Miranda Warnings. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2012. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Objective Students.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CH 14 Citizenship and Equal Justice
Advertisements

CJ305: Legal Foundations of Criminal Evidence Welcome to Unit 6! Instructor: K. Austin Zimmer, J.D. Make sure you adjust your speakers and audio settings.
THE MAGISTRATE… THE JUVENILE…THE STATEMENT KEEPING IT LEGAL Kameron D. Johnson E:mail Presented by Ursula Hall, Judge,
Miranda Warning Law Enforcement I.
Trial Procedures. Pleadings – papers filed with the beginning of a trial – establish the issues the court is being asked to decided Spell out allegations.
AJ 104 Chapter 14 Self-Incrimination.
Forensic Science FORENSIC SCIENCE The History When Did Forensics First Get Started?
The Government must respect ALL legal rights of all people. It must treat people fairly.
The Anatomy of a Criminal Case Government – Libertyville HS.
What would society look like if Eric Cartman was a police officer.
The Investigation Phase Criminal Law and Procedure.
Vivek Barbhaiya and John Coriasco
Do you know your civil rights?
Miranda Rights 5th Amendment
Miranda v. Arizona.
BY: KATIE LOSINIECKI Miranda v. Arizona. Facts Ernesto Miranda was arrested in 1966 for the kidnapping and rape of an 18 year old woman After being interrogated.
1966 Chief Justice Warren’s handwritten notes about the case.
Miranda v. Arizona 1966 Read Miranda v. Arizona Parties Facts Issue.
Daniel Moody PD. 3 3/25/10 Miranda VS. Arizona 1966.
Criminal Procedure for the Criminal Justice Professional 11 th Edition John N. Ferdico Henry F. Fradella Christopher Totten Prepared by Tony Wolusky Interrogations,
1 Book Cover Here Chapter 10 INTERROGATION OF SUSPECTS AND HOSTILE WITNESSES Guidelines and Procedures Criminal Investigation: A Method for Reconstructing.
Miranda v. Arizona. Facts of the Case Police arrest Ernesto Miranda after the victim identifies him in lineup Police interrogate Miranda for two hours.
U.S. Constitutional Amendments 1-10
By: Holden Luce.  Mapp was accused of harboring a criminal involved in a bombing case.  The Officers confronted Mapp at her home and demanded that she.
{ Criminal Trial Procedure What happens when the police arrest a criminal suspect?
Reem K, Madeline R, Miranda G, Emily K, & Britney F Government 4 th Hour Mr. Baker.
The Judicial Branch.
Arrests and Miranda. 2 Copyright and Terms of Service Copyright © Texas Education Agency, These materials are copyrighted © and trademarked ™ as.
An Overview of The Mapp, Gideon, Escobedo, and Miranda cases. Copyright 2010; The Nichols Law Firm, PLLC; By Atty. Brendon G. Basiga.
Rights Warning/Waiver Certificate
Chapter 1 The Pursuit of Justice Unit #1 Notes Packet.
Civil Liberties.  It is often said in the American justice system that it is better to allow ten guilty people to go free than to let one innocent person.
1 Bakersfield College Criminal Justice Charles Feer, JD, MPA Miranda.
Miranda v Arizona Rights of the Accused. Citations 384 U.S. 436 (1966) oDocket # 759 oArgued February 28, 1966 o Decider June 13, 1966.
Call To Order Complete the following statement: You have the right to remain silent… And take out your homework!!!
Promptbook  During our last class, we discussed Marbury v. Madison and the idea of judicial review. This will be the topic of your essay assignment. 1.In.
Miranda vs. Arizona Right to Remain Silent.
Statements and Confessions
Ashley Nine March 25, 2010 Period 7.  Poor living immigrant from Mexico living in Arizona.  He was charged with rape and kidnapping.  He was arrested.
Unit 4 Lesson 8: Miranda v. Arizona
SELF-INCRIMINATION “No person…shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself[.]” The 5 th Amendment “I plead the Fifth!”
Miranda v. Arizona. Ernesto Miranda 1966 Charged & convicted of kidnapping, rape, and armed robbery charges second trial, with his confession excluded.
Arrests and Miranda.  Right to a grand jury  Protection against double jeopardy  Protection against self-incrimination  Right to due process  Custody.
The Investigation.  Right to remain silent  Right to an attorney  No interrogation should take place before they read  Are a result of the US Supreme.
 Online Miranda quiz Online Miranda quiz. The constitutional implications of custodial interrogation.
Looking at Miranda Your Right to Remain Silent
Supreme Court Cases on Self Incrimination Sarah Claypoole.
Miranda V. Arizona By: Elise Kloppenburg. Facts of the Case Phoenix, Arizona 1963 Ernesto Miranda, 23 years old Arrested in his home Taken to the police.
Land Mark Supreme Court Cases Assignment
CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS: THE INVESTIGATION Chapter 12.
Miranda: Its Meaning and Application Chapter 6 Basic Criminal Procedures, 3/E by Edward E. Peoples PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle.
Tracing Our Rights
Know Your Rights Santa Teresa High School Intro to LPSCS.
Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.
Miranda v. Arizona.
Criminal Law ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS Why does conflict develop? How can governments ensure citizens are treated fairly?
Miranda Rights.
Miranda Warning Law Enforcement I.
Warm-up Has anyone tried to get you to confess to something you didn’t do? How did this happen? Have you ever confessed to something and then regretted.
Miranda Rights Reem K, Madeline R, Miranda G, Emily K, & Britney F
Defining the meaning of the terms in the warning
Tori Roupe and Haley Leavines
Aim: What are the protections offered by the case of Miranda vs
Miranda v. Arizona (1966).
Lesson 6- Copy the following
Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.
Miranda v. Arizona 1966.
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) The Warren Court.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Miranda Rights You have the right to remain silent…
Presentation transcript:

