57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012 Water Level Regulation in the LO/SLR System Environmental Considerations and Plan BV7.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ecosystem Flows Hydrology and Connectivity Joe Trungale October 2, 2006.
Advertisements

1 Upper Mississippi River - Illinois Waterway System Navigation Study Mississippi Valley Division.
River Pathways An Introduction to Riparian Areas.
Flood the Sugar Cane Farms Now to Save the Estuaries: Is This Feasible ? Water Resources Advisory Commission January 5, 2006 Meeting.
Case study of sub-region Barmah-Millewa Wetlands.
1. 2 Montlhy and biannually, USA provides information about forecast and status of Colorado River Basin. Since 2000, drought in the basin caused low levels.
Shrub and Wooded swamps are shrubby or forested wetlands found along the edges of lakes, rivers, and streams Seasonal Basins or flats are small, isolated.
Nisqually Glacier Glaciers are important sources of fresh water to human, plant and animal components of downstream communities. Glacier-fed streams traditionally.
Decision/Evaluation Methodologies Physical modelling (hydrologic, Hydraulics, ecological suitability) Simulation models (Shared Vision Planning) Optimization.
Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge Where Wildlife Comes First!
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Louisiana Coastal Area Modification of Davis Pond Study Overview Governor’s Advisory Commission on Coastal.
By Erick Arellano December Description The Westminster Ponds Mills complex is one of the largest Natural Areas in London, comprising some 300 hectares.
Water Levels and Wetlands Of Lake Superior Janet Keough US Environmental Protection Agency Mid-Continent Ecology Division Duluth, MN.
Biodiversity in Vietnam
Hydroelectric Relicensing in Vermont Brian Fitzgerald Vermont Agency of Natural Resources.
Why Are Wetlands Important? By: Erin Janes & Danna Svejkosky MARS 689: Wetland Ecology Dr. Tom Linton Fall 2003.
Module 3 Counterpart Regulations Standards of Review for Determining Project Effects.
CLIMATE CHANGE AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON GREAT LAKES WATER LEVELS WHAT CAN WE DO? Chicago, Illinois March 30, 2001 Presentation By: Wayne A. Smith Vice-President.
April 22, 2003 IERM Overall Objectives 1.Quantify relationship between hydrologic and hydraulic attributes and effects on selected ecological performance.
Wetland Habitat Meadow marsh area Cattail area Floating leaf area Lake Ontario Water Level Weekly WL time series Water Temperature Nearshore temperature.
Presentation to the Workshop Climate Change and Great Lakes Water Levels March 30, 2001 Chicago, Illinois Gerald E. Galloway, Jr., P.E., Ph.D. International.
Yellowstone River Compact Commission Technical Committee Discussions Sheridan County Courthouse Sheridan, WY April 24, 2007 Bighorn Reservoir operations.
Water-related Ecosystems Conservation in Armenia and Perspectives for Transboundary Conservation Karen Jenderedjian.
Ganga Basin Hydrologic Regime – Environmental Flow Perspective World Bank and INRM Consultants New Delhi February, 2015.
Indian Valley Meadow Restoration acre meadow located atop the Sierra Crest in Alpine County, CA. Headwaters of the Mokelumne River. Source for agricultural,
International Lake Ontario – St. Lawrence River Study New Study Release Today Study Board Offers Three New Options for Regulating Water Flowing From Lake.
Jan 2005 Kissimmee Basin Projects Jan Kissimmee Basin Projects Kissimmee River Restoration Project (KRR) Kissimmee Chain of Lakes Long Term Management.
What is an aquatic ecosystem? Agenda for Tuesday Sept 20 th 1.Outside to collect water samples/data 2.Finish aquatic ecosystem presentations Learning Targets.
Todd Ambs Water Division Administrator, WDNR October 26, 2009 Sustaining the Water Belt of North America.
The Atchafalaya Basin Jonah D. Price April 6, 2005.
Conceptual Ecological Model of San Acacia Reach of Middle Rio Grande River – 2/13/07 1 st Draft Ibis Ecosystem Associates, Inc. Diversion & Regulation.
Fishery Biology. Fisheries Management n Provide people with a sustained, high, and ever-increasing benefit from their use of aquatic resources n Problems.
Membership Need to clarify members and determine who has authority to vote on group decisions.
EPA and Flood Risk – Programs and Perspectives Rob Wood Acting Deputy Office Director Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds U.S. Environmental Protection.
1 Biodiversity. 2 BIODIVERSITY Includes a variety of factors  Genetic Diversity  Species Diversity - Species Richness - Total number of species in a.
Aquatic Ecosystems Chapter Seven Section One Freshwater Ecosystems.
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Invertebrate Communities as Tools for Establishing Minimum Flows and Levels in Florida Streams.
Farm Ponds and Fish and Wildlife
St. Johns River Water Management District Special Publication SJ97-SP8 Water Management Alternatives: Effects on Lake Levels and Wetlands in the Orange.
Managing Western Water as Climate Changes Denver, CO February 20-21, 2008.
A Conspectus CLIMATE CHANGE IN WETLANDS A Conspectus Dr Dipayan Dey; SAFE.
Program Implementation Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program.
Environmental & Recreational Impacts of Irrigation John Hayes.
January 27, 2011 Examples of Recovery Evaluation Objectives in the Western U.S. Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
1 Biodiversity. 2 BIODIVERSITY Includes a variety of factors  Genetic Diversity – genetic variability within a species  Species Diversity – variety.
Lee County Water Resource Initiative: Community Sustainability Committee June 16, 2010 Kurt Harclerode Operations Manager Lee County Natural Resources.
Welcome to the Salt Marsh One of the most productive places on Earth.
Central & Southern Florida Project George Horne Deputy Executive Director Operations & Maintenance Resource Area.
Fish and Dams/Weirs. In the Murray Darling Basin. Re-snagging Strategies.
Watershed Restoration Overview for the Klamath Basin.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mark Twain Lake Water Control Manual Update Joan Stemler St. Louis District Water Control.
Establishing the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management On the Upper Mississippi River Dr. Ken Lubinski, USGS Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center.
Biodiversity Health Index Main Streams for Life John MacKinnon UNDP consultant June 2012.
Defining Good Ecological Potential : Method used in the UK Niall Jones Hydro-morphology senior advisor Environment Agency.
Marine Reserves 12/15/08. Laws protecting marine biodiversity 1975 Convention of International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) 1979 Global Treaty.
The Jordan Cove Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline and Terminal.
Continuing Authorities Program
Wetlands: What are they?
The Great Lakes.
Variation and Classification
Variation and Classification
Variation and Classification
Lake Clear Victor Castro Eastern Region
Freshwater Wetlands (Marshes and Swamps)
Variation and Classification
Biodiversity.
Variation and Classification
Transboundary cooperation in the Dniester River basin
Eric Ellis Habitat Restoration Senior Program Specialist
Presentation transcript:

57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012 Water Level Regulation in the LO/SLR System Environmental Considerations and Plan BV7

57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012 Great Lakes – St. Lawrence River Drainage Basin

57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012

57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012

57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012

57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012 Background: Boundary Waters Treaty Act of 1909 – established International Joint Commission (IJC)Boundary Waters Treaty Act of 1909 – established International Joint Commission (IJC) IJC issued 1952 Order of Approval for the construction of the St. Lawrence River Hydropower ProjectIJC issued 1952 Order of Approval for the construction of the St. Lawrence River Hydropower Project Order amended in 1956 during construction to include regulation criteria designed to reduce the range of Lake Ontario water level fluctuations, facilitate navigation on the St. Lawrence River, and provide protection for riparian and other interests downstream in the Province of Quebec.Order amended in 1956 during construction to include regulation criteria designed to reduce the range of Lake Ontario water level fluctuations, facilitate navigation on the St. Lawrence River, and provide protection for riparian and other interests downstream in the Province of Quebec.

57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012 Background: No consideration for environmental or recreational boating interests.No consideration for environmental or recreational boating interests. Pre-regulation range approximately 7 feet.Pre-regulation range approximately 7 feet. Target regulation range between and feet (74.15 – meters), recognizing that water level supplies might be outside of recorded range.Target regulation range between and feet (74.15 – meters), recognizing that water level supplies might be outside of recorded range. Water level regulation Plan 1958D operational since Frequent deviations required to adapt to changing conditions/operating experience (1958D with deviations, or “1958DD”).Water level regulation Plan 1958D operational since Frequent deviations required to adapt to changing conditions/operating experience (1958D with deviations, or “1958DD”).

