High Luminosity LHC Robustness & tolerances Catia Milardi HL LHC Task 2.2, September 19 th 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  So far, we’ve talked about nice, periodic lattice, but that may not be all that useful in the real world. In particular, we generally.
Advertisements

Luminosity Prospects of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel DESY Colloquium May F. Willeke, DESY.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnetic Specifications and Tolerances Weiming Guo, NSLS-II Project In this presentation I briefly introduced the.
FCC-ee - Lepton Collider For the TLEP Lattice and Optics Design Team: B. Haerer, R. Martin, H. Garcia, R. Tomas, Y. Cai and many colleagues Optics Challenges.
6. betatron coupling sources: skew quadrupoles, solenoid fields concerns: reduction in dynamic (& effective physical) aperture; increase of intrinsic &
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
ELIC Low Beta Optics with Chromatic Corrections Hisham Kamal Sayed 1,2 Alex Bogacz 1 1 Jefferson Lab 2 Old Dominion University.
Operated by the Jefferson Science Associates for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz, Dogbone RLA – Design.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In our previous discussion, we implicitly assumed that the distribution of particles in phase space followed the ellipse defined.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Flat-beam IR optics José L. Abelleira, PhD candidate EPFL, CERN BE-ABP Supervised by F. Zimmermann, CERN Beams dep. Thanks to: O.Domínguez. S Russenchuck,
LHC online modeling Mark IV LHC online modeling Mark IV Piotr Skowroński Tobias Persson Agnieszka Szczotka Jaime Coello de Portugal Lukas Malina Mattias.
Frequency Map Analysis Workshop 4/2/2004 Peter Kuske Refinements of the non-linear lattice model for the BESSY storage ring P. Kuske Linear Lattice My.
Nonlinear Dynamic Study of FCC-ee Pavel Piminov, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
1 NICA Collider: status and further steps O.S. Kozlov LHEP, JINR, Dubna for the NICA team Machine Advisory Committee, JINR, Dubna, October 19-20, 2015.
H. Bartosik, Y. Papaphilippou. PS2 meant as potential replacement of existing PS PS2 main characteristics given by LHC requirements – Circumference defined.
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
Beam-beam compensation at RHIC LARP Proposal Tanaji Sen, Wolfram Fischer Thanks to Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, Frank Zimmermann.
Off-momentum DA of RCS 3D_BM & QFF & CC AP meeting / December 8, 2004 Alexander Molodozhentsev Etienne Forest KEK.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Some words of Wisdom / Caution B. Holzer is allowed to spend 5 % of his (precious) time to act as consultant for the lattice design and beam optics of.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz 1 Status of Baseline Linac and RLAs Design.
Optics considerations for PS2 October 4 th, 2007 CARE-HHH-APD BEAM’07 W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, C. Carli, B. Goddard, S. Hancock, J.M. Jowett, A. Koschik,
Optics solutions for the PS2 ring February 11 th, 2008 LIS Section Meeting Y. Papaphilippou.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
Numerical Simulations for IOTA Dmitry Shatilov BINP & FNAL IOTA Meeting, FNAL, 23 February 2012.
Layout and Arcs lattice design A. Chancé, B. Dalena, J. Payet, CEA R. Alemany, B. Holzer, D. Schulte CERN.
Results of TCL scans D. Mirarchi, M. Deile, S. Redaelli, B. Salvachua, Collimation Working Group, 22 nd February 2016.
Field Quality Specifications for Triplet Quadrupoles of the LHC Lattice v.3.01 Option 4444 and Collimation Study Yunhai Cai Y. Jiao, Y. Nosochkov, M-H.
How low can we go? Getting below β*=3.5m R. Bruce, R.W. Assmann Acknowledgment: T. Baer, W. Bartmann, C. Bracco, S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi, B. Goddard,W.
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
Optimization of the Collider rings’ optics
Alignment and beam-based correction
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
NSLS-II Lattice Design Strategies Weiming Guo 07/10/08
Optimization of Triplet Field Quality in Collision
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Status and needs of dynamic aperture calculations
FCC-ee Lattice with Misalignments
Electron collider ring Chromaticity Compensation and dynamic aperture
Alternative design of the matching section for crab-cavity operation
Progress of SPPC lattice design
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Towards an NMC lattice for PS2
Optics solutions for the PS2 ring
Thursday Summary of Working Group I
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Comparison of NMC rings for PS2
Simulation of the FCC-ee lattice with quadrupole and sextupole misalignments Sergey Sinyatkin.
Optics Measurements in the PSB
Triplet corrector layout and strength specifications
Ion Collider Ring Chromatic Compensation and Dynamic Aperture
PS2 meeting NMC lattice for PS2 Y. Papaphilippou September 28th, 2007.
Towards an NMC Ring: Dispersion suppressor & long straight section
Optics considerations for PS2
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Towards an NMC Ring: Dispersion suppressor & long straight section
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Update on study of chromaticity correction schemes for ion ring
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Large emittance scenario for the Phase II Upgrade of the LHC
DYNAMIC APERTURE OF JLEIC ELECTRON COLLIDER
Presentation transcript:

