17.4.2013Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland1 Classification and monitoring of the surface waters of Finland National.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Resident Fish Stock Status in the Palouse River and upper Crab Creek watersheds, Washington. Jason McLellan Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Advertisements

Convention of the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes Setting the scene for Session 1 National information systems.
1 Europe’s water – an indicator-based assessment Niels Thyssen.
Eutrophication of the Black Sea
15. 2 Diversity of Ocean Life & 15.3 Oceanic Productivity
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Aquaculture in Scotland the potential effects of the Water framework Directive the potential effects of the Water framework Directive Peter Holmes Marine.
Environmental flows in Europe Mike Acreman. Green and pleasant land? Thames basin 10,000 km mm rainfall 15 million people significant water stress.
Rivers Intercalibration Phase 2 Key Cross-GIG activities  Refining Reference Conditions  Intercalibrating Large River Ecological Status  Initial.
Pond Ecology.  Lakes and ponds are bodies of open standing water  Their physical conditions and life vary with distance from the shore.
Anne Lyche Solheim, Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Oslo, Norway Workshop on ”In situ trialing for ecological and chemical studies in support of.
Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems in Latvia Gunta Spriņģe, Institute of Biology, University of Latvia.
An overview of water quality monitoring schemes for compliance with the WFD An Overview An overview of water quality monitoring schemes for compliance.
HELCOM as an International Tool of Environmental Protection of the Baltic Sea Mieczysław S. Ostojski, Ph.D. Mieczysław S. Ostojski, Ph.D. Chairman, Helsinki.
Anne Lyche Solheim (NIVA/JRC) – team leader for ETC Water Joint NRC Freshwater and SoE drafting group meeting EEA Copenhagen – 3 rd October 2007 SoE Guidance.
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Benthic invertebrates in lakes Małgorzata Gołub (IOŚ) Jacek Koszałka (UWM) Paweł.
The Importance of Healthy Riparian Areas and their Current Status in Wisconsin Tim Asplund, Buzz Sorge (WI DNR) Advanced Lake Leaders – Green Lake Sept.
South Eastern River Basin District - Environmental Quality Standard Development-
Fish migration from a Water Framework Directive perspective
LVĢMA, 2006 LATVIJAS VIDES, ĢEOLOĢIJAS UN METEOROLOĢIJAS AĢENTŪRA Water data availability Normunds Kadiķis.
19 June 2003, Athens, Greece INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT THE RIVER BASIN PERSPECTIVE The Jucar River Basin - First results Teodoro Estrela Júcar PRB Coordinator.
Biological methods to detect the effects of hydrological and morphological pressures Introduction and overview of questionnaire responses.
A Practical Approach: The General Physico-Chemical Quality Elements and the Classification of Ecological Status.
Presented by Sandra Poikane EC Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Biological indicators of lakes and rivers and the Intercalibration.
CLASSIFICATION OF RIVERS AND LAKES
Management of the coastal and marine environment: The legal framework of the European Union from the first EEC Directives to the Water Framework Directive.
EFFECT OF AGGREGATION METHODS ON ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Paul Latour Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management CIS WORKSHOP ON NATIONAL CLASSIFICATION.
RiverLife and Implementation of the WFD Satu Maaria Karjalainen North Ostrobothnia Regional Environment Centre PRB Workshop , Ghent.
Finnish Environment Institute Seppo Rekolainen REBECCA News in March 2005.
Europe-wide monitoring obligations under the EU Water Framework Directive Jos G. Timmerman Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment.
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Pragmatic combination of BQE results into final WB assessment in Norway Anne Lyche.
Aquatic Biome Stratification MP 2.1 and 2.2. Light Intensity Light intensity decreases rapidly with increasing depth greatly influencing the communities.
Anne Laine North Ostrobothnia Regional Environment Centre FINLAND BOTHNIAN BAY LIFE.
Aquatic Ecosystem Overview: We need to understand the physical (e.g. hydrodynamics) and chemical environment that ultimately control the productivity,
11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands1 Diederik van der Molen Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management CIS workshop.
Benthic Fauna.
1 European Topic Centre on Water Workshop on: Identification of surface water bodies under the Pilot River Basin Initiative Monitoring Water Bodies Steve.
River Basin Management Plan Steps, Status and Objectives.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE CONVERSION OF RBPAPs INTO RBMPs MONITORING INCEPTION WORKSHOP ISTAMBUL February Alfredo CORROCHANO CODORNÍU Carmen.
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Overall Approach to the Ecological Classification 01 July 2003 D/UK WGL CIS 2A.
Odessa – 2016 Ukrainian Scientific Centre of Ecology of the Sea UkrSCES (Odessa, Ukraine)
Aquatic Biomes. Determined by Salt content Flow rate Size (sometimes) 2 major categories of aquatic biomes: Salt water system Freshwater.
Thematic assessments based on results from RBMPs Coastal and transitional ecological status & related presures Inland surface waters Hydromorphological.
Identification and evaluation of anthropogenic pressures Northern calotte water authority meeting Levi 16 th -18 th April 2013 Pekka Räinä/ Lapland ELY-centre.
Corina Carpentier AquaLife Workshop, Kiel, Germany 2nd June 2010
Aquatic Ecosystem Overview:
ECOSTAT, Bristol Hotel, Brussels,
Warm Up #4 Environmental conditions in coastal estuaries vary greatly.
The design of the monitoring network for lakes and rivers in Finland
Progress on Intercalibration COAST GIGs
Experiences of designing WFD-monitoring networks in the Netherlands
SoE Guidance – Biological reporting sheets
Defining reference conditions and environmental objectives for the heavily modified watercourses in Northern Finland – Oulujoki-pilot river basin approach.
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT WFD CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting, October 2005 Progress in the intercalibration exercise.
Aquatic microbial groups
COAST Lisbon February Claire Vincent Environment and Heritage Service United Kingdom.
River Kokemäenjoki – Flood risk management & WFD
River Kokemäenjoki – Flood risk management & WFD
Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE)
The normal balance of ingredients
Definition and Establishment of Reference Conditions
Northern GIG - Organisation
on a protocol for Intercalibration of Surface Water
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
Progress and activities of Oulujoki PRB (Finland) PRB Workshop 2006 Stresa, Italy Teemu Ulvi Seppo Hellsten Finnish Environment Institute.
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT SCG Meeting in Brussels
Aquatic Ecosystems.
Typology and classification of coastal waters in Estonia
FITTING THE ITALIAN METHOD FOR EVALUATING LAKE ECOLOGICAL QUALITY FROM BENTHIC DIATOMS (EPI-L) IN THE “PHYTOBENTHOS CROSS-GIG” INTERCALIBRATION EXERCISE.
Presented by Ana Cristina Cardoso
Presentation transcript:

Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland1 Classification and monitoring of the surface waters of Finland National WFD-monitoring and revised classification of ecological status

Quality elements  Biology: Algae, Macrophytes, Fish, Benthic animals  Water quality: Total nutrients and pH  Hazardous substances: EU’s Priority substances, National list of hazardous substances  Hydro-morphological alterations: Magnitude of water level and discharge regulation of lakes and rivers, Modifications of river channels and lake shores, Migration barriers Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland2

Revision of classification and monitoring 2013  Classification revised for 2. water management cycle –New quality variables and indexes –Subtypes for Northern and Southern waters –Revised reference values and class limits for most variables  Monitoring network revised by the end of 2013 –Pressures for cutting off the costs: reduction of monitored water-bodies and biological variables?? Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland3

Biological monitoring: Algae  Lakes: Phytoplankton (NEW: littoral periphyton)  Rivers: Periphyton (Diatoms) in rapids  Coastal waters: Phytoplankton, Kelp vegetation (Southern areas) Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland4

Biological monitoring: Algae: Indicators (1)  Phytoplankton: Reference values and class limits revised, new variables for lakes –Chlorophyll-α concentration –TPI (Trophic plankton-index) –Total biomass –Blue-green algae % of tot. biomass  Macroalgae (Kelp) –Distribution and maximum depth of kelp vegetation –Kelp does not occur in Northern Baltic Sea Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland5

