© Fraunhofer IOSB 1 New physical constraints for multi-frame blind deconvolution Roberto Baena Gallé Real Academia de Artes y Ciencias de Barcelona Szymon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Removing blur due to camera shake from images. William T. Freeman Joint work with Rob Fergus, Anat Levin, Yair Weiss, Fredo Durand, Aaron Hertzman, Sam.
Advertisements

Lead ~ Discover ~ Develop ~ Deliver Air Force Research Laboratory Multimodal Data and Anomaly Detection in SSA at AMOS 15 Oct 2012 Dr. Keith Knox Air Force.
Tutorial on Bayesian Techniques for Inference A.Asensio Ramos Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias.
State space model of precipitation rate (Tamre Cardoso, PhD UW 2004) Updating wave height forecasts using satellite data (Anders Malmberg, PhD U. Lund.
Rob Fergus Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences New York University A Variational Approach to Blind Image Deconvolution.
Optics in Astronomy - Interferometry - Oskar von der Lühe Kiepenheuer-Institut für Sonnenphysik Freiburg, Germany.
Digital Image Processing Chapter 5: Image Restoration.
Learning Low-Level Vision William T. Freeman Egon C. Pasztor Owen T. Carmichael.
Nanoparticle Polarizability Determination Using Coherent Confocal Microscopy Brynmor J. Davis and P. Scott Carney University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Physics 681: Solar Physics and Instrumentation – Lecture 6 Carsten Denker NJIT Physics Department Center for Solar–Terrestrial Research.
Extracting the Mystery from the Red Rectangle Meghan Canning, Zoran Ninkov, and Robert Slawson Chester Carlson Center for Imaging Science Rochester Institute.
Media Cybernetics Deconvolution Approaches and Challenges Jonathan Girroir
Understanding and evaluating blind deconvolution algorithms
Chapter 5 Image Restoration. Preview Goal: improve an image in some predefined sense. Image enhancement: subjective process Image restoration: objective.
Basic Image Processing January 26, 30 and February 1.
(1) A probability model respecting those covariance observations: Gaussian Maximum entropy probability distribution for a given covariance observation.
Noise Estimation from a Single Image Ce Liu William T. FreemanRichard Szeliski Sing Bing Kang.
Detecting Electrons: CCD vs Film Practical CryoEM Course July 26, 2005 Christopher Booth.
ELE 488 F06 ELE 488 Fall 2006 Image Processing and Transmission ( ) Wiener Filtering Derivation Comments Re-sampling and Re-sizing 1D  2D 10/5/06.
ElectroScience Lab IGARSS 2011 Vancouver Jul 26th, 2011 Chun-Sik Chae and Joel T. Johnson ElectroScience Laboratory Department of Electrical and Computer.
1 On-sky validation of LIFT on GeMS C. Plantet 1, S. Meimon 1, J.-M. Conan 1, B. Neichel 2, T. Fusco 1 1: ONERA, the French Aerospace Lab, Chatillon, France.
© by Yu Hen Hu 1 ECE533 Digital Image Processing Image Restoration.
Computer Vision - Restoration Hanyang University Jong-Il Park.
RECPAD - 14ª Conferência Portuguesa de Reconhecimento de Padrões, Aveiro, 23 de Outubro de 2009 The data exhibit a severe type of signal-dependent noise,
© R.S. Lab, UPC IGARSS, Vancouver, July, 2011 OIL SLICKS DETECTION USING GNSS-R E. Valencia, A. Camps, H. Park, N. Rodríguez-Alvarez, X. Bosch-Lluis.
1 Physical Fluctuomatics 5th and 6th Probabilistic information processing by Gaussian graphical model Kazuyuki Tanaka Graduate School of Information Sciences,
Telescopes & recent observational techniques ASTR 3010 Lecture 4 Chapters 3 & 6.
Non contact acquisition of sonic emissions of bearings Assoc. Prof.: Kiril M. Alexiev, Petia D. Koprinkova-Hristova; Dr.: Vladislav V. Ivanov, Volodymyr.
Deconvolution, Deblurring and Restoration T , Biomedical Image Analysis Seminar Presentation Seppo Mattila & Mika Pollari.
Image Restoration using Iterative Wiener Filter --- ECE533 Project Report Jing Liu, Yan Wu.
Viewing the Universe through distorted lenses: Adaptive optics in astronomy Steven Beckwith Space Telescope Science Institute & JHU.
1 Characterization of the T/T conditions at Gemini Using AO data Jean-Pierre Véran Lisa Poyneer AO4ELT Conference - Paris June , 2009.
1 High-order coronagraphic phase diversity: demonstration of COFFEE on SPHERE. B.Paul 1,2, J-F Sauvage 1, L. Mugnier 1, K. Dohlen 2, D. Mouillet 3, T.
Improved Tilt Sensing in an LGS-based Tomographic AO System Based on Instantaneous PSF Estimation Jean-Pierre Véran AO4ELT3, May 2013.
CS654: Digital Image Analysis Lecture 22: Image Restoration - II.
Digital Image Processing Lecture : Image Restoration
Weak Lensing 2 Tom Kitching. Recap Lensing useful for Dark energy Dark Matter Lots of surveys covering 100’s or 1000’s of square degrees coming online.
8-1 Chapter 8: Image Restoration Image enhancement: Overlook degradation processes, deal with images intuitively Image restoration: Known degradation processes;
Atmospheric Turbulence: r 0,  0,  0 François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz) Adaptive Optics in the.
Dr. Galal Nadim.  The root-MUltiple SIgnal Classification (root- MUSIC) super resolution algorithm is used for indoor channel characterization (estimate.
On the Evaluation of Optical Performace of Observing Instruments Y. Suematsu (National Astronomical Observatory of Japan) ABSTRACT: It is useful to represent.
The Self-Coherent Camera: a focal plane wavefront sensor for EPICS
Part 2: Phase structure function, spatial coherence and r 0.
Chapter 5 Image Restoration.
A Temporal Filtering Algorithm to Reconstruct Daily Albedo Series Based on GLASS Albedo product Nanfeng Liu 1,2, Qiang Liu 1,2, Lizhao Wang 2, Jianguang.
Air Force Research Laboratory Integrity  Service  Excellence Peter N. Crabtree and Patrick J. McNicholl Air Force Research Laboratory 19 Nov 2014 Summary.
C n 2 profile reconstruction with Shack-Hartmann slope and scintillation data: first on-sky results J. Voyez (1), C. Robert (1), J.-M. Conan (1), V. Michau.
Transit of Venus Observations From National Solar Observatory.
Parameters characterizing the Atmospheric Turbulence: r0, 0, 0
Today Defocus Deconvolution / inverse filters. Defocus.
Innovations Foresight Astronomical Seeing The Astro-Imaging Channel Dr. Gaston Baudat Innovations Foresight, LLC 1(c) Innovations Foresight Dr.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz) Basics of AO.
Labwork 3.
Biointelligence Laboratory, Seoul National University
Focal Plane Instrumentation at Big Bear Solar Observatory
NAC flat fielding and intensity calibration
Image Deblurring and noise reduction in python
Fundamentals of estimation and detection in signals and images
Deconvolution , , Computational Photography
“It is important that students bring a certain ragamuffin, barefoot, irreverence to their studies; they are not here to worship what is know, but to question.
Satellite data Marco Puts
Basic Image Processing
Applications of Fourier Analysis in Image Recovery
Image Restoration in Strong Atmospheric Turbulence
He Sun Advisor: N. Jeremy Kasdin Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Denoising of LSFCM images with compensation for the Photoblinking/Photobleaching.
Modern Observational/Instrumentation Techniques Astronomy 500
Advanced deconvolution techniques and medical radiography
Deblurring Shaken and Partially Saturated Images
Presentation transcript:

© Fraunhofer IOSB 1 New physical constraints for multi-frame blind deconvolution Roberto Baena Gallé Real Academia de Artes y Ciencias de Barcelona Szymon Gładysz Fraunhofer Institute of Optronics, System Technologies and Image Exploitation Laurent Mugnier ONERA - The French Aerospace Lab Rao Gudimetla, Robert L. Johnson and Lee Kann Air Force Research Laboratory

© Fraunhofer IOSB 2 Motivation Speckle imaging and multi-frame blind deconvolution work well only for very short integration times and very narrow bandwidths. Adaptive optics (AO) at visible wavelengths is very hard. Attainment of diffraction-limited resolution is only possible in conjunction with deconvolution. Objectives Develop a new theory of statistics of images blurred by turbulence. Test if inclusion of this theory in deconvolution removes the need for human intervention. Motivation and objectives No AO With AO With AO + deconv.

© Fraunhofer IOSB 3 Likelihood when noise is Gaussian Prior on the PSFs P(h) can be formulated in: spatial domain (focal-plane intensity statistics). Fourier domain (statistics of the optical transfer function, OTF). Bayesian framework i : dataset o : object h : PSF

© Fraunhofer IOSB 4 Likelihood when noise is Gaussian Prior on the PSFs, assuming intensity is gamma-distributed Bayesian framework (Goodman 2006) i : dataset o : object h : PSF

© Fraunhofer IOSB 5 ■ Fried’s parameter r 0 can be estimated directly from the data: (Spectral ratio. von der Lühe 1984) (Fourier contrast. Gladysz et al. 2012) Estimation of r 0

© Fraunhofer IOSB 6 single stars observed with the 3.5 m telescope at AFRL’s SOR Fourier contrast maps Size of the “black hole” is ~ 2 r 0 (where r 0 = Fried’s parameter). Estimation of r 0

© Fraunhofer IOSB 7 Estimation of r 0 isoplanatic simulation of satellite observation with a 50-cm telescope wavelength = 500 nm, bandwidth = 100 nm 100 short-exposure images per trial Gaussian noise added to images In our tests this method achieves accuracy of around 10%

© Fraunhofer IOSB 8 Focal-plane constraint. Average PSF D = diameter of the telescope z = focal length of the telescope = (mean) wavelength of the observations FFT h(x) : PSF H(u) : OTF

© Fraunhofer IOSB 9 Focal-plane or image constraint (Goodman 2006) Focal-plane constraint. PSF statistics

© Fraunhofer IOSB 10 Parameter M is related to the ratio of speckle size to pixel size. (Skipetrov et al. 2010) Focal-plane constraint. Integration parameter M

© Fraunhofer IOSB 11 Focal-plane constraint. Integration parameter M small M large M pixel sizeexposure time spectral bandwidth small pixels short exposure narrow bandwidth large pixels long exposure wide bandwidth

© Fraunhofer IOSB 12 Focal-plane constraint. Integration parameter M Luckily, for the gamma PDF parameter M has a very simple relation to first-order statistics:  - spatial integration - spectral integration  - temporal integration

© Fraunhofer IOSB 13 For large D/r 0 real and imaginary parts of the OTF are Gaussian random variables. Models are needed for means and variances of real and imaginary parts of the OTF. Focal-plane constraint in the Fourier domain

© Fraunhofer IOSB 14 Implementation I

© Fraunhofer IOSB 15 one frameshift-and-add reconstruction original Results SNR = 100 SNR = 20

© Fraunhofer IOSB 16 OriginalNo priorSpatial constraint prior Fourier constraint prior Results

© Fraunhofer IOSB 17 Built self-referencing, autonomous multi-frame blind deconvolution based on new statistical description of turbulent quantities (“PSF prior”) The approach leads to a user-independent, controllable deconvolution without noise amplification input data with PSF prior without prior Results Experimental turbulence measurements at Starfire Optical Range (AFRL)

© Fraunhofer IOSB 18 Implementation II. Estimation of PSFs using the true object

© Fraunhofer IOSB 19 Results for simulated speckles at r 0 = 10 cm

© Fraunhofer IOSB 20 Results for simulated speckles at r 0 = 10 cm

© Fraunhofer IOSB 21 TruthReconstructions Results for simulated speckles at r 0 = 4 cm & 16 cm

© Fraunhofer IOSB 22 Results using wrong r 0 (SNR = 100)

© Fraunhofer IOSB 23 Results using wrong r 0 (SNR = 20)

© Fraunhofer IOSB 24 Estimation of integration parameter M The correcting factor for τ has been calculated as F=5 μ – spatial integration can be calculated given pixel size ν – spectral integration can be calculated given filter bandwidth τ – for temporal integration one must know exposure time and turbulence-weighted wind speed

© Fraunhofer IOSB 25 Results for real SOR observations

© Fraunhofer IOSB 26 Results for real SOR observations

© Fraunhofer IOSB 27 Summary We are developing a new framework for deconvolution of images of space-based objects for the Air Force Research Lab. The algorithms must be autonomous. Average PSF is derived directly from the data. No hyperparameters are needed. Priors on the PSFs are derived from physics of the imaging process. Spatial-, and Fourier-frequency-based priors delay the onset of noise amplification. Objects and PSFs are reconstructed correctly.

© Fraunhofer IOSB 28 New physical constraints for multi-frame blind deconvolution Effort sponsored by U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Air Force Materiel Command, under grant FA