Miranda Warnings

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Objective Students will be able to explain the origin of the Miranda Warnings. Students will be able to explain the purpose of the Miranda Warnings, as they relate to Law Enforcement Student will be able to explain the Miranda warnings as they relate to Juvenile suspects, Adult Suspects and Witnesses. 2

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Groups Break into small groups of 2-3 people. Bring your journals! 3

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Discuss What is the purpose of the Miranda warnings? Related to the police? Related to the suspect? 4

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Miranda Warnings Warning given by police in the United States to criminal suspects in police custody before they are interrogated to preserve the admissibility of their statements against them in criminal proceedings. 5

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Miranda Warning 6 You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to consult with an attorney and have that attorney present during any questioning. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you. You may terminate this interview at anytime. Do you understand your rights?

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Discuss Why is it important to ask the question “Do you understand your rights?” Suspect Statement.docx 7

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Discuss (as class) Where did the Miranda Warnings originate? 8

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Ernesto Miranda 9

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Biography of Ernesto Miranda Ernesto Miranda AKA Ernesto Arturo Miranda Born: 9-Mar-1941 Birthplace: Columbus, AZ Died: 31-Jan-1976 Location of death: Phoenix, AZ Cause of death: Murder Gender: Male Race or Ethnicity: Hispanic Nationality: United States Executive summary: Miranda v. Arizona9-Mar Jan1976Phoenix, AZMurder Military service: US Army (dishonorably discharged) 10

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Ernesto Miranda Criminal History Armed Robbery Los Angeles, CA (acquitted) AWOL multiple Car Theft Nashville, TN Kidnapping Phoenix, AZ (3-Mar-1966), convicted, overturned, re-convicted Rape Phoenix, AZ (3-Mar-1966), convicted, overturned, re-convicted Armed Robbery Phoenix, AZ (13-Mar-1963) Unlawful Possession of a Firearm charges droppedArmed RobberyAWOLCar TheftKidnappingRapeArmed RobberyUnlawful Possession of a Firearm 11

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Miranda v. Arizona Miranda Warnings came about in 1966 as the result of an arrest involving Ernesto Miranda Ernesto Miranda was accused of the kidnapping and the rape of an 18-year-old female in the state of Arizona 12

13 Ernesto was arrested and the police interrogated him for two hours During the interrogation the police obtained a written and signed confession from Ernesto detailing the crime The confession was used at Ernesto's trial as evidence against him and he was ultimately found guilty.

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Miranda v Arizona Ernesto appealed the court’s decision Ernesto argued the following: Ernesto said he was never told that he had the right to remain silent Ernesto said he would never have confessed if he had been told about this right 14

15 The Supreme Court overturned the first trial giving Ernesto a new trial without the use of the confession Ernesto was again convicted at the second trial Following the second trial the Miranda decision was then codified into the Texas Code of Criminal Procedures Article Texas later added “you may terminate this interview at anytime” which was not part of the original Supreme Court decision.

