Enterprise Approach Used In Cost Estimating Presented by SCEA 2004 National Conference Lisa Stevenson ESC/GAX Robert Nelson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Global Congress Global Leadership Vision for Project Management.
Advertisements

MMEL Study Group Meeting - March 2005 (Attachment E)_Proposed MMEL Policy for Mode S Kevin Hallworth – UK CAA.
Project Management 6e..
1 Meeting On The Management Of Statistical Information Systems (MSIS), Oslo, May 18-20, 2009 Shri Narayanan, Economic Systems, TGS Jola Stefanska, STA.
Work Breakdown Structures. Purpose The WBS shows different levels within the product hierarchy. For Government program managers levels 1-3 are of prime.
NextGen GA Fund, LLC A Fund to Accelerate NextGen Equipage Benefits for the General Aviation Operator Community.
Integrated information and telecommunications solutions AIRCOM Implementation VHF Digital Link Presented by Philip Clinch to ATN 2001 Conference 19 September.
BMMP DoD’s Business Management Modernization Overview and Update to ASMC Marilyn Fleming, Deputy Director, Enterprise Architecture Business Modernization.
Defining the Project CHAPTER FOUR Student Version Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Chapter 10 Information Systems Management. Agenda Information Systems Department Plan the Use of IT Manage Computing Infrastructure Manage Enterprise.
CS Integration Management (Part 6) Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Bölümü – Bilkent Üniversitesi – Fall 2009 Dr.Çağatay ÜNDEĞER Instructor Bilkent University,
Project Management Session 7
Time and Cost Estimation
Transponder Basics Phil King, Herefordshire Gliding Club.
Project Execution.
PRESENTED BY TRUST THOMAS EROMOSELE STUDENT NO:
TopicHouseSenate AH-64 TransferDuring FY15 the SECDEF and SECARMY may not: Transfer AH-64s from the ARNG to the Active Army None of the funds authorized.
The program work breakdown structure (WBS) establishes the essential
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
PMSS Final SOW May 22 nd, Statement of Work 2 GLENN RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES (PMSS) The Contractor shall provide expert.
Defining the Project CHAPTER FOUR PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved.
1 Report Tile Training & Management Assistance Branch UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT Task Order Competition (TOC) Process.
Force Packaging. Overview Principles of War Process of Force Packaging Developing Packages.
Budgeting Civil Air Patrol National Board 4 September 2009.
Software Project Management Lecture # 7. What are we studying today? Chapter 24 - Project Scheduling  Effort distribution  Defining task set for the.
Basic of Project and Project Management Presentation.
DEFINING THE PROJECT CHAPTER 4.
Lecture 11 Managing Project Execution. Project Execution The phase of a project in which work towards direct achievement of the project’s objectives and.
Ahmad Al-Ghoul. Learning Objectives Explain what a project is,, list various attributes of projects. Describe project management, discuss Who uses Project.
SacProNet An Overview of Project Management Techniques.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
Research & Technology Implementation TxDOT RTI OFFICE.
Presentation to the Information Services Board March 6, 2008 Bill Kehoe, Chief Information Officer Bill Kehoe, Chief Information Officer.
Washington State Office of Insurance Commissioner State Insurance Management & Business Application Project Recap November 2007.
Direction générale de l’Aviation civile centre d’Études de la navigation aérienne First ASAS thematic network workshop The user’s expectations and concerns.
Advisor: Dr. Edwin Jones 1 Client: Paul Jewell ISU Engineering Distance Learning Facility May01-13 Design Team: David DouglasCprE Matt EngelbartEE Hank.
SE&I Pre-Proposal Meeting GSFC - JPL Systems Engineering Management Colleen McGraw.
Federal Software Asset Management Initiative Concept of Operations Report to the Executive Steering Committee March 8, 2004 Implementing the President’s.
BSBPMG501A Manage Application of Project Integrative Processes Manage Project Integrative Processes Unit Guide Diploma of Project Management Qualification.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
123rd Air Control Squadron Mobile network
19-21 April 2004ASAS TN – 3 rd workshop AIRLINES/IATA OVERVIEW Needs and Considerations Anthony van der Veldt/IATA Assistant Director Safety Operations.
National Agriculture Imagery Program 2006 NAIP Contract Plans December 5, 2005 USDA NAIP Planning Meeting Salt Lake City, Utah W. Geoffrey Gabbott, Contracting.
Joe Delorie DSPO Program Manager’s Tool (PMT) DoD Standardization Program Conference March 16-18, 2004.
Mode S Implementation OVERALL BRIEFING CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED.
Programme Status ECTL AAB February FACTS  A mature approach: 2500 contributors Release process organises the delivery cycle ATM Engineering:
LECTURE 5 Nangwonvuma M/ Byansi D. Components, interfaces and integration Infrastructure, Middleware and Platforms Techniques – Data warehouses, extending.
(Enhanced) Traffic Collision Avoidance System
Project Office Effectiveness Educating the Organization on How to Use a PMO February 22 nd, 2006.
Project Management PTM721S
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, 4th Edition
Business System Development
Description of Revision
The MDMP Process MDMP Inputs MDMP Outputs Step 1 MDMP Inputs Step 5
Defining the Activities
NASA Independent Reviews -Lessons Learned-
The Strategic Information Technology Formulation
Systems Engineering Management
By Jeff Burklo, Director
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is unlimited. 1 Customer Advocate Airborne Electronic Warfare Systems 29 MAR 2011 Tim.
Department of Licensing HP 3000 Replatforming Project Closeout Report
Project Management Process Groups
Financial Management Modernization Program
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
LINAC OPS Budget Review
NİŞANTAŞI ÜNİVERSİTESİ
BUDGET: M (ETS, ADMIN, BOS, TOB)
{Project Name} Organizational Chart, Roles and Responsibilities
(Insert Title of Project Here) Kickoff Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Enterprise Approach Used In Cost Estimating Presented by SCEA 2004 National Conference Lisa Stevenson ESC/GAX Robert Nelson MCR, LLC

