Technology Foresight Experience of the Czech Republic 1st National Foresight Exercise (2001) Kristina Kadlecikova Technology Centre AS CR ForeTech, Capacity.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Short overview of the SCORE project
Advertisements

Estonian Pilot Action on Technology Assessment Rene Tõnnisson Institute of Baltic Studies.
ClimDev-Africa Program & African Climate Policy Center (ACPC)
Cyprus Project Management Society
Arab Mashreq Road Safety Partnership Workshop
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
HR 08 IB SPP 02 TWINNING PROJECT “ENHANCEMENT OF CAPACITY FOR EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF EU COHESION POLICY FUNDS” 1 The most significant results of Component.
“Building Effective Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context” in Bulgaria Institute for Ecological Modernisation.
EU-Regional Policy and Cohesion Structural Funds and Accession 1 SPP BUILDING IMPLEMENTATION CAPACITY Training seminar on evaluation Prague February.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SUSTAINABLE GROWTH LIFE
The Hungarian system of ex post and on-going evaluation focusing on Structural Funds Kinga Kenyeres, Evaluation Division6-7 May, 2010 National Development.
Project Implementation Plan and Principal Activities
Selection of Research Priorities – Method of Critical Technologies Karel Klusáček Technology Centre AS CR, Prague, Czech Republic UNIDO.
Industrial Engineering Roles In Industry
Information by the Managing Authority on thematic evaluation of EU structural funds in Iruma Kravale Head of Strategic Planning Unit, European.
Energy-Efficiency-Watch (EEW) - Basics on the project – Dr. Jan Geiss Secretary General EUFORES Coordinator of the EEW SpanishWorkshop In cooperation with.
The Assessment of COST Actions PHOENIX Workshop in Kyrgyzstan, May 2007 “Road to excellence: Research evaluation in SSH“
ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.
October 17, 2011 Innovation strategy and its implementation in the Czech Republic.
Regional innovation policy in the Czech Republic Vladislav Čadil.
Technology Strategy Board Driving Innovation Participation in Framework Programme 7 Octavio Pernas, UK NCP for Health (Industry) 11 th April 2012.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
Regional Capacity Building Activities in the Caribbean UNFCCC Expert Workshop on Monitoring and Evaluating Capacity- building in Developing Countries Carlos.
UNITED NATIONS Population Unit ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Road Maps for Mainstreaming Ageing  Fiona Willis-Núñez.
Extremadura Region Foresight Exercise Luis Casas Luengo Managing Director FUNDECYT Third International Seville Conference on Future-Oriented Technology.
The Romanian National Defence College Bucharest, 1-2 November 2007Romania Ministry of Education, Research and Youth National University Research Council.
Practical aspects Dr. Ir Matthijs Soede Senter/EG-Liaison “Practical Aspects of Preparation FP6 projects Poznan - 21 November 2002 Dr. Ir.
Making Good Use of Research Evaluations Anneli Pauli, Vice President (Research)
“Thematic Priority 3” Draft Evaluation of IP + NoE.
Ministry of the Environment and Territory Directorate for Development and Environmental Research Ministry of Economy and Finance Department for Development.
NCSA AS A TOOL FOR INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (ARMENIA EXPERIENCE) Anahit Simonyan June, 2004 Bratislava UNDP ARMENIA.
1 SMEs – a priority for FP6 Barend Verachtert DG Research Unit B3 - Research and SMEs.
1 Regional Innovation Strategies RIS. 2 About Regional Innovation Strategies The RIS projects aimed to support regions to develop regional innovation.
1 Policy Analysis for RISPO II National Workshop XXXXX 2006.
WP8 – Innovation Support Kelly Vavasi General Secretariat for Research and Technology (GSRT) 1 st Innovation Dialogue Forum Becici, 8-9 November 2010.
Mysoltani.ir سایت فیلم روشهای مشارکتی Technology Foresight Foresight is about preparing for the future. It is about deploying resources in the best.
María Amor Barros del Río Gender as content in research in Horizon 2020 GENDER AS CONTENT IN RESEARCH IN HORIZON 2020 CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP FOR RESEARCHERS.
1 The FNR Foresight A participative Process. 2 Aims of the Foresight exercise Identification of National Research Priorities in the public sector with.
The RDI Governance System Vasileios Pitsinigkos Head of Managing Authority of Eastern Macedonia - Thrace Region.
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION FRAMEWORK Presentation by Ministry of Finance 10 December 2013.
ROMANIA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION National Centre for Development of Vocational Education and Training Implementation Unit of Phare.
Warszawa 18 luty th Framework Programme NMP - 2nd Calls Integrated Projects for SMEs Hervé Péro, Christophe Lesniak DG Research.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SECURITY AND CITIZENSHIP RIGHT AND CITIZENSHIP
The added value of the Wind Energy Roadmap Christian Nath – TPWind Executive Committee.
System of science financing in Poland address: ul. Hoża 20 \ ul. Wspólna 1/3 \ Warszawa \ phone: +48 (22) \ fax: +48 (22) Data:
0 S&T Foresight in Germany > Lessons from the 90‘s > Strategy for the future > Obstacles for policy implementation Note:the structure of the German S&T.
HORIZON 2020 W ORK PROGRAMME DG Research and Innovation.
1 INCO-NET Call 2010 – MIRA related provisions: Secure the participation of the remaining Mediterranean Partner Countries (MPC) in the consortium; Increase.
Technology Needs Assessments under GEF Enabling Activities “Top Ups” UNFCCC/UNDP Expert Meeting on Methodologies for Technology Needs Assessments
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
Session 4. Evaluation of publicly funded research development and innovation: The Integral Monitoring and Evaluation System (SISE) Alfonso Beltrán García-Echániz.
Utilization of knowledge for economic growth in the Czech Republic Karel Klusacek Technology Centre AS CR Knowledge Economy Forum V.
Pilot Project on implementation of SEA for regional planning in Ukraine Prof. Dr. Michael Schmidt Dmitry Palekhov Brandenburg University of Technology.
GOVERNANCE SETTINGS FOR SUCCESSFUL S3 PROCESS Jurgita Petrauskienė , Chisinau.
The EU Water Initiative and the EU ACP Facility New Instruments to promote sustainable development of water resources and affordable access Antonio Garcia-Fragio.
The BMBF Foresight Process Kerstin Cuhls, Walter Ganz, Philine Warnke Fraunhofer ISI and Fraunhofer IAO Third International Seville Conference on Future-Oriented.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
1 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND BUDGET PRIORITISATION IN CROATIA Francois-Roger Cazala, Rimantas Veckys SIGMA - Lithuanian Ministry of Finance.
Czech National Foresight Karel Klusacek Technology Centre AS CR, Prague National Foresight Programme „Poland 2020“ Seminar Warsaw January.
Benchmarking RTDI Organisations in Central and Southeast European Countries Regional Innovation Strategies International workshop 19 November 2004 Zoya.
Teacher’s Professional Development in EU Policy
CIRAZ Key factor in Smart Specialization Strategy implementation
PLANNED ACTIONS – UPCOMING DUTIES
Foresight - organising and managing a foresight exercise
EU-Russia Cooperation in the Areas of Science, Research and Innovation
Third International Seville Conference on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA): Impacts and implications for policy and decision-making 16th- 17th.
Youth Studies Institute Kishinev, 2018
Frank Glod, Carlo Duprel, and Michael Keenan*
Youth Studies Institute 2018
Role of Evaluation coordination group and Capacity Building Projects in Lithuania Vilija Šemetienė Head of Economic Analysis and Evaluation Division.
Presentation transcript:

Technology Foresight Experience of the Czech Republic 1st National Foresight Exercise (2001) Kristina Kadlecikova Technology Centre AS CR ForeTech, Capacity Building Workshop Bucharest, Romania, 26 January 2004

2 Structure of This Presentation Focus = Methodology Technology Foresight Exercise (2001) –Objectives –Background Information –Methodology –Results Implementation and Follow-up

3 Objectives of the 1st Czech National Foresight Exercise To select –a limited number of „key research directions“ (national research priorities) for the new National Research Programme (NRP) To propose –a suitable management system for the NRP –rules for the NRP implementation Limited number of selected national research priorities should receive preferential funding from public resources ~ 80% of the total project-type financing available

4 Background Information Project was ordered by the Czech Government through the Ministry of Education (responsible for research) The principal reason: to define priorities for targeted research (to be financed from public funds in a focused and coordinated way) Conditions: broad participation, consensus The Project was coordinated by a consortium of the Technology Centre AS CR (principal contractor) and the Engineering Academy CR Project deadline: 30 December 2001 (the exercise was launched in December 2000)

5 Stages of the Foresight Exercise Interviews (demand side) Desk research (strategic docs, economic data, R&D expenditure) Sectoral (SWOT) analyses (experts) Panels: SWOT, development scenarios, list of important research directions, first prioritisation, voting procedure, discussion, list of key research directions, cross-cutting measures Working group: cross-thematic topics, second prioritisation, aggregation, final list of priorities of oriented research, final cross-cutting measures, recommended programme implementation and method of management Public presentation of interim results, feedback Final report to government, public presentation of final results, dissemination Appointment of the management Building Structure Identification of Sectors Addressing experts XII 2000 VI-IX 2001 X 2001 X-XI 2001 XII 2001 III-VI 2001 I-III 2001

