Engineering studies for CN2PY secondary beam. LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/20141 F. Sanchez Galan (CERN) on behalf of the CERN Secondary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Matt Rooney RAL The T2K Beam Window Matt Rooney Rutherford Appleton Laboratory BENE November 2006.
Advertisements

The Current T2K Beam Window Design and Upgrade Potential Oxford-Princeton Targetry Workshop Princeton, Nov 2008 Matt Rooney.
Mercury Chamber Update V. Graves NF-IDS Meeting October 4, 2011.
Chapter 2: Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient
Mike Fitton Engineering Analysis Group Design and Computational Fluid Dynamic analysis of the T2K Target Neutrino Beams and Instrumentation 6th September.
for a neutrinos factory
Status of T2K Target 2 nd Oxford-Princeton High-Power Target Workshop 6-7 th November 2008 Mike Fitton RAL.
T2K Target & Secondary Beamline - progress towards a neutrino Superbeam? Chris Densham.
May 17-19, 2000 Catalina Island, CA Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting 1 Target Support Facility for a Solid Target Neutrino Production.
The JPARC Neutrino Target
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Review of NFMCC Studies 1 and 2: Target Support Facilities V.B. Graves Meeting on High Power Targets.
NBI March 2002 The MiniBooNE Horn Ioanis Kourbanis For The MiniBooNE Collaboration.
RF-Accelerating Structure: Cooling Circuit Modeling Riku Raatikainen
Vacuum windows at JPARC Contents Introduction Vacuum windows at hadron beam line Helium gas cooling Vacuum windows at neutrino beam line primitive discussion.
1 cm diameter tungsten target Goran Skoro University of Sheffield.
1 EUROnu design System target + horn First thermal calculations on the target made of aluminium G. Gaudiot 02/06/2010 Strasbourg.
Study of a new high power spallation target concept
LAGUNA/LBNO WP4: secondary beam line status report M. Calviani, P. Velten, A. Ferrari, I. Efthymiopoulos, C. Lazaridis (CERN) + M. Zito, V. Galymov (CEA),
Horn design for the CERN to Fréjus neutrino Super Beam Nikolas Vassilopoulos IPHC/CNRS.
EUROnu Target and Horn Studies Nikolaos Vassilopoulos/IPHC-CNRS on behalf of WP2 1ECFA Review PanelDarensbury, 02/05/2011.
T2K Secondary Beamline – Status of RAL Contributions Chris Densham, Mike Fitton, Vishal Francis, Matt Rooney, Mike Woodward, Martin Baldwin, Dave Wark.
Summary Why consider a packed bed as a high power target?
WP2 Superbeam Work Breakdown Structure Version 2 Chris Densham (after Marco Zito version 1 )
LHC Phase II Collimator Compact jaw simulations New FLUKA => ANSYS mapping scheme New 136mm x 950mm jaw –60cm primary collimator –Helical cooling channel.
NML High Energy Beam Absorbers and Dump 29-August-2011 Beams-doc-3928.
NuMI NuMI Target Hall Air System Review Introduction July 30, 2003 Jim Hylen / FNAL Page 1 NuMI Target Hall Air System Review Introduction Air system for.
One-Dimensional Steady-State Conduction
Safety issues for WP2 E. Baussan on behalf of WP2.
PSB dump: proposal of a new design EN – STI technical meeting on Booster dumps Friday 11 May 2012 BE Auditorium Prevessin Alba SARRIÓ MARTÍNEZ.
1 Target Station Design Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EuroNu Annual Meeting 2012.
F. Regis, LINAC4 – LBS & LBE LINES DUMP DESIGN.
Convection: Internal Flow ( )
CERN-SLAC meeting June, The LHC Collimator Project LHC Collimators for Phase 1 CERN-SLAC meeting – June, Palo Alto, Ca Alessandro Bertarelli.
1 Target Station Design for Neutrino Superbeams Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory NBI 2012, CERN.
M. Gomez Marzoa1 13th December 2012 PSB-Dump: first CFD simulations Enrico DA RIVA Manuel GOMEZ MARZOA 13 th December 2012.
The CNGS Target Station By L.Bruno, S.Péraire, P.Sala SL/BT Targets & Dumps Section.
