What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for 2015-16.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
Advertisements

Comparison of School and KSU Assessment of Teachers
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
David Guyette, Laura Six, Rose Drake and Paige Kinnaird
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR NOTE: All that is left for implementation.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
RESA Standards 2015 Revised Standards for District and School Effectiveness.
Differentiated Supervision
M EASURING T EACHER E FFECTIVENESS (MTE). H OW DID WE GET HERE ? Video from the Arizona School Administrators PUSD Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Committee.
Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
As Adopted by Emergency Action June, 2015 Slides updated
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
Regents Reform Agenda Update as of November 2012 C-A Teachers' Resource Center-- J. Robinson, director 1 A special thank you to Jill Robinson, Director.
Mississippi Teacher Evaluation System (MTES) Updates
FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING (FFT) SUMMER INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS TO ENHANCE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE DR. MICHAEL BROOKS JUNE 18, 2012.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Learning Centered Conferencing with the Using the Danielson Framework John Hellwich & Michelle Lewis.
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
APPR:§3012-d A Preview of the changes from :§3012-c Overview.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Day 3. Here We Are: 9 Components 1.New York State Teaching Standards and Leadership Standards 2.Evidence-based observation 3.Application and.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
Secaucus Reflect Live Observation Process Observer Guide.
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
TEACHER AND PRINCIPAL DEVELOPMENT SYSTEMS.  In May 2010, New York State passed Education Law 3012-c, mandating significant changes to how educators throughout.
Teachscape Reflect User Guide Teacher Observation and Evaluation Howard County Public School System.
Holland Central School District Opening Day September 3, 2013.
Day 4. Here We Are: 9 Components 1.New York State Teaching Standards and Leadership Standards 2.Evidence-based observation 3.Application and.
 Becoming a Reflective Practitioner New Licensed Staff Induction Program.
CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting December 6, 2012 Providing Effective Feedback Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction.
May Education in the Budget Evaluation; Tenure; Tenured teacher disciplinary hearings; Teacher preparation and certification; and Intervention in.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
TESS & LEADS Implementation Awareness for End-of-Year Success Office of Educator Effectiveness Arkansas Department of Education Spring, 2016.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
APPR 2.0 (based on CR 3012-d) NSCSD Goals The NSCSD District Goals Can be evidenced in planning, classroom instruction, assessment and teacher’s.
MA-PAL Task 3 This task aligns with course assignments from EDC 5630 Supervision and Evaluation of Instruction.
Evaluation of Teachers & Principals (APPR)
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Evaluation Updates.
Self-Advocacy in the Observation Cycle
DEAC MEETING AGENDA: AchieveNJ Updates Formal Observations
APPR Overview 3012c Draft Revision March 2012
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Who We Are For more than 20 years, we have believed the key to preparing student for a successful future is providing rigorous and relevant instruction.
State Board of Education Progress Update
Valley Central School District
NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT APPR/EVALUATION OVERVIEW
Implementing Race to the Top
Annual Professional Performance Review APPR
Presentation transcript:

What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for

1.Evaluators may select a limited number of observable rubric subcomponents for focus within a particular observation so long as all observable Teaching Standards/domains of the selected practice rubric (e.g., Domains 2 and 3 of the Danielson’s 2013 Framework for Teaching) are addressed across the total number of observations GUIDANCE ON NEW YORK STATE’S ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW FOR TEACHERS AND PRINCIPALS TO IMPLEMENT EDUCATION LAW §3012-d AND THE COMMISSIONER’S REGULATIONS, Updated October 16, 2015: - The “Blue Memo” page 15

New York State Teaching Standards/domains that are part of the rubric but not observable during the classroom observation may be observed during any optional pre-observation conference or post- observation review or other natural conversations between the teacher and evaluator and incorporated into the observation score GUIDANCE ON NEW YORK STATE’S ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW FOR TEACHERS AND PRINCIPALS TO IMPLEMENT EDUCATION LAW §3012-d AND THE COMMISSIONER’S REGULATIONS, Updated October 16, 2015: -The “Blue Memo” page 15

Points shall not be allocated based on any artifacts, unless such artifact constitutes evidence of an otherwise observable rubric subcomponent (e.g., a lesson plan viewed during the course of the classroom observation may constitute evidence of professional planning). GUIDANCE ON NEW YORK STATE’S ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW FOR TEACHERS AND PRINCIPALS TO IMPLEMENT EDUCATION LAW §3012-d AND THE COMMISSIONER’S REGULATIONS, Updated October 16, 2015: -The “Blue Memo” page 15

A lesson plan viewed during the course of the observation cycle may constitute evidence of the standard professional planning A(n) ____________viewed during the course of the observation cycle may constitute evidence of the standard ___________________ A (n) assessment viewed during the course of the observation cycle may constitute evidence of the standard Assessment for Student Learning

A(n) ____________viewed during the course of the observation cycle may constitute evidence of the standard ___________________ 1.IEP; Knowledge of Students and Student Learning 2.A learning target written on the board; Knowledge of Content and Instructional Planning 3.Exit ticket; Assessment for Student Learning 4.A parent contact log; Professional Responsibilities and Collaboration

Teaching Standards/Domains that are part of the rubric, but not observable during the classroom observation, may be observed during a pre-observation conference or post- observation review or other natural conversations between the teacher and the principal/supervisor and incorporated into the observation score. APPR Update Board of Regents June 15, 2015 Slide 12, Engage NY

Regardless, points shall not be allocated based on artifacts submitted to or reviewed by the evaluator outside of the observation cycle. – APPR Update Board of Regents June 15, 2015 Slide 12, Engage NY In your district what constitutes an Observation Cycle?

Observation Cycle 1. Pre- observation 2. Observation 3. Post- observation

Observation Cycle 1. Observation 2. Feedback

H15. Can a teacher or principal earn points based on the submission of artifacts? Are lesson plans considered “observable”? No, educators can no longer have points in their APPR allocated specifically to the submission of artifacts. Teacher observations and principal school visits may be based only on observable rubric subcomponents. The evaluator may select a limited number of observable rubric subcomponents for focus within a particular observation so long as all observable Teaching Standards/Domains (e.g., Domains 2 and 3 of Danielson’s 2013 Framework for Teaching) or observable ISLLC Standards are addressed across the total number of annual observations or school visits. Points cannot be earned based on any artifacts, unless the artifact is evidence of an otherwise observable rubric subcomponent (e.g., a lesson plan viewed during the course of a teacher observation may constitute evidence of professional planning and therefore be scored on the rubric as part of that classroom observation). Districts/BOCES have local discretion over what is and is not observable according to their own selected practice rubric. All observable Teaching or Leadership Standards/Domains of the selected practice rubric must be addressed across the total number of observations/school visits according to the regulations. New York State Teaching Standards/Domains (or ISLLC Standards/Domains) that are part of the rubric but not observable during the classroom observation (or school visit) may be observed during any optional pre-observation conference or post-observation review or other natural conversations between the teacher/principal and his/her evaluator and incorporated into the observation/school visit score. For example, a teacher’s ability to set instructional outcomes, as seen in Domain 1 of the Danielson’s 2013 Framework for Teaching, may be observed during a pre- or post-observation conference where the teacher brings a lesson plan as supporting evidence of an otherwise observable rubric subcomponent.

Your District: Inter-rater Reliability What are your observation cycles? What elements of your rubric are observable during a lesson? What elements of your rubric will likely need to be observed during pre-observation conference or post-observation review or other natural conversations?