Developing a Framework for Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching at the Secondary Level The Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators (AMTE) Eleventh.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jim Rahn LL Teach, Inc.
Advertisements

Empowering Learners through the Common Core State Standards
Professional Development Module Common Core Math Shift: Focus Grade 6.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Coherence Grade 8 Overview.
1. Pennsylvania Department of Education September 2009.
Math CAMPPP 2011 Plenary 1 What’s the Focus? An Introduction to Algebraic Reasoning Ruth Beatty and Cathy Bruce 1.
Spring 2012 Student Performance Analysis Algebra I Standards of Learning Presentation may be paused and resumed using the arrow keys or the mouse. 1 Revised.
Standards Based Grading in an AP Calculus AB Classroom
Rigorous Curriculum Design Showcase
5 Pillars of Mathematics Training #1: Mathematical Discourse Dawn Perks Grayling B. Williams.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
TIER ONE INSTRUCTION Comparing Fractions. Tier I Instruction Tier I is the highly effective, culturally responsive, evidence-based core or universal instruction,
©2001 CBMS Math Preparation of Teachers Teachers need to study the mathematics of a cluster of grade levels, both to be ready for the various ways in which.
NCTM’s Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making.
THE TRANSITION FROM ARITHMETIC TO ALGEBRA: WHAT WE KNOW AND WHAT WE DO NOT KNOW (Some ways of asking questions about this transition)‏
A Framework for Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching at the Secondary Level Conference on Knowledge of Mathematics for Teaching at the Secondary Level Pat.
Syllabus Additional Mathematics Senior II Cambridge O Level Additional Mathematics Syllabus code 4037 For examination in June and November 2012.
Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics High School Session 2: Matching Clusters of Standards to Critical Areas in one.
{ Mathematics Anna Demarinis.  The student understands and applies the concepts and procedures of mathematics  GLE  Students learn to solve many new.
Quantitative Reasoning Reaction Rose Mary Zbiek - Penn State August 2013 Capturing a Tension Between Structure and Variability.
Algebraic Reasoning. Algebraic Readiness Standards Topic 4 Operations on Rational Numbers N.S. 1.2 Add, subtract, multiply, and divide rational numbers.
1 Unit 4: One-Step Equations The Georgia Performance Standards Website.
UCDMP Saturday Series Secondary Session 3 January 26, 2013.
Unit 1 A Library of Functions The building blocks for Calculus.
+ What Should I Expect to See During Mathematics Instruction? Helping Secondary Principals Recognize and Support Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning.
NCTM Overview The Principles and Standards for Teaching Mathematics.
Chapter 5.2.
Two key suggestions that came from the various focus groups across Ontario were:
1 Grade-Level Standards  K-8 grade-by-grade standards organized by domain  9-12 high school standards organized by conceptual categories Common Core.
A CLOSER LOOK AT THE CCSS FOR MATHEMATICS COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS PRESENTED BY: BEATRIZ ALDAY.
Mathematics Curriculum Roadmap. What Materials Will Be Used to Support Student Learning? Grade 8 Math Resource: EngageNY Supplemental resources are used.
1. An Overview of the Algebra Standard for School Mathematics? 2.
Language Objective: Students will be able to practice agreeing and disagreeing with partner or small group, interpret and discuss illustrations, identify.
Presenter’s Guide to Multiple Representations in the Teaching of Mathematics – Part 1 By Guillermo Mendieta Author of Pictorial Mathematics
Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics High School Session 3: Exploring Standard Progressions across High School Courses.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Functions Overview of Grade Nine.
PROCESS STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS. PROBLEM SOLVING The Purpose of the Problem Solving Approach The problem solving approach fosters the development of.
Algebra II Sequence Rationale. Preface According to the TEKS for Algebra I, students will learn: What a function is Gather and record data Represent functions.
Capturing Growth in Teacher Mathematical Knowledge The Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators Eleventh Annual Conference 26 January 2007 Dr. DeAnn.
Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. Key Ingredients to Developing Mathematical Understanding: Anticipating, Monitoring, Selecting,
CONCEPTUALIZING AND ACTUALIZING THE NEW CURRICULUM Peter Liljedahl.
Create a 5 Whys. Think about the purpose of maths and what type of mathematical learners you wish to create in the classroom.
Day 2 Summer 2011 Algebraic Reasoning Institute 1.
THE NEW CURRICULUM MATHEMATICS 1 Foundations and Pre-Calculus Reasoning and analyzing Inductively and deductively reason and use logic.
Danielle Dobitsch Honors Presentation April 2, 2015 EXPLORING A CONNECTION BETWEEN TRANSFORMATIONAL GEOMETRY AND MATRICES.
MATHEMATICS 1 Foundations and Pre-Calculus Reasoning and analyzing Inductively and deductively reason and use logic to explore, make connections,
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
Grade 7 & 8 Mathematics Reporter : Richard M. Oco Ph. D. Ed.Mgt-Student.
Key understandings in mathematics: synthesis of research Anne Watson NAMA 2009 Research with Terezinha Nunes and Peter Bryant for the Nuffield Foundation.
Algebra; ratio; functions Nuffield Secondary School Mathematics BSRLM March 12 th 2011.
Content AreaGrade Mastery Scaled Score 2009 Mastery Scaled Score 2010 Change +/- Reading/Lang. Arts Math
Plenary 1. What’s important about the Math we Teach? A Focus on Big Ideas Marian Small
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
NY State Learning Standard 3- Mathematics at the Commencement Level By Andrew M. Corbett NY State HS Math Teacher Click to continue >>>
Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching at the Secondary Level: Experts Conference University Park, PA May 20-22, 2007 Mid Atlantic Center for Mathematics.
Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching at the Secondary Level Using Scenarios to Develop a Framework American Mathematical Society 2008 Fall Central Section.
Identifying Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching at the Secondary Level (6-12) from the Perspective of Practice Joint NSF-CLT Conference on Curriculum,
Deepening Teacher Math Content Knowledge MMP Key Components of High Quality Professional Development DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching at the Secondary Level Examples from the Situations Project Mathematics Education Research Colloquium November 16,
Big Ideas & Problem Solving A look at Problem Solving in the Primary Classroom Lindsay McManus.
Presented by: Angela J. Williams
What to Look for Mathematics Model Algebra 1
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 4
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 5
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 6
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 7
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 1
8th Grade Mathematics Curriculum
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Pedagogical Content Knowledge – Elementary Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

