TEACHER EVALUATION Presentation Before New Teaching Faculty May 8th and 9th, 2012 New Teacher PD at Dearborn High BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Discuss the charge of the Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness (MCEE) Summarize the MCEE Interim Report Provide an Overview of the Pilot.
Advertisements

Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation System Freehold Intermediate School Friday – February 15, 2013 Rich Pepe Director of Curriculum & Instruction.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 13, 2015.
Teacher Evaluation Model
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information. Primary Evaluators All teachers will be assigned one Administrator to be the Primary Evaluator. The primary evaluator.
Teacher Evaluation & Developing Goals Glenn Maleyko, Executive Director, Ph.D Haigh Elementary September 8, 2014.
Multiple Measures for Teacher Effectiveness
Educator Evaluations Current Law, Changes for the School Year, and Resource Links.
Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness Toward an Improvement-Focused System of Educator Evaluation Jennifer Hammond OCTE Meeting November 7, 2013.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
ComprehensiveFocused  Evidence needs to be collected for all 27 components found in all 8 Criteria  Evidence needs to be collected in one of the 8 Criteria.
Jennifer S. Hammond, Ph.D. Grand Blanc High School Principal Michigan Association of Secondary School Principals Past President Michigan Council for Educator.
Teacher and Administrator Evaluation Update Before The Board of Education By Ms. Christine Sipperley, Mr. Brian Whiston, and Dr. Glenn Maleyko. February.
Teacher Evaluation Training and Update Glenn Maleyko, Executive Director, Ph.D Elementary Forum September 23, 2014 A portion of this information is based.
December 2, 2014 BY Glenn Maleyko, Ph.D Executive Director of Staff and Student Services And Rob Seeterlin, Director of Human Resources Instrutional Wendy.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Glendale Elementary School District Professional Development August 15, 2012.
BEST Standards in Teaching Rubric.  Overview  State Legislation  District Policy  Key Components and Rating Percentiles  Outline the Evaluation Process,
Union and District Relations: Positive Collaboration and Team Work Chris Sipperley, DFT President Glenn Maleyko, Executive Director, Ph.D Stout Middle.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Human Resources: Teacher Evaluation Presentation at U of M Dearborn May 30, 2013 BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Executive Director Staff and Student Services May.
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING November 1 st, 2012 General Admin Meeting BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources John McKelvey– Teachscape November.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
East Valley School District Powerpoint located: staff resources.
Michigan Tenure Law Update By Glenn Maleyko Director of Human Resources Dearborn Public Schools August 25th, 2011 General Administrators meeting.
Dearborn Teacher Evaluation Program By Chris Sipperley, Glenn Maleyko, and the evaluation committee November 14th, 2011.
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING November 1 st, 2012 General Admin Meeting BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources John McKelvey– Teachscape November.
Politics Everywhere Courageous Journey Presentation by: Glenn Maleyko, Ph.D February 4, 2014.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING May 3rd and 4th, 2012 GEN ADMIN MEETING and AP MEETING BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources May 3rd and 4th,
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
Evaluation School Year Review. Evaluation Intent  Collaborative process to support professional growth  Conversations and reflection should.
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 25, 2015.
Dearborn Administrator Evaluation Program Dearborn Board of Education Meeting, November 26, 2012 By Andy Denison, ADSA President and Glenn Maleyko, Director.
Teacher Evaluation MEASURING EDUCATOR IMPACT / / / CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT.
Teaching and Learning Courageous Journey Presentation by: Glenn Maleyko, Ph.D December 9, 2013.
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING June 19, 2012 Administrative Retreat BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources June 19, 2012 Administrative Retreat.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
Dearborn Administrator Evaluation Program The General Administrators Meeting: By Andy Denison, Glenn Maleyko, and the evaluation committee September 13.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Educator Evaluation Mary K. Bradley, Associate Director for School Operations Mark J. Weinberg, Director of Academic Performance & Accountability The Center.
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING Secondary Admin meeting March BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Executive Director Secondary Admin meeting March BY GLENN.
 Mark D. Reckase.  Student achievement is a result of the interaction of the student and the educational environment including each teacher.  Teachers.
State Tenure Law Changes and the Dearborn Teacher Evaluation Program Presented to the Dearborn Public Schools Board of Education: By Chris Sipperley and.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
Teacher Evaluation Process
Value-Added Evaluation & Tenure Law
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Glenn Maleyko, Superintendent, Ph.D
Kansas Educator Evaluation
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING
Human Resources Presentation at AP Leadership Meeting
APPR Overview 3012c Draft Revision March 2012
TEACHER EVALUATION Updates
Teacher Evaluation Process
Georgia Department of Education
Evaluation Information
Dearborn Employee Evaluation Update
The best way to predict the future is to create it.
Pike County Schools Certified Evaluation Annual Training
HOW TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE CLASSROOM OBSERVATIONS
Presentation transcript:

TEACHER EVALUATION Presentation Before New Teaching Faculty May 8th and 9th, 2012 New Teacher PD at Dearborn High BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources May 8th and 9th, 2012 New Teacher PD at Dearborn High BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources Wendy Zdeb-Roper MASSP. A few of the slides are based on a presentation by Jim Gullen Oakland Schools at the MIEM conference in Lansing on February 29th, The video protocol is based on work by Wendy Zdeb-Roper MASSP. Some of the Slides are also based on the Danielson iobservation training (Pam Rosa) from WCRESA on April 3rd and 4th.

