Application for Ethics Approval for BEd/BSSc Honours Projects Tianyuan Li, Chairperson of the PS Departmental Ethics Committee (June 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The School Research Ethics Committee Welsh School of Architecture.
Advertisements

A Guide. Why is writing an ethics application NOT a waste of time? It helps you to... clarify your research questions. limit your research questions.
How to complete an Expedited Ethical Review Submission.
University Research Ethics Committee Workshop on procedure and data protection issues 30th May 2008.
Psychology Departmental Research Ethics Board (Psych-REB) September 2012 Dr. Jill Singleton-Jackson, Chair.
Ethical regulations for health research involving human subjects in Cambodia By Chap Seak Chhay, MD, MPH, MHPEd Public Health and Health Professions Educator.
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
7 Tips for Quicker IRB Approval And one unavoidable truth.
The Consent Process: It’s More Than Just a Form A “10 Minute Training” Brought to you by Cyndi Long, MS, RD, CCRC CU Sports Medicine.
Dr. Anjum Susan John, MRC 4/13/2017.
Action research, grounded theory and the ethical approval of projects with evolving methods George Ellison Research and Graduate School
Human Research and Ethics Dr Michèle de Courcy Chair, Faculty of Education HEAG University of Melbourne.
Ethical Issues Role of the Qualitative Researcher.
HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS. TRI-COUNCIL POLICY The University has adopted the Tri-Council Policy Statement on the Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.
Use of Children as Research Subjects What information should be provided for an FP7 ethical review?
Research Compliance Office Consent Form Workshop Kristin B. Frazier HRPP Education Specialist Research Compliance Office January 24, 2008.

The Research Project: ethical approval process
How to Avoid Problems in the Informed Consent Process Shannon Ontiveros, MS, CIP, CIM Institutional Review Board.
Research Ethics A guide to principles and procedures
Psychology Departmental Research Ethics Board (Psych-REB) October 2013 Dr. Carlin J. Miller, Chair.
Human Subject Research by Students at William Paterson University March 2015.
 About SP ERC  Role of SP ERC  SP ERC Members  ERC Operations  Definition of Research  Definition of Principal Investigator (PI), Co-PI, Collaborator.
Workshop on Health Examination Surveys (HES) Legal and ethical issues Susanna Conti, M. Kanieff, G. Rago Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS) (National Public.
Psychology 291 – Lab 4 Ethics October 9, 2012
Human Research Ethics and Obtaining Ethics Approval
Regulatory Authority Governing Clinical Trials Anthony J. Minisi, MD Director, Cardiology Fellowship Program.
NSW Department of Education & Training NSW Public Schools – Leading the Way SELECTION PANEL PROCEDURES FOR SCHOOL TEACHERS 2009 Procedural.
University of Western Sydney Comments on your HREC Application.
What you need to know about the Saint Leo IRB review process.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Human Subject Dr. John N. Austin, Director and Ms. Renee S. Jones, Associate Director Delaware State University Office.
 The WP IRB is concerned with Social- Behavioral and Biomedical research that is: A systematic investigation Designed to develop or contribute to generalizable.
1. Proposal deadline 2. Timeline  A grant opportunity announcement will include a sponsor deadline for receipt of the proposal.  The instructions will.
The work of the Research Ethics Committee Dr Carol Chu.
Negotiating access, ethics and the problems of ‘inside’ research.
Teaching Research Methods (Classroom Protocols) Boston University Charles River Campus Boston University Medical Center Mary A. Banks BS, BSN IRB Director.
Psychology Departmental Research Ethics Board (Psych-REB) October, 2007 Dr. Pascual-Leone, Chair.
Cardiff and Vale UHB Bwrdd lechyd Prifysgol Caerdydd a’r Fro NHS R&D Overview How to avoid the common pitfalls? Thomas Fairman Research Liaison Manager.
Module 3: Informed Consent. This training session contains information regarding: Documenting consent Documenting consent Conducting informed consent.
Why Proposed TC Procedures? Define how TC reaches “completion” of what OASIS calls “Committee Specifications” TC procedures lead up to the OASIS process:
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
Ethical Standards for Conducting Research at Unitec
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTION PROGRAM Office Location: 1350 N. Vine Ave. (one block west of Cherry Ave. & three blocks north of Speedway) PO Box Phone:
The Linguistics Department Institutional Review Board Committee Silvina Montrul, chair Fred Davidson Irene Koshik Ryan Shosted September 22, 2008.
Human Subjects Protections Research Ethics. Basic Assumptions about How Research Should be Conducted Subjects should be protected from harm. Subjects.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
Humanities and Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee (HSSREC) April 2014.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
Renewals A HOW-TO. Objectives 1.Why are renewals necessary? 2.What projects require a renewal? 3.How do I find the form? 4.How do I fill out the form?
IRB Applications Ten Common Mistakes. 1. Failing to attach documents properly.
Secretary’s Workshop Standard Duties. Usually, the secretary position is the training ground for a future leadership position The standard duties of a.
Elements of Ethical Review of Study Documents Dr.C.H.Shashindran Director-Professor & Head Department of Pharmacology JIPMER.
INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FAIR Rules and Guidelines 2016.
 Empowered by the University to insure we are in compliance with Federal regulations  Guided by the standards in the Belmont Report and regulations.
The research ethics review process Hazel Abbott, Chair University Research Ethics Committee.
Application for Ethics Approval for MSocScP(SCS) Research Projects Tianyuan Li, Chairperson of the PS Departmental Ethics Committee (May 2015)
Prepare for Year 3 Consideration of Ethics Sarah Stevenage.
Slide 1 Standard Operating Procedures. Slide 2 Goal To review the standard operating procedures Creating the informed consent document Obtaining informed.
Presentation prepared for GCSU ENGAGE INSTITUTION REVIEW BOARD (IRB): FUNCTION AND SERVICE Tsu-Ming Chiang, Chair Whitney Heppner, Vice Chair Qiana Wilson,
Research Ethics: a short guide for Staff 2017/18
Duck, Duck, Goose Keeping your IRB Ducks in a Row
Top Ten eIRB Application Mistakes
Dr. Niamh Lenahan November 2016
Preparation for a Major Paper
What types of research are exempt and ohrp guidance on exemptions
Dr. Sarah Quinton, UREC Chair,
Consent Form Workshop Kristin B. Frazier HRPP Education Specialist
UL Research Ethics & Research Integrity
Human Participants Research
Presentation transcript:

Application for Ethics Approval for BEd/BSSc Honours Projects Tianyuan Li, Chairperson of the PS Departmental Ethics Committee (June 2015)

Review by the Departmental Ethics Committee (DEC), PS DEC Membership: Chairperson and members are appointed by Head. DEC is delegated by Head - to review ethics applications endorsed by supervisors; and - to approve and notify the applicant of the decision Enquiries: Miss Helena Tsang, DEC (PS) Secretary,

Where to begin? ◦ Departmental ethics application webpage ◦ 37&secid= &secid=2474

Student Ethics Application Documents needed ◦ Application form ◦ Appropriate consent forms and information sheets (e.g., school, parent, participants)  Chinese version ALSO needed if it is the language that will be presented to the participants ◦ (Draft) Questionnaire and/or interview scripts ◦ Research proposal

Procedure Step 1Download documents from the Department’s website at Read the advice and notes in the application document and reference documents on the web, and consult supervisor in preparing your ethics applications. Submit the application materials to your supervisor. NOTE: - Processing time can take one month. Allow enough time!! - You should NOT start collecting data or asking for participants ’ consent before obtaining approval from the Departmental Ethics Committee. Step 2Supervisor to review the ethics documents and research proposal and suggest necessary amendments. Step 3Supervisor to pass the signed application documents to Secretary of the Departmental Ethics Committee (Helena, Soft copy with e-signature is

Procedure Step 4DEC to review and pass feedback comments to student and supervisor for revision. Student is required to use track changes in making changes and pass the revised documents to supervisor. Supervisor to review and forward the documents to DEC for review again. Step 5DEC to review revised application documents. If no further revision is required, DEC Secretary will the approval to the student and supervisor If the revision is not done carefully, multiple rounds of revision is possible.

Time: A major issue! Allow about one month for the ethics application To save time Prepare the documents carefully Present the participants, methodology, and data collection process clearly and consistently Only make necessary changes to the templates Draft questionnaire and interview scripts are acceptable as long as experimental procedures will not change in ethically important ways, e.g.: Doesn’t newly ask any potentially sensitive information of the participants (e.g. drug use; sexual activity; etc.), Doesn’t newly recruit children (below age of 18) as participants, Doesn’t introduce new recruitment procedures that could pressure potential participants to participate Doesn’t change anonymity or confidentiality of data (e.g. newly deciding to take videotapes or other recordings)

Common mistakes Information being vague / missing, especially about participants and methodology Number of participants, age range of participants, the way to recruit participants and conduct the study, tasks for the participants, duration of each task, audio/videotape or not, confidentiality/anonymity of the data, how long the data file will be kept, etc. Information* being inconsistent (initial submission or revision) Consistency between documents: proposal, application form, information sheet, etc Consistency between Chinese and English version of consent form and information sheet * as indicated above, e.g., number of participants, duration of task (time commitment), etc. Consent forms and Information Sheets - Mistakes when doing copy and paste. For example, used “your child” in school consent form, used “your student” in parent consent form. - Wrongly placed the names (supervised by [name of student] and conducted by [name of supervisor]) in the forms.

Common mistakes Parent consent School consent If there is some kind of potential risk / discomfort or eliciting negative emotion, how to eliminate or minimize (i) For children aged below 9, only signature of their parents/guardians on consent form is required; completion of the task, after verbal explanation of its nature by the researcher, provides implied consent by the child; (ii) For children aged 9 to 15, signature of both the children and their parents/guardians on consent form is required; and (iii) For adolescents aged 16 to 17, signature of the adolescents on consent form would be required while consent from their parents/guardians is optional for studies involving minimal risk.

Common mistakes Others Application form - PART III, question p “Will the research participant's identity be disclosed if archived tissue samples or personal / medical / social records are used? and PART III, question t “If the study is a medical/clinical research, does the protocol state compliance to declaration of Helsinki ( Normally, the answer to the questions should be “NA”. - Part IV, 3a “You will publish this research in the form of … Students should check “Thesis”. More information from the Guideline and FAQs

QUESTIONS?