Exploring Philosophy During a Time of Reform in Mathematics Education Dr. Kimberly White-Fredette Gordon State College Barnesville, GA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I Directors Conference Sept 2007 Carol Diedrichsen Gwen Pollock Surveys of the Enacted Curriculum for English.
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
Stephanie Burba, Noyce Graduate Tyler Ghee, Noyce Scholar Shelby Overstreet, Noyce Scholar Kathryn Crawford, Noyce Graduate Hope Marchionda, PhD Using.
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving
Learning Outcomes Participants will be able to analyze assessments
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Functions A Close Look at Grade 9 Module.
MYP (Middle Years Programme).  m7oU.
Developing Mathematical Practices for Geometry, Algebra II and Beyond Developed by Education Development Center, Inc. with support from the Massachusetts.
X = ax= b f(x) Calculus students’ understanding of area and volume in calculus- and non-calculus contexts Allison Dorko Masters of Science in Teaching.
Mathematics Reform The Implications of Problem Solving in Middle School Mathematics.
Smarter Together! Rigorous Mathematics for All Students through Complex Instruction Marcy Wood Teaching, Learning, and Sociocultural Studies
Mathematics for Middle School Teachers: A Program of Activity- Based Courses Portland State University Nicole Rigelman Eva Thanheiser.
Investigations in Number, Data, and Space: Teaching Philosophy.
FACILITATORS’ SESSIONS K-1, 2-3, and 4-6 Number and Computation JMU MSP K-3 and 4-6 Grants, Facilitator Module,
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
ED 3501: Curriculum and Instruction Section GHI - Fall Understanding by Design Understanding and Creating Effective Instructional Design.
Learning to teach Secondary science: An Activity Theory analysis of issues concerning the use of constructivist approaches Tanvir Ahmed The Open University.
Teaching Thinking, Problem Solving, and Skill Acquisition
Effective Instruction in Mathematics for the Junior learner Number Sense and Numeration.
What is Philosophy? The investigation of causes and laws underlying reality Inquiry into the nature of things based on logical reasoning rather than empirical.
Identifying Mathematics Levels of Cognitive Rigor (DOK) Office of Curriculum, Instruction & Professional Development - Mathematics February 19, 2015 Module.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
Exploring Cognitive Demands of Mathematical Tasks Milwaukee Public School Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialist
Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) at Sojourner Douglass College Faculty and Staff Session One Saturday, November 9, 2013.
NCTM Overview The Principles and Standards for Teaching Mathematics.
1 National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Illustrating the Standards for Mathematical Practice: Getting Started with the Practices Investigations.
Mathematics Teacher Leader Session 1: The National Mathematics Strategy & Modelling Exemplary Teaching 1.
Critical Events Legacy Learning Program Schema. Learning Program Learning Modules Classroom Management Special Needs Education Child Development Literature.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
Mathematics Professional Development Senior School Teachers Session 1: Teaching Through Problem Solving 1.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Study Group 7 - High School Math (Algebra 1 & 2, Geometry) Welcome Back! Let’s.
Branches of Philosophy
District Learning Day August 5, 2015
Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) Don Martin EPSY 6304 Cognition and Development UT-Brownsville Professor Garcia By PresenterMedia.comPresenterMedia.com.
Math & Science Collaborative Analyzing Mathematical Tasks and the Mathematical Task Framework.
1 Historical Perspective... Historical Perspective... Science Education Reform Efforts Leading to Standards-based Science Education.
Summer Academy Planning and Teaching Mathematics Through Problem Solving Day 1 Facilitator: Rebeka Matthews Sousa Mathematics Specialist Teacher, Ministry.
Elementary Math: Grade 5 Professional Development Fall 2011.
The Evolution of ICT-Based Learning Environments: Which Perspectives for School of the Future? Reporter: Lee Chun-Yi Advisor: Chen Ming-Puu Bottino, R.
USING DIGITAL OPEN-SOURCE EDUCATION RESOURCES IN THE SECONDARY MATHEMATICS CLASSROOM Presented by Dr. Paul Gray Chief Curriculum Officer Cosenza & Associates,
Mathematics Teachers Grade 8 October 10, 2013 Joy Donlin and Tony Lobascher.
Mathematics Teacher Leader Session 2: Modelling Exemplary Teaching – Teaching Through Problem Solving 1.
HUE City, Vietnam Hue University’s College of Education 32 Le Loi St. APEC-Khon Kaen International Symposium August 2007.
Operation: Algebra Collaborating to collect and assemble quality math content for understanding and applying basic algebra.
Constructivism A learning theory for today’s classroom.
The Impact of Technology on the Contemporary Classroom Shaun Rosell Kansas State University EDCI 803 Curriculum Development.
Tech-knowledgy in Mathematics: Investigating Mathematical Models and Concepts Using Virtual Manipulatives and Applets Jennifer M. Suh, Ph.D.
The Relationship between Elementary Teachers’ Beliefs and Teaching Mathematics through Problem Solving Misfer AlSalouli May 31, 2005.
DEFINITION: An algorithm is a step-by-step process that guarantees the correct solution to a given problem, provided the steps are executed correctly (Barnett,
Describing Teaching from a Constructivist Perspective
Persevering Through the Prospectus Process By: Nicole Maxwell & Megan Nason.
Welcome! Please arrange yourselves in groups of four so group members represent: A mix of grade levels A mix of schools 1.
Mary McClure, EdD, LPC Class 3. Multiple approaches to instruction are probably appropriate… Diversity of student populations is increasing – more inclusive.
Inquiry Primer Version 1.0 Part 4: Scientific Inquiry.
Middle Mathematics Teacher Endorsement Programme Planning and Teaching Mathematics Through Problem Solving Session 3 Facilitator: Rebeka Matthews Sousa.
Researching Teachers, Researching Myself Challenging my teacher educator pedagogy through researching beginning teachers Dr. Monica McGlynn-Stewart George.
Introduction to Math Methods Math Standards. Why can math be fun? Math can be fun because… it can have so much variety in topics. many different ways.
More About Research and Beliefs Interpretive Frameworks.
Coding Connections at the Interface of Algebra I and Physical World Concepts Improving Teacher Quality Grant Program Summer 2016.
Chapter 1 Teaching Mathematics in the Era of the NCTM Standards
Designing Professional Development for Elementary School Teachers
CHAPTER 3 Teaching Through Problem Solving
Elementary and Middle School Mathematics Chapter Reflections: 1,2,3,5,6 By: Amy Howland.
Reflecting on Practice: Using Inquiry to Build Thinking Classrooms
Math Standards Math 120—Algorithms for Arithmetic
The Call for Action: Coaching and Supporting Mathematics Instruction
Reflecting on Practice: Using Inquiry to Build Thinking Classrooms
The curriculum The curricullum tells «What and how the learners should learn» at specific levels of the education system. It includes the objectives and.
Math Standards Math 120—Algorithms for Arithmetic
Presentation transcript:

Exploring Philosophy During a Time of Reform in Mathematics Education Dr. Kimberly White-Fredette Gordon State College Barnesville, GA

Theoretical framework  Mathematics curricular reform rooted in a social constructivist view of mathematics  NCTM’s mathematics standards (1989, 2000)  Georgia’s curriculum reform (2005 to present)  Development of Common Core Standards for Mathematics (2010 to present)  Social constructivist view of mathematics is rooted in a humanist/fallibilist philosophy of mathematics

Mathematics educational reform: How do we teach and learn mathematics?  NCTM’s Process Standard  Common Core’s Standards for Mathematical Practice  Students engaged in reasoning and critical thinking  Use of worthwhile tasks  Exploration of multiple pathways towards the solution of complex, real-world problems  Communicating about mathematics  Using multiple representations

Mathematics education reform: What is mathematics?  Social constructivism as a philosophy of mathematics (Ernest, 1991, 1998, 2004)  Why Not Philosophy? Problematizing the Philosophy of Mathematics in a Time of Curriculum Reform (White- Fredette, 2010)

What is mathematics?  Traditional/absolutist view of mathematics  Mathematics as a fixed subject of absolute truths  Exploring a humanist/fallibilist view of mathematics  Mathematics as constructed knowledge

Exploring philosophy: research questions  How do teachers define their personal philosophies of mathematics teaching and learning?  As teachers explore humanist/fallibilist philosophies of mathematics, how do their perceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching and learning change?

Exploring philosophy: participants  Four mathematics educators  Classroom teachers and instructional coaches  Elementary, middle, and high school  Graduate students engaged in a reading-intensive course focused on philosophy of mathematics  Involved with implementation of reform curriculum at classroom level, as well as district-wide and statewide levels

Exploring philosophy: readings  Russell (1919) Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy  Lakatos (1976) Proofs and Refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery  Davis & Hersh (1981) The Mathematical Experience  Hersh (1997) What is Mathematics, Really?

Exploring philosophy: methodology  Data included:  Reading journals  Reflective essays  Extensive interviews over 18 months  Narrative analysis  Telling of stories  Examining stories on multiple occasions, through multiple sources  Thematic analysis within each narrative  Riessman (1993, 2002, 2008)

Exploring philosophy: teacher stories  New to idea of philosophy of mathematics  Philosophy of mathematics influenced by personal experiences (as students and teachers)  Initial attraction of right/wrong nature of mathematics  Love of mathematics tied to struggles and successes  Effort and hard work  Beyond rules and procedures – “doing math”  Power and mathematics (learner and teacher)  Need to see math as more than computation, more than algorithms, more than memorizing formulas  Struggles to have others (students, teachers) see math differently

Discussion  How do we define mathematics?  What is the purpose of school mathematics?  How do we impact teachers’ and students’ views of mathematics?  Importance of our personal stories of mathematics  Examine, explore, challenge

Works cited  Davis, P. J., & Hersh, R. (1981). The mathematical experience. Boston: Birkhauser.  Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. London: The Falmer Press  Ernest, P. (1998). Social constructivism as a philosophy of mathematics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.  Ernest, P. (2004). What is the philosophy of mathematics education? [Electronic Version]. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 18.  Hersh, R. (1997). What is mathematics, really? New York: Oxford University Press.  Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.  National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.  National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.  Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published in 1945)  Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.  Riessman, C. K. (2002). Analysis of personal narratives. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context & Method (pp. 695–710). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.  Riessman, C. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.  Russell, B. (1993). Introduction to mathematical philosophy. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1919)  White-Fredette, K. (2010). Why not philosophy? Problematizing the philosophy of mathematics in a time of curriculum reform. The Mathematics Educator, 19(2).