Legislation Requires / Rigorous, transparent, and fair performance evaluation systems / Evaluations based on multiple rating categories / Evaluation based in part on student growth: as determined by multiple measures of student learning including national, state or local assessments or other objective criteria as a significant factor. / Rigorous, transparent, and fair performance evaluation systems / Evaluations based on multiple rating categories / Evaluation based in part on student growth: as determined by multiple measures of student learning including national, state or local assessments or other objective criteria as a significant factor.

Evaluation Components Observation Protocol / 1. The measurement of practice (what an educator does) based on a definition of practice that is clear, observable, commonly accepted, and supported by transparent measurement methods and instruments that are technically sound and validated against desired outcomes.

Evaluation Components Student Outcomes / 2. The measurement of student outcomes based on a definition of desired student outcomes that is clear commonly accepted, and supported by transparent measurement methods and instruments that are technically sound and validated against desired outcomes.

Observation Protocol has been the predominant focus, however that will shift soon Currently calls for a significant portion based on student growth and assessment. What does that mean? Currently calls for a significant portion based on student growth and assessment. What does that mean?

Evaluation Focus Shift: What does this mean?

Winston Churchill / True genius resides in the capacity for evaluation of uncertain, hazardous, and conflicting information.

Governor’s Council will / Make specific recommendations to the Governor and Legislature regarding this by April 30, 2012 / They Shall submit a growth and assessment tool (MCL) (5)(a) / Make specific recommendations to the Governor and Legislature regarding this by April 30, 2012 / They Shall submit a growth and assessment tool (MCL) (5)(a)

They Shall submit a growth and assessment tool (MCL) (5)(a) / That is value-added (MCL) (5)(a) (I) / Has at least a pre and post test (MCL) (5)(a) (IV) / It must be based on 3 years of data if the data is available. (MCL) (2)(a) (II) / That is value-added (MCL) (5)(a) (I) / Has at least a pre and post test (MCL) (5)(a) (IV) / It must be based on 3 years of data if the data is available. (MCL) (2)(a) (II)

Today we will focus on #1 with our training / The Governor’s Council Interim Report Came out. Not much direction at this point. / They will pilot models in 12 districts. / The Governor’s Council Interim Report Came out. Not much direction at this point. / They will pilot models in 12 districts.

Growth-Achievement Measurement Options / 1. State Tests (MEAP/MME/MiAccess) / 2. Other third party assessments (Tera Nova, Iowa, etc) / 3. Locally Created Assessments -common assessments ? - unique assessments (SRI, DRA, Writing prompts, other). / 1. State Tests (MEAP/MME/MiAccess) / 2. Other third party assessments (Tera Nova, Iowa, etc) / 3. Locally Created Assessments -common assessments ? - unique assessments (SRI, DRA, Writing prompts, other).

Growth- Achievement Measures continued. / 4. Measures other than Tests / Portfolios, presentations, projects, product assessments. / 5. Some combination of the above- The legislation calls for multiple measures. Each measure comes with strengths and weaknesses. / 4. Measures other than Tests / Portfolios, presentations, projects, product assessments. / 5. Some combination of the above- The legislation calls for multiple measures. Each measure comes with strengths and weaknesses.

A Quote from Maya Angelou “People will forget what you said. People will forget what you did. But they will never forget how you made them feel” Commencement Address, 2002 “People will forget what you said. People will forget what you did. But they will never forget how you made them feel” Commencement Address, 2002

Maria Montessori / One test of the correctness of educational procedure is the happiness of the child.

Legislative Changes - IDP goals developed for all 1st year probationary teachers or any teacher rated minimally effective or ineffective on most recent evaluation

Plan I: / Prior to 10-1, IDP Goals, and expectations. / 1st year probationary teachers need to have an IDP ASAP / Prior to st formal observation / Observation Times have changed (no less than 40 minutes) / Prior to nd formal observation / Prior to 4-30 Year End Evaluation to be completed and include multiple observations / Please note that all timelines are recommended / Prior to 10-1, IDP Goals, and expectations. / 1st year probationary teachers need to have an IDP ASAP / Prior to st formal observation / Observation Times have changed (no less than 40 minutes) / Prior to nd formal observation / Prior to 4-30 Year End Evaluation to be completed and include multiple observations / Please note that all timelines are recommended

Plan II / Prior to 10-1, Distribute forms and review expectations. / Prior to Initial Meeting to set goals / Prior to 4-30 Multiple Formal Observations (minimum of 2) / Prior to 5-31 Year End Evaluation to be completed and include multiple observations / Prior to 10-1, Distribute forms and review expectations. / Prior to Initial Meeting to set goals / Prior to 4-30 Multiple Formal Observations (minimum of 2) / Prior to 5-31 Year End Evaluation to be completed and include multiple observations

Observations / Performance evaluations must include classroom observations. MCL / The observer must review / 1. Lesson Plans / 2. State Curriculum Used / 3. Pupil Engagement / Performance evaluations must include classroom observations. MCL / The observer must review / 1. Lesson Plans / 2. State Curriculum Used / 3. Pupil Engagement

Observations -Administrators can still conduct informational/walkthrough observations and use the information gathered for the evaluation document

HR Website org/human- resources/hr- evaluation-tools org/human- resources/hr- evaluation-tools

Rate the Lesson / Based on what you observed of the lesson, how would your rate the teacher? (understanding that this is just a snapshot / Highly Effective / Effective / Minimally Effective / Ineffective / Based on what you observed of the lesson, how would your rate the teacher? (understanding that this is just a snapshot / Highly Effective / Effective / Minimally Effective / Ineffective

Observations / What are the strengths? / What are the weaknesses? / What do you still wonder after viewing a snapshot of the lesson? What questions? / What recommendations might you have? / What are the strengths? / What are the weaknesses? / What do you still wonder after viewing a snapshot of the lesson? What questions? / What recommendations might you have?