Ssd simulation status : preparation for embedding Jonathan Bouchet Svt Meeting : 09/19.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
November 3rd, 2006 CALICE-UK, Manchester - A.-M. Magnan - 1 Noise studies DESY + CERN TB overview Anne-Marie Magnan Imperial College London.
Advertisements

Star Week 6-10 Frb 2002SSD Status Report 1# SSD Status Report Main components Production status Last news: first ladder Schedule SSD pages:
FNAL TB09 Plots Alessandra Borgia Syracuse Unviersity Marina Artuso, Jianchun Wang, Ray Mountain January 20, 2010.
Update on Analysis of FNAL TB09 Jianchun Wang for the group Syracuse Univesity Jan 29 th,2010.
Standalone VeloPix Simulation Jianchun Wang 4/30/10.
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
Offline Code for Next Beam Test Jianchun Wang 08/06/01.
Track Fitting and Comparator Results Emu UC Davis Feb. 26, 2005 Yangheng Zheng University of California, Los Angeles  Motivation & Introduction.
1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.
1 Configuration Database David Forrest University of Glasgow MICO Meeting 13/10/2008
Cluster Threshold Optimization from TIF data David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara July 26, 2007.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
HCAL Digitization Rick Wilkinson 1. CMSSW HCAL Simulation Three gains are used as input –Calibration (GeV/fC) From DB gain, by channel –Electronics (fC/photoelectron)
29 Mar 2007Tracking - Paul Dauncey1 Tracking/Alignment Status Paul Dauncey, Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Anne-Marie Magnan, George Mavromanolakis,
An offline look at TIF data David Stuart UC Santa Barbara May 2, 2007.
Alberto Oliva INFN/University of Perugia Tracker meeting 24/10/2006 Beam test 2003Beam test 2003 Goal: charge discrimination algorithm with high efficiency.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, Nantes, July2002 SVT Analysis/Status Update Jun Takahashi – University of Sao Paulo.
7/19/2004FTPC Review - J. Seyboth1 FTPC Review - Software Janet Seyboth for the FTPC group DAQ Online Calibration Databases Offline Documentation FTPC.
STAR HFT STAR Collaboration Meeting - LBNL IST Software Status Yaping Wang (University of Illinois at Chicago) Outline Offline software infrastructure.
SSD Status P. Christakoglou (NIKHEF-UU) for the SSD collaboration Thanks to: Marco vL, Enrico, Mino, Marek and Massimo.
1 HBD Commissioning (II) Itzhak Tserruya HBD group meeting November 28, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
1 SSD status report – 16 July 2004 Jerome Baudot, Strasbourg STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL, 16 July 2004 Silicon Strip Detector status report  Report.
Update on the new reconstruction software F. Noferini E. Fermi center INFN CNAF EEE Analysis Meeting - 14/09/20151.
Status of TPC experiment ---- Online & Offline M. Niiyama H. Fujimura D.S. Ahn W.C. Chang.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL, Dec 2004 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software and calibration L3 display 200 GeV February.
SSD Status Report July SSD Status Report accessible from STAR group documents Pictures Updated documentation.
Pure D0 : 950 MuDst files (400 possibles D0 per file) |Zvertex| < 20 cm NHitsFit > 15 histos in 2-d to investigate possible cuts Cuts in MuKpi-update HF.
Testbeam Studies of the LHCb Vertex Locator Modules Lisa Dwyer.
AMS Tracker Data Reduction Status Claude Zurbach Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Astroparticules – Montpellier Houston, AMS-TIM, January 08, 2007.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL, Feb 2005 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software update L3 display 200 GeV February.
BesMUC Reconstruction Current Status You zhengyun, Mao yajun School of Physics, PKU
1 Behaviour of the Silicon Strip Detector modules for the Alice experiment: simulation and test with minimum ionizing particles Federica Benedosso Utrecht,
Update on Material Studies - Progress on Linearity using calib-hits (very brief) - Revisiting the material problem: - a number of alternative scenarios.
Charge Sharing & Hit Identification & Cluster Information.
1 SDD: DA and preprocessor Francesco Prino INFN Sezione di Torino ALICE offline week – April 11th 2008.
SSD status report Marek Chojnacki, Panos Christakoglou, Enrico Fragiacomo, Marco Van Leeuwen, Massimo Venaruzzo
LM Feb SSD status and Plans for Year 5 Lilian Martin - SUBATECH STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL - February 2005.
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
Use new detector description in Reconstruction You Zhengyun School of Physics, PKU
Forward Pixel Beamtest Analysis Carsten Rott Purdue University Januar 24, 2001.
Jonathan BouchetBerkeley School on Collective Dynamics 1 Performance of the Silicon Strip Detector of the STAR Experiment Jonathan Bouchet Subatech STAR.
Features needed in the “final” AliRoot release P.Hristov 26/10/2006.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
E-EMC developments and plan Jan Balewski IUCF, Indiana Detector status Run 3 goals Calibration Software status STAR Analysis Meeting BNL, October
1 Oct 2009Paul Dauncey1 Status of 2D efficiency study Paul Dauncey.
FIRST RESULTS OF THE SILICON STRIP DETECTOR at STAR Jörg Reinnarth, Jonathan Bouchet, Lilian Martin, Jerome Baudot and the SSD teams in Nantes and Strasbourg.
1 HBD Commissioning Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, BNL December 13, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
Javier Castillo 1 Muon Embedding Status & Open Issues PWG3 - CERN - 15/02/2011.
SSD STATUS Enrico Fragiacomo – INFN Trieste. Outlook  MC-data comparison  Cluster finder  dE/dx  Material budget in geometry ITS alignment&offline.
A. De Caro for the ALICE TOF Offline Group (University of Salerno and INFN)
1 CPC2-CPR2 Assemblies Testing Status Charge Amplifiers –Attempts to make them work Best voltage single channel 2MHz Cluster finding first.
Overview of PHENIX Muon Tracker Data Analysis PHENIX Muon Tracker Muon Tracker Software Muon Tracker Database Muon Event Display Performance Muon Reconstruction.
PHOS offline status report Yuri Kharlov ALICE offline week 7 July 2008.
Chaouki Boulahouache 01/20, 2010 Slide 1 Static Vs. Dynamic Pedestals Chaouki Boulahouache Rice University DPG Meeting  What are the effects of the static.
Calibration algorithm and detector monitoring - TPC Marian Ivanov.
Test Beam Meeting Monday, January 31, 2000 Fpix1 Calibration Status 1.What we have 2.What to do Monitor Software to use now 1.Current Version 2.Calibration.
1 Outline First look at the 2007 data with the offline reconstruction (~1000evts) : –Clusters. –Reconstructed Space points. FastOffline plots: –2 differents.
9 Sep 2008Paul Dauncey1 Tracking software status Paul Dauncey.
D. Elia (INFN Bari)Offline week / CERN Status of the SPD Offline Domenico Elia (INFN Bari) Overview:  Response simulation (timing info, dead/noisy.
Anna Kotynia.  8 stations  fully based on micro-strip detectors Tracking detector: -low-mass detector -full azimuthal angle coverage -polar angle coverage:from.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
ST software status, Jeroen van Tilburg
Preparations for pass data
CLAS12 software workshop
Bonn Test Station data analysis with PandaRoot
Physics with the HFT prototype?
DC monitoring - calibration - simulation - corrections
MUC simulation and reconstruction
Presentation transcript:

Ssd simulation status : preparation for embedding Jonathan Bouchet Svt Meeting : 09/19

Ssd simulation chain SsdSimulationMaker SLS (slow simulator) Simulate charge over the strips SPA Signal+pedestal+noise Addition Pedestal supression Zero supression SsdClusterMaker SCF Scan the strips Form the clusters SCM Associate the clusters

Ssd Reconstruction Chain SsdDaqmaker Scan the strips and store the pedestals, id and noise into a ssdStripCalib table SsdPointMaker Do the reconstruction of the clusters Match the clusters to form a hit

To recall

Ssd soft : real data vs simu Many differences between the 2 codes  Real Data :  pick the ssdStripCalib (pedestal and noise) accorging to the time stamp  in /Calibration/ssd.  Reco : (s/n)>5 && noise > 0.  Geometry : ssdWafersPosition.C (the geometry with alignment corrections)  Simu :  The actual calibration : pedestal =100 ADC, noise = 3 ADC  in /starDb/svt/ssd/  Reco : (s/n)> 5 only  Geometry : geom.C (old) To have a consistent simu with respect to the data, we must have makers and parameters (noise, pedestal, geometry) equivalent

New way for embedding StSsdDaqMaker DAQ File StSsdSimulationMaker Fzd File StSsdPointMaker St_scf_Maker St_scm_Maker Spa_strip old chain : StSsdSimulationMaker + St_scf_Maker + St_scm_Maker New chain : StSsdSimulationMaker + StSsdPointMaker

Noise of the clusters Simulation N-side P-side Real data

Noise : with the new calibration P-sideN-side

Charge of the clusters Pedestal = 100 ADC Noise = 3 ADC With real pedestal and noise values  Remove the large tail for the fake clusters (noise)

Comparison between the 2 chains: signal to noise Old chainNew chain

Size of the clusters [strips]  The 2 chains give the same results Old chainNew chain

Comparison with the efficiencies  Within the bars errors, efficiencies look the same for the 2 chains Old chainNew chain

Efficiency The efficiency looked better (agree with the real data) But it was before a correction (use simu flag in StSsdDbMaker) After this correction, efficiency get back to 70 % Bands in residuals The difference between efficiencies in simu vs real data still here until now

Summary,outlook 1.Old Db vs ssdStripCalib  Effect on the clusters properties (noise,size) Consistant with the real data 2.Old reco chain vs new reco chain  The 2 chains give similars results (number of ssdHit reco,efficiency)  Not entirely ready for embedding (see previous problem) 3. Check efficiency (if agree with real data) 4.Then eliminate old makers (status of StSsdEvalMaker)-->rename Ssd simu chain 5.Create StSsdMixer for embedding