High Luminosity LHC Robustness & tolerances Catia Milardi HL LHC Task 2.2, September 19 th 2012

Topics Tolerances to gradient errors in quadrupoles method results for quadrupoles in: IR5 Matching Section (MS) Dispersion Suppressor (DS) impact of the gradient errors on linear and nonlinear optics Next steps

Low-  triplet Matching Section quadrupoles Dispersion Suppressor quadrupoles: Q8, Q9, Q10, QT11 All the quads in MS and in DS are double bore magnet housing separated beam pipe for each ring Layout of half IR1 (IR5) IR1 and IR5 are equal in terms of quadrupole configuration

A  gradient error  k affects: linear optics in terms of:  -beating tune shift orbit and dispersion distortion chromaticity shift non-linear optics changing chromatic functions Linear optics variation can been evaluated analytically, under some approximations. In the present study the impact of gradient errors on the LHC optics are evaluated numerically by using the MAD-X model Where: Q is the betatron tune  is the phase advance between the quadrupole error and the observation point Gradient error  k

Optics: slhc/opt_0150_0150.madx (15 cm) Tolerance criteria: Parameter step: Parameter range Terms of the study (for triplet quadrupoles)

Method Optics is computed for each quadrupole and for each beam using a different k Output files return the following parameters: name, s,k1l, betx,bety,dx,dy,DDX …….. For each Quadrupole twiss_lhcb1.tfs twiss_lhcb1_kqx1l5_1p0001.tfs twiss_lhcb1_kqx1l5_1p0002.tfs twiss_lhcb1_kqx1l5_1p0003.tfs twiss_lhcb1_kqx1l5_1p0004.tfs twiss_lhcb1_kqx1l5_1p0005.tfs twiss_lhcb1_kqx1l5_1p0006.tfs twiss_lhcb1_kqx1l5_1p0008.tfs twiss_lhcb1_kqx1l5_1p0007.tfs twiss_lhcb1_kqx1l5_1p0009.tfs twiss_lhcb1_kqx1l5_p9991.tfs twiss_lhcb1_kqx1l5_1p001.tfs twiss_lhcb1_kqx1l5_p9993.tfs twiss_lhcb1_kqx1l5_p9992.tfs twiss_lhcb1_kqx1l5_p9994.tfs twiss_lhcb1_kqx1l5_p9996.tfs twiss_lhcb1_kqx1l5_p9995.tfs twiss_lhcb1_kqx1l5_p9997.tfs twiss_lhcb1_kqx1l5_p9998.tfs twiss_lhcb1_kqx1l5_p9999.tfs twiss_lhcb1_kqx1l5_p999.tfs twiss_lhcb2.tfs twiss_lhcb2_kqx1l5_1p0001.tfs twiss_lhcb2_kqx1l5_1p0002.tfs twiss_lhcb2_kqx1l5_1p0003.tfs twiss_lhcb2_kqx1l5_1p0005.tfs twiss_lhcb2_kqx1l5_1p0004.tfs twiss_lhcb2_kqx1l5_1p0006.tfs twiss_lhcb2_kqx1l5_1p0007.tfs twiss_lhcb2_kqx1l5_1p0008.tfs twiss_lhcb2_kqx1l5_1p0009.tfs twiss_lhcb2_kqx1l5_p9991.tfs twiss_lhcb2_kqx1l5_1p001.tfs twiss_lhcb2_kqx1l5_p9992.tfs twiss_lhcb2_kqx1l5_p9993.tfs twiss_lhcb2_kqx1l5_p9994.tfs twiss_lhcb2_kqx1l5_p9996.tfs twiss_lhcb2_kqx1l5_p9995.tfs twiss_lhcb2_kqx1l5_p9997.tfs twiss_lhcb2_kqx1l5_p9998.tfs twiss_lhcb2_kqx1l5_p9999.tfs twiss_lhcb2_kqx1l5_p999.tfs

