Borbinha DLM Forum Members’ Meeting Luxembourg October 2015.
Microsoft Office System 2007: Records Management Wes Preston Inetium.
Underwritten by: #AIIM Information Is Your Most Important Asset. Learn the Skills to Manage It SharePoint: Determine Your Next Move Presented August 17,
Multi-Repository Information Governance in an Office 365 World
Kevin Dorr Sr. Solutions Engineer Alfresco Channel Americas
Introducing ICA-Requirements Module 3: Functional Requirements for Records in Business Systems
Microsoft 365 Get help with regulatory compliance
Document & Web Content Management
RECORDKEEPING METADATA STANDARDS: THE INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT
© 2016 Global Market Insights, Inc. USA. All Rights Reserved Electronic Document Management System Market to grow at 15% CAGR from 2017.
11/16/2018 © 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks.
Use of Oregon Statewide Electronic Records Management Systems (ERMS) Price & Services Agreements (PSA) DAS SPO Representative Lena Ferris DAS EISPD Representatives.
Microsoft Office System 2007: Records Management
Compliant Information Management and the eDiscovery Challenge
ARMA Gaithersburg Chapter USPTO Electronic Records Management
Presentation transcript:

Information Governance & Standards Across the World: DoD5015.2, VERS, MoReq Presented by: Mike Alsup, Gimmal June 16, 2015

Information Management for Everyone How did Gimmal Get Here? Retained by Microsoft to review alpha version of SharePoint 2010 Evaluated planned SharePoint 2010 capabilities against DoD Evaluated planned SharePoint 2010 capabilities against MoReq2 Gimmal productized in SharePoint when Microsoft didn’t – Certified Chapters 2 & 5 with Gimmal Compliance Suite in 2011 – Added Chapter 3, Classified Documents in 2013 Gimmal has the only DoD certified products inside SharePoint 2

Information Management for Everyone Target ECM Repositories for Information Governance Traditional RM SharePoint, Office 365 Traditional ECM File Shares ERP Archives

Information Management for Everyone Retention Location Metadata Security Versions Disposition Many others Retention XX Days Location(s) Network Shares Inbox Metadata Name Retention XX Months Location(s) Document Libraries Metadata Name Document Type Retention Retention Schedule Location(s) Repository of Record Metadata Name Document Type Information Lifecycle Best Practices All Information is managed from creation to disposition Retention for all information in every state of the ILC Early classification (indexing) is an important step to compliance Rules are enforced by the technology TemporaryIn-ProgressFinalArchive Hold Disposition ( Destroy or Archive )

Information Management for Everyone ISO ICA/ISO DoD VERS MoReq RM Standards Vary in Style & Content Soft Standards No Testing Regime Requires a Consultant to tell me I am compliant More Guidelines than Standards Hard Standards Testing and Certification Compatible and Interoperable

Information Management for Everyone DoD Overview DoD : – Defines mandatory and non-mandatory requirements for RM software – Functional Standard vs. Procedural Standard (e.g. ISO 15489) – Certify the product, not the solution Benefits of DoD Certification – Solution Credibility Considered the North American ‘Gold Standard’ for RM Applications Only standard endorsed by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) Leading ECM vendors are certified (Open Text, IBM, EMC, HP, Alfresco, Perceptive, Gimmal) – Legal Integrity Facilitates compliance with internal and external RM requirements Considered a secure records repository for evidentiary integrity – Industry Acceptance Endorsed by industry analysts and associations Gartner  MarketScope for RM required DoD certification 6

Information Management for Everyone Standard Test Procedures JITC maintains Baseline Test Procedures Section 2 – Test Readiness Evaluation Section 3 – User Management Section 4 – File Plan Management Section 5 – Filing Section 6 – Search Section 7 – Screening Section 8 – Disposition Management Section 9 – System Management Section 10 – Usability Evaluation JITC produces Summary & Detailed Reports JITC maintains certified Product Registry

Information Management for Everyone Critical DoD-certified RMA functionality records management Case management Event-based retention Vital records management File plan builder Secure electronic records destruction Enhanced security Enhanced search features  Very specific way of performing records management 8

Information Management for Everyone VERS – Standard is called PROS 99/007 – Version 2, 2003 is the most current VERS sets record keeping requirements for state agencies in Australia – By law, agencies in certain jurisdictions must comply to the requirements in the standard Standard concentrates heavily on formats for storage, long term preservation, and export to controlling/preservation agencies – VEOs (VERS Encapsulated Objects) – Records are aggregated in container objects (Files and File Parts)  Everything is a Record VERS (Victorian Electronic Records Strategy)

Information Management for Everyone MoReq History MoReq – Long history MoReq2 – 2008 – Defines RM requirements to support all needs of any Org. – Based on historical model of a single RM repository – Fabasoft only vendor ever certified – SharePoint  multi-repository, in-place RM changed market MoReq 2010 – 2011 – Modular governance – Export records – Big Vision, Big Plans  not realized, but it’s not too late!

Information Management for Everyone Aspirations that MoReq 2010 Abandons  A ‘file’ in electronic RM system is ERM equivalent of a traditional hard copy file o MoReq 2010 replaces concept of a ‘file’ with an ‘aggregation’ o An aggregation can be a multilevel hierarchy in its own right  A monolithic classification/fileplan applying retention rules to all records o Previously, a classification was linked to retention definitions to apply rules o A Moreq 2010 record can have several classifications that apply rules  A single ERM system that can meet the needs of all organisations in all sectors o MoReq 2010 core module contains rqmts. common to most organisations

Information Management for Everyone Electronic RM systems will integrate w/ applications used to create records MoReq compliant systems will control records held in other systems A new RM system can understand what happened to records in old RM system – MoReq 2010 compliant system needs to be able to export a record and associated metadata – MoReq 2010 is strict on how a system maintains audit logs and event histories Line of business system vendors may incorporate RM functionality The new aspirations of MoReq 2010

Information Management for Everyone MoReq2 vs. MoReq 2010 Product Oriented Traditional ERMS Large Core Tightly Coupled Some Modules One Size Fits All Entry Bar High An Extension of Original MoReq Consumer Oriented Contemporary Systems Small Core Loosely Coupled Many more Options Scaleable / Flexible Entry Bar Low A Foundation for Future Extensions

Information Management for Everyone MoReq 2010 Extensibility

Information Management for Everyone Interoperability

Information Management for Everyone Issues & Opportunities with MoReq 2010 Harmonization with E-Ark Rate of Evolution of Technology Support from ECM (& Other) Vendors Availability of DLM Forum Resources Information Policy – Many types of information policies – Reporting is required by regulatory groups – How to apply policy to multiple repositories consistently? – How to apply to transfer of records between repositories?

Information Management for Everyone Records Mgmt. vs. Regulatory Policy ISO Specification EU Data Protection Regulation 2014

Information Management for Everyone Standards Summary High Demand for governance in Europe and North America – Many new market and technology developments – RM standards  not designed for cloud, social, mobile, or Apps – Much need for RM and IG standards to be harmonized across vendors – Converging standards create a bigger market for RM and IG DoD not workable. US  RM and IG vacuum in standards VERS is minor standard, with similar goals to MoReq 2010 MoReq 2010 published  After 4 years, no vendors certified MoReq has great merits but not yet adopted

Information Management for Everyone What Do We Need to Do? Accept that MoReq is the Best RM Standard – Only Std. Built for Multi-Repository Governance – Only Std. Built for Transfer to Archives Testing Center needs to be completed – Great progress from Ricardo Vieira and Jose Borbinha Synchronize MoReq 2010 Export Rules with E-ARK Initiatives – Enables Consistent Capture into National Archives Use technical experts to update MoReq standard Work w/ N. American standards orgs, esp. JITC Solicit involvement of AIIM, ARMA, NARA and ICA

Information Management for Everyone ? Questions

Information Management for Everyone Mike