Muon Efficiency and Fake Rate Two Dimension Fit Exclusive B->JPsiMuMu Analysis in CMSSW_3_1_2 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 (1385) ANALYSIS STATUS Enrico Fragiacomo, Massimo Venaruzzo INFN and University Trieste Resonances meeting – CERN – 04/03/2011.
Advertisements

1 Preliminary stuff Summer09 ppMuMuX sample with CMSSW_3_3_2 –it requires opposite charge generated dimuons from heavy processes or K, pi, K0 L decays.
PDCMSSW - Luca Perrozzi1 Looking for… Punch throughs… Looking for… Punch throughs…
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon 1 B s Mixing at CDF Seminar at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Gavril Giurgiu Carnegie Mellon University August 16,
M.Mevius Open and hidden beauty production in 920 GeV proton –nucleus collisions at HERA-B M.Mevius DESY.
1 Semiexclusive semileptonic B->charmdecays C. Gatto - INFN Napoli A. Mazzacane - Universita’ di Napoli April 10, 2003.
Measuring the bb cross- section using B  D o X   decays Liming Zhang & Sheldon Stone Syracuse University.
22 July 2005Mauro Donega HEP20051 B s lifetimes in hadronic decays at CDF Mauro Donegà Université de Genève on behalf of the CDF collaboration.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
1 Update: High energy photon pairs Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech 04 December 2007.
Identification of neutrino oscillations in the MINOS detector Daniel Cole
Measurement of the Branching fraction B( B  D* l ) C. Borean, G. Della Ricca G. De Nardo, D. Monorchio M. Rotondo Riunione Gruppo I – Napoli 19 Dicembre.
B S Mixing at Tevatron Donatella Lucchesi University and INFN of Padova On behalf of the CDF&D0 Collaborations First Workshop on Theory, Phenomenology.
B c Results from CDF II Satyajit Behari (For the CDF Collab.) Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore,USA 23 rd Jul HEP2005 Europhysics Conference, Lisboa,
LCWS2013 Higgs Recoil Mass Study at 350 GeV Apr 27, 2014 Jacqueline Yan Komamiya Lab, Univ. of Tokyo 富山 12013/07/20.
A Study of Electron Identification Jim Branson UCSD with collaborators from FNAL, UCSB & UCSD.
Optimization of  exclusion cut for the  + and  (1520) analysis Takashi Nakano Based on Draft version of Technical Note 42.
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
Drell-Yan study in CMS at 10 TeV, with 100 pb -1 Monika Jindal K.Mazumdar, D. Bourilkov, J.B. Singh 1LHC Physcis meeting.
Recent Open Heavy Flavor Results from ATLAS and CMS Experiment at LHC
Chunhui Chen, University of Pennsylvania 1 Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the Tevatron Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the.
B. Naroska Un. Hamburg Beauty at HERA HEP05 Lisbon 21/07/ Beauty Production at HERA HEP05 International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics.
A bin-free Extended Maximum Likelihood Fit + Feldman-Cousins error analysis Peter Litchfield  A bin free Extended Maximum Likelihood method of fitting.
Γ +Jet Analysis for the CMS Pooja Gupta, Brajesh Choudhary, Sudeep Chatterji, Satyaki Bhattacharya & R.K. Shivpuri University of Delhi, India.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
Properties of B c Meson On behalf of DØ Collaboration Dmitri Tsybychev, SUNY at Stony Brook, PANIC05, Santa Fe, New Mexico B c is ground state of bc system.
1 Selection of non-triggering muons in J/ψ  μμ events for the calibration of the Muon System 1)Offline Selection:  use of Mass Constrained Global Fit.
1 First observation of a New b-baryon  b at D0: Celebrating 30 Years of Fermilab Eduard De La Cruz Burelo University of Michigan for the DØ Collaboration.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
