What is a Service Level Agreement? Service level agreements are part of a quality approach to help teams identify and agree what ‘good quality’ looks like.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2006 LaBounty & Associates, Inc. Working With Support Teams Beyond the Service Desk Char LaBounty LaBounty & Associates, Inc.
Advertisements

Building effective networks. In this session Consider the value of building networks with NGOs and other stakeholders. Learn how to develop effective.
Using New Technologies and Approaches Pamela Bigart World Bank.
Bryan Roach Chairman Crime Stoppers Australia. Strategic Planning The process for defining strategy (direction) and decision making For Crime Stoppers,
Page 2 Agenda Page 3 History –Blue Print, 2000 –GIS Process 1.2, 2001 (training only) –GIS Process 2.0, (ITIL based - not implemented) –Supply/Demand.
Professional Certificate in Leadership and Management - Certificate in Electoral Processes 9 th – 13 th July 2012 Guide to Planning for Electoral Management.
Aligning Employee Performance with Agency Mission
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
ASSESSORS ORIENTATION 2008 DEPARTMENTAL SERVICE EXCELLENCE AWARDS.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
An introduction to Learning in Future Environments (LiFE)
A vision for a new national youth work strategy for Wales I want Youth Services to reach out to all young people and.
Service Design / SLA Architecture “Services are a means of delivering value to customers by facilitating outcomes customers want to achieve without the.
Strategies for Developing and Implementing a Successful Strategic/Business Plan Affiliated Programs 19 th Annual Meeting October 27, Haddon Avenue.
Teachers’ Appraisal and Pay Pete Gaskin Julie Chow Alison Trehearn Paula Shaw 1 12 July 2013.
Benchmarking as a management tool for continuous improvement in public services u Presentation to Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation u Peter.
DEPAUL UNIVERSITY SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS AND PERFORMANCE METRICS Marge Hayes Ashton Hayes Group January 31, 2000.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
Performance Improvement and Accountability Framework
Fully Leverage External Data Sources: A Census Bureau Change Principle Amy O’Hara, U.S. Census Bureau Washington Statistical Society Seminar on Administrative.
System Office Performance Management
Appraisal and performance management
Imperial College Web Review Imperial College.... An audience-focused realignment of our web strategy with our College strategy, our market, technology.
THE PRINCIPLES OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT. DEFINING QUALITY Good Appearance? High Price? The Best? Particular Specification? Not necessarily, but always: Fitness.
School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools” Self-Evaluation of Learning and Teaching Self-Evaluation of Learning and.
Delegation of Commissioning Responsibilities (DR) to pathfinders and emerging Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) - What is it? Why should pathfinders.
Learning with a Purpose: Learning Management Systems Patti Holub, Director District Initiatives and Special Projects Miguel Guhlin, Director Instructional.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
Strategic Commissioning
Teamwork: Developing SMART Goals Together Massachusetts Association of School Business Officials September 12, 2013.
LOUGHBOROUGHCOLLEGE Business Support Self Assessment
FHWA Reorganization Update Program Performance Management Standing Committee on Performance Management Meeting Detroit, MI October 14, 2011 Peter Stephanos.
Evaluation of the SEND Pathfinder Programme: Early Findings Graham Thom and Meera Prabhakar May 2012.
A simple performance measurement framework A good performance measurement framework will focus on the customer and measure the right things. Performance.
Early Market Briefing Proposed tender for the Australia-Timor-Leste Partnership for Human Development (ATLPHD) 14 September 2015, Dili.
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
A Performance Culture for Local Government in Northern Ireland Anne Donaghy Chair of the Performance Culture Pillar 13 December 2012.
Student Education Service Update June SES Update SES Configuration SES Leadership Team SES Business case Faculty progress Page 2.
Governance and Commissioning Natalie White DCSF Consultant
Business Consulting Services Engagement Proposal & Letter of Agreement Project Management Timelines/GANNT Chart.
IT SERVICE MANAGEMENT (ITSM). ITIL\ITSM OVERVIEW  ITIL Framework.
Disability Services Value for Money and Policy Review 29/11/20151 Value for Money and Policy Review of Disability Services in Ireland Presentation to the.
Public Protection Service 2008/9 Charter Mark and Electronic Data Management System (EDMS) Improve performance and efficiency together with improving customer.
Queen’s Management & Leadership Framework
Geospatial LoB: Lifecycle WG Update November 3, 2009.
A Call to Arms Create an IT department that can be clearly defined by the faculty, administration, students and staff as successful by using agreed upon.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
1 Fit for the Future Selvin Brown MBE Programme Director, GCS Improvement Programme November 2015.
Achieving Success Reviewee Workshop. Aims 2 main aims: To provide an understanding of the review process To introduce the SMART approach to objective.
Building Strong Library Associations | Sustaining Your Library Association BSLA Stakeholders Workshop Yaounde, Cameroon, April 2012 Managing Relationships.
© SITA (Pty) Ltd 2001 – ITAC Parliamentary Portfolio Committee, 05 June 2002.
Phoenix Technology Solutions Products At the highest level, the products offered by Phoenix Technology Solutions are: IT Project/Programme Management.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Manage IT Budgets & Cost World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
Commissioning Support Programme Post-16 Commissioning David Brown NASS Conference 9 th October 2009.
Business Transformation Project December 18, 2015 Rachel Mercer, Project Director.
A Professional Development Series from the CDC’s Division of Population Health School Health Branch Professional Development 101: The Basics – Part 1.
Leading Nottingham Programme update to ACOS 7 September 2010 Angela Probert Director of HR and Organisational Transformation Contributions from Lisa Sharples.
PARCA Demonstration Data Information Flow Diagram Footnote:- No set timescales – timescales will be agreed by the Project Team Phase 0 Phase 1 Phase 2.
WGCapD, CEOS and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Committee on Earth Observation Satellites Deputy CEOS Executive Officer / CSA Marie-Josée.
Connecting and collaborating with University departments to achieve a more impactful curriculum career education Anna Graves, Kim.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
1 Developing Your Internal Processes to Ensure Consistency Across Service Channels Integrating Government Service Channels Conference February 11, 2003.
1 Balanced Scorecard Philosophy, Basics, Fundamentals, and Functions.
“Collaborative” (noun) vs. “Collaborative” (adjective) Focusing on Collaboration as a Process col·lab·o·ra·tive adjective produced or conducted by two.
Technical Business Consultancy Project
Professional Certificate in Strategic Change Management
Core Values.
Strategy
Stakeholder & Public Affairs Manager
Presentation transcript:

What is a Service Level Agreement? Service level agreements are part of a quality approach to help teams identify and agree what ‘good quality’ looks like and provide a framework for measuring and monitoring the success of service quality. A service level agreement is normally a two-way written agreement which defines the service and standards your team provides to your customers whether these are students, staff in schools and/or other central administration teams. It also describes what you need from your customers/service users in order to deliver the service stated.

Benefits of SLAs Facilitates a clear understanding of the service and responsibilities of all parties; Helps you to manage your service users expectations; Promotes transparency, accountability and consistency; Informs team performance, workloads, staffing decisions; Supports cooperative and collaborative working; and Focuses teams on continuous improvement

Why we are introducing SLAs To support the strategic review by providing : ● a standard framework for defining the services provided by central administration to be agreed with its service users ● a set of core and departmental quality standards that are measurable ● clear boundaries and accountabilities ● an opportunity to review and improve our services and demonstrate how we add value and improve cost effectiveness

What has been agreed by SHA: ● The development of departmental and core SLAs for all central administration teams by December 2009 taking into account: ● Service quality, relevance – new ways of working, cost effectiveness, success measures and key performance indicators ● A group of departments will lead on the development consisting of Estates, External Relations, ITS, the Library and Registry ● A standard SLA template has been agreed for use by all teams ● A management consultation group to be established to develop Core SLAs and review departmental SLAs ● Timescales for the development, implementation and evaluation of SLAs with updates and progress reviews by SHA

Timeline for development By June 2009 Lead departments to develop SLAs Management group to develop Core SLAs July 2009 Discussions with Schools to start September 2009 Core SLAs and Lead Department SLAs complete December 2009 All SLAs to be in place

Developing SLAs Start with a plan! Work out the logistics - what needs to be done, when and by whom Decide how you will - communicate, engage and involve your teams Address any resource issues

Review your services What services are provided? What quality standards already exist? Seek feedback from service users Set out what you need from your service users in order to deliver Consider new ways of working

Be prepared to negotiate SLAs need to be agreed not simply defined Don’t get bogged down in detail Service Standards should be SMART – specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time based. Who is accountable for service delivery?