SCRIPT ela.sh Deals with input-output files Runs two fortran programs F1 and F2 F1: compare the output file for each Dk/k with the reference one produce an summary file with:  q1  q2  d q1  d q2  k/k (  x /  x ) MAX (  y /  y ) MAX (  x /  x ) MAX (  ” x /  ” x ) MAX (  x /  x ) min (  y /  y ) min (  x /  x ) min (  ” x /  ” x ) min F2: Finds out which one among the parameters: (  x /  x ) MAX (  y /  y ) MAX (  x /  x ) min (  y /  y ) min violates the tolerance criteria Interpolate data to get the exact (  /  ) value corresponding to (  /  ) = ±0.1 Analysis

Tolerance for the quadrupoles in the IR5 triplet

Tolerances for the quadrupole strengths in IR5

Quadrupole Name (  k/k) min (  k/k) MAX kqx3_l kqx3_r kqx2b_r kqx2a_r kqx2b_l kqx2a_l kqx1_l kqx1_r Summary table for the IR5 triplet

Tune variation range

Chromaticity variation range

Second order dispersion variation range

Quad Name (  k/k) min (  k/k) MAX KQTL11.L5B KQTL11.R5B Quad Name (  k/k) min (  k/k) MAX KQTL11.L5B KQTL11.R5B Tolerances for the quadrupoles in MS and DS Beam 2 Beam 1

Tune variation range Beam 1

Chromaticity variation range Beam 1

Tune variation range Beam 2

Chromaticity variation range

Beam 2 Beam 1 Second order dispersion variation range

Quad Name (  k/k) min (  k/k) MAX kq4.l5b KQ4.R5B KQ5.L5B KQ5.R5B KQ6.L5B KQ6.R5B KQ7.L5B KQ7.R5B KQ8.L5B KQ8.R5B KQ9.L5B KQ9.R5B KQ10.L5B KQ10.R5B KQTL11.L5B KQTL11.R5B Quad Name (  k/k) min (  k/k) MAX KQ4.L5B KQ4.R5B KQ5.L5B KQ5.R5B KQ6.L5B KQ6.R5B KQ7.L5B KQ7.R5B KQ8.L5B KQ8.R5B KQ9.L5B KQ9.R5B KQ10.L5B KQ10.R5B KQTL11.L5B KQTL11.R5B Summary table for the quadrupoles in MS and DS Beam2Beam1

Conclusions and further studies Tolerances to gradient errors have been evaluated for quadrupoles in IR5, MS and DS and their values are quite reasonable As expected gradient errors have a relevant impact on linear and non-linear optics parameters Relying on the present results a further study is required to understand the optics flexibility in compensating such errors.