Biological monitoring: Algae: Indicators (2)  Periphyton (Diatoms) –Formerly used IPS- index discarded –For rivers, Northern and Southern subtypes added –New reference values and class limits –Rivers & Lakes:  Number of type-specific species (TT 40 )  Percent Model Affinity (PMA) Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland6

Biological monitoring: Macrophytes  Lakes, use in rivers under development  Northern and Southern subtypes  Indicators: –Type-specific species % of tot. no. of species –PMA (Percent Model Affinity) –Eutrophication Index –NEW: Reference values for naturally eutrophic lakes Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland7

Biological monitoring: Benthic invertebrates  Lakes: Profundal, (NEW: lake littoral area)  Rivers: Rapids  Coastal areas: Soft substrate bottoms Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland8

Biological monitoring: Benthos, indicators (1)  Rivers and Lake littorals: new reference values and class limits for Northern and Southern freswaters  Rivers: –No. of type-specific species (TT) –No. of type-specific sensitive (EPT) species –PMA (Percent Model Affinity)  Lake littorals: –No. of type-specific species (TT) –PMA (Percent Model Affinity) Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland9

Biological monitoring: Benthos, indicators (2)  Lake profundals: –BQI (Benthic Quality Index) discarded –Profundal Invertebrate Community Metric (PICM) –PMA (Percent Model Affinity), updated  Coastal waters: –BBI (Brackish water benthic index), type-specific benthic index Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland10

Biological monitoring: Fish  Lakes: Survey fishing with NORDIC-nets  Rivers: Electrofishing of rapids –Updated reference values and class limits Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland11

Biological monitoring: Fish, indicators  Lakes: Fish-index, includes: –Total biomass, Total no. of individuals –Cyprinid % of tot. biomass –Natural occurence of indicator species  Rivers: FiFi-index, includes: –No. of species –Proportion of sensitive species –Proportion of tolerant species –Density of Cyprinid-populations –Density of natural Salmonid fry Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland12

Updates on water quality classifications  River pH: classification based on mean of yearly minimum pH’s of observation period (recommended ). Earlier, classification was based on observed minimum.  Lakes: –New ref. values and class limits for P and N on shallow, humic lakes  Coastal waters: –Based on tot. nutrient concentration in summer (previously based on winter observations). –Classifications for secchi depth and profundal oxygen concentration Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland13

14 Characterized waters in Tana-Neiden-Pasvik Basin All rivers >100 km 2 and lakes >1 km 2 should be classified by June Data scarce -> expert judgement based on existing pressures using grouping of water bodies by type Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland

2013: Classification of border rivers Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland15

Classification of border lakes Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland16

Example Lake Inari (Lagre clearwater lake -type) Biological elements:  PhytoplanktonEQR = 1,48  Macrophytes /EQR = 0,56 PhytobenthosEQR = 0,83  Littoral benthos / EQR = 0,35 Profundal benthos EQR = 0,75  Fish EQR = 0,97 -> Biological status mean EQR = 0,84 -> Expert judgement 17 high moderate high poor good high good

Example Lake Inari (continued) Physico-chemical status –total nutrients etc. Chemical status –priority substances < EQS as expert judgement Hydromorphological status –slightly altered -> Ecological status high good

Moderate lakes in first period in RBD Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland19

Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland20 Blue: Basic monitoring Red: Operational mon. Green: Basic & Operational Triangles: Lakes Circles: Rivers Monitoring in Lapland

Present monitoring in Lapland Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland21 -Biological sampling in majority of monitoring stations. -Monitoring sites represent existing surface water types (goal is to include at least 3 sites/type/Basin). -EU-directives cause pressures to increase the number of stations, especially on smaller rivers and lakes -Resources already insufficient…

Revision of national monitoring  National monitoring network will be ”updated” by the end of 2013  Savings in state administration may create needs for reduction of monitoring costs –May cut down the number of monitoring stations and reduce monitoring frequency especially for biological variables  Obligation monitoring by industry, mines etc. and voluntary monitoring by civil organisations should be fully utilized in monitoring –Limited possibilities in Northern Lapland due to lack of industry and small, aging population of the region –The quality of voluntary monitoring data? Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland22

THANK YOU! Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland