Environment Canada, ETC, Ottawa

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Forsyth County (NC) Office of Environmental Assistance and Protection.
Advertisements

STUDY OF PM CORRECTION FACTORS IN THE UK Dr Janet Dixon Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK.
Particulate Matter 101 Red Deer Particulate Matter Information Session Matthew Parsons Air Quality Development – Meteorological Service of Canada, Environment.
Utilizing Nephelometers for Near Roadside John Carney Mark Phelps Andrew Tolley American Ecotech.
GRIMM Aerosol Technik Existing technologies and improvements Environmental Measurement Instruments by Eng. Wolfgang Brunnhuber.
PM 2.5 in the Upper Midwest Michael Koerber Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium.
2025 Partisol Sequential Sampler
BAM-1022 Continuous Beta Gauge
HOW TO MAKE A CLIMATE GRAPH CLIMATE GRAPHING ASSIGNMENT PT.2.
R&P 8400S and 8400N Ambient Particulate Sulfate and Nitrate Monitors: Performance during PMTACS-NY Intensive Field Campaigns and Routine Measurements (Poster.
ADVANCES IN MONITORING METHODS FOR AIRBORNE PARTICLES Philip K. Hopke Department of Chemical Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY USA.
Working Together for Clean Air PM 2.5 Continuous Methods Lynnwood, Washington Site.
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Methods Lydia Scheer ITEP.
Evaluation of Simultaneous PM10, PM2. 5, and PM10-2
Continuous Ambient Particulate Monitors A Review of Current Technologies by Michael Corvese, Product Manager Thermo Electron Corporation Air Quality Instruments.
Introduction to Thermo Electron Instruments Robert Kinsella Sky Patton Thermo Electron.
Particulate Matter Monitoring in the Eastern Sierra Region A Brief History Presented by Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District.
1 Key Monitoring Issues Status of PM 2.5 monitoring methodologies Criteria for acceptance of monitors and sites Special considerations for comparing ambient.
Tim Morphy Rupprecht & Patashnick Co., Inc. 25 Corporate Circle
Chemistry of Particles and Selected Trace Gases at Whistler, BC A.M. Macdonald, K.G. Anlauf and W.R. Leaitch.
Monitoring Station Location and Siting Initially on a residential porch at Marina Towers, aligned with the Mirant Potomac River Generating Station (PRGS)
Effects of Pollution on Visibility and the Earth’s Radiation Balance John G. Watson Judith C. Chow Desert Research Institute Reno,
Air Quality Surveillance Branch Air Monitoring Operations l Manual and Non-criteria Samplers » Reggie Smith » Special Purpose Monitoring & Data Support.
Introduction to BGI Instruments
Comparison of gravimetric PM data from the Harvard Impactors and Gent Stacked Unit PM 10 Samplers in Prague 2004 M. CIVIŠ 1, J. HOVORKA 1 and J. SCHWARZ.
1 Guest Speaker: Brandy Toft Leech Lake Ojibwe.  Overview of FRM/FEM/ARM status, requirements, and reporting  QC (routine checks, audits, and method-
Continuous Particulate Monitoring Using Light Scatter Photometers.
 April 7: QA Systems, EPA definitions, PQAOs and common sense – Mike Papp  April 14: Routine Quality Control and Data Management (1-pt QC, flow rate,
1 β Attenuation Method PM10/2.5 Automated Dichotomous Monitor SPM-613D β Attenuation Method PM10/2.5 Automated Dichotomous Monitor Model SPM-613D ■SPM.
Emergency Air Monitoring During Wildfires Jim Homolya USEPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park, NC.
Correcting TEOM Measurements using the KCL Volatile Correction Model David Green, Gary Fuller & Timothy Baker.
WESTAR Council – Continuous PM 2.5 Monitoring Workshop Portland, Oregon April 13-14, 2005 Real-Time Smoke Monitoring.
CARB Continuous PM 2.5 Monitoring Activity (BAM’s) Reggie Smith California Air Resources Board.
