European Coastal-Shelf Sea Operational Monitoring and Forecasting System WP8 Model validation and inter-comparison.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Operational System for Coastal Waters of Gdansk Region Goals Supporting the Region Authority and the society with essential information about the coastal.
Advertisements

(Multi-model crop yield estimates)
ECOOP Meeting March 14-21, 2005 ECOOP WP7 Pierre-Yves LE TRAON Better use of remote sensing and in-situ observing systems for coastal/regional seas Objective.
MyOcean2 First Annual Meeting – April 2013 WP 10 MONITORING & FORECASTING CENTRE for Mediterranean sea MyOcean2 First Annual Meeting – Cork /16-17.
ATMOP Partners Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), France 7 th framework project selected.
Mercator Ocean activity
WP4 Task T4.2 WP4-T4.2 : Establishment of validation criteria of multidisciplinary information products
Summary discussion Top-down approach Consider Carbon Monitoring Systems, tailored to address stakeholder needs. CMS frameworks can be designed to provide.
Adapting Ocean Surveys to the Observed Fields Characteristics Maria-João Rendas I3S, CNRS-UNSA.
THE STUDY OF BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES AND RELATED SEDIMENT FLUXES: THE IOC-BSRC PROJECT PROPOSAL Could such a project idea be developed into an EC FP Integrated.
GlobColour CDR Meeting ESRIN July 2006 Merging Algorithm Sensitivity Analysis ACRI-ST/UoP.
Black Sea ECOOP system G.K. KOROTAEV MARINE HYDROPHYSICAL INSTITUTE SEVASTOPOL, UKRAINE.
WP12. Hindcast and scenario studies on coastal-shelf climate and ecosystem variability and change Why? (in addition to the call text) Need to relate “today’s”
ECOOP WP2 overview “A community modelling framework” Jason Holt For Roger Proctor ECOOP Consensus and planning meeting March 2005.
ECOOP WP11 ENSEMBLE AND SUPER-ENSEMBLE FORECASTING (TO UPGRADE EXISTING REGIONAL AND COASTAL FORECASTING SYSTEMS)
A Concept of Environmental Forecasting and Variational Organization of Modeling Technology Vladimir Penenko Institute of Computational Mathematics and.
The new ECOOP suggestion from Norway (Met.no, NERSC, IMR) Why new? Because: Too little focus on clear objectives and specific products Products and services.
Progress Towards a Regional Coastal Ocean Observing System for the Southeast (SEACOOS) Harvey Seim / University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University.
Jędrasik J., Kowalewski M., Ołdakowski B., University of Gdansk, Institute of Oceanography Impact of the Vistula River waters on the Gulf of Gdańsk during.
Baltic Operational Oceanographic System (BOOS) Erik Buch Centre for Ocean and Ice.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2014 WE-01 Jim Caughey THORPEX IPO.
ECOOP Consensus Meeting, Erdemli, March 2005 ECOOP WP13: Demonstration & Evaluation of ECOOP Monitoring Forecasting and Information System  Goals:  Demonstration.
Needs for Data and Information Managing living and non-living resources, monitoring environmental changes in the sea and protecting the marine environment,
JERICO KICK OFF MEETINGPARIS – Maison de la recherche - 24 & 25 May 2011 WP9: New Methods to Assess the Impact of Coastal Observing Systems Presented by.
The Importance of Atmospheric Variability for Data Requirements, Data Assimilation, Forecast Errors, OSSEs and Verification Rod Frehlich and Robert Sharman.
MAMA Malta meeting, January 2004 Expert Meeting Towards Operational ecological models in coastal areas
1.Introduction 2.Description of model 3.Experimental design 4.Ocean ciruculation on an aquaplanet represented in the model depth latitude depth latitude.
The GEOSS Portfolio for Science and Technology Produced by ST Featuring: Climate: Capacity Building of Operational Oceanography and Climate Adaptation.
NOCS: NEMO activities in 2006 Preliminary tests of a full “LOBSTER” biogechemical model within the ORCA1 configuration. (6 extra passive tracers). Developed.
Marine Core Service MY OCEAN Potential contribution of Observatories to GMES Marine Core Service, MyOcean Fabrice HERNANDEZ IRD/Mercator Ocean, France.
Assimilation of HF Radar Data into Coastal Wave Models NERC-funded PhD work also supervised by Clive W Anderson (University of Sheffield) Judith Wolf (Proudman.
Potential benefits from data assimilation of carbon observations for modellers and observers - prerequisites and current state J. Segschneider, Max-Planck-Institute.