HG 5: Trigger Study for ttH, H→bb Catrin Bernius (UCL) CPPM, Genova, Glasgow, RAL, RHUL, UCL some outline.
Penny Kasper Fermilab Heavy Quarkonium Workshop 21 June Upsilon production DØ Penny Kasper Fermilab (DØ collaboration) 29 June 2006 Heavy Quarkonium.
Tuning of trigger simulation parameters (Bossi, Moulson, Palutan, Sciascia) Calorimeter trigger thresholds calibration using prompt photons from K S 
Kalanand Mishra February 23, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 decay Giampiero.
ICSHEP 8, Apr , CMS BOnia physics: J/Psi & Inclusive b(  J/PsiX) production x- Section Xiangwei Meng Guoming Chen Institute of.
Sinéad Farrington University of Glasgow for the CDF Collaboration European Physical Society Aachen, 17 th -23 rd July 2003 B Lifetimes and Flavour Tagging.
Thursday, March 13th Z   had Z  had Preselection Efficiencies (muon) Backgrounds + Cuts Trigger Back to the Tau..and what remains to.
QCHS 2010 Lei Zhang1 Lei Zhang (on behalf of BESIII Collaboration) Physics School of Nanjing University Recent.
I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.
Exotic Quarkonium Spectroscopy & Production Jane Nachtman on behalf of the CMS Collaboration University of Iowa, USA Charm 2013, 31 August – 4 Sept, 2013,
Photon purity measurement on JF17 Di jet sample using Direct photon working Group ntuple Z.Liang (Academia Sinica,TaiWan) 6/24/20161.
Progress on Simulation Software Hai-Ping Peng(USTC) Xiao-Shuai Qin(IHEP) Xiao-Rong Zhou(USTC) Yu Hu(IHEP) 2014 STC Workshop (ITP) Hai-Ping Peng.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov* *National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
QWG Sept 20-22, Jundong Huang Indiana University 1 DØ Quarkonium Production at DØ Jundong Huang Indiana University Quarkonium Workshop FermiLab September.
K. Holubyev HEP2007, Manchester, UK, July 2007 CP asymmetries at D0 Kostyantyn Holubyev (Lancaster University) representing D0 collaboration HEP2007,
Upsilon production and μ-tagged jets in DØ Horst D. Wahl Florida State University (DØ collaboration) 29 April 2005 DIS April to 1 May 2005 Madison.
 (2S) cross section and search for narrow resonances below the Upsilon mesons at CDF Alberto Annovi - INFN Frascati for the CDF collaboration International.
Charmless Hadronic B Decays at BaBar
The Top Quark at CDF Production & Decay Properties
Inclusive Tag-Side Vertex Reconstruction in Partially Reconstructed B decays -A Progress Report - 11/09/2011 TDBC-BRECO.
 discrimination with converted photons
CMSSW_3_1_1 preproduction samples
Effect of t42 algorithm on jets
Kinematic variables pT and Rapidity of J/psi and Psi(2S) in invariant mass window of 100 MeV around respective peaks (3.097 and 3.68 GeV)
Muon momentum scale calibration with J/y peak
Measurement of inclusive branching fraction for y(3686)fX
Update: High energy photon pairs Search for RS-1 Gravitons
Charged PID in Arbor 23/02/2016 Dan YU.
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
EMCal Recalibration Check
 discrimination with converted photons
Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb-1
Samples and MC Selection
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Quarkonium production, offline monitoring, alignment & calibration
 discrimination with converted photons
Z. X. Zhang , G. M. Chen, X. Y. Wang, et al 2009/11/27
10 TeV BJ/K at CMS Zheng Wang Apr
K/p fakes rejection VERY Preliminary Full offline environment
Presentation transcript:

Muon Efficiency and Fake Rate Two Dimension Fit Exclusive B->JPsiMuMu Analysis in CMSSW_3_1_2 1

outline Muon Efficiency and Fake rate new MC data sample comparison of three kinds muons’ efficiency muon to pi/K fake rate Two Dimension Fit CDF J/ψ meson 2D fit David’s Note BtoJPsiK 2D fit To do list 2

