THE GI SYSTEM PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE IN EU Arnaud FAUGAS Legal and international department INAO WIPO SEMINAR ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS DECEMBER 2009 (BRATISLAVA)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EU system for geographical indications for agricultural products and foodstuffs Brussels, Michael ERHART European Commission DG Agriculture.
Advertisements

Sui generis system for the protection of non-agricultural geographical indications – the Hungarian example András Jókúti Legal and International Department.
Pentti Mäkinen Central Chamber of Commerce of Finland Benefits of low regulation environment Brussels
Learning from Existing Evaluation Practices on the Impacts and Effects of Intellectual Property on Development Geneva 6th/7th October 2011 Evaluation Section.
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
QUALITY FOOD PRODUCTS LINKED TO GEOGRAPHIC ORIGIN AND TRADITIONS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN 8-9 November 2007, Casablanca Gonca ILICALI Trademark Examiner, Turkish.
Workshop on wines for making a protected geographical indication Technical File Anabela Alves BELGRADE, SERBIA 30th of January 2013.
International Registration of Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Matthijs Geuze, WIPO National Seminar on the Use of Industrial Property.
European Data Protection Supervisor 1 A new body in the European Institutional Landscape : the EDPS Presentation at the Court of Justice Hielke HIJMANS.
1 Promotion of mountain quality produce and rural areas « Strategic information for the development of agricultural quality products in European mountain.
1 XI INT. CONGRESS AAAML A comparison of the three GI schemes in the EU A trade mark practioner’s perspective… Benjamin Fontaine Parma, March 2013.
AIPPI-MIE-MSZJF Budapest 2005 “Enforcement of IP Rights in the Enlarged EU" Similarities and differences in the enforcement of trademarks and designations.
The Protection of the Protected Geographical Indications in Europe TAIEX Seminar on Trade Marks and Designs Warsaw November 28 Rafael Fernández Ibiza.
WORKSHOP PROTECTED DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN (PDO) “PHÚ QUỐC” FOR THE EXTRACT OF FISH AND LESSONS LEARNT FOR GI REGISTRATION IN THE EU Ha Noi, July 22 nd 2014.
WORKSHOP ON LABELING OF WINES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEW EU STANDARDS EU LEGISLATION ON LABELING REGISTRATION OF PDO AND PGI ALBERTO RIBEIRO DE ALMEIDA,
Enforcement of IP Rights in the Enlarged EU 13th Enforcement of IP Rights in the Enlarged EU 13th AIPPI-MIE International Conference Budapest, September.
Supervision of the quality of water intended for human consumption by State Sanitary Inspection bodies Małgorzata Kedzierska Environmental Hygiene Dept.
Trademark Issues in Current Negotiations Prof. Christine Haight Farley American University.
Enforcement measures of GIs through sui generis protection, unfair competition and consumer protection law GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND TRADEMARKS: A GLOBAL.
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN: AN OVERVIEW
ECO-MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT SCHEME Performance, credibility, transparency Accreditation & Registration Systems in EMAS.
IPO-PAKISTAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION OF PAKISTAN 1 GIs as Economic Tool for SMEs Development: Current Status of Protection in Pakistan; Future.
Introduction to the GI system. Origin Linked Products (OLP) are products that have a specific link to their area of origin because of their reputation.
Czech Presidency High Level Conference on the Future of Quality Policy of Agricultural Products and Foodstuff PDOs/PGIs: The point of view of GI producers.
EPA Negotiations: Intellectual Property and Sustainable Development for ECOWAS Countries By Catherine Grant Director: Trade Policy Business Unity South.
1 Vietnam study tour Geographical Indications: Control, Certification and Accreditation Swiss experiences Peter Damary, AGRIDEA 28 th october 2009,
M. ANGELA JIMENEZ 1 UNIT 5. REGULATION OF EXTERNAL AUDIT IFAC AND E.C.
Approximation of legislation to the internal market acquis An EU funded project managed by European Agency for Reconstruction Directive 89/106/EEC on Construction.
Overview report of a series of FVO fact- finding missions and audits carried out in 2012 and 2013 in order to evaluate the systems put in place to give.
EXAMPLES OF TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO TRADE  one of the main TBT issue at the moment is labelling (see Tuna report)  brief overview of marks and rules of.
