Airdrie Land Use Bylaw Presentation to City Council May 2, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Siskiyou County Land Development Manual 2006 Update Planning Commission Hearing Land Development Manual Update.
Advertisements

Public Visioning Meeting January 28 & 29, 2015 CenterPlace Regional Event Center.
Tampa Comprehensive Plan Housing Element Affordable Housing Policies.
Public Meeting Agenda – September 13, 2007 Provide an Update on the Committee’s Work Discuss Emerging Vision for Redevelopment of Town-owned Property.
Update on the Proposed Urban Agriculture Regulations Planning Commission August 20, 2014.
Planning and Localism – How it can work for you John King Friends of the Peak District
October 4, 2004 Detrich B. Allen City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department 1 Siting New Development Detrich B. Allen General Manager Environmental.
Seattle Planning Commission Briefing December 11, 2014 Seattle’s Comprehensive Plan: What it is and why we have it How it’s working What’s new and what.
Public Information Meeting Tools for Intensification within the Yonge/Davis Urban Centres Marion Plaunt MES, MCIP, RPP Planning and Building Services August.
Availability of suitable space for expansion Lack of flexibility in allowed uses.
LOCAL BUFFER SUPPORT PROGRAM 1 May 2014 MAV. Liveability, growth and waste As Melbourne continues to grow, we need secure the right mix of resource recovery.
University Village Local Area Plan Terms of Reference Report Brian Green, Deputy Director of Planning & Development March, 2013.
Zoning Revisions Update May UNO Division of Planning Project Team: Wendel Dufour,Director, Division of Planning Tim Jackson, AICPSenior Research.
Temple City Housing Element City Council /Planning Commission Study Session September 27, 2012.
Village of Ossining Vision Presentation Frederick P. Clark Associates, Inc. May 11 th, 2005.
Implementing the Freeland Subarea Plan Zoning and Development Regulations Island County Planning & Community Development 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update.
Climate Change Council November 2011 draft ACT Planning Strategy.
Eccles Housing Market Report Community Committee Meeting 25 th January 2005 Shahla Zandi Strategy and Planning (Partnerships and Planning)
City of New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting October 18, 2005 Agenda Item: 6A (Public Hearing) Special Use Permit for Detached Garage Exceeding 624.
DC Zoning Review Low/Moderate Density Residential Working Group DC Office of Planning Meeting 1 March 24, 2008.
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT MAJOR COMMUNITY ISSUES RELATED TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Board of County Commissioners/ Local Planning Agency Joint Meeting.
City of Palm Coast Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) City Council Meeting Presentation December 7, 2010.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
West Oakland Specific Plan Equity Strategies. Potential impacts of new development and investment on existing West Oakland community New development &
New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting April 18, 2006 Public Hearing: Zoning Ordinance Amendment: Section Regarding Commercial/Industrial Park.
Planning and Community Development Department Housing Element City Council February 03, 2014.
Updates to Title 8. Anticipated Timeline… July - December 2013 Ideas Compiled Research and Drafting January 2014 Planning Commission Worksession Review.
Process to Revise Austin’s Land Development Code GENERAL USE George Adams, Assistant Director, PDRD George Zapalac, Division Manager, PDRD Matt Dugan,
