THIS SLIDE DECK CONTAINS UPDATES ON THREE PROJECTS: -UNC Innovation Development and Transfer Initiative -REACH-NC (research capabilities) -RAMSeS Implementation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning Collaborative Spaces in Libraries
Advertisements

LAO PDR Summary Findings from NOSPA Mission and Possible Next Steps.
Response to Recommendations by the National Association of Child Care Resource & Referral Agencies (NACCRRA) The Massachusetts Child Care Resource & Referral.
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
A Health and Wellbeing Board for Leicestershire Cheryl Davenport Programme Director.
BATTELLE CROSS-SECTOR INITIATIVE: Technology Transfer & Commercialization Task Force Report to the Board of Regents Master Plan Research Advisory Committee.
Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
E.g Act as a positive role model for innovation Question the status quo Keep the focus of contribution on delivering and improving.
Innovation & Entrepreneurship Judith Cone Special Assistant to the UNC Chancellor for Innovation and Entrepreneurship Senior Fellow Kauffman Foundation.
Overview of Priorities and Activities: Shared Services Canada Presentation to the Information Technology Infrastructure Roundtable June 17, 2013 Liseanne.
VOLUNTEER MANAGEMENT INTERNAL KICKOFF DATE The Leadership Development and Strategic HR Practice Area is presented by American Express. This Service Grant.
Improving Your Business Results Six Sigma Qualtec Six Sigma Qualtec Six Sigma Qualtec – All Rights Reserved June 26, 2002 BEYOND SIX SIGMA: A HOLISTIC.
MIIE activities are supported by a grant from the C.S. Mott Foundation. 1 Michigan Initiative for Innovation and Entrepreneurship (MIIE) Pilot Program.
ITPD PRODUCTION SUPPORT PROCESS OCTOBER 8, /15/2015 Guiding Principles 1.Support the business area’s needs to execute transactions and expand.
1 Open Library Environment Designing technology for the way libraries really work December 8, 2008 ~ CNI, Washington DC Lynne O’Brien Director, Academic.
Fulton Charter System Overview. Fall 2010 Winter Spring 2011 Fall 2011 Spring – Summer 2012 Conversion to Fulton Charter System 2 Board voted to.
Roles and Responsibilities
Developing a ‘Bench to Bedside’ Commercial Collaboration Jo Chambers.
Review of Technology Transfer at The University of Texas System Margaret Sampson Partner, Vinson & Elkins LLP U. T. System Board of Regents’ Meeting Technology.
Campaign Readiness Project Overview Enabling a structured, scalable approach to customer-centric campaigns.
ELearning Update March 12, National Trends Approximately 1.9 million students were studying online in the fall of 2003 In 2009, 11.9 million students.
© 2005 Carlson Marketing. All rights reserved. March 8 Launch Innovation to Prioritization Process Overview.
RUSS SPAIN, CCAP NICK BURROWS, CCAP SHERYL BAILEY, CCAP The Journey To Winning The Award For Excellence in Community Action THIS PRESENTATION CAN BE DOWNLOADED.
Fred H. Cate Vice President for Research September 18, 2015 Grand Challenges.
© The Delos Partnership 2005 Dairygold Workshop Supplier Relationship Management.
Global Forest Observations Initiative Methods and Guidance Portal SDCG – Oslo – 24 th October 2014.
WIPO Pilot Project - Assisting Member States to Create an Adequate Innovation Infrastructure to Support University – Industry Collaboration.
1 Designing Effective Programs: –Introduction to Program Design Steps –Organizational Strategic Planning –Approaches and Models –Evaluation, scheduling,
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
MHC at its Best MHC at its Best.
Office of Performance Review (OPR) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Stephen Dorage.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Module V: Writing Your Sustainability Plan Cheri Hayes Consultant to Nebraska Lifespan Respite Statewide Sustainability Workshop June 23-24, 2015 © 2011.
Module II: Developing a Vision and Results Orientation Cheri Hayes Consultant to Nebraska Lifespan Respite Statewide Sustainability Workshop June 23-24,
United States-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council TBWG Fall Plenary November,
State Advisory Council Community Support Grant Summary Presentation for Policy Committee Meeting December 3, 2012.
Sustainability Planning Framework and Process Cheri Hayes Consultant to Nebraska Lifespan Respite Statewide Sustainability Workshop June 23-24, 2015 ©
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
NSDI Future Directions Governance Report Presentation to the FGDC Steering Committee June 23, 2005.
NIST MEP Strategic Planning MEP Advisory Board1. Board Engagement in Strategic Planning Review the charge from Pat Gallagher What we have heard so far:
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program Smart Choice Pre-Select Phase Transition September 2002.
1 Introduction Overview This annotated PowerPoint is designed to help communicate about your instructional priorities. Note: The facts and data here are.
TIER IT Inventory CITI Meeting November 6,
AEO COMPLIANCE PROGRAM Authorized Economic Operator Requirements.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP – APRIL 12, Strategic Action Plan Evaluation Results.
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
NC Digital Learning Competencies School Administrators and Classroom Teachers ****** Partnering for Education Impact April 19, 2016.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
January 23,  Balance state’s higher education long range plan and agency operations in the required strategic plan;  Involve agency staff in.
Planning Engagement Kickoff
Roles and Responsibilities
Five Steps To Effective Research Proposals
Successful Integration is a result of good governance – getting the wiring right Integrated care as an aspiration is simple, and simplest if one begins.
Office 365 FastTrack Planning Engagement Kickoff
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Road Manager Module National Heavy Vehicle Regulator
PMI Chapter, IT Governance, Portfolio and Project Management in State Government Chris Cruz, Chief Information Officer, California Department of Food and.
Collective Impact Fall 2017.
ORGANIZATIONAL Change management
District Improvement plan
Board of Trustees Update
Road Manager Module National Heavy Vehicle Regulator
Key Stakeholders are aware of the Coalitions activities
Harvard Web Publishing Web Publishing for the Harvard Community
Field monitoring Project (number and title)
CEng progression through the IOM3
IT Next – Transformation Program
International Standards and Contemporary Technologies,
Presentation transcript:

THIS SLIDE DECK CONTAINS UPDATES ON THREE PROJECTS: -UNC Innovation Development and Transfer Initiative -REACH-NC (research capabilities) -RAMSeS Implementation and Change Management Courtney Thornton, UNCGA SPARC Meeting April 15, 2010

Big Picture INNOVATION INITIATIVE: Identify unique strengths in research and intellectual property and strategic areas of focus (Recommendations 1 & 2, UNC Innovate-Collaborate-Accelerate Report) IMPLEMENTATIONS: Data captured in eRA tools like RAMSeS, Blue REACH-NC Leveraging data to profile UNC research capabilities

UNC Innovation Development and Transfer Initiative Courtney Thornton, UNCGA SPARC Meeting April 15, 2010

Innovation Initiative Updates The purpose of the initiative is to make UNC the “go to” place to partner with innovative minds by ▫creating supportive campus cultures that reward and incentivize translational efforts; ▫valuing partnerships and consider them with strategy and holistic thinking; ▫doing “tech transfer” differently, in terms of practices that move innovations forward and out quickly while valuing individuals and partners involved. Pilot Campuses: ECU UNC-CH UNCC UNCG WCU Phase I: October 2009 through September 2010

Innovation Initiative Updates What are campus teams doing that relates to SPARC? ▫Identifying areas of research strength – assist in building and/or supporting campus strategy ▫Inventorying efforts/programs that support entrepreneurial faculty – share best practices/resources that prepare faculty to work in start-ups and deal with conflict of interest, etc ▫Making negotiations simpler and faster –adopt or support standard agreements (like Carolina Express License), standard trainings in contracts and contract negotiations

Goal ▫Stimulate, direct and achieve commercialization opportunities at UNC campuses, particularly those lacking internal capacity Features ▫Campus visits to build relationships and culture ▫Process to “adopt” innovations within UNC and see them through to positive outcomes ▫Engagement of key external stakeholder network 6 UNC ACTION: Accelerating Commercialization and Transfer – Innovation Opportunity Network

7 Start-up Potential License Potential Impact Potential ACT Back to Campus/ Inventor UNC Opportunity Council ACT Back to TTO Ideation Session Implications for Data Systems? (Blue)

REACH-NC (Research, Engagement And Capabilities Hub) Courtney Thornton, UNCGA SPARC Meeting April 15, 2010

REACH-NC What is it? ▫A portal to information about UNC expertise and capabilities How is it being built? ▫Data on faculty publications, research, courses, IP, and more are used to build an expertise profile that is searchable within a taxonomic framework An example from biomed fields using publication data:

REACH-NC Enhancing REACH through Visualization Multiple audiences – faculty, administrators, economic developers, industry, legislators Implications – data access, data collection, strategic management of the tool April Basic functionality available using NCSU/UNCCH data May Early visualization work May-July 2010 – Stakeholder focus groups September 2010 – Prototype unveiled October 2010 and ongoing – Seek and secure resources to expand tool systemwide

RAMSeS Implementation and Change Management Process Courtney Thornton, UNCGA SPARC Meeting April 15, 2010

Implementation Update Bare bones campuses coming online between now and June 2010 ▫WSSU, FSU, ECSU, UNCA, UNCP, NCCU Technical resource through UNC-CH to support systemwide RAMSeS users Upcoming priorities ▫IRBIS ▫ACAP ▫Attention on Conflict of Interest and Blue (IP management) modules through innovation initiative eForms feature will allow easy update and customization

Configuration and Change Management What is it? ▫A new process to request changes regarding RAMSeS features and functionality, unless  You can make the change yourself in Backbone or Research Contacts (adding/removing people or units, approver roles, etc.)  You have a “troubleshooting” issue while using the tool (correcting mistakes in numbers, status, dates, etc.) and can use the online help system to resolve it What types of changes fall under this process? Level 1: Data elements core to the tool and standard to all campus instances of RAMSeS Level 2: Changes recommended by UNC-CH ORIS Level 3: Other changes to data fields or text (if not a Level 1 field), adding sponsors

Configuration and Change Management Why do we need this process? ▫Ensure standard practices remain intact for key data elements  Maintains confidence in systemwide reporting ▫Allow systemwide adoption of campus ideas for change or improvement, as appropriate  Allows parallel growth across system ▫Provide transparent prioritization and scheduling of change requests

Configuration and Change Management How will it work? Each campus elects a Standards Advisory Board (SAB) representative Any campus (usually through SAB member) can request a change; simple online form for change requests is being developed through UNC GA website Levels 1 and 2 change requests are reviewed and approved by the full SAB. Level 3 requests can be addressed by the Change Manager Change Request Made by Campus Request Reviewed by Change Manager Level 1 and 2 Requests Reviewed by SAB Approved Requests Implemented on Campuses Change Resolved: Change Manager and Requestor Notified Rejected by SAB; Back to Requestor Level 3 Requests Reviewed by Change Manager Approved Requests Implemented on Campus(es) Change Resolved: Change Manager and Requestor Notified Rejected by Change Manager; Back to Requestor

Configuration and Change Management Timeline ▫SAB members selected by April 19, 2010 ▫First meeting mid-late May ▫Inventory of outstanding change requests will provide starting point Document to be fleshed out as critical mass of campuses use other tools for IRB, animal care, etc. Ultimate vision – “binder” (virtual or printed) to instruct users QUESTIONS?