Staff development for technology- enhanced learning and assessment an institutional overview Carol Russell.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

Dr Catherine Bovill Academic Development Unit University of Glasgow Dr Kate Morss and Dr Cathy Bulley, Queen Margaret University.
UQ Teaching and Learning Small and Large Strategic Grants Scheme Second Round Applications 30 October 2007.
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
Project Overview 2010 Programme FA: 14 June 2007 Start: 2 Sept 2007 Completion: 31 June 2011 Budget: €10,155,000 (EU), €155,000 (National)
THE STRATEGIC COUNCIL LEADERSHIP TRUST AND ENGAGEMENT NEW FUNDING SOURCES AND NEW DELIVERY VEHICLES Appendix 1 NEW FUNDING SERVOURCES AND NEW DELIVERY.
Ed-D 420 Inclusion of Exceptional Learners. What is an IEP?  An IEP is a documented plan developed for a student with special needs that:  describes.
Supporting continuous improvement in the replication process Getting to Grips with Replication Seminar 3: Monitoring, evaluation & continuous improvement.
April 10, 2013 SPDG Implementation Science Webinar #3: Organization Drivers.
Mental Health Up-Skill Jo Skinner London Metropolitan University Kalwant Sahota Ealing PCT.
UQ Teaching and Learning Small and Large Strategic Grants Scheme 14 June 2007.
ACADEMIC QUALITY & STANDARDS TEAM Strategic Priorities refining assessment practice and improving academic feedback research-led teaching use.
EBS Survey Vermont PBS “Bringing out the BEST in all of us.”
Preparing the Underprepared for Academic Success: St. Petersburg College’s Approach to Implementing SB1720 A Conversation with the Jobs for the Future.
S519: Evaluation of Information Systems Understanding Evaluation Ch1+2.
Total ‘Student Experience’ Benchmarking:. Benchmarking© Tribal Education Limited 2005 What is it?  Tool to deliver;  Internal & External Benchmarking.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Course 'Evaluations': A Strategic Approach TLC Session January 26, 2006.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
Human Resource Services Planning Council September 20, 2011 Overview of Service Area Outcome 1: Mission, Evaluation and Outcomes.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Raising Attainment Evidence and Challenges Jim Cameron, Head of Schools with Education Support West Lothian Council.
Center for Urban Education Equity Scorecard Project INQUIRY TO ACTION June 7 th, 2011.
FOLLOW UP SITE VISIT Dr Robert Schofield Dr Arthur Brown Advisors to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic of Egypt.
4th Phase : 4th Phase : CONTROL Why is control necessary? Because:  People make mistakes  External factors can have impact on the project  Requirements,
Z26/GI03: Project Management Tutorial: What to include in your presentation Graham Collins.
2015 Annual Strategic Action Plan Evaluation. Background & Overview January 2015: Citizen Survey Results March 2015: 2014 Annual Progress Report Delivered.
2015 Annual Strategic Action Plan Evaluation. Background & Overview January 2015: Citizen Survey Results March 2015: 2014 Annual Progress Report Delivered.
Birmingham Primary Strategy Team Subject Leader Training Literacy Co-ordinator Session Monitoring Progress - Book Trawls/Scrutinies.
Prevention and Early Intervention Program East Region.
Mathematics Subject Leader Meeting October 2012.
Mani Subramanian. What is Project? is a temporary endeavor with a beginning and an end. Delivers Unique Product, Service or result.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Goal: Momentum to impact student access, retention, and success will be sustained System-wide by further implementing the Transformation Business Plan.
Supporting Development of Organisational Knowledge Management Strategy NHS Librarians Meeting 3 rd June 2010.
Mathematics Program Improvement Review. KWL Complete the following sections of the KWL Chart K – What you know? W – What you want to know? We will complete.
Office of Institutional Effectiveness. Bob Boehmer, Associate Provost for Institutional Effectiveness Sue Achtemeier, Assistant Director for Institutional.
2013 Common Block Development Evaluation and Feedback February 26, 2014.
Evaluating gifted and talented students January 2007.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
S UPPORT S ERVICES D EPARTMENT - L EADERSHIP T EAMS Involving Everyone in continuous improvement! Session 4 – April15 th, 2011.
Report of Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE) Goals, Timelines and Requirements Catherine F. Andersen Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
Strategic Directions: Taking Stock Report to College Council AIQ & Strategic Directions December 4, 2015.
UNIT 7 MONITORING AND EVALUATION  Monitoring and evaluation is the process of examining progress against institution’s goals or plan.  The term SM &
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
Devon Enhanced C&I Programme. © Babcock Integration LLP, No unauthorised copying permitted. 2 Priorities To.
PRESENTED BY DIANE DUGAS, DIRECTOR OF CURRICULUM JON LAMBERT, DIRECTOR OF TECHNOLOGY GRANBY THREE YEAR TECHNOLOGY PLAN.
Curley K-8 AWC for All March 31, pm-4pm #curleycares.
QAA COLLABORATIVE PROVISION AUDIT DRAFT REPORT. QAA CPA Process Submission by the University of Self Evaluation Document (SED) (December 2005) Selection.
Using Research-Teaching Linkages to Enhance Graduate Attributes George Gordon, Cherie Woolmer University of Strathclyde 5 March 2009.
Course Director’s Strategy Day
Self-Evaluation and Curriculum Change
No Student Left Behind: Enhancing student learning opportunities through a whole institution approach to retention and success …using impersonal tools.
Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC)
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Implementing Career Resources, Service-Delivery Tools, and Services
Performance Management Workday Module
Study Programmes: Modelling & Operation Project
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
Overview of WMO Strategic Planning Initiative
Institution Name.
Public Health Intelligence Adviser
Overview What is evaluation? Why an evaluation framework?
Periodic Review Departmental Review.
Subject Leadership Notes/guidance
Metrics for process and Projects
February 21-22, 2018.
Implementing Career Resources, Service-Delivery Tools, and Services
Assessment Day Strategy
Presentation transcript:

Staff development for technology- enhanced learning and assessment an institutional overview Carol Russell

Why staff development? … supporting strategic outcomes from the bottom up

Overall strategy

Inputs

Processes

Example 1: designing for study units

Example 2: designing for degree programs

Measurable outcomes

9 OUR FUTURE PROGRAM Summary of redesigned study units by School BLENDED LEARNING STATUS PROGRESS As at January 31 st 2015 QuarterCompletedOn TrackYellowRedTotal January UWS Unit Status School Unit Status – behind schedule requiring a plan to rectify; –behind schedule with a plan to rectify; –on track; –completed ** Some of these units will complete early in 2015

Tools designing and developing curriculum delivering learning activities monitoring and evaluating

Student feedback

How do we prove it’s better than before? e.g. ‘choose your own adventure’ case study assessments e.g. more work- integrated learning & team projects

Evidence for institutional investment?

Questions 1.What systemic curriculum changes (i.e. in assessed learning outcomes) are taking place? 2.How are you supporting staff in making these changes? 3.What evidence do you have that it’s worth the investment? 4.What other evidence is needed?