Mu efficiency and fake rate MC Data Sample: Single Muon events Single Pion events Single Kaon events Muon type: Glb Ξ Global Muon Trk Ξ Track Muon Trk’ Ξ Track Muon with χ 2 11 Muon efficiency: Muon fake: Using Single Pion and Kaon MC Datasample. Here, we correct our mistake about double counting of muons With Pt =[3,65] GeV 3

Muon Efficiency I. At low pt <  5GeV, Endcap muon can get highest efficiency, barrel + endcap lower, and barrel the lowest. But at high pt range, the contrary in the case. II. At high pt range,Global muon can get 96% efficiency, Tracker muon 97%,and Tracker muon with cuts 96%, and at low pt range Tracker muon can get highest effieiency 77.5%, Tracker muon with cuts 75.5% and Global muon only 63%. In a word, at high pt Global and Tracker muon efficiency almost the same, but in low pt Tracker muon can gain 12% higher efficiency than Global muon. Barrel+Endcap Barrel Endcap Barrel+Endcap Barrel Endcap Barrel+Endcap Barrel Endcap 4

Comparison of fake rate Pi After correctdouble counting, using new Single Pi MC sample Barrel+Endcap Barrel Endcap 5

Comparison of fake rate K After correct double counting, using new Single Kaon MC sample Barrel+Endcap Barrel Endcap 6

Two Dimension Fit for J/ψ (CDF) Unbinned extended maximum likelihood fit  N is total number of events in the mass range 2.85GeV<m μμ <3.55GeV f Sig is the fraction of signal J/ψ events, F Sig and F Bkg are the PDLS of Signal and BKG. M Sig and M Bkg is the mass spectrum for Signal and BKG. parameters Signal PDL: f B,s 2 M : f 2, M,D,σ M,r2 5 BKG PDL: f +,f -,f sym, λ +,λ -,λ sym 6 M : M slope 1 lnL : fsig 1 total 15 7

Fit results of CDF 8

Two Dimension Fit for BtoJPsiK (David Note) Unbinned extended maximum likelihood fit Five components of B + -> J/ψ K + datasample: Signal, B + ->J/ψπ +, prompt J/ψ, combinatorial bbar(BB), feeddown bbar(B 0 -> J/ψ K *0,B ± -> J/ψ K *± ) Extended likelihood function: where i = [1…5], n i and P i is the yield and PDF of each component separately, j is the event No. of the fit. 9

PDF of B mass and c  MBMB cc Component FunctionParameterFunctionparameter Signal G1+G2+G3 {μi,σi}{μi,σi} (G1+G2) e -ct/ λ {μi,σi,λ}{μi,σi,λ} J/ψπ G1+G2+G3 {μi,σi}{μi,σi} (G1+G2) e -ct/ λ {μi,σi,λ}{μi,σi,λ} Peak B G1+G2+e - αMB {μi,σi,α}{μi,σi,α} G (e -ct/ λ1 + e -ct/ λ1 ){σ,λ1,λ2}{σ,λ1,λ2} Comb B e - αMB {α}{α} (G1+G2) e -ct/ λ {μi,σi,λ}{μi,σi,λ} Prompt J/ψ e - αMB {α}{α}{μi,σi,λ}{μi,σi,λ} Same with Signal 10

Fit Procedure First fit each component with p T > 9GeV MC truth match data sample to determine the best values of λs(except Signal) and all parameters. 11 PDL MASS

Fit Procedure Then fix λ s(except Signal) and all parameters, and fit all pt bins sample of S+B to determine the B lifetime λ B and yield for each component. (4 yields + λ B ) T he last, fix all λ s and all parameters, and fit data sample(S+B) for yields in each bins of P T. 12

To do list Perform the two dimension fit referring to David’s Note. Code skeleton was ready, but parameters need to be optimized QCD BKG may introduce new variables when we fit the real data. 13