1 Bolar Provisions in Europe Robert Watson Chartered Patent Attorney European Patent Attorney AIPLA, February 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Data Protection Billy Hawkes Data Protection Commissioner Irish Human Rights Commission 20 November 2010.
Advertisements

European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims
29 April 2011 Brian Cordery Bristows London
Actions Developing in Countries Accessing the WTO System Vung Tau, February 2006 “US – Brazil Compulsory licensing.
Introduction to PPDs Regulatory requirements and rationale.
“Reform of the Child Care System: Taking Stock and Accelerating Action” South East Europe 3 – 6 July 2007, Sofia.
THE LANGUAGE OF ETERNITY THE LANGUAGE OF ETERNITY Constitutional review of the amending power in France (or the absence thereof) Denis Baranger February.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
The UK Freedom of Information Act – A Practical Guide for Academic Researchers Cambridge Wednesday, 16 February 2011.
Software Protection & Scope of the Right holder Options for Developing Countries Presentation by: Dr. Ahmed El Saghir Judge at the Council of State Courts.
DOMESTICATION OF TRIPS FLEXIBILITIES IN NATIONAL IP LEGISLATION FOR STRENGTHENING ACCESS TO MEDICINES IN ZAMBIA AN OVERVIEW OF PATENT PROTECTION IN ZAMBIA.
Utility Requirement in Japan Makoto Ono, Ph.D. Anderson, Mori & Tomotsune Website:
Supplies by pharmacists to entities other than patients.
U D T Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive, Warsaw June 2004 INTERFACES BETWEEN NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND DIRECTIVE 97/23/EC SYSTEM OF ENSURING.
Pharma.be The Initiative to Promote Clinical Trials in Belgium Key Performance Indicators: Impact on Clinical Research of European Legislation Square –
Human Rights Act 1998 The European convention on human rights The European convention on human rights The Convention rights The Convention rights How does.
A Review of Board of Health Liability James A. LeNoury LeNoury Law Counsel to alPHa February 5th, 2015.
THE UK EXPERIENCE RELATED TO ESCITALOPRAM seeking clarity in the EU interest IS THE UK’S REFERRAL TO CHMP UNDER ARTICLE 31 OF DIRECTIVE 2001/83 LEGITIMATE?
Data protection and extension of patent rights TRIPS requirements & TRIPS-plus provisions Carlos Correa.
Stakeholders In Clinical Research Government and Regulatory Bodies Professor Phil Warner.
DOMESTICATION OF TRIPS FLEXIBILITIES IN NATIONAL IP LEGISLATION FOR STRENGTHENING ACCESS TO MEDICINES IN ZAMBIA PROPOSED PATENT BILL AND ITS RELEVANCY.
Biotech Inventions in Latin America Argentina Ignacio Sánchez Echagüe Marval, O’Farrell & Mairal.
Practical Aspects of IP Arbitration: Improving the negotiating position Olav Jaeger September 14, 2009.
Data exclusivity, patents and registration of medicines Karin Timmermans TWN Regional Workshop Kuala Lumpur on bilateral trade agreements Aug
The Pharmaceutical Industry in Turkey
THE UK EXPERIENCE RELATED TO CASE C- 185/10, COMMISSION v REPUBLIC OF POLAND DOES A “SPECIAL NEED” ARISE FOR AN UNLICENSED MEDICINE IF THE LICENSED EQUIVALENT.
Authorisation of medicinal products: selected challenges Rocío Salvador Roldán Pharmaceuticals Unit/DG SANCO This presentation only reflects the views.
The Eighth Asian Bioethics Conference Biotechnology, Culture, and Human Values in Asia and Beyond Confidentiality and Genetic data: Ethical and Legal Rights.
Implementation of EU Electronic Communication Directives.
WORKSHOP, Nicosia 2-3rd July 2008 “Extension of SAFETY & QUALITY Common Requirements to the EMAC States” Item 3 : Regulatory Context Peter Stastny EUROCONTROL.
November Lovells Trademark and Design Right Enforcement in the European Union Part I France Marie-Aimée de Dampierre, Paris.
Introduction to Patents Anatomy of a Patent & Procedures for Getting a Patent Margaret Hartnett Commercialisation & IP Manager University.
Session 6 : An Introduction to the TRIPS Agreement UPOV, 1978 and 1991 and WIPO- Administered Treaties.
ENFORCEMENT OF PATENT RIGHTS IN EUROPE The Hungarian way Zsolt SZENTPÉTERI S.B.G.&K. Patent and Law Offices, Budapest International Seminar Intellectual.
Dr. Thomas Pattloch, LL.M.Eur. The new Chinese Patent Law An overview Dr. Thomas Pattloch, LL.M.Eur., German Attorney at Law Senior Counsel TaylorWessing.
ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE GENERAL European Commission 1 PECAs David Eardley DG Enterprise and Industry European Commission Tel: 032 (2)
© 2008 International Intellectual Property June 24, 2009 Class 8 Patents: Multilateral Agreements (WTO TRIPS); Global Problem of Patent Protection for.
Test data protection TRIPS requirements & TRIPS-plus provisions Carlos Correa.
ADAMS & ADAMS Intellectual Property within the Pharmaceutical Industry Presentation to SAPRAA. 04 September 2009 By : Alexis Apostolidis B.Sc (Chem, Law);
Case 428/08 Monsanto v Cefetra e.a THE FUTURE OF BIOTECH PATENT PROTECTION IN EUROPE What every biotech patent practitioner should know John J. Allen.
DOMESTICATION OF TRIPS FLEXIBILITIES IN NATIONAL IP LEGISLATION FOR STRENGTHENING ACCESS TO MEDICINES IN ZAMBIA PROPOSED PATENT BILL AND ITS RELEVANCY.
A: Copy –Rights – Artistic, Literary work, Computer software Etc. B: Related Rights – Performers, Phonogram Producers, Broadcasters etc. C: Industrial.
Side 1 Andrew Chin AndrewChin.com A Quick Survey of the America Invents Act Patent Law October 12, 2011.
Federal agency for medicines and health products EC REGULATION 1901/2006 ON MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR PAEDIATRIC USE AND HOMEOPATHIC MEDICINAL PRODUCTS Marie-Anne.
“THE UNITARY PATENT AND THE UNIFIED PATENT COURT: A PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW PERSPECTIVE” Prof Dr Paul L.C. Torremans School of Law University of Nottingham.
‘Linkage’ & other TRIPS+ provisions: a public health perspective Karin Timmermans World Health Organization Seminar “Data exclusivity and patent Bangkok.
Directive on the Authorisation of electronic communications networks & Services Directive (2002/20/EC) Authorisation Directive Presented by: Nelisa Gwele.
Support for the Modernisation of the Mongolian Standardisation system – EuropeAid/134305/C/SER/MN Training on standardisation Support to the Modernisation.
European Aviation Safety Agency Head of Aircraft Product Certification
Paola Lucantoni Economic and Financial Market Law.
1 Session 1 Perspective for More National Space Legislation - Report of the Rapporteur - Dr. Michael Gerhard, DLR Project 2001 Plus Symposium, Cologne,
Agreement concerning the adoption of uniform conditions for periodical technical inspections of wheeled vehicles and the reciprocal recognition of such.
European Committe for Social Rights. The Council of Europe was established in 1949 by 10 Countries. It has now 47 member States. The European Convention.
Patent Review Overview Summary of different types of Intellectual Property What is a patent? Why would you want one? What are the requirements for patentability?
Information day on EUROCONTROL Guidance Material on the application of Common Requirements for Service Provision LIABILITY AND INSURANCE ISSUES Nathalie.
Ethical, legal and social aspects of public health genomics Mark Taylor, School of Law, University of Sheffield 7 th November 2014.
Position of the Japanese Government and Possible impact of the REACH on Japanese trade relations with the EU.
Managing IP Risk in the Supply Chain - Identifying The Weakest Link 02/11/2016 Time: – Dr N. Imam Partner at Phillips & Leigh Registered UK.
Making the Connection ISO Master Class An Overview.
ENFORCEMENT OF PATENT RIGHTS IN EUROPE The Hungarian way
Data Protection: EU & International
REGULATORY PROBLEMS IN CARING OUT PRE- AND POST- AUTHORISATION CLINICAL TRIALS Dr Penka Decheva GCP Inspector, BDA.
Patent law update.
SPCs and the unitary patent package
Scope of Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs)
HOW CAN WE FIX OUR EXISTING PATENT/IP LAWS
The activity of Art. 29. Working Party György Halmos
European Committe for Social Rights
Victoria Henson-Apollonio, Ph. D
Patent enforcement in Poland – Hot topics
Presentation transcript:

1 Bolar Provisions in Europe Robert Watson Chartered Patent Attorney European Patent Attorney AIPLA, February 2006

2 Overview The EU New Pharma legislation Existing Exemption from Infringement Focus on Countries Summary

3

4 The EU 25 countries Population:455 million (US:293 million) GDP: $11,000 billion (~ same as US) EU accounts for 20% of exports from and imports to US

5 New EU Pharma Legislation EU Directive (2004/27/EC) amends rules relating to approval of medicines Only has the force of law in member states when it is enacted in their legislation (no later than October 30, 2005)

6 New EU Pharma Legislation Introduces sweeping amendments to the rules on generic products Harmonises the term of data protection for innovative medicinal products Broadens the abridged process for relying on dossier of reference products Introduces Bolar provision

7 Briefly … Applicants for generic product authorisations under ‘abridged’ or ‘hybrid abridged’ procedures may rely on an dossier for a reference product once the reference product has been on the market for 8 years But, cannot be put generic on the market until 10 years

8 New ‘Bolar’ Provisions Article 10(6) of the Directive reads: “Conducting the necessary studies and trials with a view to the application of paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 and the consequential practical requirements shall not be regarded as contrary to patent rights or to supplementary protection certificates for medicinal products.”

9 New ‘Bolar’ Provisions Article 10(1) is the ‘abridged’ procedure Article 10(3)(4) are the ‘hybrid abridged’ procedures where some extra pre-clinical and/or clinical data is required Not clear whether such extra tests are covered by exemption

10 Experimental Use Old EU states infringement law derived from Community Patent Convention Article 31(b) CPC (1975) exempted: “acts done for experimental purposes relating to the subject-matter of the patented invention” Construed differently across EU

11 UK Position Directive enacted in identical wording – though by Regulatory Authority to cover both ‘abridged’ and ‘hybrid’ abridged procedures Experimental Use exemption construed narrowly

12 UK Position Monsanto v Stauffer (1985, Ct of Appeal) Field trials of herbicides Experimental purposes may have a commercial end in view Following can be fairly regarded as experiments: trials carried out (i) in order to discover something unknown, or (ii) to test an hypothesis, or

13 UK Position (iii) to find out whether something which is known to work in specific conditions will work in different conditions, or (perhaps) (iv) to find out whether the experimenter could manufacture commercially in accordance with the patent. Trials carried out to demonstrate to a third party (e.g. a regulatory body) that a product works as its maker claims are not for experimental purposes.

14 German Position Bolar provision enacted more broadly Covers all studies and trials necessary to obtain authorisations of a medicinal product in EU, or elsewhere Research exemption construed more broadly than in UK

15 French Position Bolar provision enacted more broadly Covers all studies and trials necessary to obtain authorisations of a medicinal product in EU, but not elsewhere Research exemption construed more broadly than in UK

16 Dutch Position Clinical Trials have been held ineligible for the research exemption unless aimed at researching a further medical indication of the patented product. As no plans to introduce a Bolar provision into patent law, the research exemption will likely now be construed to cover the necessary trials!

17 Swedish Position Plans to enact Bolar provision as in the UK No established case law on research exemption, but clinical trials probably non-exempted acts

18 ‘New’ EU states Hungary: Article 19(6) of 1995 Patents Act exempts “acts done for experimental purposes relating to the subject matter of the invention, including experiments and tests necessary for the registration of a medicine” Poland: Article 69 of 2000 IP Law similar in effect to above

19 Summary There is now a minimum standard for exemption of work relating to generic medical approval … but a great deal of variation in the breadth of exemptions The minimum standard will only be clarified by case law

20 Bolar Provisions in Europe Robert Watson Mewburn Ellis LLP York House, 23 Kingsway, London WC2B 6HP