Steering Committee Meeting March 9, 2012 1. Why talk about assumptions? Garbage in, garbage out! “Let’s go dumpster diving!” Results sensitive to key.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
California Energy Commission 1 Energy Workshops for W&WW Agencies UTILITY STRATEGIES FOR SHIFTING PEAK DEMAND PERIOD WATER & ENERGY USE REGIONAL STRATEGIES:
Advertisements

Preliminary Resource Adequacy Assessment for the 2017 Pacific Northwest Power Supply NW Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting August 16 th.
Preliminary Impacts of Wind Power Integration in the Hydro-Qubec System.
Technical Conference Avoided Cost Modeling January 6, 2015.
Power Supply Adequacy Assessment Model/Methodology Review Steering Subcommittee Meeting January 29, 2010.
Preliminary Review of July 24 th Extreme Temperature Event & Implications for Pilot Capacity Standard Mary Johannis & Wally Gibson PNW Resource Adequacy.
Resource Adequacy Forum 2019 Adequacy Assessment Overview PNGC Offices June 28, 2013.
Genesys Model Enhancements October 4, 2011 NW Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting Gwendolyn S Shearer.
PLWG Report to ROS July 9, PGRRs needing vote PGRR043 – FIS Scoping Amendment – PGRR043 moves the Subsynchronous Resonance (SSR) Study out of the.
ERCOT PUBLIC 4/21/ Loss of Load Probability Assessment for NERC April, 2015.
NW Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Conference Call November 4, 2010.
Jenell Katheiser Doug Murray Long Term Study Scenarios and Generation Expansion Update January 22, 2013.
1 18-Month Outlook October March 2005 Presented by Greg Hine IMO Long-Term Forecasts and Assessments.
1 Planning Reserve Margin Dan Egolf Senior Manager, Power Supply & Planning.
A Resource Adequacy Standard for the Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Technical Committee January 17, 2008 Portland Airport.
Developing an Adequacy Metric Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Subcommittee Meeting October 16, 2009.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 2009 Draft Resource Program Released: September 30, 2009 Accepting Comments until: November 30,
Adequacy Assessment for the 2017 Pacific Northwest Power Supply Steering Committee Meeting October 26, 2012 Portland, Oregon 1.
Revising the Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Standard Resource Adequacy Technical Committee June 23, 2011.
June 27, Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2010 and 2012 Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Meeting Northwest Power Pool.
Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting April 6, 2011.
Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting October 4, 2011.
Guidance for Utility Adequacy Assessments Steering Committee Meeting January 29, 2010.
Relationship of Regional Resource Adequacy Standards to Utility Planning PNW Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting June 27, 2007.
Power Association of Northern California Maintaining Grid Reliability In An Uncertain Era May 16, 2011 PG&E Conference Center Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive.
Providing Resource Planning Guidance to Individual Utilities PNW Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting June 20, 2007.
Winter Power Supply Adequacy/Reliability Analysis Power Committee Briefing October 17, 2001.
2009 Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Assessment Resource Adequacy Technical Committee October 16, 2009.
2010 Work Plan Steering Committee January 29, 2010.
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
Moving toward a Final Resource Adequacy Standard Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Meeting September 27, 2007.
09/17/2006 Ken Donohoo ERCOT Peak Day August Initial Settlement Data by Fuel Type.
Analysis of Demand Response Modeling in GridView Andy Satchwell and Sarah Smith Modeling Work Group December 21, 2015 The work described in this presentation.
Providing Resource Planning Guidance to Individual Utilities PNW Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting April 13, 2007.
Work Plan Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee July 29, 2009.
Capacity Metric & Hydro Capacity Assessment Decisions Mary Johannis PNW Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting June 20, 2007.
Utility Responsibility to Maintaining Load Reliability Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting June 20, 2007.
Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2015 Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting October 1, 2010.
Out of Region Market Assumption Resource Adequacy Technical Committee December 1, 2011.
Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2011 and 2013 Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Meeting July 21, 2008.
Developing Synthetic Temperature-Correlated Wind Generation Data Steering Committee Meeting January 29, 2010.
Probabilistic Approach to Resource Adequacy Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting Portland, OR January 23, 2009.
RFPEG2013 PRE-BID MEETING RFPEG2013 – Pre-Bid meeting January 9, 2014 Presentation by Derek Davis – Public Utilities Commission.
Defining LOLP Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Subcommittee Meeting November 14, 2008.
2021 Adequacy Assessment Data Requirements Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee Technical Committee Meeting March 18, 2016.
Power Supply Adequacy for the 2021 Operating Year Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee Steering Committee Webinar June 8, 2016.
Estimating the resource adequacy value of demand response in the German electricity market Hamid Aghaie Research Scientist in Energy Economics, AIT Austrian.
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
GENESYS Redevelopment Strawman Proposal
Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Demand Response in the 7th Power Plan
penetration of wind power
Idaho Power 2017 Integrated Resource Plan
Security of supply - deriving a winter energy standard using the DOASA model EPOC Winter Workshop September 2018.
Steering Committee Webinar March 25, 2016
Additional clarifications on economic and adequacy running hours
Out of Region Market Assumptions
Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2015 Interim Results Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting July 28, 2010.
GENESYS Current Functionality
Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Assessment
2021 Adequacy Assessment Status Report
Steering Committee Webinar March 25, 2016
Technical Committee Meeting March 18, 2016
Planning Reserve Margin
Technical Committee Meeting March 18, 2016
Steering Committee Webinar March 25, 2016
Progress on Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2017
Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive Operations Advisor California ISO
Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting October 4, 2011
Base on maximum operating wind capacity at end of planning period
Presentation transcript:

Steering Committee Meeting March 9,

Why talk about assumptions? Garbage in, garbage out! “Let’s go dumpster diving!” Results sensitive to key assumptions Adequacy assumptions ≠ resource planning assumptions 2

Adequacy Assumptions Market supply Market access Borrowed hydro Wind Thermal resources and conservation Standby resources How to deal with uncertainty in load and conservation 3

Adequacy Assessment ≠ Resource Planning Adequacy Assessment = early warning, should resource development fall short Resource Planning = acquisition strategy that produces an adequate, efficient, economical and reliable power supply Adequacy assessment is a part of resource planning 4

Treatment of Market Supply Adequacy vs. Resource Planning Adequacy = realistic assumption for available market and non-firm supply during periods of stress Resource Planning = policy decision, based on economic considerations, about how much market supply to plan for 5

In-region Market Made up of independent power producers October-April Full capability (about 3,500 MW) May-September 1,000 MW max 6

Out-of-region Market Assumed to be from SW coming in over the NW-SW interties Oct-Apr (on peak) Min of tie capacity and once-through-cooling adjusted surplus About 3,200 MW 2015, lower for 2017 May-Sep (on peak) None May-Sep (off peak, purchase ahead) 1000 MW 7

Market Access – Not Modeled Due to difficulties in defining or coding Market “friction” – inefficiencies in market transactions Sell-ahead market – pre-committed resources could limit supply Transmission bottlenecks – some utilities don’t have full access to all markets Will use uncertainty in load/conservation as a surrogate for this 8

Borrowed Hydro Energy derived from drafting below “drafting right” elevations for short periods, then replaced as soon as possible Available all months Maximum allowable per month 1,000 megawatt-months Maximum used per hour Ranges from 2,500 to 3,000 MW 9

Wind Resources 40 synthetic wind-year profiles, each profile contains 8,760 capacity factors that represent how wind would operate Currently using historic data from BPA wind fleet Future work to adjust for extreme temperatures Need to develop wind profiles for other sites 10

Thermal Resources and Conservation Thermal resources Existing Expected to be operational by the study date Conservation 6 th plan expected level by study date Built into the hourly load profiles 11

Standby Resources Resources or demand side actions Contractually available to utilities Not designed to be used often Very small amounts Energy capability is 83,000 MW-hours per year Capacity 662 MW (Oct-Apr) and 722 MW (May-Sep) 12

Uncertainty in Loads and Conservation Economic load growth and conservation assumptions are essentially point forecasts How can we address the uncertainty in these values? Solution = use the range of uncertainty to delineate between the red, yellow and green status for the power supply Calculate LOLP U, which is the LOLP assessed with higher loads and lower conservation 13

Alert Status Red = warning, resources are too low LOLP > 5% Yellow = caution, resources getting low LOLP 5% Green = adequate LOLP U < 5% 14