The SSMP Process 1. The Servicing and Settlement Master Plan A plan to encompass the community’s visions and ideas, while approaching planning and servicing.
Planning schemes Statutory documents under s.20(2) of LUPAA –outline policies and objectives –regulate or prohibit use or development of land –reserve.
Eastside Activity Center Zoning Overlay District and Amended Land Development Regulations.
Planning & Community Development Department Zoning Code Amendment Public Hearing Proposed elimination of the 50% review step from the design review process.
NOVEMBER 19, 2015 STUDY SESSION R IDGEFIELD J UNCTION S UBAREA P LAN DRAFT NOVEMBER 2015.
Comprehensive Plan Update. General, far-reaching vision to benefit the whole community Takes a long term view of issues Focuses on physical development.
Neighbourhood Development Plan December 1 st, 2013.
Developing a Purpose & Need Statement. Objectives  Understand when the P&N is developed in the PDP  Understand the importance of a well- written/well-justified.
UDIA HOT TOPICS – STRUCTURE PLANNING REFORM & LIVEABLE NEIGHBOURHOODS REVIEW 26 SEPTEMBER 2012 PAUL ELLENBROEK PROJECT MANAGER – LIVEABLE NEIGHBOURHOODS.
Community Development Department APPLICATION 2922 VARIANCE TO REDUCE LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
Siemon & Larsen Outline of New Zoning Code. Siemon & Larsen Goals Eliminating redundant and conflicting provisions An overall update Address concerns.
Public Consultation Session: Consultation and Transparency Requirements for Offshore Petroleum Activities Francesca Astolfi A/g General Manager, Offshore.
Planning Commission Study Session: Preferred Plan July 23, 2015.
NORTH 40 SPECIFIC PLAN Advisory Committee Meeting #6 November 3, 2011.
Airdrie Land Use Bylaw Public Info Session & Open House October 29th 2015.
Town of Chapel Hill | 405 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. | Land Use Management Ordinance Update Planning Commission September 1,
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 4 – POPULATION & HOUSING ELEMENTS 1/30/2014.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY DESIGN PANEL. Recent Projects  University Village Local Area Plan (2015)  Active Transportation Plan (2014)  Trans Canada.
Airdrie Land Use Bylaw Business Community Info Session October 29th 2015.
Council Grove Zoning & Planning Committee Final Plan Presentation March 9, 2016.
Airdrie Land Use Bylaw MPC Information Session December
Airdrie Land Use Bylaw Municipal Planning Commission April
Planning & Community Development Department General Plan Implementation Strategy City Council February 29, 2016.
Planning Commission Ian Macek May 26, 2016 Freight Master Plan.
Development Permit System. Development Permit System 2 Disclaimer  The information presented is provided as background information to facilitate understanding.
1 AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICY & PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LAS CRUCES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES.
AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: 9.01CA3-05 January 17, 2006 City-initiated Code Amendment.
Planning Explained Module 4 – Engaging with Neighbourhood Planning.
City of East Palo Alto Planning Commission
Growth Management Amendments Land Use & Transportation
Manchester Master Plan Committee (MPC) Planning Framework
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
New Comprehensive Zoning By-law December 12, 2016.
Zoning Ordinance Update Study
General Plan Adoption Follow-up
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
Community Design Advisory Committee
Grandview Heights, Ohio Steering Committee Meeting September 27, 2018
Development Code Overhaul
Presentation Outline Workshop Overview/Background
Land Use 101: The Design Process
Presentation transcript:

Airdrie Land Use Bylaw Presentation to City Council May 2, 2016

 Needed to improve LUB Format, Readability, Administration.  Implements City Plan and responds to Council’s strategic priorities.  One tool of many in the Planning & Development process.  Have we achieved the right balance? Why was this project necessary?

. What is a Land Use Bylaw?  Required by the Municipal Government Act.  Sets development rights and regulates the uses of land and buildings within the City.  Separates the City into districts and defines appropriate land uses and densities.  Implements but does not set policy or direction.

. Project Background The LUB is the result of a comprehensive engagement process involving developers, businesses, and residents.  Development Group  UDI/CHBA  Local Businesses  Local Residents  Inter-Municipal Committee  Airdrie Housing Limited

. Project Background  All comments were individually reviewed, debated within our project team, and responded to.  Important for the project to address potential or inadvertent issues, but must maintain a balance.

. Project Background  Many individual discussions, conversations, and one-on-one meetings.  Planning Staff made time for anyone who wanted to discuss any aspect of the Bylaw including… o Artist Studios o Secondary Suites o Non-Profit Signs o Landscaping

Our Goals Tonight Review LUB Topics Public Hearing Response to Submissions Feedback from Council Adjourn Hearing

Major Topics

Neighbourhood Design Neighbourhood design is an important element of the Land Use Bylaw, which addresses how buildings relate to the street and the surrounding areas of the community.  Garage requirements replaces 2:1 ratio with base standard and design criteria.  Residential districts incentivize housing that is accessed off of lanes.  Specific regulations on residential driveways.  Site Design standards address landscaping, access, and connectivity.

Density It is important that the Land Use Bylaw is able to manage density effectively and work in concert with City Plan and ASPs.  New R2-T District accommodates and encourages street-oriented townhouses.  Rewritten purpose statements for Multifamily districts focus on location and re-inforce good site planning.  Multifamily districts provide density ranges and require additional design criteria at higher densities.

Accessory Suites The Land Use Bylaw sets standards for accessory suites to provide for diversity and affordability in Airdrie’s housing options.  Implements City Plan policies (6.14, 6.21 and 6.22)  Discretionary Uses  Standards established for parking, coverage, amenity, minimum parcel width and area.  Public survey highlighted benefits and challenges; overall beneficial for the community as long as impacts are managed.  Must still meet Building Code requirements.

Business Opportunities & Economic Development The Land Use Bylaw is intended to promote commercial & industrial development in Airdrie and accommodates a range of businesses.  New office park district provides another tool.  Range of Home Business uses are accommodated.  Innovative approach to address Sign regulations.  Use-specific regulations address many gaps in the previous LUB.  Landscaping requirements place plantings where they will provide the most aesthetic value and impact.

Improvements to Format & Enforceability One of our key project objectives was to ensure the new Land Use Bylaw was more clear, consistent, and enforceable.  Administrative requirements are much clearer.  Format is more intuitive and easier to navigate.  Tables and charts in Sign requirements and Land Use Districts provide better information and are easier to compare.  Detailed enforcement section addresses many areas that were missing in previous LUB.

Notes & Wrap Up

Municipal Planning Commission The draft LUB was presented to Municipal Planning Commission on April 7 th MPC voted 6-1 to recommend that Council approve Bylaw B-01/2016.

Next Steps  Draft was closed on March 17.  Staff to incorporate edits and clarification for comments that have been raised since then.  Staff has prepared a list of expected changes which are attached in the Council package.  Staff has also anticipated additional feedback or questions for clarification from Council.  All of this will be re-consolidated and brought back to a future Council meeting.

Planned Edits to Draft  Clarification of Development Authorities  Updates to best practices for managing securities  Updates to standards on tandem parking  Addition to considerations for Accessory Suites  Update to allow carports in Residential Districts  Clarification on minimum site dimensions for Multifamily Districts  Revision to minimum site dimensions for Live-Work units  Updates to reflect redesignation of DC-28 and adoption of DC-46  Revision to fix transcription errors in RR-H and RR-F Districts  Formatting updated to embed images in document  Updates to Maps  Other administrative edits / housekeeping items  Any additional direction from Council

Ongoing Discussions There have been some comments raised to administration that will require their own focus and would be best addressed through their own policies and as a later amendment to the Land Use Bylaw:  Provisions to include other Mobile Vendors under the LUB.  Proposed working group for Bylaw sustainment involving developers and stakeholders.

Wrap Up Staff have prepared a draft Land Use Bylaw that meets our project goals and provides Council with…  A set of balanced and responsive development regulations.  Another part of the Planning framework, which implements the Airdrie City Plan.  A made-in-Airdrie solution that has been developed with our community and stakeholders.

Public Hearing

Alternatives 1.That Council gives First Reading to Bylaw B-01/ That Council gives First Reading to Bylaw B-01/2016 and directs staff to make changes to the Bylaw prior to Second Reading. 3.That Council defeats Bylaw B-01/2016.

Recommendation Administration recommends: THAT Council gives First Reading to Bylaw B-01/2016. And THAT Council directs Administration to make changes to Bylaw B-01/2016, as outlined in Attachment #2 and as directed by Council, prior to second reading.