Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Mechanistic Three-Dimensional Analytical Solutions for a Direct Liquid Fuel Cell.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 5/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Direct JP-8 Conversion Using a Liquid Tin Anode Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (LTA-SOFC)
Advertisements

Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: High Temperature Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Based on Phosphoric Acid PBI Membrane.
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Modeling of Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Using the Artificial Neural Network J. Fuel.
Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Intermediate Temperature Fuel Cell and Oxygen Reduction Studies With Carbon-Supported.
Date of download: 6/9/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Adjoint-Based Sensitivity Analysis and Error Correction Methods Applied to Solid.
Date of download: 6/23/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Project ABSOLUTE: A ZEBRA Battery/Intermediate Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cell.
Date of download: 6/25/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An X-Ray Tomography Based Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Study on Gas Diffusion.
Date of download: 6/25/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Review of Materials and Characterization Methods for Polymer Electrolyte Fuel.
Date of download: 6/27/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Smart Glass and Its Potential in Energy Savings J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2013;136(1):
Date of download: 6/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Conceptual Design and Performance Analysis of SOFC/Micro Gas Turbine Hybrid Distributed.
Date of download: 7/3/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: The Impregnating Reduction Method for Synthesis of Pt–Ru Nanoparticles and Its.
Date of download: 7/5/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Causal and Fault Trees Analysis of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Degradation.
Date of download: 7/6/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Fuel Cell-Based Powertrain System Modeling and Simulation for Small Aircraft Propulsion.
Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Electrochemical Characterization of Synthesized Ni–Co and Ni–Co–Fe Electrodes for.
Date of download: 7/8/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Novel Testing Method for Fuel Cell Hardware Design and Assembly J. Fuel Cell Sci.
Date of download: 7/16/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Study on Hardness and Elastic Modulus of Surface Nanostructured 304 Stainless.
Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of a Catalytic Flat Plate Fuel Reformer.
Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Performance Enhancement of Alkaline Direct Methanol Fuel Cells by Ni/Al Layered.
Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Pumpless Fuel Supply Using Pressurized Fuel Regulated by Autonomous Flow-Rate.
Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Pressure Surge During Cryogenic Feedline Chilldown Process
Date of download: 10/10/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/17/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/17/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/17/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A New Geometry High Performance Small Power MCFC
Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: SOFC Lifetime Assessment in Gas Turbine Hybrid Power Systems
Date of download: 10/31/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/4/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Computational Aerodynamics: Solvers and Shape Optimization
Date of download: 11/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/10/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/2/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/2/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/2/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 3/10/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Presentation transcript:

Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Mechanistic Three-Dimensional Analytical Solutions for a Direct Liquid Fuel Cell Stack J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2015;12(6): doi: / Schematic of procedure used to obtain closed-form analytical solutions for a DMFC stack. (a) The stack comprising of n cells is first decoupled; (b) each cell, cell j, is considered individually. (c) Symmetry is used to reduce the computational domain to a representative volume cell; (d) the anode of the representative volume cell is decoupled from the membrane and cathode based on high stoichiometry of the latter. (e) Spatial smoothing is used to reduce the remaining computational domain to two dimensions while retaining salient features from the third dimension; (f) leading-order asymptotics is employed to simplify the set of PDEs, and the approximate analytical solutions for cell j is found. The solutions for each individual cell can then be recoupled to yield the closed-form analytical solution for a stack. Figure Legend:

Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Mechanistic Three-Dimensional Analytical Solutions for a Direct Liquid Fuel Cell Stack J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2015;12(6): doi: / Schematic of a single cell depicting the various functional layers and their dimensions for the (a) 3D model and (b) spatially smoothed model Figure Legend:

Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Mechanistic Three-Dimensional Analytical Solutions for a Direct Liquid Fuel Cell Stack J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2015;12(6): doi: / Polarization curves for decoupled cells with anode inlet velocity 2.19 × 10 −3 (cell 1, ), 4.38 × 10 −3 (cell 2, ), and 7.3 × 10 −3 (cells 3–10, ) m s −1 as well as overall ten cell stack. Individual cell potentials along a prespecified stack current can be summed to obtain the stack potential ; this process can be repeated multiple times using different currents to yield the stack polarization curve. Figure Legend:

Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Mechanistic Three-Dimensional Analytical Solutions for a Direct Liquid Fuel Cell Stack J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2015;12(6): doi: / Polarization curves for the best performing single cell, worst performing single cell, ten cell stack, and limiting stack current Figure Legend:

Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Mechanistic Three-Dimensional Analytical Solutions for a Direct Liquid Fuel Cell Stack J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2015;12(6): doi: / Individual cell potentials for a perturbed ten cell stack operating at V stack = 3.5 V. Due to the difference in inlet velocities, each cell is operating at a different potential in order to sustain an equal current density within each cell. Cells 1, 2, 3–10 and the normalized stack potential are 0.320, 0.347, 0.354, and V, respectively. Figure Legend:

Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Mechanistic Three-Dimensional Analytical Solutions for a Direct Liquid Fuel Cell Stack J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2015;12(6): doi: / Local current densities of a ten cell stack operating at V stack = 3.5 V for cell 1, cell 2, and cells 3–10. Cells 3–10 are operated with the highest anode inlet velocity; hence, they have the most uniform streamwise local current density profile. Figure Legend:

Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Mechanistic Three-Dimensional Analytical Solutions for a Direct Liquid Fuel Cell Stack J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2015;12(6): doi: / Parasitic current densities of a ten cell stack operating at V stack = 3.5 V for cell 1, cell 2, and cells 3–10. Cells 3–10 are operated with the highest anode inlet velocity; therefore, they experience the highest parasitic current due to high methanol crossover via diffusion. Figure Legend:

Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Mechanistic Three-Dimensional Analytical Solutions for a Direct Liquid Fuel Cell Stack J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2015;12(6): doi: / Methanol mass fraction within the anode flow channel and diffusion layer of cells 1, 2, and 3–10 of the perturbed stack. The analytical stack solution is able to resolve the boundary layer formed near the catalyst surface in each cell. Figure Legend: