Income Convergence in South Africa: Fact or Measurement Error? Tobias Lechtenfeld & Asmus Zoch.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Econometric Modelling
Advertisements

Introduction Describe what panel data is and the reasons for using it in this format Assess the importance of fixed and random effects Examine the Hausman.
Economics 20 - Prof. Anderson1 Multiple Regression Analysis y =  0 +  1 x 1 +  2 x  k x k + u 7. Specification and Data Problems.
The effect of land restitution on poverty reduction among the Khomani San “bushmen” in South Africa Johane Dikgang and Edwin Muchapondwa.
Income distribution, labour market returns and school quality REDI3x3 Income Distribution Workshop 4 November 2014 Rulof Burger.
Prof. Dr. Rainer Stachuletz
Democracy and Globalization Barry Eichengreen David Leblang.
Specific to General Modelling The traditional approach to econometrics modelling was as follows: 1.Start with an equation based on economic theory. 2.Estimate.
By Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, and James A. Robinson, 2001
Poverty and Income Distribution in Ethiopia: By Abebe Shimeles, PhD.
The Subjective Well-being Effects of Imperfect Insurance that Doesn’t Pay out Kibrom Hirfrfot Christopher Barrett Erin Lentz Birhanu Taddesse Cornell University.
Squeezing more out of existing data sources: Small Area Estimation of Welfare Indicators Berk Özler The World Bank Development Research Group, Poverty.
How sensitive are estimates of the marginal propensity to consume to measurement error in survey data in South Africa Reza C. Daniels UCT
Rural Non-Farm Enterprises Operate Mainly in Survival Mode Paula Nagler and Wim Naudé Annual Bank Conference on Africa, Paris, 23 June 2014 AGRICULTURE.
Non-farm Occupational and Earnings Dynamics in Rural Thailand March 7 th, 2013 Applied Microeconomics Seminar, Monash University Chayanee Chawanote and.
A Clear Advantage: The Benefits of Transparency to Foreign Direct Investment By Elaine Shen and Mike Sliwinski.
LT6: IV2 Sam Marden Question 1 & 2 We estimate the following demand equation ln(packpc) = b 0 + b 1 ln(avgprs) +u What do we require.
1 Dealer Price Discrimination in New Car Purchases: Evidence from the Consumer Expenditure Survey Pinelopi Goldberg (JPE, 1996) Presented by Jake Gramlich.
Tax Subsidies for Out-of-Pocket Healthcare Costs Jessica Vistnes Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality William Jack Georgetown University Arik Levinson.
Dean R. Lillard 1,3, Richard V. Burkhauser 2,3,4, Markus H. Hahn 4 and Roger Wilkins 4 1 Ohio State University, 2 Cornell University, 3 DIW-Berlin, 4 Melbourne.
NUFE 1 General Education, Vocational Education and Individual Income in Rural China HUANG Bin Center for Public Finance Research Faculty of Public Finance.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 7: fitting a model, fit indices, comparingmodels, statistical power.
Tobacco Control Research Conference July 2014 Determinants of smoking initiation in South Africa Determinants of smoking initiation in South Africa.
Has Public Health Insurance for Older Children Reduced Disparities in Access to Care and Health Outcomes? Janet Currie, Sandra Decker, and Wanchuan Lin.
Who emits most? An analysis of UK households’ CO2 emissions and their association with socio-economic factors Milena Büchs & Sylke V. Schnepf with Nick.
Duration Analysis using Household Surveys Nicole Vellios Emerging Research Programme June
POVERTY TRAPS AND STRUCTURAL POVERTY “Escaping Poverty Traps” Conference February 2009, Washington DC Julian May, School of Development Studies,
Random Regressors and Moment Based Estimation Prepared by Vera Tabakova, East Carolina University.
The use of GEM data for analyzing the relationship between entrepreneurship and economic growth Jolanda Hessels EIM and Erasmus School of Economics July.
Variables Instrumentales Econometría UDESA. Example Wooldridge The estimate for β 1 implies an almost 11% return for another year of education.
Ameet Morjaria NSF-AERC-IGC Workshop Mombasa, 4 th Dec 2010 Comments on: “Adoption and Impact of Conservation Agriculture in Central Ethiopia: Application.