16 Miranda v. Arizona Facts In 1966, Miranda was accused of kidnapping and rape of an 18 year old female. Miranda signed a written confession and was found guilty during the first trial. Miranda appealed the decision saying he was never told he had the right to remain silent. The ruling from the first trial was overturned. Miranda was tried again and found guilty.

17 Discuss Does the failure of the police to read the Miranda Warning automatically result in the suspect walking free? Yes/No Explain

18 Miranda Warnings Explained

19 The result of the failure to give the Miranda warning does not automatically result in the defendant going free. It only means that the confession cannot be used against the defendant. Ernesto Miranda was tried again without the confession. He was convicted and served 11 years before he was paroled. After several other returns to prison on other charges, he was stabbed to death during an argument in a bar in He was 34. A suspect was arrested, but he chose to exercise his right to remain silent after being read his Miranda rights. The suspect was released, and no one was ever charged with the murder. Prior to Ernesto’s death he made a living selling Miranda cards which he autographed.

20 Failure of the police to read the Miranda Warning does not always mean the suspect can go free, it means a confession cannot be used against a suspect. Miranda was stabbed to death, the suspect in the crime exercised his right to remain silent and was never convicted of the crime.

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 21

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 22

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Objective Explain requirements for Miranda warnings as they relate to Juvenile Suspects, Adult Suspects, and Witnesses. 23

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Discuss When is Miranda required for an adult suspect? 24

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Miranda Requirements for Adult Suspects The courts ruled that in order for the Miranda warning to be required, the circumstances had to meet two criteria. The person was in custody, and The person was interrogated 25

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. When is Miranda Require for Adult Suspects TWO PRONG SYSTEM The suspect is in custody The suspect is interrogated 26

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Discuss When is a suspect being interrogated? 27

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Miranda Requirements for Suspects (continued) Interrogation – Law enforcement asks the suspect(s) questions – If the suspect voluntarily offers information that is not in response to any question asked, even if he or she is in custody, the statement is admissible without the Miranda warning because the two- prong test of interrogation is not met 28

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Discuss When is a person in custody? 29

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Miranda Requirements for Suspects (continued) Suspects are considered in custody – When they are not free to leave – The court states Being physically deprived of freedom in any significant way Law enforcement has told the person he or she is not free to leave When there is probable cause to arrest and a law enforcement does not tell the person he or she is free to leave 30

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Custody/Interrogation Custody-When a suspect is not free to leave Interrogation- Law enforcement asks the suspect(s) questions. If a suspect makes a statement voluntarily, Miranda is not required. 31

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Miranda Requirements for Juvenile Suspects Child (Family Code Section 51.02) 17 years of age and younger The Miranda warning must be issued by a magistrate (judge) prior to any statement being made by a child or juvenile 32

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Miranda Requirements for Juvenile Suspects (continued) The Miranda warnings and statement must be in writing The statement and Miranda warnings must be signed in the presence of a magistrate (Judge) without the presence of a bailiff, prosecuting attorney, or law enforcement officer The magistrate must believe that the juvenile understood the Miranda warning and that the statement was given voluntarily; then the magistrate will sign the certification acknowledging that these occurred The juvenile must intelligently, knowingly, and willingly waive their rights before and during their statement 33

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Discuss What are some possible issues in getting a statement from a juvenile? 34

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Miranda Requirements for Juveniles Warning must be issued by a magistrate. Warnings must be in writing. Warning must be signed by the juvenile. Magistrate must believe that the juvenile understands his/her right before any questioning occurs. 35

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Waiver of Miranda rights Suspects must make a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of rights after they have been read their rights The court looks at two factors when allowing the waiver of rights: To be voluntary it must be the product of a free and deliberate choice, and not the product of coercion, intimidation, or deception Was it made by the defendant with full awareness of both the nature of the rights being abandoned and the consequences of the decision to abandon them 36

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Waiving Miranda Rights Suspects must make a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of rights after they have been read their rights before making a statement. 37

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Discuss When is Miranda required for a witness? 38

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Miranda Requirements for Witnesses There is no legal requirement for Miranda when someone is a witness; witnesses are free to leave at any time If you are arrested based on your statements as a witness, the Miranda warning would apply As a witness, if the police determine you are obstructing justice, and charge you with such, the Miranda warning then applies 39

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Miranda Requirements for a Witness Miranda is not required, unless you are arrested based on your statement, or if you are obstructing justice 40

Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Resources Judge Erin Bakker division/the-informer/research-by-subject/5th- amendment/juvenilemirandarights.pdf dyn/content/article/2010/06/01/AR html Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act 18 USC Texas Constitution and Statutes