6 Panels – 1st Czech National Foresight Exercise (2001) Social TransformationAgriculture and Food Environment Health and Pharmacy Construction, Urbanism and Housing Information Society Materials Discrete Manufacturing Machinery and Equipment Devices and Instruments Chemical Products and Processes Transport Systems Energy and Raw Materials 13 application sectors (panels) 3 cross-cutting panels 1 systemic panel Human Resources for R&D Integrated R&D Regional and International Co-operation in R&D Management and Implementation of the National Research Programme

7 Panels - cont. one of the most critical points of the project typically experts mixed background – research, industry, business, government chairperson – a respected „strategic thinker“ assisted by a secretary members recommended by important stakeholders (institutions), individual recommendations, co- nomination (for which there was not enough time) about 300 experts more closely involved (of 1000) panel members received a modest fee to compensate for travels and other expenses

8 Panels representation of sectors

9 Thematic Programme Development of Results Thematic Programmes Panels SWOT Development scenarios List of IRDs Panels First prioritisation (importance x feasibility) On-line voting procedure List of KRDs Working Group Second prioritisation Final (reduced) list of KRDs Sub-programmes Working Group Allocation of final KRDs to sub- programmes Grouping of sub- programmes into thematic programmes IRD KRD 1 st prioritisation in panels Sub- programme 2 nd prioritisation and aggregation in the WG (19) KRD allocation of KRDs grouping of sub-pgms

10 Defined Structure - principal sections: – Situation in the field (CR, Europe, world) – Anticipated trends in the CR in the next 10 years – SWOT analysis – Important Research Directions (IRD) – Selection of Key Research Directions (KRD) from IRD – KRD in the order of importance – Explanation of the order of importance, aggregation – Suggestion of cross-panel KRD – Emerging technologies and market niches – KRD – identification sheets Panel Reports

11 A Brief Evaluation Project + –full commitment of the Government as a consequence of the Government demand –clearly defined tasks –wide participation –involvement of a variety of stakeholders Project – –insufficient time (12 months) – given the task and conditions, no time for complex consensual discussions across the society, more time for setting up the panels would have been welcomed

12 Project resulted in 19 thematic and 19 cross-cutting sub- programs, 90 key research directions Implementation and management principles outlined Important by-products: interviews of ~300 industrial and service entities (a demand side), analyses of application sectors, development sector scenarios outlined General principles of the National Research Programme (NRP) based on the Project results were approved by the Czech Government in May 2002 Minor modifications in the NRP management were needed according to the new Act on Public Support to the R&D; final approval of the NRP in April 2003 Launch of the NRP: 1 January 2004 Final Summary

13 National Research Programme (NRP) on the basis of the Foresight Exercise launched in January 2004 Dominant part of the public funds allocated to „oriented“ research is to be gradually transferred to the NRP Main objectives of the NRP: - to increase performance and effectiveness of Czech research and increase its benefit for the economy and society - to concentrate funds and research capacities on a smaller number of selected issues Duration : 2004 – 2009 Implementation – NRP (1)

14 Structure of the NRP: 5 thematic and 3 cross-cutting programmes, further divided into sub-programmes (calls for projects will be published on the level of sub- programmes) Coordinator of the NRP: Ministry of Education through the Council for the NRP Management / control boards will be established on the level of each sub-programme (parallel to the financing organization) – i.e. coordination and financing will be separated Main criteria for selecting research projects: importance (for the society, economic aspects, applicability), expected benefits and quality, feasibility Implementation – NRP (2)

15 Generally - raising interest on foresight activities in “decision-making circles” (Czech Government) with the aim of embedding the foresight culture among policy-makers Preparation for the NRP II (= another round of a foresight exercise – „problem-oriented“) has been initiated by the Government) and conducted under the coordination of the Technology Centre AS CR (09/ /2004) NRP II : , NPV III to be launched in 2009 More information: Follow-up

16 Technology Centre will be running a systematic Foresight Programme (Strategic studies for R&D): - running for 5 years ( ) - financed by the Ministry of Education (responsible for research in the CR) and politically supported - the main objective: to prepare analytic and future-related infomation for decision-makers involved in shaping national research and innovation policies - main activities: development of methodology, analytic and future-related studies, training, international cooperation/coordination - mobilized funds: approx € /year - personnel: 10 people Current Situation and Future of Foresight in the CR