Science Investigation Discussion of Results to Date & Future Work Red Deer Particulate Matter Information Session Maxwell Mazur
Industrial Hygiene Indoor Particles: Technology Copyright © 2008 by DBS.
Spatial Pattern of PM2.5 over the US PM2.5 FRM Network Analysis for the First Year: July 1999-June 2000 Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf.
PM 2.5 Continuous FEMs; Update and Assessments For AMTAC April 12, 2011 Kate Hoag – US EPA, Region 9.
Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium Validation of the method to retrieve the AOD and first preliminary results of the aerosol measurements campaign.
Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium Validation of the method to retrieve the AOD and first preliminary results of the aerosol campaign. RMI December.
Measuring Particle Pollution ITEP Air Quality Training Kodiak 2015
Evaluation of the Light Scattering Data from the ASOS Network Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis January 2, 2002.
 April 7: QA Systems, EPA definitions, PQAOs and common sense – Mike Papp  April 14: Routine Quality Control and Data Management (1-pt QC, flow rate,
Federal Equivalent Methods and Federal Reference Methods Tim Hanley U.S. EPA OAQPS.
GENERAL SPARTAN ACTIVITIES Crystal Weagle & Graydon Snider June 9, 2015 First International SPARTAN Meeting Dalhousie University.
AREP GURME Section 8 Pollutant Monitoring Monitor Types Monitor Density and Location Data Availability.
NATIONAL TRIBAL FORUM ON AIR QUALITY 2013 Establishment of a PM 2.5 Monitoring Network on the Colville Reservation.
Janice Lam Snyder, SMAQMD December 11, 2015
NACAA MSC, North Carolina
Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium Validation of the method to retrieve the AOD and first preliminary results of the aerosol campaign. RMI December.
Qualitative Forecasting Fire duration/size/impacts? -multiple fire starts close together* –acres burned per day above some threshold* -valley topography.
2025 Partisol Sequential Sampler Deborah Bowe Thermo Electron Corporation.
PM 2.5 Continuous FEMs; Update and Assessments For NESCAUM Monitoring Meeting April 29, 2011 Tim Hanley – US EPA, OAQPS 1.
Alternative Approaches for PM2.5 Mapping: Visibility as a Surrogate Stefan Falke AAAS Science and Engineering Fellow U.S. EPA - Office of Environmental.
Assessing Ambient Air Quality James Payne Morongo Band of Mission Indians.
Fresno NCore Monitoring Deployment Status Presentation April 12, 2011 by: Joe Cruz Air Pollution Specialist, CARB.
PRINCIPLE OF OPERATION
Phoenix Metropolitan Area Urban Nephelometer Program Mike Sundblom Arizona Department of Environmental Quality April 13, 2005.
Air Toxics & Public Health Committee Update Heidi Hales Monitoring and Assessment Committee Meeting Troy, NH April 24, 2007.
Continuous Particulate Matter (PM 2.5 ) Monitoring Tom Dann Luc White, Alain Biron Luc White, Alain Biron Environment Canada, Ottawa Tom Dann Luc White,
GRIMM Aerosol Technik Dehumidification methods Dehumidification methods from GRIMM by Eng. Wolfgang Brunnhuber.
1 National Monitoring Committee Report Bruce Louks WESTAR Fall Meeting Portland, OR September 28, 2010.
COMPARISON OF APS AND BETA AS CONTINUOUS MONITORS FOR MEASURING PM10 CONCENTRATIONS IN URBAN AIR Devraj Thimmaiah, Jan Hovorka Institute for Environmental.
Aerosol chemistry studies at the SMEARIII station in Kumpula
Introduction to Tisch Instruments
PMcoarse , Monitoring Budgets, and AQI
NESCAUM MAC Meeting Troy, New Hampshire April 24 – 25, 2007
FEM Testing Update: 1405 DF TEOM
Brief Synopsis of Air Quality and Local/Regional Meteorology
Time-Integrated Particle Measurements : Status in Canada
EMEP-Intensive-Measuring-Campaigns Summer 06 and Winter 07
Presentation transcript:

Environment Canada, ETC, Ottawa Performance of Continuous PM2.5 Monitors at a Monitoring Site in Ottawa, Canada Tom Dann Luc White, Alain Biron Environment Canada, ETC, Ottawa NESCAUM Monitoring and Assessment Committee Meeting Troy, NH April 24/25, 2007 Environment Environnement Canada Canada

Ottawa Monitoring Site Study Period: May 2004 – present > 500 days of data for 1 or more continuous instruments with filter-based data 24h PM2.5 Max: 64 µg/m³ 98th Perc: 37 µg/m³ Mean: 10.0 µg/m³ Temperature Range: -27°C to 29°C Filter based samplers: R&P Partisol FRM and R&P Partisol Sequential Dichot

Ottawa Monitoring Site Met-One BAM 1020 May 2004 Met-One BAM 1020 (new) Nov 2006 TEOM SES (30°C) May 2004 TEOM FDMS July 2004 GRIMM 180 (PM10, PM2.5, PM1.0) Oct. 2005 Thermo SHARP 5030 June 2006

Met-One BAM 1020 low-level C14 radiation source uses beta-ray attenuation and a filter tape system inlet is heated but filter is at ambient (station) temperature humidity problems in early units caused higher readings in the summer ‘smart heater’ is turned on by a relative humidity sensor hourly average output

Linear regression results for 24h data BAM Ottawa (Warm Seasons 2004-2006)

Linear regression results for 24h data BAM with 35% Humidity Setting Ottawa (2005-2006)

Replacement of BAM

Linear regression results for 24h data TEOM-FDMS Ottawa (2004-2006)

Grimm 180 Multi-channel Aerosol Spectrometer A high resolution wide range multi-channel Aerosol Spectrometer 31 channels Infers mass from particle size using ‘proprietary algorithms’ No size cut on inlet – moisture control using Nafion dryer Simultaneous measurement of PM1.0, PM2.5 and PM10 Particle counts by size (31 channels) and mass determination using algorithms No size cut on inlet – moisture control using Nafion dryer Truly continuous (real-time)

Results for 24h PM2.5 data: Grimm 180 (Ottawa) Jan. 2006 – Dec. 2006

Grimm 180 Results – Ottawa Summer 2006

Humidity Effects on Grimm 180 (Ottawa)?

Results for 24h Coarse data: Grimm 180 (Ottawa) Jan. 2006 – Mar. 2007

Results for 24h PM10 data: Grimm 180 (Ottawa) Jan. 2006 – Mar. 2007

Grimm 180 Results – Ottawa January 29-31, 2007

Thermo SHARP 5030 Synchronized Hybrid Ambient Real-time Particulate Monitor Truly continuous (real-time) Combination nephelometer & beta-ray attenuation Light scattering photometer is continuously calibrated by beta attenuation mass sensor Intelligent Moisture Reduction (IMR) System heating the inlet tube; threshold is set at 40% Nephelometer – fast response; very precise, dependent on aerosol characteristics Beta Attenuation – slow response, very accurate, independent of aerosol characteristics

Linear regression results for 24h data: Sharp 5030 (Ottawa Jun. – Dec

Performance During Air Mass Change (Ottawa September 2006)

Cost Comparisons for Continuous PM2.5 Instruments (Canadian$): Met-One BAM 1020 $25,000 R&P 1400AB TEOM $25,400 R&P SES Kit $ 4,750 R&P 8500 FDMS Kit $10,700 TEOM-FDMS $36,100 GRIMM 180 (PM10, PM2.5, PM1.0) $31,000 Thermo SHARP 5030 $26,500

2006 Performance Based on EPA ARM Template Instrument N Slope Intercept r TEOM-SES 133 0.80 0.04 0.940 TEOM-FDMS 126 1.06 -0.43 0.961 BAM 1.01 0.34 0.942 GRIMM 107 0.27 0.953 SHARP 68 1.00 1.20 0.958

PM Workshop – Ottawa April 2007 Presentations and Summary: http://www.etc-cte.ec.gc.ca/NAPSAnnualRawData/ Password: ozone Folder: PMWORKSHOP2007