LABOUR FORCE PARTICIPATION, EARNINGS AND INEQUALITY IN NIGERIA
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005 TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS AND GROWTH: THE GENERAL SOLOW MODEL Chapter 5 – second lecture Introducing Advanced Macroeconomics:
The dynamics of poverty in Ethiopia : persistence, state dependence and transitory shocks By Abebe Shimeles, PHD.
Accounting for the Effect of Health on Economic Growth David N. Weil Proponent/Presenter Section.
Who supports whom? Co-residence between young adults and their parents Maria IacovouMaria Davia Funded by JRF as part of the Poverty among Youth: International.
WOMEN’S PROPERTY, MOBILITY AND DECISION-MAKING: EVIDENCE FROM RURAL KARNATAKA, INDIA Hema Swaminathan, Rahul Lahoti, Suchitra J. Y. Centre for Public Policy.
United Nations Workshop on Revision 3 of Principles and Recommendations for Population and Housing Censuses and Evaluation of Census Data, Amman 19 – 23.
STAT 497 LECTURE NOTE 9 DIAGNOSTIC CHECKS 1. After identifying and estimating a time series model, the goodness-of-fit of the model and validity of the.
Targeting Outcomes, Redux Coady, Grosh, and Hoddinott (forthcoming in World Bank Research Observer) Presentation at Reaching the Poor Conference Washington,
Resilience, Poverty and Malnutrition in Mali
1 Household Propensities to Plan for Retirement: A Lifecycle Analysis Erik Hurst University of Chicago August 2005.
The Impact of Extension Services on Farm Level Outcomes: An Instrumental Variable Approach Anthony Cawley, Walsh Fellow REDP, Teagasc & NUI Galway Supervisors.
10-1 MGMG 522 : Session #10 Simultaneous Equations (Ch. 14 & the Appendix 14.6)
A County Level Analysis of Educational Attainment in the United States by Social, Economic and Geographic Variables BY Brandon Hallstrand (University of.
6. Ordered Choice Models. Ordered Choices Ordered Discrete Outcomes E.g.: Taste test, credit rating, course grade, preference scale Underlying random.
[Part 5] 1/43 Discrete Choice Modeling Ordered Choice Models Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
Effects of migration and remittances on poverty and inequality A comparison between Burkina Faso, Kenya, Nigeria, Senegal, South Africa, and Uganda Y.
Determinants of women’s labor force participation and economic empowerment in Albania Juna Miluka University of New York Tirana September, 14, 2015.
INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES Eva Hromádková, Applied Econometrics JEM007, IES Lecture 5.
Yu-Hsuan Lin Catholic University of Korea, Korea University of York, U.K. 5 th Congress of EAAERE, Taipei, 06 th – 07 th August 2015.
Demand Elasticities of residential electricity demand in South Korea, Yejin Keum* (Depart of Economics, Chungbuk National University)
Lena Malesevic Teaching assistant at the Faculty of Economics Split, Croatia PhD student at Staffordshire University, UK Investigating non-linearities.
Chapter 4. The Normality Assumption: CLassical Normal Linear Regression Model (CNLRM)
Modeling Poverty Martin Ravallion Development Research Group, World Bank.
VIII Międzynarodowe Forum Finansowo-Bankowe
Olga Maslovskaya, Gabriele Durrant, Peter WF Smith
Module 5 Inference with Panel Data
Robust Estimation Techniques for Trip Generation in Tennessee
Residential Mobility, Heterogeneous Neighborhood effects and Educational Attainment of Blacks and Whites Li Gan Texas A&M University and NBER Yingning.
REGRESSION DIAGNOSTIC II: HETEROSCEDASTICITY
More on Specification and Data Issues
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling
STOCHASTIC REGRESSORS AND THE METHOD OF INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES
More on Specification and Data Issues
How sensitive are estimates of the marginal propensity to consume to measurement error in survey data in South Africa Reza C. Daniels UCT
Tutorial 1: Misspecification
Econometrics Chengyuan Yin School of Mathematics.
Instrumental Variables Estimation and Two Stage Least Squares
More on Specification and Data Issues
Presentation transcript:

Income Convergence in South Africa: Fact or Measurement Error? Tobias Lechtenfeld & Asmus Zoch

Data KwaZulu-Natal Income Dynamics Study (KIDS) Provincial study 3 waves:1993, 1998 and 2004 National Income Dynamics Survey (NIDS) Reprehensive National 2 waves: 2008 and 2010 Outcome variable: Income change Instruments: Second lagged income Household wealth Reported satisfaction Income Convergence in South Africa: Fact or Measurement Error?

Outline Theory and Literature Review Empirical Strategy Results Income Convergence in KwaZulu-Natal Income Convergence at National Level Source of Measurement Error Conclusion Income Convergence in South Africa: Fact or Measurement Error?

Theory and Literature Review Recent papers for micro income dynamics in developing countries have found : „a strong tendency of a regression towards the mean“ E.g. Fields et al. (2003), Woolard and Klasen (2005). However, to make a valid statement about income mobility one has to take into account measurement error. For South Africa: Agüero et al. (2007) note that measurement error could account for up to 60% of mobility between 1993 and 1998 in the KwaZulu- Natal province. Income Convergence in South Africa: Fact or Measurement Error?

Theory and Literature Review Define income mobility as ∆Y i,t ≡ Y 2 – Y 1 To determine how initial income influences income change studies have run regression of the form: ∆Y i,t = α + β 1 Y i,t-1 + β 2 Z i, + β 3 X i,t-1 + β 4 X i,t + ε i,t In case β 1 0 there is conditional divergence Yet, if Y is measured with error, such error is present on both sides of the regression => attenuation bias Income Convergence in South Africa: Fact or Measurement Error?

Empirical Strategy If true income Y* it is not observable and only self-reported income Y it is available and biased by ε it it states: Y it = Y* it + ε it For income dynamics this means that the initial income coefficient is also measured with error and can cause an overestimation of the true effect. To solve the problem we follow the suggestion by Antman and McKenzie (2007) and instrument Y i,t-1 using Y i,t-2. Income Convergence in South Africa: Fact or Measurement Error?

Empirical Strategy Run IV regression using KIDS: ∆Ln (Income per Capita) i,t = α + β 1 X it + β2Ψ it + β 3 *ln(Income per Capita) i,t-2 + ε it If lagged initial income variable is a good instrument, this regression will give a consistent coefficient β 3. To test the robustness of the results we use a second instrument: ∆Ln (Income per Capita) i,t = α + β 1 X it + β 2 Ψ it + β 3 *ln(Asset index) i,t-1 + ε it Income Convergence in South Africa: Fact or Measurement Error?

Empirical Strategy Finally, to test for over-identification we use the full set of instruments. The Hansen J statistic implies that the over-identification restrictions are valid and the set of instruments is appropriate. For the National Income Dynamics Survey (NIDS) there is no second lag available. Therefore, we use again an asset index as well as self- reported satisfaction of the household head. Income Convergence in South Africa: Fact or Measurement Error?

OLS IV 1 st stage2 nd stage Outcome Change in log (Income per Capita) between 1998 and 2004 Ln(Income per Capita, 1998) Change in log (Income per Capita) between 1998 and 2004 Ln (Income per Capita in 1998)-0.848***-0.557*** Education of household head Education of household head *** *** Female household head-0.278*** *** Black-0.438***-0.354** Employed0.865***0.183**0.795*** HH size-0.084***-0.019**-0.075*** Ln(Income per Capita in *** Constant5.001***3.440***3.391*** Observations714 R-squared Under-identification test (LM Statistic)49.38 Weak identification test (Wald F Statistic)63.25 Weak-instrument-robust inference (P-val) Table 1: Income Convergence in KwaZulu-Natal Province (KIDS )

Results Income Convergence in South Africa: Fact or Measurement Error? Table 2: Effect of measurement error on initial income KIDS Lagged Income IV: Second lag Income IV: Lag Asset Index IV: Set (combining the two instruments) Coefficient *** (0.037) *** (0.124) *** (0.124) *** (0.097) Drop in %34%44%39%

OLS IV 1 st stage2 nd stage Outcome Change in log (Income per Capita) between 2008 and 2010 Ln(Income per Capita, 2008) Change in log (Income per Capita) between 2008 and 2010 Ln (Income per Capita in in 2008)-0.623***-0.238*** Education ** Education Squared0.005***0.006***0.003** Coloured0.308*** *** Indian0.451***0.582***0.081 White0.506***0.834***0.041 Employed0.546***0.351***0.401*** Number of children in HH-0.191***-0.157***-0.131*** Number of adults in HH-0.069***-0.102***-0.047*** HH moved place ***0.178** IV: Household Wealth, *** Constant3.935***5.812***2.013*** Observations5,673 R-squared Under-identification test (Lm statistic) Weak identification test (Wald rk F statistic) Weak-instrument-robust inference (P-value) Table 3: National Income Convergence (NIDS )

Results Income Convergence in South Africa: Fact or Measurement Error? Table 3: Effect of measurement error on initial income NIDS Lagged Income IV: Lag Asset Index IV: Lag Satisfaction IV: Set (combining the two instruments Coefficient *** (0.025) *** (0.079) *** (0.121) *** (0.075) Drop in %62%39%58%

Source of Measurement Error The aggregate measurement error can have several sources: the rich understate household income the poor overstate income, or both effects are driving the bias in the income convergence estimates Income Convergence in South Africa: Fact or Measurement Error?

Source of Measurement Error Figure 1: Income change by income level in 2008, NIDS

Transition matrix Measured values Household was poor in 2010 NOYES Household was poor in 2008 NO 2497 (77.34%) 755 (32.32%) YES 853 (25.46%) 1581 (67.68%) Predicted values (for 2010) Household was poor in 2010 NOYES Household was poor in 2008 NO 2,591 (77.9%) 661 (28.01%) YES 735 (22.10%) 1699 (71.99%)

Sources of Measurement Error Income convergence for different groups? Urban vs. rural Black, Coloured vs. Indian, White Higher convergence for black population? To test these hypothesis, finally IV regression were also run for various sub-groups. Income Convergence in South Africa: Fact or Measurement Error?

Table 5: Measurement Error by Race and Location, KIDS and NIDS KIDS Full sample BlackIndianUrbanRural Lagged Income (OLS) ***-0.855***-0.775***-0.824***-0.863*** IV set ***-0.577*** ***-0.509*** Change of OLS results when using IV in % 39.3%32.5%79.7%32.4%41.0% Observation NIDS Full sample Black/ Coloured White/ Indian UrbanRural Lagged Income (OLS) ***-0.661*** ***-0.717*** IV set ***-0.323*** ***-0.592*** Change of OLS results when using IV in % 57.8%51.2%88.8%73.1%17.4% Observation

Conclusion Using KIDS and NIDS, substantial measurement error in reported income data is found Employing an instrumental approach it is possible to mitigate the effect of measurement error Our results suggest that previously estimated income dynamics have been largely overestimated by about 40-60% In a breakdown of the source of the measurement error it appears that the poor substantially overstate their incomes Income Convergence in South Africa: Fact or Measurement Error?

Questions 1.Story Line clear and precise? 2.Analysis well motivated? 3.IV strategy convincingly presented? 4.Mixed analysis of NIDS and KIDS useful? 5.Analysis of source of bias helpful?