Developing a Framework for Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching at the Secondary Level The Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators (AMTE) Eleventh Annual Conference Irvine, CA January 27, 2007 Mid Atlantic Center for Mathematics Teaching and Learning Center for Proficiency in Teaching Mathematics

Situations Research Group Glen Blume Brad Findell M. Kathleen Heid Jeremy Kilpatrick Jim Wilson Pat Wilson Rose Mary Zbiek Bob Allen Sarah Donaldson Ryan Fox Heather Godine Shiv Karunakaran Evan McClintock Eileen Murray Pawel Nazarewicz Erik Tillema

Collaboration of Two CLT’s to Identify and Characterize the Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching at the Secondary Level Mid Atlantic Center for Mathematics Teaching and Learning Focus: The preparation of mathematics teachers The Center for Proficiency in Teaching Mathematics Focus: The preparation of those who teach mathematics to teachers

Our collaborative work is addressing: the mathematical knowledge the ways of thinking about mathematics that proficient secondary mathematics teachers understand.

How to get teachers acquainted with secondary mathematics in ways that are useful in their teaching. How to help secondary mathematics teachers connect collegiate mathematics with the mathematics of practice The Problems

Grounding our Work in Practice We are drawing from events that have been witnessed in practice. Practice has many faces, including but not limited to classroom work with students. Situations come from and inform practice, making this mathematics for practice.

Working toward a Framework We would like to build a framework of Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching at the Secondary level. The framework could be used to guide: –Research –Curriculum in mathematics courses for teachers –Curriculum in mathematics education courses –Design of field experiences –Assessment

Situations We are in the process of writing a set of practice-based situations that will help us to identify mathematical knowledge for teaching at the secondary level. Each Situation consists of: Prompt - generated from practice Commentaries - providing rationale and extension Mathematical Foci - created from a mathematical perspective

Prompts A prompt describes an opportunity for teaching mathematics E.g., a student’s question, an error, an extension of an idea, the intersection of two ideas, or an ambiguous idea. A teacher who is proficient can recognize this opportunity and build upon it.

Commentaries The first commentary offers a rationale for each focus and emphasizes the importance of the mathematics that is addressed in the foci. The second commentary offers mathematical extensions and deals with connections across foci and with other topics.

Mathematical Foci The mathematical knowledge that teachers could productively use at critical mathematical junctures in their teaching. Foci describe the mathematical knowledge that might inform a teacher’s actions, but they do not describe or suggest specific pedagogical actions.

Example of a Situation: Inverse Trig Functions Prompt Three prospective teachers planned a unit of trigonometry as part of their work in a methods course on the teaching and learning of secondary mathematics. They developed a plan in which high school students first encounter what they called “the three basic trig functions”: sine, cosine, and tangent. The prospective teachers indicated in their plan that students next would work with “the inverse functions,” identified as secant, cosecant, and cotangent.

Example of a Situation: Inverse Trig Functions Commentary The problem seems centered on knowing about the entity of inverse. Connections can be made to the notion of inverse from abstract algebra. When we think about inverses, we need to think about the operation and the elements on which the operation is defined. The selection of foci is made to emphasize the difference between an inverse for the operations of multiplication and composition of functions. The foci contrast how the multiplicative inverse invalidates the properties for an inverse element for the operation of composition. The contrasts will be illustrated in a variety of approaches: graphical, numerical, and verbal.

Example of a Situation: Inverse Trig Functions Mathematical Focus 1 [What does it mean to be an inverse?] The problem seems centered on knowing about the mathematical entity of inverse. An inverse requires two elements: the operation and the elements on which the operation is defined. csc(x) is an inverse of sin(x), but not an inverse function for sin(x). For any value of x such that csc(x) ≠ 0, the number csc(x) is the multiplicative inverse for the number, sin(x); multiplication is the operation in this case and values of the sin and csc functions are the elements on which the operation is defined. Since we are looking for an inverse function, the operation is composition and functions are the elements on which the operation is defined.