Overview Background Enterprise Approach Estimate Results Lessons Learned Cost Estimate Team Members – Linda BlackwellOasis – Janet WentworthUSAF – Bob NelsonMCR 2

Background Problem Statement Air Force must meet Mode S requirements – 2005 Eurocontrol mandate for Mode S 46 aircraft types 5,000 aircraft – 2008 US military requirement for Mode 5 3

Background Mode S Secondary Surveillance Radar –Airborne beacon that sends out signals identifying flight number, location, attitude, heading, etc. –Used by air traffic control – includes ground radars –Signal is used by the Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System –Mandated for use by all aircraft operating in Europe starting in

Background Mode S con’t 30 minute timeline during day EUROCONTROL Mandates Elementary Surveillance (ELS) by March 2005 Enhanced Surveillance (EHS) by March Civil Interrogators 167 Military Interrogators Charts per Eurocontrol 5

Background Eurocontrol Mandate Elementary Surveillance (ELS) 2005 deadline – Flight Number – Selective Interrogation Codes Enhanced Surveillance (EHS) 2007 deadline – Selected Altitude (by autopilot) – Airspeed – Magnetic Heading – Roll Angle – Track Angle/Angle Rate Chart per Eurocontrol 6

Background Mode S/5 Equipment Examples of Mode S/5 Aircraft Equipment: –Transponders (Example Shown) –Interrogators (MS/5) –Crypto appliqués (M5) –Control panels (Example Shown) APX-119 APX-118 w/Control Panel 7

Background Platforms CombatMobilitySpecial Ops Based in or potentially rotated to Europe Fly frequently in Europe Fly seldom or never in Europe or still in development A-10 F-15 F-16 HH-60G RC-135 MC-130H/P MH-053M/J B-1 B-2 B-52 E-3 E-4 E-8 EC-130H F-117 RQ-4 U-2 C-5 C-17 C-32 C-40 C-130J C-130 other KC-10 VC-25 AC-130H/U EC-130E/J HC-130H/N/P MC-130E CV-22 F-22 F-35 RQ-1 X-45 (UCAV) YAL-1 (ABL) C-12 C-22 C-38 C-141 UH-01N C-9 C-20 C-21 C-37 C-130E KC-135 Group 8

Background Enterprise Approach 9 Establish a multiple office/capability team to accomplish this very complex cost estimate tasking Extend beyond individual expertise and experience to − Develop and apply a common methodology − Decrease enterprise risk

Background Enterprise Partners Electronics Systems Center –Global Air Technical Expertise – Mode S Estimate Review and Coordination –Strategic Reconnaissance / Computer Resources Support Group Technical Expertise – Mode 5 Aeronautical Systems Center –Aging Aircraft Aircraft Integration Expertise –SPO & Financial Management Estimate Review and Coordination Air Mobility Command/ Air Combat Command / Air Staff –Integration Roadmap Coordination 10

Enterprise Approach The Overall Process Programmatic Requirements Mode S/5 Technical Requirements Acquisition GR&A CES Project Offices Develop Estimate Technical & Cost Consistency Review Refine Estimate Briefing Preparation Brief Acquisition Authority Brief Decision Makers 11

Estimate Process Technical Consistency Technical solutions to required upgrade Specifications – for transponder Integration level (Elementary / Enhanced) Upgrade path definition 12

Estimate Process Consistency Common Cost Element Structure –Development Hardware (aircraft kit) Software (modify flight S/W) Test, Systems Engineering Operational Testing –Production Procurement (Mode S and A/C kits) Installation (Mode S and A/C kits) Test, Systems Engineering 13

Estimate Process Consistency con’t Common Ground Rules & Assumptions –Schedule/priority to meet mandate –Estimate confidence –Economic – constant year, inflation factors 14

Estimate Process Consistency con’t Mode S transponder is an iGATM catalog item Knowledge of analogous integrations Various approached could be used to estimate aircraft changes, software modification and in- particular by the newer aircraft (F-22, F-35) Reviewed by ASC/ESC cost estimators who understood the technical requirements 15

Estimate Process Consistency con’t Aircraft specific integration requirements defined by each SPO based on: –Mode S/5 technical specifications –Mode 5 crypto development schedule –Requirements to integrate to EHS 16

Estimate Process Coordination Constant interface and contact required among Enterprise participants −Provided by ASC to ensure that each SPO acted in a timely manner Multiple stakeholders have multiple priorities Warfighter capability has a higher priority 17

Estimate Results Cost Breakdown Total Mode S/5 Mode S ELS Un-funded Mode S EHS/5 Un-funded Un-funded Mode S/5Funded Mode S Mode S ELS Un-funded Mode S EHS/5 Un-funded EHS M5 18

Estimate Results Fielding Plan Sand-Chart Aircraft Qty 19

Estimate Results The Final Briefing Estimate briefed to Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition in Nov 2003 –Focus on Mode S Integration –Time-phased costs –Fielding plan Briefing accepted –Offices directed to work the immediate costs and to budget requests for FY-06 and beyond 20

Lessons Learned Insure consistent understanding of GR&A Insure understanding of technical approach Allow estimator to define methodology. Review for consistency and compliance Keep to the schedule 21