Forecasting and Uncertainties GLOBEC Program DiLorenzo Bond Ballerini Brodeur Collie Hastings Kimmel Ribic Strub Wiebe.
NACLIM CT1/CT3 1 st CT workshop April 2013 Hamburg (DE) Johann Jungclaus.
ECOOP annual meeting February 2008 Athens Ole K. Leth Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI) Contribution to WP 4 (13 February 2008) – Modelling and.
Downscaling Future Climate Scenarios for the North Sea 2006 ROMS/TOMS Workshop, Alcalá de Henares, 6-8 November Bjørn Ådlandsvik Institute of Marine Research.
Global monitoring of runoff and lake storage: - important elements of Integrated Global Observing Systems - integral parts of water resources management.
Météo-France / CNRM – T. Bergot 1) Introduction 2) The methodology of the inter-comparison 3) Phase 1 : cases study Inter-comparison of numerical models.
WP 3. Present and future projections of climate effects (Leader: Gunnar Myhre, co-leader Ivar Isaksen, CICERO) Partners: CICERO, UCAM Task 3.1: Current.
Arctic Operational Oceanography at IMR Einar Svendsen Arctic GOOS planning meeting, September 2006 at NERSC, Bergen.
Department of Physical Oceanography Lab of Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis Lab of Sea Dynamic.
Henning Wehde I IMR I 2013, June 18/19th I UPMC I Paris JERICO MID TERM REVIEW Wp 2 Strengthening regional and trans-regional.
Mediterranean Sea Basin Scale model P.Lazzari, S. Salon, A. Teruzzi, K.Beranger, A. Crise Sesame WP3 meeting Villefranche sur Mer, Februay 2008 OGS,
U.S. ECoS U.S. Eastern Continental Shelf Carbon Budget: Modeling, Data Assimilation, and Analysis A project of the NASA Earth System Enterprise Interdisciplinary.
Aristeidis K. Georgoulias Contribution of Democritus University of Thrace-DUTH in AMFIC-Project Democritus University of Thrace Laboratory of Atmospheric.
Task 2.6. Products and services. Sub-tasks Definition and design of added value products Definition and design of added value products
IGST Meeting, St John’s, Newfoundland, Canada – 7-9 August 2007 Kirsten Wilmer-Becker (Met Office, UK) GODAE-IMBER meeting outcomes.
1 1 Morten D. Skogen WP10: Hindcast and scenario studies on coastal- shelf climate and ecosystem variability and change Overview and plans ECOOP annual.
Baltic Sea, eutrophication and climate change, Uusimaa case study Polona Rozman ASTRA Conference Gdansk 26 th – 28 th October 2006.
Henning Wehde I IMR I 5 to / Oslo / Norway 2 nd General Assembly – NIVA HQ WP 2 Strengthening regional.
Problem 10M€/70 partners – Meetings ~0 Project lacks focus Moot point whether it addresses the call Proposed work is vastly in excess of available funds.
Annual Meeting, June , Split, Croatia WP1: Data collection and metadata compilation in sea regions: current status EMODnet Chemistry Partner.
Uncertainty assessment of state- of-the-art coupled physical- biogeochemical models for the Baltic Sea BONUS Annual Conference 2010 Presentation: Kari.
Ocean Biological Modeling and Assimilation of Ocean Color Data Watson Gregg NASA/GSFC/Global Modeling and Assimilation Office Assimilation Objectives:
Presented by LCF Climate Science Computational End Station James B. White III (Trey) Scientific Computing National Center for Computational Sciences Oak.
The Mediterranean Forecasting INGV-Bologna.
EuroGOOS Arctic Task Team Workshop September 2006 Satellite data portals for Arctic monitoring Stein Sandven Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing.
WP 9 Ecosystem modelling and data assimilation The overall objective is to improve forecasts of the pre-operational systems with quantitative evaluation.
G. Panteleev, P.Stabeno, V.Luchin, D.Nechaev,N.Nezlin, M.Ikeda. Estimates of the summer transport of the Kamchatka Current a variational inverse of hydrographic.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund and European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument) Information & Dissemination.
RTOFS Monitoring and Evaluation Metrics Avichal Mehra MMAB/EMC/NCEP/NWS.
- Proposed actions, targets and indicators to reach the objectives
Expert Meeting Methods for assessing current and future coastal vulnerability to climate change 27 – 28 October 2010 Draft conclusions.
TOPAZ monitoring and forecasting system
MESMA: for sustainable use of European seas and coastal areas
NSO8055 Okeanograafiline prognoos
Juha-Markku Leppänen Marine Research Centre
The effect of ship Nox deposition on cyanobacteria blooms
HELCOM and operational oceanography
Presentation transcript:

European Coastal-Shelf Sea Operational Monitoring and Forecasting System WP8 Model validation and inter-comparison

Objectives of the WP are: -to evaluate the quality of available information products; -to improve quality of multidisciplinary nowcasting/forecasting within ECOOP partnership; -to develop NRT quality evaluation of multidisciplinary information products.

Products EuroMISS -output of EMISS -oceanographic state characteristics - (information: meaning full way to present products) Currents, temperature, salinity (pan-E) Integration of waves (available on the portal) Sea level (pan-E) Sea ice (available on the portal) Biogeochemical state variables (chlorophyll, phytoplankton, oxygen, nutrients) (pan-E) (zooplankton, zoo-benthos in targeted areas) Sediment fluxes (targeted areas) River input changes and influence (runoff, nutrient and organic matter) (pan-E) Bloom type and probability (targeted areas) Transport and dispersion of particles/tracers (pan-E)

Products to be validated: Currents, temperature, salinity Sea level Biogeochemical state variables Sediment fluxes Bloom type and probability Transport and dispersion of particles/tracers

The WP aims are: Develop common model validation standards Create a quality controlled validation database Develop common protocol to calculate standard validation criterions. Develop online model validation system Carry out model validation and inter-comparison experiments Carry out model error covariance functions study Carry out atmospheric forcing comparison

The following WP structure is proposed according to the formulated objectives and aims: WP8.1. Evaluation of the quality of information products. (in connection with WP1,WP4,WP5) WP8.2. Optimization of multi operational models. WP8.3. Optimisation of the forcing fields WP8.4. Building and pilot operation of online model validation system.

WP8.1. Evaluation of the quality of information products. (in connection with WP1,WP4,WP5) Task Development of common model validation standards Task Development of quality controlled validation database from distributed data centres Task Development of common protocol to calculate standard validation criterions Task Certification of operational models and assimilation schemes. V0 models products available at each region will be evaluated based on the common standards.

WP8.2. Optimization of multi operational models (in connection with WP2,WP10,WP11) Task Models intrcomparison based on certification results Task Installation of the best models/assimilation schemes Task Intercomparison of models (same initial conditions and prognostic mode) Task Intercomparison of models and assimilation schemes (nowcasting and covariance matrix study) Recommendation will be elaborated for the application of the most efficient models (or blocks of models) at every region of ECOOP partnership

WP8.3. Optimisation of the forcing fields Task Data base of forcing fields of different atmospheric models/remote sensing data Task Sensitivity study of nowcasting/forecasting accuracy with respect to different atmospheric input Task Certification of the atmospheric forcing fields Optimal forcing field will be recommended at every region of ECOOP and error statistics of forcing will be evaluated.

WP8.4. Building and pilot operation of online model validation system Task Development of on line common model validation standards Task Development of on line quality controlled validation dataflow from distributed data centres Task Development of on line common protocol to calculate standard validation criterions Task On line pilot quality evaluation of multi operational models and assimilation schemes. Distribution of the product quality evaluation together with nowcasting/forecasting fields.

1.Bar ents 2. Baltic 3.Nor th 4.Bisc ay 5.Medit erranea n-west 6.Mediterr anean-east 5.Aegean6.Black 1. Currents, temperature, salinity 2. Sea level 3.Biogeoche mical state variables 4. Sediment fluxes 5. Bloom type and probability 6. Transport and dispersion of particles/trac ers Clustering or targeting?