57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012 Annual Range of Lake Ontario Water Levels

57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012 Water Level Attributes Necessary for Sustained Ecological Benefits Magnitude (high water/low water)Magnitude (high water/low water) Seasonal timingSeasonal timing DurationDuration Rate of changeRate of change Long-term (15-35 year) frequency in supplies/levelsLong-term (15-35 year) frequency in supplies/levels

57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012

57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012 March 2010: ft (74.3 meters) IGLD

57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012 Background: The “Levels Reference Study: Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin” (Report to the International Joint Commission by the Levels Reference Study Board, 1993) concluded: “The studies determined that a reduction in the range of Lake Ontario’s levels brought about by regulation of its outflows has had a significantly adverse effect on the extent, diversity, and integrity of its wetlands”. This same document concluded that Great Lakes wetlands that are flooded periodically each ten to twenty years and dewatered for two or more consecutive years between floods exhibited the greatest wetland vegetative diversity.

57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012 Background: Wetlands are the most productive and diverse habitats, supporting hundreds of species of fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals, plants, invertebrates.Wetlands are the most productive and diverse habitats, supporting hundreds of species of fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals, plants, invertebrates. In the Lake Ontario/St. Lawrence River system, approximately 60,000 acres of wetland are negatively impacted by water level regulation.In the Lake Ontario/St. Lawrence River system, approximately 60,000 acres of wetland are negatively impacted by water level regulation. In SLR, approximately 100 species of fish that use wetland habitats at some point of their life cycle; feeding, breeding, nursery.In SLR, approximately 100 species of fish that use wetland habitats at some point of their life cycle; feeding, breeding, nursery.

57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012 Background: Recreational angling extremely important to local economies: 2007 SLR>$33 million, Lake Ontario nearly $113 million.Recreational angling extremely important to local economies: 2007 SLR>$33 million, Lake Ontario nearly $113 million. Wetlands developed over thousands of years under very dynamic conditions.Wetlands developed over thousands of years under very dynamic conditions. Extreme highs maintained upper extent though flooding of robust emergents and upland plants; extreme lows expose accumulated sediments to oxygen aiding in their decomposition and allows for the germination of plant seeds that restores vegetative diversity to the benefit of organisms that rely on those plants.Extreme highs maintained upper extent though flooding of robust emergents and upland plants; extreme lows expose accumulated sediments to oxygen aiding in their decomposition and allows for the germination of plant seeds that restores vegetative diversity to the benefit of organisms that rely on those plants.

57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012 (Doug Wilcox)

57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012 Typha Dominance/Loss of Vegetative Diversity

57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012 Photo- interpretation results showing loss of meadow marsh and increase in cattail after Regulation (Doug Wilcox)

57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012

57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012 IJC Proposed Plan BV7 2000: International Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Study (5 years; $20 million)2000: International Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Study (5 years; $20 million) Several proposed regulation plans developed, including “B+” (environmental plan); IJC released “Plan 2007” for extensive public review.Several proposed regulation plans developed, including “B+” (environmental plan); IJC released “Plan 2007” for extensive public review. From environmental perspective, Plan 2007 was more harmful than 1958DDFrom environmental perspective, Plan 2007 was more harmful than 1958DD After extensive consultation, “Plan BV7” developed.After extensive consultation, “Plan BV7” developed.

57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012 IJC Proposed Plan BV7 Incrementally restores more natural water level variation without disproportionate, negative impacts to other interests.Incrementally restores more natural water level variation without disproportionate, negative impacts to other interests. During high water supply, would raise maximum level of Lake Ontario by 2.4 inches compared to Plan 1958DD.During high water supply, would raise maximum level of Lake Ontario by 2.4 inches compared to Plan 1958DD. During low supply periods, would lower minimum lake level by 8 inches.During low supply periods, would lower minimum lake level by 8 inches. If approved, adaptive management practices will be employed.If approved, adaptive management practices will be employed.

57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012 Plan BV7 vs. 1958DD and Unregulated

57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012

57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012

57th Annual Meeting of the GLFC Buffalo, NY June 6-7, 2012 Thank you; questions?