Overview of the EU Food Safety Requirements
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Elements for the Organization of Geographical Indications under Article 22.1 of the TRIPS Agreement Warsaw,
World Intellectual Property Organization International Protection of Geographical Indications Overview and Recent Developments Tbilisi, October 28, 2009.
Irene Bocchetta EU Protected Food Names Manager Assisting Producers Apply for EU Protected Food Names.
QUALITY POLICY CONFERENCE Prague, 12-13th March 2009 LA FUNDACIÓN DEL JAMÓN SERRANO. JAMÓN SERRANO PRODUCTION (T.S.G.) José Ramón Godoy Álvaro Fundación.
1 MARKET SURVEILLANCE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION A coordinate approach for metrology Lucia Palmegiani Policy Officer, DG ENTR I.5 WELMEC, WG 5, Malta, 23 October.
History of the GI system How it all started. History of the GI system Foods have be named after their geographical origin since Antiquity: examples: 5th.
European Commission Rita L’ABBATE Legal aspects linked to internal market DG Enterprise and Industry MARKET SURVEILLANCE COMMUNITY FRAMEWORK UNECE “MARS”
MOT Dr. Dinh Thi My Loan Director General, Competition Administration Department MINISTRY OF TRADE STRENGTHENING THE TASK OF CONSUMER PROTECTION IN VIETNAM.
New Regulation on Plant Reproductive Material: main elements of the upcoming Commission proposal Yannis Karamitsios European Commission, DG SANCO.
The Quality Package Seminarium: Livsmedelskvalitet ur olika perspektiv, Stockholm, Lars Hoelgaard, Vicegeneraldirektör.
Food Quality Labels: the situation today in Europe Assembly of European Regions, Kriti 15 September 2006 Nikiforos SIVENAS European Commission.
© Melanie Fiedler, Attorney at law 2005 Sofia The Community Trade Mark The functions of a trade mark distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking.
Recently Established Registration Systems for Geographical Indications JAMAICA Loreen Walker Executive Director Jamaica Intellectual Property Office.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
1 The Future Role of the Food and Veterinary Office M.C. Gaynor, Director, FVO EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate.
French Quality Policy Governance Institut National de l’Origine et de la qualité Izmir – May 18 th
CZECH PRESIDENCY HIGH LEVEL CONFERENCE ON THE FUTURE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT QUALITY POLICY Prague, 13 March 2009 DRAFT CONCLUSIONS OF WORKSHOP B: EU.
Approximation of legislation to the internal market acquis An EU funded project managed by European Agency for Reconstruction Directive 89/106/EEC on Construction.
1 GOVERNMENT OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL POLICY & PROMOTION R.S. JULANIYA DIRECTOR.
The EU and Access to Environmental Information Unit D4 European Commission, Directorate General for the Environment 1.
1 This project is supported by the European Union 3 rd MEDREG-IMME Seminar Reform and Opening of Maghreb Electricity Markets September 2013 MRA (Malta)
Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.
Geographical indications of source Dr. Ioannis Kikkis, EPLO, Head of Intellectual Property dpt. 16 March 2015 Workshop on intellectual property protection.
Karl Plsek BMG II/B/71 WIPO NATIONAL SEMINAR ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS Bratislava, December 1, 2009 GIs for Foodstuffs, Spirits and Wines- Verification.
Protection of GIs in the EU - WarsawSlide 1 of 18 The Protection of Geographical Indications - The EU system - TAIEX Seminar on the protection.
CLAUDIA PANAIT TAIEX Expert – European Commission Legal Adviser Ministry of Health, ROMANIA.
Technology Services – National Institute of Standards and Technology Conformity Assessment ANSI-HSSP Workshop Emergency Communications December 2, 2004.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 11 – Agriculture and rural development.
PRODUCER GROUPS AND ORGANIZATIONS IN THE AGRICULTURE OF HUNGARY Marton Bittsanszky Deputy Head of Department.
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 11 – Agriculture and rural development.
Geographical Indications: Connecting Products with Geographical Origin for Value Creation. Flavio Innocenzi.
INFORMATION SESSION ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
Geographical Indications
1st December 2009, Bratislava
Training on standardisation
Community protection of geographical indications :
Practices related to geographical indication systems: the european union wipo sct geneva 28 march 2017 Francis FAY Head of Unit ‘Geographical Indications’
Presentation transcript:

THE GI SYSTEM PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE IN EU Arnaud FAUGAS Legal and international department INAO WIPO SEMINAR ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS DECEMBER 2009 (BRATISLAVA)

Five key elements for the success of GIs A typical product (« typicité ») : the difference has to be objective Relevance of the market : informed and interested consumers, ready to pay Adequate system of protection and control Public support Involvment : product specification defined by producers themselves in cooperation with INAO

Some figures … PDO Wines, spirits 48 Appellations producers 2,1 B € turnover 17,3% of the production 39 Appellations producers 0,2 B € de CA PDO dairy products PDO other products 80 IGP Producers 1 B € de CA IGP (Données 2007) 470 Appellations farms 57% of the viticultural area wines : 11 B € turnover, Spirits : 2 B € de CA

The European system Different regulations depending on the product (question of competences between Member States and the Community) Agricultural and foodstuff products and Wines : Community registration system, EU wide protection (Regulation n° 510/2006 and n° 1234/2007) and spirits: national registration, EU publication, EU wide protection (Regulation n°110/2008). System is quite similar to that under Regulation 510/06 Other products: protection by Member States Additional means of protection: legislation on labelling, on misleading advertising or unfair competition

The features of the French system PDOs and PGIs are part of an official quality signs policy as a strong economic tool in the agricultural sector. Group of producers and Administration in the monitoring of the system Existence of a specific public body (INAO) Involvement of the State in the protection of GIs

First step The recognition of the geographical indication

Group of producers or processors (application) INAO (checking and proposal) Government (decision and submission or forwarding to the EC) EUROPEAN COMMISSION (scrutiny and registration or publication) Registration – general view

The competent authority The competent authority must be able to judge the capacity to register a product as a GI this means to get legal and technical skills along with a good knowledge of products : the administrative organization is adapted to this demanding nature Missions must be clearly defined : from scrutiny of the application to the controls of the GI products In France : mission of INAO (a public body led by producers under the authority of the ministry of agriculture )

Application for registration  Only a group shall be entitled to apply for registration. « Group » means any association, irrespective of its legal form or composition, of producers or processors working with the same agricultural product or foodstuff. Other interested parties may participate in the group. A natural or legal person may be treated as a group.  A group may lodge a registration application only for the agricultural products or foodstuffs which it produces or obtains.  Task :  - Drafting of the product specification (technical, historical and economic components) - After registration : GI follow-up, support to producers, protection

Contents of the application a description of the good, and particularly its physical or chemical characteristics; the boundaries of the geographical area as well as a description of its characteristics in terms of geology, pedology, climate, or hydrography; the documents proving the good originates from within the boundaries of the geographical area; a description of the method of production; the documents proving the good’s link to the geographical environment or geographical origin; the method of controls; elements related to the notoriety of the good; the specific labelling rules.

A focus on the link to the origin Specificity of the area Natural and/or human factors Criteria of definition of the geographical area Specificity of the product Quality or characteristics Reputation Causal link between the area and the specificity of the product Impact of natural and human factors on the product

A scrutiny of the product Link to the territory Natural factors : characteristics of the area influencing techniques and uses or giving the raw materials of the product particular characteristics. Relevant information concerning the soil and the subsoil, the geography of the area (relief and slope, climate and microclimates, vegetation, landscape, etc). Human factors : adaptation of the geographical area to suit the production method, special constructions for production (i.e., mills, storage, etc.) as well as the development of local know-how or special production skills. Explanation : about the influence of these specific characteristics on the final product and why the production is adapted to this particular environment. how the producers have taken advantage of the specific characteristics of the area in developing their product.

Scrutiny A scrutiny of the product and its economic context Definition of the characteristics Link with geographical origin or environment Image and notoriety of the product ( proof of reputation based on documentation, consumer surveys, price...)

Procedure of objection The opposition procedure ensures that the names required as a GI will not be unjustifiably protected. By allowing all interested parties to have their say (public consultation), the procedure helps to guarantee a balanced decision. Procedure at national and European level : official publication of the application Any interested person (through public authorities) or member state or third country

Grounds of objection non-compliance of the proposed GI to the definition of a GI; prejudice to a previous trademark registered generic nature of the indication After this procedure there is a registration at the European level and a publication in the Official Journal

Product Specification Definition of rules of production Name of the product Description of the product Boundaries of the geographical area Method of obtaining Controls Rules of labelling

The recognition of a GI depends on the application by a group of producers and leads to the definition of specification, worded by producers, that producers must comply with in order to be entitled to use the geographical name. Controls are operated before marketing.

Second step The control of the GI

The compliance to the rules laid down in the product specification constitutes a guaranty for consumers and provides fair competition among producers

The control of products aims at : The compliance with specification By analysis, that the products complies with particular criteria and an aptitude for consumption By tasting that the products presents specific organoleptic features (typicité)

General rules An organization must be responsible for the controls of the compliance with the specification: Public : the competent authorities of the State are responsible for the control Private : control bodies organize and carry out the controls Principles : independence, competence and impartiality Those controls do not stand in for general controls : compliance with sanitary rules for example

Organization of controls Producer Group of producers in charge of the defence and the management of the GI INAO Inspection bodies/ Certification bodies Self-controls Internal controls External controls (Control activities delegated by I.N.A.O.)

Third step the Protection of GI in the EU

Objectives of protection To encourage a fair competition between producers To help the consumers, giving them information on the specific characteristics of the products To protect a national and economic heritage: terroirs, know-how, products

Consequences of registration Protection for an unlimited length But rules for cancellation of the registration Any interested person may submit that a condition laid down in the specification of a product covered by the Geographical Indication is no longer fulfilled. Any person with a legitimate interest

In case of non-compliance to specification by any producers, those producers shall lose the right to use the Geographical Indication. Criminal Proceedings Fine €- and prison sentence – 2 years Protection of specification

Protection of names A wide protection of names : misuse, usurpation, false or misleading indication direct or indirect commercial use misuse, imitation or evocation (even in translation or accompanied by expressions such as « type » or « style » false or misleading indication any other practice liable to mislead the public as to the true origin of the product A large protection of the GI : è for a similar product : forbidden (usurpation) è for a different kind of product : excluded if risk of weakening or altering the notoriety of the geographical indication

Exceptions to protection Generic nature : no registration of a generic name Trademarks : no registration if, in the light of a trademark’s reputation and renown and the length of time it has been used, it is liable to mislead the consumer as to the true identity of the product

GI and trademarks Trademarks : The registration of a trademark misusing a previous GI is impossible Relation with previous trademarks : there is a coexistence between GI and a previous trademark and a case by case examination depending on the good faith and the risk of confusion for the public as to the true origin or essential qualities. Example : trademark Cambozola / PDO Gorgonzola A protection of trademarks reputation and renown.

Infrigments on GIs

Counterfeiting by similar products DenmarkGermany PDO Lentille verte du Puy PGI Jambon de Bayonne

PDO Olive de Nice Belgium PDO Lentille verte du Puy Sweden

Argentine Pruneau d’Agen

Trademarks that contain or consist of french GIs Trademark « Chablis » for a wine from Chili Trademark « Ålvados » for a spirit cider from Finland

Weakening/dilution of notoriety by different products Champagne for biscuits Bress with poultry for a wineBress with poultry for a wine ArgentinaAustralia

 Sounds like “Côtes du Rhône”, “Côte d’Or”, “Côte Rôtie” & “Bordeaux” New infringements : The « sounds like »

As a conclusion A demanding approach : a commitment of all producers supported by a public policy Developed Products, Men and Territories.

Thank you for your attention