Shock Reduction History James Coles, PhD Medtronic, Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Agenda Introduction Classes of recommendations Level of evidence
Advertisements

Single and Dual Chamber Pacemaker Timing Module 6
EP Testing and Use of Devices in Heart Failure HFSA 2010 Recommendations.
Cardiovascular Disaster in Hemodialysis patients
Myocardial Ischemia: An Underrated Cause of Sudden Cardiac Death?
Natale MARRAZZO Francesco SOLIMENE Quando la CRT-P può bastare?
Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (S-ICD)
MADIT Randomized Trial to Reduce Inappropriate Therapy (MADIT-RIT) Arthur J. Moss, MD for the MADIT-RIT Executive Committee AHA Late Breaking Trials November.
UC EN Protecta Customer PPT (Detailed Version)
for internal use only Evidence Based Medicine The Need to Avoid Unnecessary Ventricular Stimulation.
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators to Prevent Sudden Cardiac Death: Background Frederick A. Masoudi, MD, MSPH Associate Professor of Medicine (Cardiology)
Outcome of Patients with Advanced Heart Failure who Receive Device- Based Therapy for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death, G. Amit, N. Samniah,
IMPANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATORS (ICDs) Janet McComb Freeman Hospital Newcastle upon Tyne.
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Rebecca Boduch Biomedical Engineering University of Rhode Island.
ICD FOR PRIMARY PREVENTION EVIDENCE REVIEW
Slides adapted from those presented by Ilan Goldenberg, MD at ACC 2014, Washington, DC USA CRM AB Long-Term Survival with Cardiac Resynchronization.
Prognostic Value of Programmed Electrical Stimulation Among Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Recipients Real-World Data from the Israeli National.
Indications of ICD in 2010 Dr Mervat Aboulmaaty Professor of Cardiology Ain Shams University DAF 1 st EP course 2010.
Pacemakers and Implanted Defibrillators Mike Harlan.
Cardiac Arrhythmias in Coronary Heart Disease SIGN 94.
Mr. J is a 70 year old man with an ischemic cardiomyopathy who presents with class III CHF and significant dissatisfaction with his functional capacity.
Most Relevant Technological Advancements of Recent Years in Cardiac Pacing Dr. Sebastian Gallino Electrophysiology Sector. Cardiology Service. Cosme Argerich.
Heart Failure Ben Starnes MD FACC Interventional Cardiology
Basic Concepts—Electricity and Pacemakers Module 3
Renal function and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing ICD and CRTD implantation- Data from the Israeli ICD Registry Alon Eisen, Mahmoud Souleiman,
XPECT Study Physician Presentation. XPECT Study 1 Purpose Quantify the performance of the first implantable leadless cardiac monitor (ICM) with dedicated.
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (CRT-D) for Mildly Symptomatic Heart Failure.
Devices and the older patient with syncope Michael Gammage, Reader in Cardiovascular Medicine MHRA Committee for Safety of Devices.
Device and Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Advantages and Pitfalls Teresa Menendez Hood, M.D.
The GOLIATH Study ..
INTRODUCTION: INTRODUCTION: implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have clearly demonstrated to terminate an elevated percentage of sustained ventricular.
New Findings in the Management of AF in Pacemaker Patients Results from the MINERVA Trial a Medtronic sponsored trial February 2014.
PainFree SST Primary Manuscript Results James Coles, PhD Medtronic, Inc.
Date of download: 6/1/2016 From: Systematic Review: Cardiac Resynchronization in Patients with Symptomatic Heart Failure Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(5):
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Safety and efficacy of advanced atrial pacing therapies.
Increased Patient Device Concerns But Not General Anxiety in Patients with a Secondary Indication for the ICD Susanne S. Pedersen, Professor of Cardiac.
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator.
Real World Performance of Rhythm Discrimination Algorithms in Hard-to-Treat Single Chamber ICD Patients James Coles, PhD Medtronic, Inc.
Alireza Heidari Bakavoli, MD. Cardiology department Qaem medical center Mashhad University of Medical Science Role of ICD and CRT devices in Heart failure.
Date of download: 6/21/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Reduction in Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias With Statins.
Ventricular Arrhythmias:A General Cardiologist’s Assessment of Therapies in 2004 C.Richard Conti M.D. MACC.
Date of download: 7/8/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Safety and Efficacy of the Totally Subcutaneous Implantable.
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators & End of Life Anna Wilson Cardiac Physiologist Waikato Hospital.
1 Is It Time to Redefine ICD Therapy ? The Importance of Reducing Shocks.
Ethical Scenario: Cardiovascular System
Patient Enrollment Guide
Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillators
Sudden Cardiac Arrest Morhaf Ibrahim, MD, FHRS Electrophysiology.
Implantable Defibrillator Therapy Post Cardiac Arrest
Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS): A proven surgical option for chronic pain Jeffrey M. Epstein, M.D. Babylon, NY.
Reactive ATP and MINERVA
Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators
Laurie Racenet, FNP, MSN, CCDS, CEPS, FHRS
Results from the PROVIDE Trial
Dysrhythmias Disorders of formation or conduction (or both) of electrical impulses within heart Can cause disturbances of Rate Rhythm Both rate, rhythm.
Pacemakers and Devices – Interactive Session
Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines on the Use of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Evidence and Patient Selection  Derek V. Exner, MD, MPH, David.
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Gaurav A. Upadhyay, MD, Jonathan S. Steinberg, MD  Heart Rhythm 
David D. Berg et al. JACC 2018;71:
FDA Perspective Marco Cannella, PhD Senior Lead Reviewer
Cautery (ELECTRO MAGNETIC INTERFERENCE) & cardiac devices in endoscopy
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
The Heart Rhythm Society Meeting Presented by Dr. Johan De Sutter
Algorithm-based reduction of inappropriate defibrillator shock: Results of the Inappropriate Shock Reduction wIth PARAD+ Rhythm DiScrimination–Implantable.
Sylvain Ploux et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Presentation transcript:

Shock Reduction History James Coles, PhD Medtronic, Inc.

Avoiding Shocks Is Important To Reduce Pain and Anxiety and Increase Device Acceptance 1 To Reduce Healthcare Burden and Improve Patient Quality of Life 1 Avoiding Shocks May Improve Survival/Heart Failure 2 1 Wathen MS, DeGroot PJ, Sweeney MO, et al, for the PainFREE Rx II Investigators. Prospective randomized multicenter trial of empirical antitachycardia pacing versus shocks for spontaneous rapid ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Pacing Fast Ventricular Tachycardia Reduces Shock Therapies (PainFREE Rx II) trial results. Circulation. October 26, 2004;110(17): Sweeney MO, et al. Differences in effects of electrical therapy type on health care utilization in the MVP ICD Trial. Presented at HRS 2010.

Shocks Increase Healthcare Utilization 199,000 patients receive high power device implants and replacements each year* These patients experience nearly 54,000 shocks each year based on reported shock rates. The annual cost of the care related to these shocks: $112,172,022 * Millennium Research Group, Market Research Report on Global Markets for Cardiac Rhythm Management Devices, July 2012.

The 3 Pillars of Inappropriate or Unnecessary Shock Reduction Painless Therapies Device Programming Sensing and Detection Algorithms Since 1997, Medtronic has enrolled more than 15,000 patients in 14 Prospective Clinical Trials

EnTrust 5 (n= 421) ATP during charging can terminate 69% of Fast VT with low a risk of acceleration or symptoms EnTrust 5 (n= 421) ATP during charging can terminate 69% of Fast VT with low a risk of acceleration or symptoms Nominally “On" ADVANCE CRT-D 4 (n = 526) A single burst of ATP effectively and safely terminates 68% of VT in CRT-D patients No differences in ATP efficacy between BiV and RV-delivered ATP ADVANCE CRT-D 4 (n = 526) A single burst of ATP effectively and safely terminates 68% of VT in CRT-D patients No differences in ATP efficacy between BiV and RV-delivered ATP Applies to all Devices ADVANCE D 3 (n = 925) ATP is effective and safe in treating Fast VT in all ICD indicated patients: ischemic, nonischemic, primary, and secondary prevention ADVANCE D 3 (n = 925) ATP is effective and safe in treating Fast VT in all ICD indicated patients: ischemic, nonischemic, primary, and secondary prevention Applies to all Patients Painless Therapies: The Evolution of Anti-Tachycardia Pacing (ATP) in ICDs PainFree I 1 & II 2 (n = 854) 76% of device detected VF is actually Fast VT ATP successfully terminated 3 out of 4 Fast VTs ATP added no additional risk from syncope or acceleration PainFree I 1 & II 2 (n = 854) 76% of device detected VF is actually Fast VT ATP successfully terminated 3 out of 4 Fast VTs ATP added no additional risk from syncope or acceleration Safe and Effective

ShockLess 10 (n= 4,132) Long Detection Delays (VF NID) and High Rate Cut-Offs (LTI) are underutilized shock reduction programming strategies for primary prevention patients ShockLess 10 (n= 4,132) Long Detection Delays (VF NID) and High Rate Cut-Offs (LTI) are underutilized shock reduction programming strategies for primary prevention patients Real World Impact of Programming RELEVANT 8 (n = 324) and ADVANCE III 9 (n = 1902) Extending VF detection to 30 out of 40 intervals reduces ICD therapies without increasing the risk of syncope or mortality in single, dual, and CRT ICDs, ischemic and non-ischemic, and primary and secondary prevention patients RELEVANT 8 (n = 324) and ADVANCE III 9 (n = 1902) Extending VF detection to 30 out of 40 intervals reduces ICD therapies without increasing the risk of syncope or mortality in single, dual, and CRT ICDs, ischemic and non-ischemic, and primary and secondary prevention patients Applies to all Devices and Patients PREPARE 7 (n = 700) Extending VF detection to 30 out of 40 intervals reduces shocks by 63% in primary prevention patients Extending VF detection was not associated with an increased risk of arrhythmic syncope or mortality PREPARE 7 (n = 700) Extending VF detection to 30 out of 40 intervals reduces shocks by 63% in primary prevention patients Extending VF detection was not associated with an increased risk of arrhythmic syncope or mortality Delayed Detection is Safe and Effective Device Programming: How Device Programming Has Evolved EMPIRIC 6 (n = 900) Standardized programming is as safe and effective in reducing shocks for VT/VF as physicians-tailored programming EMPIRIC 6 (n = 900) Standardized programming is as safe and effective in reducing shocks for VT/VF as physicians-tailored programming Programming Can Be Standardized

PainFree SST 15 (n= 2,770) With SmartShock 98.5% of dual and triple chamber ICD patients and 97.5% of single chamber ICD patients are inappropriate shock free at 1-year PainFree SST 15 (n= 2,770) With SmartShock 98.5% of dual and triple chamber ICD patients and 97.5% of single chamber ICD patients are inappropriate shock free at 1-year Clinical Validation Sensing and Detection Algorithms: The Path to Algorithm Enhancement Virtual ICD 14 SmartShock ® has 99.2% sensitivity for detection of sustained VT/VF in dual chamber ICDs SmartShock reduces the number of dual chamber ICD patients who receive an inappropriate shock to 2.4% at 1 year and 8.4% at 5 years Virtual ICD 14 SmartShock ® has 99.2% sensitivity for detection of sustained VT/VF in dual chamber ICDs SmartShock reduces the number of dual chamber ICD patients who receive an inappropriate shock to 2.4% at 1 year and 8.4% at 5 years Total Shock Reduction WAVE 12 (n = 1,122) and REMEDIO 13 (n = 106) Wavelet has 91.6 to 98.6% sensitivity for detection of sustained VT/VF in single chamber ICDs Inappropriate therapies were reduced by 78.2 to 90.6% WAVE 12 (n = 1,122) and REMEDIO 13 (n = 106) Wavelet has 91.6 to 98.6% sensitivity for detection of sustained VT/VF in single chamber ICDs Inappropriate therapies were reduced by 78.2 to 90.6% Single Chamber Enhancement GEM DR 11 (n = 933) PR Logic has 100% sensitivity and 88.4% positive predictive value for detection of sustained VT/VF in dual chamber ICDs GEM DR 11 (n = 933) PR Logic has 100% sensitivity and 88.4% positive predictive value for detection of sustained VT/VF in dual chamber ICDs Dual Chamber Enhancement

References 1.Wathen, et al. Circulation. 2001;104: Wathen, et al. Circulation 2004;110; Santini, et al. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2010;27:127– Gasparini, et al. Am Heart J 2010;159: Schoels, et al. Heart Rhythm 2007;4:879– Wilkoff, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:330– Wilkoff, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:541– Gasparini, et al. European Heart Journal 2009;30:2758– Gasparini, et al. JAMA 2013;309: Silver, et al. Heart Rhythm doi: /j.hrthm [Epub ahead of print] 11.Wilkoff, et al. Circulation 2001;103; Klein, et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006;17: Toquero, et al. Europace 2009;11:727– Volosin, et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2011;22: Auricchio, et al. Heart Rhythm In press

Indications Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are indicated for ventricular antitachycardia pacing and ventricular defibrillation for automated treatment of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Some ICDs are also indicated for use in patients with atrial tachyarrhythmias, or those patients who are at significant risk for developing atrial tachyarrhythmias. The RV Lead Integrity Alert (LIA) feature is intended primarily for patients who have a Medtronic ICD or CRT-D device and a Sprint Fidelis lead (Models 6949, 6948, 6931, and 6930, based on performance data. The RV LIA feature may not perform as well with a St. Jude Riata/Durata lead or a Boston Scientific Endotak lead as it does when used with a Medtronic Sprint Fidelis lead. This is because different lead designs may have different failure signatures and conditions that may or may not be detected early by the RV LIA feature. Notes for ICDs: The ICD features of the device functions the same as other approved Medtronic market-released ICDs. Due to the addition of the OptiVol diagnostic feature, the device indications are limited to the NYHA functional class II/III heart failure patients who are indicated for an ICD. The clinical value of the OptiVol fluid monitoring diagnostic feature has not been assessed in those patients who do not have fluid retention related symptoms due to heart failure. Additional notes for DR ICDs: The use of the device has not been demonstrated to decrease the morbidity related to atrial tachyarrhythmias. The effectiveness of high-frequency burst pacing (atrial 50 Hz Burst therapy) in terminating device classified atrial tachycardia (AT) was found to be 17%, and in terminating device classified atrial fibrillation (AF) was found to be 16.8%, in the VT/AT patient population studied. The effectiveness of high-frequency burst pacing (atrial 50 Hz Burst therapy) in terminating device classified atrial tachycardia (AT) was found to be 11.7%, and in terminating device classified atrial fibrillation (AF) was found to be 18.2% in the AF-only patient population studied. Contraindications ICDs are contraindicated in patients experiencing tachyarrhythmias with transient or reversible causes including, but not limited to, the following: acute myocardial infarction, drug intoxication, drowning, electric shock, electrolyte imbalance, hypoxia, or sepsis; patients who have a unipolar pacemaker implanted, patients with incessant ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF), and patients whose primary disorder is chronic atrial tachyarrhythmia with no concomitant VT or VF. Brief Statement: ICDs Last Updated: Oct 2014

Warnings/Precautions Changes in a patient’s disease and/or medications may alter the efficacy of the device’s programmed parameters. Patients should avoid sources of magnetic and electromagnetic radiation to avoid possible underdetection, inappropriate sensing and/or therapy delivery, tissue damage, induction of an arrhythmia, device electrical reset or device damage. Do not place transthoracic defibrillation paddles directly over the device. Potential complications Potential complications include, but are not limited to, rejection phenomena, erosion through the skin, muscle or nerve stimulation, oversensing, failure to detect and/or terminate arrhythmia episodes, and surgical complications such as hematoma, infection, inflammation, and thrombosis. An additional complication for ICDs is the acceleration of ventricular tachycardia. See the device manual for detailed information regarding the implant procedure, indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, and potential complications/adverse events. For further information, please call Medtronic at and/or consult Medtronic’s website at Caution: Federal law (USA) restricts these devices to sale by or on the order of a physician. Brief Statement: ICDs Last Updated: Oct 2014