Trademark Update June 13, 2013. No Likelihood of Confusion? TAMAYA is not confusingly similar to MAYA TTAB found dissimilarity based on: –3 syllables.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prosecution Lunch October Trademark Bullies? USPTO is requesting feedback from U.S. trademark owners, practitioners, and others regarding their.
Advertisements

Intellectual Property Protection – Critical Issues to Consider in Business Ventures John F. Letchford, Esquire Archer & Greiner, P.C.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association COST COMPARISON OF INTER PARTES PROCEEDINGS IN THE USPTO AND INFRINGEMENT ACTION IN.
1 Term Paper n Articles of Organization n Business Plan n Legal Analysis.
Trademark Update January 16, Applicant Must Pay PTO Fees District court review of an ex parte appeal decision by the TTAB Section 1071 (b)(3) –In.
Trade-Mark Infringement. Three Types of Infringement s.19 – Use of the same mark in respect of the same wares s.19 – Use of the same mark in respect of.
Trade-marks and Video Games David Spratley October 1, 2014.
Peter D. Aufrichtig, Esq..  Intellectual Property clients look and sound like all other clients.
Prosecution Group Luncheon July 2012 Trademarks. Failure To Function, the next rejection? MONTICELLO YELLOW In re Thomas Jefferson Foundation, Inc., Serial.
Maintaining Trademark Rights: Policing and Educational Efforts April 7, 2011.
Law 227: Trademarks & Unfair Competition Trade Dress June 30, 2009 Jefferson Scher.
Prosecution Group Luncheon Trademarks April, 2011.
Worldwide. For Our Clients. Trademark Dilution Law in the United States September 14, 2004.
According to PTO, a trademark is a word, phrase, symbol or design, or a combination thereof, that identifies and distinguishes the source of the goods.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School April 11, 2008 Trademark – Domain Names.
Trademark Dilution Intro to IP - Prof Merges
Trademark Inringement Intro to IP – Prof Merges
Trademark Fair Use and Parody Intro to IP Prof Merges
Trademark Protection Under the Madrid Protocol: Strategic Considerations Presented by John Scruton.
Trademark Cases And now for something confusingly similar Steve Baron Bradley IM 350 Fall 2010.
Chapter 14 Legal Aspects of Sport Marketing
Domain Disputes Overview of UDRP Procedures 6/5/2015.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
FUNDAMENTALS OF TRADEMARK LAW THE HONORABLE BERNICE B. DONALD U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN SEPT. 18, 2013 LAHORE, PAKISTAN.
What the U.S. Supreme Court Decided this Term About Trademarks (and Some Other Recent IP Developments) ADDMG In-House Seminar May 13, 2015 Presented by:
Law 227: Trademarks & Unfair Competition Acquisition, Priority & “LOC” June 9, 2009 Jefferson Scher.
On the Web at DELVACCA, in conjunction with its Intellectual Property Committee, presents Tips and Traps of Trademark Searching.
Trademarks and the World Wide Web IM 350: Intellectual Property Law and New Media Spring, 2015.
Non-Traditional Marks
Trademark Cases And now for something confusingly similar.
7.1 Chapter 7 Trademarks © 2003 by West Legal Studies in Business/A Division of Thomson Learning.
TRADEMARKS. Definition A trademark is any word, name, phrase, symbol, logo, image, device, or any combination of these elements, used by any person to.
Trademark and Copyright Updates July USPTO TMEP Update July 2015 TBMP Update July 2015 Final rule relating to Changes in Requirements for Collective.
Trademarks and Packaging Learning Objectives Explain what a trademark is. Discuss protecting the trademark. Discuss forms of trademarks. Explain.
Intellectual Property and Entrepreneurship Presented at IEEE/ComSoc, Boston Section June 2, 2011 George Jakobsche For additional information, see accompanying.
COUNTERFEIT COMPONENTS AND RELATED LEGAL ISSUES Counterfeit Electronic Components Avoidance Workshop August 27, 2008 Laurence E. Pappas © EQuality Services,
Intellectual Property PatentCopyright Trade Marks Trade Secrets.
Trademark Cases And now for something confusingly similar
Prosecution Lunch September Trademark Public Advisory Mtg. Concerns about unauthorized practice of law by document mgmt services and others eFiling-
Trademark Cases And now for something confusingly similar
What’s in a Trademark Anyway? Dan McKinnon, New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. Harvard University - July 10, 2008.
WORKING WITH TRADEMARK EXAMINING ATTORNEYS: TWO INSIDERS TELL ALL Danielle I. Mattessich Andrew S. Ehard Merchant & Gould.
Trademark Prosecution Luncheon May 15, USPTO April 2014 version of TMEP published – clarifications/ revisions regarding: –Trade dress examination.
Prosecution Group Luncheon May, General Announcements Version 3 of TBMP now available online; copies in the print rooms USPTO submits “Trademark.
Trademark May Pay the USPTO’s ATTORNEY FEES??? Ex parte appeal to D. Ct. for De Novo Review –must name the Director of the PTO as a defendant; and.
Prosecution Group Luncheon Trademarks August, 2011.
John B. Pegram Fish & Richardson P.C. Issue Preclusion and Estoppel: Trademark and Patent Perspectives 1 © AIPLA 2015 George W. Lewis Westerman, Hattori.
1 Trademark Infringement and Dilution Steve Baron March 6, 2003.
Trademark Prosecution Luncheon May 15, USPTO April 2014 version of TMEP published – clarifications/ revisions regarding: –Trade dress examination.
Prosecution Group Luncheon Trademark Updates October, 2011.
Chapter 18 The Legal Aspects of Sport Marketing. Objectives To introduce the key legal concepts and issues that affect the marketing of the sport product.
Trademark Opposition & Cancellation Proceedings Salumeh Loesch January 12, 2016.
Trademark Searching Donna Hopkins Engineering Librarian Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
"You Have Mail" And Other Terms Are Generic Produced by: Asia Green.
Reviewing Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc. and other select 2012 trademark cases of interest Garrett Parks Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Presented to the Alaska.
Mini Law Lesson How Brands Can Use #Hashtags Without Getting Sued Brian Heidelberger
Non-traditional Marks - China
Trademarks III Infringement of Trademarks
Practice Group Luncheon
HOW TO AVOID INVALID U.S. TRADEMARK REGISTRATIONS BY BEING ABLE TO PROVE A BONA FIDE INTENT TO USE IN THE U.S. Presented by Howard J. Shire 13 October.
Noteworthy Developments at the TTAB
Trademarks Copyright © Jeffrey Pittman
Apple v. Samsung: Product Design
Prosecution Luncheon Trademark
Trademark Parody: Have We Lost Our Sense of Humor?
ENTREPRENEURSHIP Lecture No: 19 BY CH. SHAHZAD ANSAR
Chapter 3: Trademarks in E-Commerce.
TRADEMARKS, SERVICE MARKS and COPYRIGHTS LEGAL PROTECTIONS AND USE AS ASSETS FOR CONSULTANTS AND EARLY STAGE BUSINESS By Robert A. Adelson, Esq. Partner,
The current referrals to the CJEU
Presentation transcript:

Trademark Update June 13, 2013

No Likelihood of Confusion? TAMAYA is not confusingly similar to MAYA TTAB found dissimilarity based on: –3 syllables vs. 2 –Different beginning – first part of mark creates greatest impression –Different look and sound –MAYA is diluted and weak While TAMAYA has a meaning in a foreign language, the TTAB found the language to be obsolete and obscure and the that consumer is likely to perceive the mark as a coined term

No Disclaimer for “NATURALLY”? The PTO refused registration of the mark NATURALLY POWERED for “all-natural coconut- based beverages” because applicant refused to disclaim the word NATURALLY. –The PTO asserted that NATURALLY is merely descriptive of the goods not containing synthetics, chemicals, preservatives, etc. The TTAB reversed, holding that NATURALLY POWERED is a unitary expression –The multiple elements create an single commercial impression separate and apart from the meaning of the constituent terms –NATURALLY POWERED is a double entendre: the goods are powered by forces of nature/ the goods are powered in a natural manner.

Facebook Inc. v. Teachbook.com LLC (N.D. Ill 2011) FACEBOOK sued TEACHBOOK for trademark infringement. TEACHBOOK moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Motion was denied. –In Europe, FACEBOOK argued it was distinguishable from FACTBOOK based on the “aural and conceptual differences between the marks” –TEACHBOOK’s website advertised the TEACHBOOK site as an alternative to FACEBOOK’s site as a confidential network not available to students