Heaters for the QXF magnets: designs and testing and QC M. Marchevsky (LBNL)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QXF Quench Protection: issues and plans Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab QXF Video-meeting August 1, 2013 The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High.
Advertisements

2 nd Joint HiLumi LHC – LARP Annual Meeting INFN Frascati – November 14 th to 16 th 2012 LBNL: Helene Felice – Tiina Salmi – Ray Hafalia – Maxim Martchevsky.
Protection study options for HQ01e-3 Tiina Salmi QXF meeting, 27 Nov 2012.
MQXF Quench Protection Analysis HiLumi workshop – KEK, Tsukuba Vittorio Marinozzi 11/18/2014.
1 QXF heater proposal M. Marchevsky, H. Felice, T. Salmi, D. Cheng, G. Sabbi, LBNL.
MQXF state of work and analysis of HQ experimental current decays with the QLASA model used for MQXF Vittorio Marinozzi 10/28/
Susana Izquierdo Bermudez. With many contributions from Juho Rysti, Gerard Willering and all the people involved in the manufacturing and test of the magnet.
Overview of main results from first HQ02a test For HQ meeting 7/30/13.
Coil parts & Instrumentation issues for LQ/HQ coils tested at Fermilab HQ/LHQ coil parts task force.
1 QXF heater design: current status and the path forward M. Marchevsky (LBNL) 03/06/2014 D.W. Cheng, H. Felice, G. Sabbi (LBNL), G. Ambrosio (FNAL)
Dan Cheng 1/13/2015 LARP Copper Plated Trace Development Update.
LQ Goals and Design Study Summary – G. Ambrosio 1 LARP Collab Mtg – SLAC, Oct , 2007 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC LQ Goals & Design Summary Giorgio Ambrosio.
Susana Izquierdo Bermudez. OUTLINE 1. Margin and MIITs overview 2. Quench study based on FNAL 11T tests results 1. Longitudinal quench propagation 2.
HL-LHC/LARP, QXF Test Facility Workshop– R. Carcagno QXF Test Requirements Ruben Carcagno BNL Workshop December 17, 2013.
Design optimization of the protection heaters for the LARP high-field Nb 3 Sn quadrupoles M. Marchevsky, D. W. Cheng, H. Felice, G. Sabbi, Lawrence Berkeley.
1 QXF heater parameters G. Chlachidze, M. Marchevsky March 13, 2014.
LQ status and plans – G. Ambrosio 1 LARP Collaboration Meeting - LBNL, April , 2006 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC OUTLINE: Goals, Input and Output Sub-tasks.
DOE Review of LARP – February 17-18, 2014 Coil Design and Fabrication Miao Yu February 17,
HiLumi-LHC / LARP Conductor and Cable Internal Review October 16 th and 17 th 2013 H. Felice LARP Short Magnets Fabrication and Test experience relevant.
QXF instrumentation trace development
QXF protection heater design : Overview and status Tiina Salmi QXF quench protection meeting April 30, 2013.
Plans and schedule for QXF Giorgio Ambrosio and Paolo Ferracin Joint LARP/CM20 HiLumi meeting Napa Valley, CA, USA 8-10 April, 2013 The HiLumi LHC Design.
LARP CM15 Magnet Testing Working Group SLAC, November 2 nd 2010.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Coil Parts Task Force Video MtgG. Ambrosio 11 HQ/LHQ Coil Parts Task Force January 6, 2012 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC.
Triplet status and plans P. Ferracin, G. Ambrosio, M. Anerella, A. Ballarino, B. Bordini, F. Borgnolutti, R. Bossert, D. Cheng, D.R. Dietderich, B. Favrat,
Dan Cheng Mar 6, 2014 QXF Instrumentation Trace Fabrication Update.
MQXF protection – comparison between 1 or 2 power supplies Vittorio Marinozzi 06/08/
Lab Coordination Meeting 3/21/13LHC IR Quadrupole Plan – G. Sabbi 1 LARP Magnet Systems Plan GianLuca Sabbi Lab Coordination Meeting March 21, 2013.
HL-LHC Annual Meeting, November 2013HQ Planning – G. Sabbi 1 HQ Status and Plans G. Sabbi High Luminosity LHC Annual Meeting Daresbury, UK, November 11-14,