Example of a Situation: Inverse Trig Functions Mathematical Focus 2 [Are these three functions really inverses of sine, cosine, and secant?] Suppose cosecant and sine are inverse functions. A reflection of the graph of y = csc(x) in the line y = x would be the graph of y = sin(x). Figure 1 shows, on one coordinate system graphs of the sine function, the line given by y = x, the cosecant function, and the reflection in y = x of the cosecant function. Because the reflection and the sine function graph do not coincide, sine and cosecant are not inverse functions. The reflection in the line given by y = x of one function and the graph of an inverse function coincide because the domain and range of a function are the range and domain, respectively, of the inverse function.

Example of a Situation: Inverse Trig Functions Mathematical Focus 3 [For what mathematical reason might one think the latter three functions are inverses of the former three functions?] The notation f -1 is often used to show the inverse of f in function notation. When working with rational numbers, f -1 is used to represent the reciprocal of f. If people think about the “inverse of sine” as sin -1, they might use to represent the inverse of sine.

1. Adding Radicals A mathematics teacher, Mr. Fernandez, is bothered by his ninth grade algebra students ’ responses to a recent quiz on radicals, specifically a question about square roots in which the students added and and got. Samples of Prompts for the MAC-CPTM Situations Project

2. Exponents In an Algebra II class, the teacher wrote the following on the board: x m. x n = x 5. The students had justt finished reviewing the rules for exponents. The teacher asked the students to make a list of values for m and n that made the statement true. After a few minutes, one student asked, “ Can we write them all down? I keep thinking of more. ”

Mathematical Lenses Mathematical Objects Big Mathematical Ideas Mathematical Activities of Teachers

Mathematical Lens: Mathematical Objects A “mathematical-objects” approach Centers on mathematical objects, properties of those objects, representations of those objects, operations on those objects, and relationships among objects; Starts with school curriculum; and Addresses the larger mathematical structure of school mathematics.

Mathematical Lens: Big Mathematical Ideas A “big-mathematical-ideas” approach Centers on big ideas or overarching themes in secondary school mathematics; Examples: ideas about equivalence, variable, linearity, unit of measure, randomness; Begins with a mix of curriculum content and practice and uses each to inform the other; and Accounts for overarching mathematical ideas that cut across curricular boundaries and carry into collegiate mathematics while staying connected to practice.

Mathematical Lens: Mathematical Activities of Teachers A “mathematical-activities” approach Partitions or structures the range of mathematical activities in which teachers engage Examples: defining a mathematical object, giving a concrete example of an abstraction, formulating a problem, introducing an analogy, or explaining or justifying a procedure. May also draw on the mathematical processes that cut across areas of school mathematics.

Looking at the Inverse Trig Function Mathematical Foci through an Object Lens Focus 1: Inverse Focus 2: Relationship between graphs of inverse functions Focus 3: A conventional symbolic representation of “the inverse of ” f is f -1. The exponent or superscript -1 has several different meanings, not all of which are related to inverse in the same way.

Looking at the Inverse Trig Function Mathematical Foci through an Big Ideas Lens Focus 1: Two elements of a set are inverses under a given binary operation defined on that set when the two elements used with the operation in either order yield the identity element of the set. Focus 2: Equivalent Functions/ Domain and Range: Two functions are equivalent only if they have the same domain and the same range. Focus 3: The same mathematical notation can represent related but different mathematical objects.

Looking at the Inverse Trig Function Mathematical Foci through an Activities Lens Focus 1: Appealing to definition to refute a claim Focus 2: Using a different representation to explain a relationship Focus 3: Explaining a convention

The Problems How to get teachers acquainted with secondary mathematics in ways that are useful in their teaching. How to help secondary mathematics teachers connect collegiate math with the math of practice

Engaging with Mathematical Lenses Big Ideas Lens: Two UGA courses (Concepts in Secondary School Mathematics and Connections in Secondary School Mathematics) based on secondary mathematics from an advanced standpoint Two PSU courses (Foundations of Secondary Mathematics: Functions and Data Analysis) based on fundamental ideas related to function and data analysis in secondary mathematics Mathematical Activities Lens: PSU course (Understanding secondary mathematics in classroom situations) UGA course (Teaching and Learning Secondary School Mathematics) with a major component on Situations

The Mathematics of Your Courses Where do you see objects, big ideas, and mathematical activities in your courses? Which mathematical lenses (these or others) or combination of mathematical lenses influence your courses?

What insights can you now offer regarding the problems we posed? How to get teachers acquainted with secondary mathematics in ways that are useful in their teaching. How to help secondary mathematics teachers connect collegiate math with the math of practice

This presentation is based upon work supported by the Center for Proficiency in Teaching Mathematics and the National Science Foundation under Grant No and the Mid-Atlantic Center for Mathematics Teaching and Learning under Grant Nos and Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.