Investigation of a “Pencil Shaped” Solid Target Peter Loveridge, Mike Fitton, Ottone Caretta High Power Targets Group Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK.
7 November 2003 Status of CNGS NBI presented by K. Elsener 1 Status of CNGS Konrad Elsener CERN – Accelerators+Beams Division.
Superbeam target work at RAL Work by: Ottone Caretta, Tristan Davenne, Peter Loveridge, Chris Densham, Mike Fitton, Matt Rooney (RAL) EURONu collaborators:
Presentation at BBC, Linac 4 Commissioning Dump at 50 and 100MeV 1 Øyvind Dahle Lauten, EN-STI.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Jörg Wolters, Michael Butzek Focused Cross Flow LBE Target for ESS 4th HPTW, Malmö, 3 May 2011.
GRAN SASSO’S HADRON STOP Temperature’s behaviour under specified beam conditions Barbara Calcagno.
Simulation of heat load at JHF decay pipe and beam dump KEK Yoshinari Hayato.
Status of UK contribution to LBNF beam and target system Chris Densham, Tristan Davenne, Otto Caretta, Mike Fitton, Peter Loveridge, Joe O’Dell, Andrew.
Packed Bed Target Design Concept (for EURONu) Tristan Davenne, Ottone Caretta, Peter Loveridge, Chris Densham (RAL); Andrea Longhin, Marco Zito (CEA Saclay)
Engineering studies for the Conceptual design of the LBNO Facility 1 F. Sanchez Galan (CERN) on behalf of the CERN Secondary Beam Working Group, With contributions.
SECONDARY BEAM HANDLING AND INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN STATUS BRUNO FERAL (CERN/EN) DIAMANTO SMARGIANAKI (CERN/EN) Project Leader: I.Efthymiopoulos (Cern/EN)
ESS RFQ B. POTTIN and RFQ team CEA-IRFU. RFQ design Strategy 3 RF codes to validate calculations Consideration of machining and assembly possibilities.
High Power Target Experience with T2K Chris Densham T2K Beamline Collaboration including RAL / KEK / Kyoto.
CENF target station and secondary beam design M. Calviani (CERN) on behalf of the CENF Secondary Beam Working Group ICFA Neutrino European Meeting – 8-10.
CENF target station and secondary beam design M. Calviani (CERN) on behalf of the CENF Secondary Beam Working Group CENF/LBNE meeting – 5 th February.
Design for a 2 MW graphite target for a neutrino beam Jim Hylen Accelerator Physics and Technology Workshop for Project X November 12-13, 2007.
High Energy Dump of the Super Proton Synchrotron at CERN – Present and Future designs A. Perillo-Marcone (EN-STI) Contributions from several colleagues.
Target Systems and Monolith Design Update Rikard Linander Group Leader Monolith and Handling April 2, 2014.
T2K Target status PASI Meeting Fermilab 11 th November Chris Densham STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory On behalf of the T2K beam collaboration.
SPS High Energy LSS5 Thermal contact & cooling aspects
704 MHz cavity design based on 704MHZ_v7.stp C. Pai
The ESS Target Station Eric Pitcher Head of Target Division February 19, 2016.
Target work plan for LBNO study Chris Densham STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Chiara Di Paolo EN-STI-TCD Material Choice for the Vacuum Window at the Exit of BTM.
New nTOF target: Design Issues
Institute of Applied Mechanics
P. Sievers/CERN. A. Ushakov/Univ. Hamburg. S. Riemann/DESY-Zeuthen.
Peter Loveridge High Power Targets Group
M. Calviani, A. Ferrari (EN/STI), P. Sala (INFN)
First thermal calculations on the target made of aluminium
EUROnu Beam Window Studies Stress and Cooling Analysis
Overview of mechanical design & construction
ANALYSIS OF THE HORN UNDER THERMAL SHOCK – FIRST RESULTS
Presentation transcript:

Engineering studies for CN2PY secondary beam. LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/20141 F. Sanchez Galan (CERN) on behalf of the CERN Secondary Beam Working Group, With contributions from B. Biskup, D. Brethoux, M. Calviani, N. Charitonidis, DAES, I. Efthymiopoulos, B. Feral, J.A. Osborne, RAL, D. Smargianaki, C. Strabel, P. Velten, V. Venturi, H.Vincke.