S. Caspi, LBNL HQ Progress and Schedule Shlomo Caspi LBNL LARP Collaboration Meeting – CM13 Port Jefferson November 4-6, 2009.
LQ Quench Protection – G. Ambrosio 1 LQ DS video Mtg – May. 23, 2007 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Long Quadrupole Quench Protection Giorgio Ambrosio LQ DS.
Review of Quench Limits FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab 1 st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting CERN November 16-18, 2011.
E. Todesco PROTECTION IN MAGNET DESIGN E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With help from B. Auchmann, L. Bottura, H. Felice, J. Fleiter, T. Salmi, M.
D. Cheng Feb 11, 2014 QXF Instrumentation Trace Update.
HQ01e3 test summary December 2012 M. Marchevsky, LBNL.
QXF quench heater delay simulations Tiina Salmi, T. Salmi.
1 Quench Protection Workshop - 04/29/2014 QXF heater design M. Marchevsky, D.W. Cheng (LBNL) E. Todesco (CERN) T. Salmi (Tampere UT) G. Chalchidze, G.
FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 1/19 FRESCA II Dipole review March 28 th, CERN Magnet protection Protection studies.
1 QXF / SQXF heater design update M. Marchevsky (12/03/13)
Dan Cheng, Maxim Marchevsky 9/9/2014 Copper Plated Trace Development Update.
Quench Protection Maximum Voltages G. Ambrosio, V. Marinozzi, M. Sorbi WG Video-Mtg January 14, 2015.
E. Todesco INTERACTION REGION MAGNETS E. Todesco On behalf of the WP3 collaboration CERN, Geneva, Switzerland CERN, 27 th October 2015.
DOE Review of LARP – February 17-18, 2014 SQXF Coil Design and Fabrication Winding and Curing Miao Yu February 17,
Tiina Salmi and Antti Stenvall, Tampere University of technology, Finland FCCW2016 Roma, April 13 th, 2016 Quench protection of the 16T dipoles for the.
Protection heater design for MQXF outer layer *Using long Super- Heating Stations for ensuring quenhces at low currents* Tiina Salmi, Tampere.
HQ02A2 TEST RESULTS November 7, 2013 FERMILAB. HQ02 test at Fermilab 2  First HQ quadrupole with coils (#15-17, #20) of the optimized design o Only coil.
MQXFS1 Test Results G. Chlachidze, J. DiMarco, S. Izquierdo-Bermudez, E. Ravaioli, S. Stoynev, T. Strauss et al. Joint LARP CM26/Hi-Lumi Meeting SLAC May.
Answers to the review committee G. Ambrosio, B.Bordini, P. Ferracin MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
MQXFSM1 results Guram Chlachidze Stoyan Stoynev 10 June 2015LARP meeting.
2 nd LARP / HiLumi Collaboration Mtg, May 9, 2012LHQ Goals and Status – G. Ambrosio 11 Quench Protection of Long Nb 3 Sn Quads Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab.
LARP CM15, SLAC, 11/3/2010GianLuca SabbiSummary of MS Parallel Sessions Summary of Magnet Systems Parallel Sessions GianLuca Sabbi LARP Collaboration Meeting.
MQXFS1 Protection heater delays vs. Simulations 9 May 2016 Tiina Salmi, Tampere university of technology Acknowledgement: Guram Chlachidze (FNAL), Emmanuele.
Cold powering test results of the 11 T cosθ model magnets at CERN Gerard Willering With thanks to Jerome Feuvrier, Vincent Desbiolles, Hugo Bajas, Marta.
QXF Coil Fabrication & Tooling Reaction / Impregnation
MQXF Goals & Plans G. Ambrosio MQXF Conductor Review
MQXF Quench Protection and Meeting Goals
Protection of FCC 16 T dipoles
MQXF Short Models Status and Plans
Protection Database Tool
Quench Protection Measurements & Analysis
Voltage tap layout and quench antenna options for the long QXF magnet
Cooling aspects for Nb3Sn Inner Triplet quadrupoles and D1
Electrical Quality Control (QC): coil to coil parts
Guram Chlachidze Stoyan Stoynev
QXF schedule and milestones
MQXFS1e – PH-to-Coil hipot tests
Review of Quench Limits
Long term behavior of MQXFS1
Electrical integrity of magnets and coils
Presentation transcript:

Heaters for the QXF magnets: designs and testing and QC M. Marchevsky (LBNL)

2 QXF Quench Protection Workshop - 04/29/2014 Heater plan for the short QXF one year ago Coil 1: LARP  IL :“SS only”  OL: “SS only Coil 1: CERN  IL :“SS only”  OL: “SS only” Coils 2-3: LARP  IL: “Cu plating” option 1  OL: “SS only” Coils 2-3: CERN:  IL: “Cu plating” IL, option 2  OL: “Cu plating” OL option 1 or 2 CAD Trace In progress v v v v v v v x x x x x x x x

120 mm 40 mm Cu SS OL heater options ”Cu” - Option 2 ”SS only”- Option 1 short Magnet length(m) 1 Heater width(mm) 24 Heater thickness(mm) Station length(mm) 12 (straight part) Station distance(mm) 60.7 SS resistivity(Wm ) 5.0E-07 Number of stations(diml ess) 16 (IMT) 17 (OMT) Total resistance(W) 1.32 (IMT) 1.4 (OMT) Voltage(V) 100 Current(A) 75 (IMT) 71.4 (OMT) Power(W/c m 2 ) 103 (IMT) 93 (OMT)

”Cu” - Option 2 ”Cu” - Option 1 IL heater options

Coil 103 & Coil 104 SQXF03 (mirror); SQXF06 - spare SQXF04 or 05 & SQXF05 - first magnet (first magnet) Two different designs for the inner layer and two different designs for the outer layer Current short QXF coils LARPCERN

Heater choice for the long QXF OL: G.A: “We need the copper cladding for the long coils. And in a few months from now the CERN style OL heaters will be the only one demonstrated with copper cladding. If they perform as expected or "good enough" we have no need to develop and test other solutions.” “Of course, if we find any issue with these traces, we will come back to other design options.” IL: No decision yet. - What is “good enough” in term of numbers? - How and when are we going to select the IL heater design ?

Which of these heater tests are relevant for qualifying them for the machine? Typical scope of the heater tests Heater performance Quench delays as function of heater power density Quench delays as function of magnet current MIITS studies with varying heater power / firing delays / in combination with CLIQ (In the past LQ/HQ tests these were mainly driven by T. Salmi’s effort for validating the CoHDA code ) Heater reliability Bubbles / delamination Hipot issues Cracks / burnouts

Firing heaters at “nominal magnet” current using standard HFU settings of the LHC (450 V?) and accessing quench delays and MIITS Repeating tests for 80%, 50%, 30% of the “nominal” current Repeating above tests in combination with CLIQ (tbd) Validating protection: Accessing reliability and degradation: Multiple firing of a single heater: performance comparison between the beginning and the end of the firing sequence visual / IR imaging / resistivity assessment before and after the test for detecting bubbles / cracks / delamination (may be done even without having current in the magnet!) Minimal list of heater tests for the short QXF

IR heater imaging results T (C) Hot spots at the concave-curved portion of the heating station A-AB-B A B A B

Time-resolved heat diffusion (300 V pulse) +9 ms +18 ms +36 ms

Time-resolved IR “tomography” of heat diffusion T (C) Image was taken  9 ms after the current pulse has been applied. Fine details of thermal diffusivity profile are seen revealing the underlying cable and its edge profile. Heat diffusion time and dimensional scale are related as:  a 2 /D For copper: D= 1.16 x m 2 /s (293 K), hence at  = 9 ms we are probing depths of  1 mm For Kapton insulation: D= 1.8 x (293 K) hence at  = 9 ms we are probing depths of  40 micron An effective tool for testing uniformity of the insulation layer under the trace!

Epoxy thickness variations under the heater trace Can be readily probed with a non-destructive IR imaging technique OL IL

Bubbles in the HQ heater (HQ02 Coil 16) “bubble”

Bubbles in the HQ heater (HQ02 Coil 16) 0 ms +18 ms +36 ms  126 ms time interval; 350 V pulse T (C)