2 Outline LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/2014 Lay out, overview Horn, reflector, target, striplines Target chamber Decay pipe Hadron stop Timeline Conclusions

 = 3 m water cooled steel tube, surrounded by 50 cm concrete; GeV GeV GeV GeV LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/20143 Helium tanks ~9 m 3 cooled graphite, followed by m iron; NeardetectorNeardetector Lay-out, overview

4LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/2014 Lay-out, overview Handling and infrastructure (talk B.Feral, D. Smargianaki) Radioprotection, He vessel in target chamber and decay pipe volumes (talk C. Strabel) Horn, target, reflector, striplines Integration of services.

LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/20145 Lay-out, overview He vessel at target chamber Integration of services Target, Horn and reflector and ancillary systems design and integration. Openings for maintenance operations

LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/20146 Horn and reflector Target integration. Insertion to horn & plug-in at the hot cell Work done in collaboration with RAL

LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/20147 Target Target design was splitted between CERN-STI Phase 1 (400GeV) and RAL (50 GeV)

LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/20148 Target Work done in collaboration with RAL Steady-state results, Trod 1387 C, inner C pipe 202, inner Be pipe 126 C

LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/20149 Target Transient results, T1 608 C, T2 362 C, T3 807 C Maximum equivalent stress around 20 MPa during cycles, below the stress range fatigue limit for Graphite. Maximum displacements around 0.45 mm

Inlet pressure = 1.45 bar (gauge) Pressure drop = bar Helium cooling velocity streamlines Maximum velocity = 398 m/s Graphite core T2K Beam 30GeV, 750kW Target 23kW, 8 MPa stress Ti-6Al-4V shell Monolithic (peripherally cooled) target à la T2K M.Fitton C.Densham

Target exchange system T2K-like Target & horn (50 GeV) Helium cooled solid graphite rod Design beam power: 750 kW (heat load in target c.25 kW) Beam power so far: 230 kW 1 st target & horn just replaced after 4 years operation, 7e20 p.o.t. π π p RAL

LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/ Horn, target integration Work done in collaboration with RAL Target helium feeds Horn plug-in helium & water feeds

LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/ Horn, target integration Target integration Work done in collaboration with RAL

LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/ Horn and reflector, ancillary systems. Plug-in systems, RH vertical movement. He and water feeds /outlets Striplines connection.

LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/ Striplines remote connection Vertical insertion Clamping with a vice system

LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/ Striplines thermal analysis With a ‘normal’ He cooling, maximum temperatures are within acceptable values: below 50 C for phase 1 and below 100 C for phase 2

LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/ Striplines remote connection There’s a good margin to improve cooling if required.

LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/ Horn and reflector Thermo-structural analysis Energy deposition for the entire horn: kW Max energy deposition: at target end ~ 110 W/cm 3

LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/ Horn thermal analysis Phase 1 : Beam from 400 GeV 6 s cycle two extractions/cycle separately by 50 ms beam pulse during 10 us in each extraction protons/extraction ( protons/cycle) average beam power 750 kW Phase 2 : Beam from 50 GeV - 1 s cycle - single extraction per cycle - beam pulse during 4 us protons/cycle - average beam power 2.0 MW Phase 1 Phase 2

LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/ Horn thermal analysis

LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/ Horn thermal analysis The maximum temperature in steady state is 83°C for the 400GeV beam and 73°C for the 50GeV beam For the 50GeV beam, the temperature remains always below 75°C, even during a pulse. For the 400GeV beam, the temperature reaches 162°C during a short time. Convection: Inner conductor 10 kW/m 2 K Outer conductor 100 W/m 2 K

LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/ Horn structural analysis Images from P. Sabbagh, DAES Maximum lateral displacement 3.9 mm during pulse Maximum vertical displacement 0.5 mm during pulse

LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/ Horn structural analysis Vibration modes start at 93 Hz (main in the range Hz)

LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/ Horn structural analysis Stress values are acceptable The equivalent stress reaches for 400GeV 100MPa in the internal part of the horn, 132MPa in the exit cover and 30MPa in the front cover. At 50GeV, those values are much smaller (31MPa, 119MPa and 28MPa respectively).

LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/ Heat loads in shielding elements A detailed model of the whole geometry has been done in Fluka, including: Target chamber shielding elements

26LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/2014 Heat loads in shielding elements Internal elements: horn, reflector, striplines

27LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/2014 Heat loads in shielding elements Decay tunnel

28LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/2014 Heat loads in shielding elements Hadron stopper

29LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/2014 Heat loads in shielding elements 870 kW Iron 0.8 kW Al 80 kW Horn 50 kW Target 30 kW Reflector

30 Around 4% of the generated Heat is removed by the Helium, 96% by water cooling LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/2014 Temperature profiles: Target Chamber (4/4)

Decay pipe 31LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/ m diameter Water cooled Helium bag

32LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/2014 Decay pipe cooling With the chosen configuration (32 cooling channels, contact surface 20 mm) the decay pipe temperature is around 42 C. The highest temperatures (around 75 C) are reached in the surrounding concrete.

Decay pipe 33LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/2014 Upstream shutter allows to keep He inside the decay pipe when opening the target chamber vessel 5 m long tube sectors welded, U water connections (T2K-like).

34LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/2014 Hadron stop (CNGS-like dump)

35LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/2014 Hadron stop (CNGS-like dump) Aluminium water cooled sinks Graphite core Steel shielding Energy deposition (FLUKA)

36LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/2014 Temperature estimations: Hadron stop Graphite block, Al water cooled plates (CNGS-like)

LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/ Temperature estimations: Hadron stop Heat generation (from Fluka) Maximum temperature at graphite 110 C for the 50 GeV case

LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/ Temperature estimations: Hadron stop Heat generation (from Fluka) Maximum temperature at graphite 118 C for the 400 GeV case

LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/ Temperature estimations: Hadron stop Temperature in the graphite is far below 400°C (criteria for graphite) and the temperature in the aluminium plates remains around 30°. Even with a reduced water flow the margin is adequate.

40LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/2014 Possible CN2PY timeline

41LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/2014 Conclusions Helium bags at target and decay pipe reduce RP issues. Remote operation foreseen for maintenance operations. Acceptable values of cooling parameters, well known manufacturing methods available. No show stoppers. Integration of elements and general services outlined. A sound technical design for the secondary beam lines. When do we start with the detailed design?

Spare slides LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/201442

43 LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/2014 Preferred manufacturing method : Cylindrical sections with hydro formed or welded-U channels along each decay pipe section length, connected by U pipes between sectors. To be welded in- situ. Surface Area Coverage Operating Temperature Ratio of Cooling Area to Cost Hydra~CoolExcellent Machined in Trace Excellent Poor Dimple PlateExcellent Good Double WalledExcellent Poor Welded C Channel Good Wrapped TubePoor Effectiveness of Hydro forming Versus Alternative Water Cooling Pictures & table from Picture from CNGS

LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/201444

45LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/2014 Hydra~Cool Features Hydra~Cool is a technically superior and cost effective method of water cooling vacuum chambers. This revolutionary new method of water-cooling is made by welding a trace to a chamber and then using water pressure to hydro-form the water channel. By utilizing radius bends instead of square corners, it improves water flow and eliminates low flow and stagnant areas. When coupled to a full penetration weld, this reduces the chances of crevice crack corrosion and extends the working life of the chamber. Hydra~Cool gives you the ability to approximately double the surface area being cooled over conventional ‘C’ channel style water cooling. This high surface area coverage possible with this method also makes it an affordable alternative to double walled cooling.

Minimal requirements for water cooling ( Heat transfer coefficient ) 46LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/2014 A heat transfer coefficient of 2 kW/m2/K was considered in all calculations. For a 20 mm Din pipe, this is achievable with speeds above 0.35m/s (pressure drop around 1 mbar per meter) For a 20x4mm rectangular channel, this is achievable with speeds above 0.35m/s (pressure drop around 1 mbar per meter)